OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Intel Core i7 1185g7 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380PassMark benchmark result:9967N. of physical cores:4CPU boost clock speed:4.8 GHzCPU socket:FCBGA1449TDP (Thermal design power):28 W

Intel Core i7 1185g7 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

▲Better than 50% of processors

5.7

▲Better than 51% of processors

?

4.9
Gaming
Gaming
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
5.2
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
5.2
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
7.4
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.1
L3 cache
8.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
3.7
Video editing
Video editing
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
4.6
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
20.0%
4.4
CPU threads
15.0%
2.1
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices

N/A~ £380

Best rankings

#308inBest mobile CPUs

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7 1185g7

5.7

Show more

Hide

?

Platform

7.8

Show more

Hide

Brand name

Intel

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

N/A

CPU architecture

Show more

Performance

4.8

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

Threads per core

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

Show more

Cache & Architecture

6.9

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

6.6

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated Graphics

8.3

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

7.7

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

Tau (power duration limit)

Configurable TDP

Show more

Intel Core i7 1185g7 vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i7 1185g7 better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

2.5x more L2 per core
L2 per core
1.25 MB/core
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.25 MB/core – >2 MB/core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
More advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Tiger Lake
▲ Better than 64% of models
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake).
Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake
75% more L3 per core
L3 per core
3 MB/core
▲ Better than 89% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (3 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
3 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
11.6% higher boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
4.8 GHz
▲ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
4.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
Newer PCIe version
PCIe version
4.0
▲ Better than 62% of models
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4.0 vs 3.0
Newer DDR support
DDR memory version
DDR4/LPDDR4X
▲ Better than 63% of models
This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).
DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4
37.8% lower base power
Base power (PL1)
28 W
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a lower base power draw than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
28 W vs 45 W
Includes crypto acceleration
Cryptographic acceleration
AES, VAES, SHA, RSA/PKA
★ Better than 96% of models
This processor includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
AES, VAES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA

Includes crypto acceleration
Cryptographic acceleration
AES, VAES, SHA, RSA/PKA
★ Better than 96% of models
This processor includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
AES, VAES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA
Advanced security extensions
Security extensions
SGX, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (SGX, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
SGX, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor

11.6% higher boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
4.8 GHz
▲ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
4.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
16.8% higher single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,718
▲ Better than 61% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,718 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,718 vs 1,471
10.5% better single-core performance
PassMark single-core benchmark score
2,762
▲ Better than 59% of models
Market range: <1.4k – >4k
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,762 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
2,762 vs 2,500

2.5x more L2 per core
L2 per core
1.25 MB/core
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.25 MB/core – >2 MB/core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
More advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Tiger Lake
▲ Better than 64% of models
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake).
Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake
75% more L3 per core
L3 per core
3 MB/core
▲ Better than 89% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (3 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
3 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
2x larger L2 cache
L2 cache
5 MB
▲ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
5 MB vs 2.5 MB
18.6% smaller die size
Die size
144 mm²
▲ Better than 66% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (144 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
144 mm² vs 177 mm²
More advanced foundry
Foundry
Intel 10 nm SuperFin
▲ Better than 54% of models
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm).
Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm
16.7% smaller process node
Semiconductor size
10 nm
▲ Better than 52% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (10 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
10 nm vs 12 nm
50% larger L3 cache
L3 cache
12 MB
▲ Better than 54% of models
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (12 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
12 MB vs 8 MB

Newer PCIe version
PCIe version
4.0
▲ Better than 62% of models
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4.0 vs 3.0
Newer DDR support
DDR memory version
DDR4/LPDDR4X
▲ Better than 63% of models
This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).
DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4
45.5% higher memory speed
Maximum memory speed
4,267 MHz
▲ Better than 64% of models
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (4267 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
4,267 MHz vs 2,933 MHz

4x more GPU execution units
Integrated GPU execution units
96
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <6 – >64
This processor has more GPU execution units than the average processor (96 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
96 vs 24
Better integrated GPU
Integrated GPU model
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
▲ Better than 81% of models
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
1 more supported displays
Maximum supported displays
4
▲ Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

37.8% lower base power
Base power (PL1)
28 W
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a lower base power draw than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
28 W vs 45 W
37.8% lower TDP
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a lower TDP than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
28 W vs 45 W
13.3% lower boost power
Boost power (PL2)
52 W
▲ Better than 66% of models
Market range: <25 W – >150 W
This processor has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (52 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
52 W vs 60 W

