OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Intel Core i5-4670K review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35PassMark multi-core score:5583N. of physical cores:4CPU boost clock speed:3.8 GHzCPU socket:LGA1150TDP (Thermal design power):84 W

Intel Core i5-4670K Review: Compare 74 technical specifications and 11 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

Intel Core i5-4670K

6.5/10

▼Worse than 54% of processors

7.6

▲Better than 65%

4.5

▼Worse than 70%

8.1

▲Better than 78%

?

Not in any best-of list yet

3.3
Gaming
Gaming
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
3.6
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
3.8
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
4.2
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
1.6
L3 cache
8.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
2.6
Video editing
Video editing
2.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
3.3
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
20.0%
2.1
CPU threads
15.0%
1.6
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the Intel Core i5-4670K

Based on 6 · 9

Solid everyday and gaming speed wins praise, but it runs hot and power-hungry, and overclocking opinions are split.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Intel Core i5-4670K

Based on 147 owners sharing their experience in online comments

60%positive18%mixed22%negative

Owners value its lasting gaming performance and overclocking, while newer games, heat and unpredictable results cause frustration.

What owners like

Owners reach 4.4 GHz or higher on modest air or water cooling, often at around 1.1 to 1.25 volts, though some chips need much more voltage.46
Under full load, owners with decent air or water cooling typically see around 50 to 70°C, and idle temperatures stay in the 30s.34
Owners still run modern games at 1080p with a midrange graphics card, though heavier titles can be CPU-limited and drop frames.33
Owners report still using it for many years, with some running it for over a decade for older and lighter games.13
Owners use it as a home media centre or light server PC, where it handles video and streaming without trouble.3

What owners dislike

In CPU-heavy games, and when streaming or multitasking alongside them, the four-core chip bottlenecks the graphics card and drops frame rates.22
Many chips reach only about 4.0 to 4.4 GHz and need high voltage to get there, with some crashing at 4.3 GHz or higher.17
Under load, especially when overclocked or on a basic cooler, temperatures can climb to around 80 to 90°C, with some owners reporting much higher readings.13
Reaching 4.4 GHz or higher often requires 1.25 to 1.35 volts or more, which pushes temperatures up.10
Owners see frame time spikes, stutters and freezes in newer games, especially when paired with a faster graphics card.9
Owners say that upgrading to a newer Ryzen chip costs little more and gives a noticeably smoother experience.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i5-4670K

6.5

Show more

Hide

Platform

6.9

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

4.3

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

4.0

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

4.5

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated graphics

6.3

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

What reviewers say

Power & Thermal

6.5

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

Tau (power duration limit)

?

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

Intel Core i5-4670K vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i5-4670K better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
20.9% higher review score
Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
80%
7.9
Average grade
20%
8.7
Popularity
Grades by review (11)
6 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.1 vs 6.7
7.14x cheaper
Intel Core i5-4670K is cheaper than the average processor (£35 vs £250).
£35 vs £250
16.7% higher sentiment score
8.4 vs 7.2

20.9% higher review score
Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
80%
7.9
Average grade
20%
8.7
Popularity
Grades by review (11)
6 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.1 vs 6.7
7.14x cheaper
Intel Core i5-4670K is cheaper than the average processor (£35 vs £250).
£35 vs £250
16.7% higher sentiment score
8.4 vs 7.2

Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.

Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.

Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.

Why is Intel Core i5-4670K worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

51.3% lower PassMark score
This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (5,583 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
5,583 vs 11,469
83.3% larger process node
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
22 nm vs 12 nm
2 fewer CPU cores
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
13.6% lower boost clock
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
3.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
Narrower instruction support
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
4 fewer CPU threads
This processor has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
4 vs 8

Narrower instruction support
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
7 years older release date
This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2013 vs 2020).
June 2013
2013 vs 2020
More limited crypto acceleration
This processor offers more limited crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES vs AES, SHA).
AES vs AES, SHA
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (TPM 1.2 vs PTT 2).
TPM 1.2 vs PTT 2.0

51.3% lower PassMark score
This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (5,583 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
5,583 vs 11,469
13.6% lower boost clock
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
3.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
2 fewer CPU cores
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
4 fewer CPU threads
This processor has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
4 vs 8
16.3% weaker single-core performance
This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,140 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
2,140 vs 2,558
31.2% lower multi-core score
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (3,586 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
3,586 vs 5,209
No simultaneous multithreading
This processor does not support simultaneous multithreading, while the average processor does. 73.8% of processors support it.
15.4% lower single-core score
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,299 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,299 vs 1,535
37.5% lower bus transfer rate
This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s

83.3% larger process node
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
22 nm vs 12 nm
66.7% smaller L2 cache
This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
1 MB vs 3 MB
50% less L2 per core
This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
Less advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Haswell vs Kaby Lake).
Haswell vs Kaby Lake
18.9% less L3 per core
This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
1.5 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
33.3% smaller L1 cache
This processor has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (256 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
256 KB vs 384 KB
71.7% fewer transistors
This processor has fewer transistors than the average processor (1.4 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
1.4 billion vs 4.95 billion
33.3% smaller L3 cache
This processor has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (6 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
6 MB vs 9 MB
Less advanced foundry
This processor uses a less advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 22 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
Intel 22 nm vs Intel 14 nm

50% lower memory speed
This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (1,600 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
1,600 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
45.4% lower memory bandwidth
This processor has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (25.6 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
25.6 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
Older DDR support
This processor supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
DDR3 vs DDR4
Lower JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR3-1600 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR3-1,600 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
50% less memory capacity
This processor has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
32 GB vs 64 GB
Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4

Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode/encode), VC-1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), MPEG-2 (HW decode/encode), VC-1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
86.7% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (84 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
84 W vs 45 W
86.7% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (84 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
84 W vs 45 W
31.3% higher boost power
This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (84 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
84 W vs 64 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0

Budget-Builds Official

≈ estimated

28/01/2026

Benchmark test · games, overclock and RAM upgrade

Verdict

Intel Core i5-4670K is not perfect, but at current prices it is hard to go wrong with for most people.