Why is Intel Core i7 1185g7 worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

2 fewer CPU cores
N. of physical cores
4
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
Lower base clock
CPU base clock speed
4 x 1.2 GHz
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This processor has a lower base clock than the average processor (4x1.2 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
4x1.2 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
Limited PCIe bifurcation
PCIe bifurcation modes
x4
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4).
x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4
50% lower bus speed
Bus speed
4 GT/s
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <3 GT/s – >8 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
50% lower bus transfer rate
Bus transfer rate
4 GT/s
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4 GT/s – >19 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
Older CPU socket
CPU socket
FCBGA1449
▼ Worse than 81% of models
This processor uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1449 vs FP4).
FCBGA1449 vs FP4
Narrower media codec support
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
▲ Better than 54% of models
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
52% more expensive
Intel Core i7 1185g7 is more expensive than the average processor (£380 vs £250).
£380 vs £250

52% more expensive
Intel Core i7 1185g7 is more expensive than the average processor (£380 vs £250).
£380 vs £250

Older CPU socket
CPU socket
FCBGA1449
▼ Worse than 81% of models
This processor uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1449 vs FP4).
FCBGA1449 vs FP4

2 fewer CPU cores
N. of physical cores
4
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
Lower base clock
CPU base clock speed
4 x 1.2 GHz
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This processor has a lower base clock than the average processor (4x1.2 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
4x1.2 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
50% lower bus speed
Bus speed
4 GT/s
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <3 GT/s – >8 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
50% lower bus transfer rate
Bus transfer rate
4 GT/s
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4 GT/s – >19 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
11.3% weaker multi-core performance
Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
2,477
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <702 – >10.8k
This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (2,477 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
2,477 vs 2,791

Limited PCIe bifurcation
PCIe bifurcation modes
x4
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4).
x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4

Narrower media codec support
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
▲ Better than 54% of models
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

tech.hindustantimes.com

31/07/2021

Performance check: How the Intel Core i7-1185G7 chipset with Xe graphics performs Are you looking for these reviews to compare performance against a s...

Real-world test · Ultrabook chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 in the Dell XPS 13 (9310) is fast and steady for everyday work, though the Ryzen 7 4800U scores higher on multi-core.

phoronix.com

15/07/2021

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7 1185G7 Linux Performance - Phoronix

The Phoronix review of the Intel Core i7-1185G7 (Tiger Lake) on Linux indicates that the flagship processor offers only marginal performance gains over the i7-1165G7, delivering less than a 3% performance improvement in most benchmarks. While offering higher clock speeds and superior single-core performance in productivity tasks, the processor is frequently held back by thermal limitations in thin-and-light laptops. The review notes that the high cost of the i7-1185G7 is difficult to justify given its limited multi-threaded advantage over cheaper options and occasional underperformance in graphics, making it a questionable upgrade over the 1165G7.

tech-critter.com

13/01/2021

Summary of the review

Tested & Reviewed - Intel's Core i7-1185G7 reference laptop

The Tech-Critter review of the Intel Core i7-1185G7 reference laptop (MSI Prestige 14 Evo) highlights the processor's ability to exceed its 28W TDP, often sustaining 33W-40W, which provides superior performance over the i7-1165G7. The device boasts impressive integrated Iris Xe graphics, capable of handling light gaming, and features an efficient thermal design with a, propped-up chassis that keeps temperatures low, though the "Cooler Boost" fan mode is notably loud. While the CPU shows high-performance gains in synthetic benchmarks, the review finds diminishing returns in real-world scenarios, and the system still struggles with heavy AAA gaming, concluding that the "over-wattage" capability has practical limits. Key pros include excellent thermal management, high sustained wattage for better performance, and strong integrated graphics for light gaming. Cons include diminishing returns from high power consumption, loud fans under load, and inability to handle heavy gaming.

techspot.com

17/12/2020

Intel Core i7-1185G7 vs. Core i7-1165G7 Review - TechSpot

Benchmark review · Chip comparison

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is barely faster than the i7-1165G7, so it pays off mainly in laptops that can supply more than the standard 28W.

hardwarecanucks.com

18/09/2020

We Benchmarked Tiger Lake - Core i7-1185G7 Performance Benchmarks

Early preview · Laptop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is a major step up from Ice Lake in lightly threaded tasks, but it is unlikely to match AMD in heavy multi-threaded work.

arstechnica.com

17/09/2020

Hands-on with Intel's i7-1185G7 Tiger Lake prototype laptop

Hands-on test · Thin laptop chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 leads on single-threaded speed and has strong built-in graphics, but at 15W its multi-core speed falls slightly below the previous Ice Lake chip.

notebookcheck.net

17/09/2020

Intel Core i7-1185G7 in Review - First Tiger Lake Benchmarks

Benchmark review · Thin laptop chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is fast in single-threaded work, but its multi-core speed drops sharply at 15W, where it trails AMD's Ryzen 7 4700U.

pcworld.com

17/09/2020

Intel 11th-gen Core i7-1185G7 Tiger Lake Preview

Hands-on preview · Reference laptop

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 beats the Ryzen 7 4800U at integrated-graphics gaming, though AMD's eight cores still lead in multi-core work.

imtest.de

28/05/2021

Summary of the review

Surface Laptop 4 13.5-inch with Intel CPU Review

The 13.5-inch Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 (Intel) features a premium, lightweight aluminum chassis with a standout 3:2 PixelSense touchscreen, offering excellent color accuracy and vertical screen real estate. Performance is snappy thanks to 11th Gen Intel processors, providing11 hours of web browsing battery life, though it still falls behind competitors like the MacBook Air M1. Key pros include a best-in-class keyboard and Windows Hello, while cons include a reflective glossy screen, limited ports (no Thunderbolt 4), and dated, thick display bezels.

hardwareluxx.de

22/12/2020

Summary of the review

MSI Prestige 14 Evo Review: Premium Ultrabook with Core i7-1185G7

The MSI Prestige 14 Evo is a portable 1.29 kg business ultrabook featuring the Intel Core i7-1185G7 processor, offering strong productivity performance and Iris Xe graphics within an aluminum chassis. Certified under the Intel Evo platform, it provides modern features like Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 6, and a comfortable, ergonomic keyboard. With over 12 hours of battery life and a vibrant, color-accurate matte display, it is well-suited for professional, mobile use. However, the thin design results in loud, frequent fan noise under load, and the 14-inch display has a relatively low peak brightness of around 315 nits. Other drawbacks include weak, tinny speakers, a flimsy-feeling touchpad, and the inclusion of a slower USB 2.0 port. Despite these issues, the device balances high performance and portability for on-the-go users. Pros include exceptional portability, high-end productivity performance, a great keyboard, and modern connectivity options. Cons consist of loud cooling fans, limited display brightness, poor audio quality, and non-upgradable soldered RAM. Detailed testing results can be found in the review from Tom's Hardware.

hardwareluxx.de

18/04/2021

Summary of the review

Intel NUC 11 Compute Element with Core i7-1185G7 Review

The Intel NUC 11 Compute Element AV, featuring a Core i7-1185G7 processor (28W TDP), is a modular 1.05-liter mini-PC tailored for office work and content creation. A key feature highlighted by Hardwareluxx is the integrated AVerMedia CO513EC capture card, enabling 1080p video recording via dedicated HDMI input/passthrough, along with dual M.2 SSD slots for storage. The system delivers strong performance for demanding tasks and 4K playback, while maintaining quiet operation. Despite its compact, modular design, the review notes significant drawbacks, including a lack of modern connectivity options like Thunderbolt or USB 3.2 Gen 2x2. Additionally, the LPDDR4X RAM is soldered to the compute element, preventing user upgrades. Furthermore, the built-in capture card is limited to 1080p, which may not satisfy users requiring UHD capture.

computerbase.de

17/09/2020

Intel Core i7-1185G7 Tiger Lake Review - ComputerBase

Benchmark review · Top-end laptop chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is Tiger Lake's top chip, with record single-core speed for office and multimedia apps, but it loses to AMD in heavily parallel tasks.

notebookcheck.com

17/09/2020

Intel Core i7-1185G7 in Benchmarks - Notebookcheck.net Reviews

Lab benchmark · Power limit test

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7's real speed depends on how much power the laptop allows, so the model name alone tells you little about performance.

galaxus.fr

14/11/2022

Summary of the review

Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: Compared to the Laptop 4's i7-1185G7", "Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: Comparison with the i7-1185G7 in the Lap...