4.0

Techo Mode

≈ estimated

01/09/2023

Gaming test · 1080p benchmarks with an RTX 3060 Ti

Verdict

Intel Core i5-4670K is still playable in some games, but not recommended for modern AAA gaming in 2023.

9.0

OC3D TV

≈ estimated

01/10/2013

Hands-on review · overclocking, gaming and workload tests

Verdict

Intel Core i5-4670K is a top pick for gamers, though heavy editing workloads may call for more.

6.0

Nicolas11x12 English

✓ explicit

07/07/2013

Hands-on review · benchmarks, temperatures and power use

Verdict

Intel Core i5-4670K offers strong performance and higher frame rates, but heat and power draw are serious drawbacks; it is still recommended for performance.

8.0

Nicolas11x12 English

≈ estimated

18/10/2013

Overclock review · 4.4 GHz benchmarks and temperatures

Verdict

Intel Core i5-4670K gains big rendering and gaming speed from overclocking, but temperatures and power draw climb sharply.

8.0

Tech YES City

≈ estimated

04/06/2013

Quick look · 4.8 GHz overclock and stress test

Verdict

Intel Core i5-4670K overclocks well to 4.8 GHz at a modest voltage, but runs hot under stress testing.

Hands-on video, no verdict

Not graded

Shop video

Overview video

Not graded

Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

10

expertreviews.co.uk

✓ explicit

11/06/2013

Intel Haswell Core i5-4670K review(overclock3d.net) | 01 October 2013 | Intel 4670K i5 Haswell Review & Overclocking - OC3D(www.techpowerup.com) | 13...

Lab test · Overclocking and multitasking

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-4670K is a strong all-around desktop chip that overclocks well, but the i7-4770K pulls ahead in multitasking.

8.0

techradar.com

✓ explicit

19/06/2013

Intel Core i5-4670K review - TechRadar

Benchmark review · Haswell gaming CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-4670K edges out the i5-3570K and suits gaming, but with identical clocks and core count, the upgrade is hard to notice.

8.0

goldfries.com

≈ estimated

21/06/2013

Intel Core i5-4670K Processor Review

Hands-on test · Encoding and overclocking

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-4670K beats the i5-2500K in every conversion test, but AMD's FX-8350 leads in tasks that spread across many cores.

8.0

pcgameshardware.de

≈ estimated

01/06/2013

Intel Haswell: Core i5-4670K Pre-Review [Original Article]

Preview test · Haswell desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-4670K is a modest step up from the i5-3570K, mainly faster per clock with a noticeably stronger built-in graphics chip.

10

lesnumeriques.com

✓ explicit

02/06/2013

Intel Core i5-4670K Review: Mid-range Haswell

Benchmark test · Haswell desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-4670K offers only a small speed gain over the i5-3570K and lower idle power draw, but its built-in graphics don't always match rivals.

7.0

elchapuzasinformatico.com

≈ estimated

31/12/2013

Intel Core i5-4670K Review (Performance) - El Chapuzas Informático

Benchmark review · Overclocking and games

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-4670K is a clear step up from Sandy Bridge but barely ahead of Ivy Bridge, and it runs hot when overclocked.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core i5-4670K

Excellent value for gaming, often matching the performance of more expensive i7 models at 1080p resolution.
Easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier, providing significant performance gains with proper cooling.
Strong single-threaded performance, making it highly effective for everyday tasks and gaming applications.
Improved integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600) compared to previous generations, capable of handling light gaming.
Highly reliable long-term performance, with many users finding it capable of running older or less demanding titles years after release.

What customers don't like about Intel Core i5-4670K

Runs quite hot, especially when overclocked, which can lead to thermal throttling if using the stock cooler.
Lacks Hyper-Threading, putting it at a disadvantage in heavily multi-threaded tasks like professional video rendering compared to i7 chips.
Marginal performance improvements over the previous generation (Ivy Bridge) on a clock-for-clock basis.
Higher Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 84W compared to its predecessor's 77W, leading to increased power consumption.
Missing some advanced features found in non-K or i7 models, such as TSX (Transactional Synchronization Extensions) and certain virtualisation supports.

Verdict

The Intel Core i5-4670K is a fourth-generation 'Haswell' quad-core processor featuring a 3.4 GHz base frequency and a 3.8 GHz Turbo Boost, built on a 22nm process with an 84W TDP. Compatible with the LGA 1150 socket, it includes 6MB of L3 cache, a dual-channel DDR3-1600 memory controller, and integrated HD Graphics 4600. Its primary advantages are its fully unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking, strong single-threaded performance for gaming, and improved power-saving states. However, it is known for running significantly hot under load due to the use of internal thermal paste instead of solder, which can limit its maximum overclocking potential without high-end cooling.

Best alternatives

Intel Core i7-4770

Processors

Intel Core i7-2700K

Processors

Intel Core i7-3770

Processors

Intel Core i5-4690K

Processors

Processors

Intel Core i5-7600T

Processors

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

Processors

Intel Core i7-4770T

Processors

Intel Pentium Gold G5420T

Processors

Intel Core i3-4130

Processors

AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE

Processors

Intel Core i5-3450S

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Intel Core i5-4670K with other processors

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i5-4670K and other processors

No results found