The Microsoft Surface Laptop 5, reviewed by Galaxus, is a premium, iterative update featuring 12th Gen Intel Core processors and Thunderbolt 4, though it drops AMD options. While praised for its exceptional build quality, 3:2 touchscreen, and excellent keyboard, the device is criticized for outdated, thick display bezels and a 720p webcam. Despite solid performance, the "passable" battery life and limited port selection make it a niche choice for those specifically seeking the signature Surface design.

laptopspirit.fr

20/10/2020

Intel Core i7-1185G7 Review: How good is the Tiger Lake processor and its Iris Xe graphics?

Benchmark test · Iris Xe graphics

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 clearly beats the i7-1065G7 at 28W, but at 15W it falls to the older chip's level, except in GPU-assisted exports.

cpubenchmark.net

N/A

Summary of the review

Processor Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 4800U vs Intel i7-1185G7

PassMark CPU data highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 4800U as the superior choice for multi-threaded workloads, offering 8 cores/16 threads and roughly 39.2% higher performance than the 4-core Intel Core i7-1185G7. Conversely, the Intel i7-1185G7 leads in single-threaded tasks by approximately 8% due to higher clock speeds (4.8 GHz) and provides superior connectivity features like Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 4.0. The 4800U excels in demanding content creation, while the 1185G7 is better for responsive, everyday productivity. Review detailed benchmarks and specs for both processors at PassMark Software.

laptopspirit.fr

30/11/2020

Summary of the review

Core i7-1165G7 / i7-1185G7 vs i7-10750H: which one to choose?

LaptopSpirit analyzes the architectural differences between 11th Gen Tiger Lake (i7-1165G7/i7-1185G7) and 10th Gen Comet Lake-H (i7-10750H) processors, highlighting the shift from high-performance H-series to power-efficient, thin-and-light solutions. The 11th Gen chips provide superior Iris Xe integrated graphics and better single-core efficiency as a pro, while the 10th Gen chip offers higher multi-threaded performance with its six cores. Ultimately, the i7-10750H is better for sustained heavy workloads despite higher power consumption, whereas the Tiger Lake chips excel in mobility and battery life, with minimal real-world performance differences between the 1165G7 and 1185G7. For the full comparison, read the article at LaptopSpirit.

valid.x86.fr

01/03/2026

Summary of the review

CPU-Z Performance Rankings - Intel Core i7-1185G7

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is an 8-core, 12nm Zen+ processor featuring a 3.7 GHz base clock and 4.3 GHz boost, offering strong multi-threaded performance suitable for productivity and streaming. It excels in rendering (Cinebench) and includes the capable Wraith Prism RGB cooler, often outperforming competitors like the i7-8700K in workstation tasks. While competent for gaming, it generally trails Intel alternatives in single-threaded performance and 1080p gaming, though this gap closes at higher resolutions. Key strengths include superior game-streaming consistency and platform longevity on the AM4 socket. However, the chip has limited manual overclocking headroom due to aggressive stock XFR 2.0 and Precision Boost 2 technologies. Additionally, its 105W TDP leads to higher power consumption compared to the previous generation. For a detailed review and comprehensive benchmarks, visit GamersNexus.

laptopmedia.com

01/04/2022

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1250U vs Core i7-1185G7 – Passing the Evo Torch

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is a high-end 11th Gen Tiger Lake-U quad-core processor designed for thin-and-light laptops, featuring a 3.00 GHz base clock, 4.80 GHz boost, and 10nm SuperFin technology. It offers strong single-core performance, excellent integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU), and enterprise-grade features like vPro and Thunderbolt 4 support. Performance is highly competitive in light workloads, often surpassing the i7-1065G7. However, a major limitation is its quad-core design, which causes it to lag behind AMD’s eight-core Ryzen 7 4800U/5000 series in heavy multi-threaded tasks. A key drawback is its limited multi-core advantage over the lower-tier i7-1165G7, often making it a questionable value, especially when paired with limited thermal management that causes significant throttling. The processor's performance and value are highly dependent on the specific laptop's cooling capabilities. For more details, visit LaptopMedia. Copy

laptopmedia.com

N/D

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1185G7 | Specifications and Benchmark Tests

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is a high-end 11th Gen Tiger Lake processor for thin-and-light laptops, featuring 4 cores, 8 threads, and a 4.80 GHz turbo frequency. A major advantage is the integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7, which offers significant performance boosts for light gaming and creative tasks. The processor is known for excellent single-core speed, strong integrated graphics, and enterprise-focused features like Thunderbolt 4 and vPro support. However, the 4-core architecture, while efficient, struggles with heavy multi-threaded workloads when compared to competitor offerings. Performance is highly contingent on the laptop's thermal solution, leading to inconsistent results in thinner laptops. Additionally, the chip is typically found in premium devices, resulting in a lower price-to-performance ratio for some users. For the full specifications and review details, visit LaptopMedia.

notebookcheck.nl

14/05/2021

Summary of the review

Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Review - Too expensive with Intel CPU

The Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 (13.5-inch, Intel) boasts a premium aluminum chassis, an excellent 3:2 PixelSense touchscreen, and superior input devices, maintaining its reputation for top-tier build quality and silent operation. Pros include a high-quality keyboard, a responsive trackpad, and strong single-core performance from the Core i7-1185G7 processor. However, the Intel model suffers from significant cons, specifically a poor price-to-performance ratio compared to its AMD Ryzen counterparts, shorter-than-advertised battery life (often 7.5 to 10 hours), and a lack of modern connectivity features like Thunderbolt 4. While the Intel Iris Xe graphics offer a boost, the device fails to match the multi-core performance of AMD alternatives at a higher price point. The review concludes that the Intel Surface Laptop 4 is hard to recommend, as it is considered too expensive for the incremental improvements offered over its predecessor. The AMD-based configuration is presented as a better alternative, providing better efficiency and value. For more details, visit the Notebookcheck review.

techzine.nl

26/04/2021

Summary of the review

Dell OptiPlex Ultra Review: Giving the All-in-One a New Lease on Business Life

The Techzine review highlights the Dell OptiPlex 7090 Ultra as a modular all-in-one desktop that hides the PC unit within a monitor stand, enabling independent upgrades of the computer and display to extend hardware lifecycles. Built for business productivity, the system boasts excellent cable management via a single USB-C connection and offers toolless access for servicing components like RAM and SSDs. However, the compact design limits performance to that of a high-end laptop, lacking a discrete GPU for demanding tasks, while also requiring specific, often costly, compatible stands for the "invisible" look.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Intel Core i7 1185g7

Excellent single-core performance, rivaling M1 and matching top-tier mobile competitors in lightly threaded tasks.
Integrated Iris Xe graphics provide a significant boost over previous generations, handling light gaming and 4K video editing well.
Major efficiency and performance leap from 10th Gen Ice Lake predecessors due to the 10nm SuperFin architecture.
Includes enterprise-ready features like Intel vPro support, Trusted Execution Technology, and Total Memory Encryption.
Native support for modern standards like PCIe 4.0, Thunderbolt 4, and Wi-Fi 6.

What we don't like about Intel Core i7 1185g7

Multi-core performance often trails behind AMD Ryzen 7 equivalents (like the 4800U) due to having only 4 cores and 8 threads.
Performance is highly dependent on the laptop's thermal solution; in power-constrained (15W) or poorly cooled designs, it may barely outperform the cheaper i7-1165G7.
Negligible real-world performance gains over the i7-1165G7 in many standard workloads, often making the extra cost hard to justify.
Not suitable for heavy multi-threaded professional work like intensive 3D rendering or complex video transcoding compared to H-series or Ryzen chips.
High power draw spikes (up to 50W+) can lead to high heat and rapid battery drain during intense tasks.

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is a high-end quad-core mobile processor from the Tiger Lake-U generation, built on a 10nm SuperFin process with 4 cores and 8 threads. It features a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and a max turbo frequency of up to 4.8 GHz, supported by a 12MB Intel Smart Cache and an integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 96 execution units. Main pros include its exceptional single-core performance for productivity tasks, support for advanced technologies like PCIe 4.0, Thunderbolt 4, and Wi-Fi 6, and a configurable TDP (12W–28W) that balances power and efficiency. However, its primary cons are the limited 4-core count compared to many contemporary Ryzen alternatives and the tendency for performance to be heavily dependent on a laptop's cooling and power limits, often leading to thermal throttling in slim designs.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9955WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Intel Core i7 1185g7 with other processors

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7 1185g7 and other processors

No results found