OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Intel Celeron G1620t Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£35
Avg. price in US: ~$40
PassMark benchmark result: 1532
N. of physical cores: 2
CPU boost clock speed: N/A GHz
CPU socket: LGA1155
TDP (Thermal design power): 35 W

Intel Celeron G1620t review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

4.3

Poor

3.9

Poor

7.6

Very good

7.4
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
?
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
?
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
?
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
?
L3 cache
8.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
6.6
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
?
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
20.0%
?
CPU threads
15.0%
?
L3 cache

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

#355 in Best Desktop CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Celeron G1620T is a dual-core desktop processor based on the Ivy Bridge architecture, featuring a 2.40 GHz base clock speed and 2 MB of Intel Smart Cache. Released in Q3 2013, it utilizes the FCLGA1155 socket and a 22 nm lithography process. Its main pros include an exceptionally low 35W Thermal Design Power (TDP) for energy efficiency and support for up to 32 GB of DDR3-1333 memory, making it a reliable choice for basic web browsing and light office tasks. However, it suffers from several cons, including a lack of Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost technologies, a locked multiplier that prevents overclocking, and significantly limited performance for modern gaming or data-heavy applications due to its dated two-thread configuration and basic integrated Intel HD Graphics.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Celeron G1620t

Overall score

4.3

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

7.1

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: LOW

Intel

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: LOW

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: LOW

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: LOW

?

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Performance

2.8

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: LOW

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

N/A

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

5.1

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: LOW

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

?

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

3.9

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: LOW

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

7.2

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: LOW

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: LOW

?

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=24

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=350 MHz

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Thermal

8.4

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <50 W

?

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Intel Celeron G1620t vs the average processor

Why is Intel Celeron G1620t better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Includes stock cooler
Intel Celeron G1620t includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
What it is: A stock CPU cooler is included in the box with the processor.
When it matters: When total build cost matters and you need to know whether separate cooling must be bought right away.
Importance: LOW
Intel Celeron G1620t includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
46.9% smaller die size
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower die size than the average processor (94 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
What it is: The physical area of the processor die, usually measured in square millimeters.
When it matters: When you are comparing chip scale, packaging density, or broader design differences rather than direct user-visible performance.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <150 mm²
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower die size than the average processor (94 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².94 mm² vs 177 mm²
5 °C higher TJ Max
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=100 °C
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.105 °C vs 100 °C
Supports ECC memory
Intel Celeron G1620t supports ECC memory, the average processor does not. 32.5% of processors support ECC memory.
What it is: Can work with ECC memory, which helps detect and correct certain memory errors on supported platforms.
When it matters: When long-term stability, uptime, or data integrity matter more than a basic consumer-style setup.
Importance: LOW
Intel Celeron G1620t supports ECC memory, the average processor does not. 32.5% of processors support ECC memory.
7.14x cheaper
Intel Celeron G1620t is cheaper than the average processor (£35 vs £250).
Intel Celeron G1620t is cheaper than the average processor (£35 vs £250).£35 vs £250
90.9% more popular
Intel Celeron G1620t is more popular than the average processor (1.91 vs 1.000).
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Intel Celeron G1620t is more popular than the average processor (1.91 vs 1.000).1.91 vs 1
22.2% lower base power
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower base power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <30 W
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower base power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.35 W vs 45 W
85.7% higher GPU clock speed
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (650 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.
When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=350 MHz
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (650 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.650 MHz vs 350 MHz
46.9% smaller die size
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower die size than the average processor (94 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
Supports ECC memory
Intel Celeron G1620t supports ECC memory, the average processor does not. 32.5% of processors support ECC memory.
85.7% higher GPU clock speed
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (650 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
Includes stock cooler
Intel Celeron G1620t includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
5 °C higher TJ Max
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
22.2% lower base power
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower base power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Why is Intel Celeron G1620t worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Narrower instruction support
Intel Celeron G1620t supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
7 older release date
Intel Celeron G1620t has an older release date than the average processor (2013 vs 2020).
September 2013
No crypto acceleration
Intel Celeron G1620t does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0% of processors include crypto acceleration.
85.5% lower PassMark score
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (1,532 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
85.5% lower multi-core score
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (701 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
74.6% lower single-core score
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (374 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
46.9% weaker single-core performance
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,327 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
6 fewer CPU threads
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
Lower base clock
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower base clock than the average processor (2x2.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
No multithreading support
Intel Celeron G1620t does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
39.5% slower Blender rendering
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (234.5 vs 387.66). The average processor needs 387.66 for the Blender BMW27 test.
1 fewer threads per core
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
37.5% lower bus speed
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower bus speed than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
37.5% lower bus transfer rate
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
No Turbo Boost
Intel Celeron G1620t does not support Turbo Boost, the average processor does. 88.6% of processors support Turbo Boost.
83.3% larger process node
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
41.7% less L3 per core
Intel Celeron G1620t has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
Less advanced microarchitecture
Intel Celeron G1620t uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Ivy Bridge vs Kaby Lake).
75% smaller L3 cache
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
50% less L2 per core
Intel Celeron G1620t has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
66.7% smaller L1 cache
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (128 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
Less advanced foundry
Intel Celeron G1620t uses a less advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 22 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
54.1% lower memory bandwidth
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (21 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
Older DDR support
Intel Celeron G1620t supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
54.6% lower memory speed
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (1,333 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
Lower JEDEC memory speed
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR3-1333 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
Older PCIe version
Intel Celeron G1620t supports an older PCIe version than the average processor (2 vs 3.0).
50% less memory capacity
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
Limited PCIe bifurcation
Intel Celeron G1620t supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4).
Narrower media codec support
Intel Celeron G1620t supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
75% fewer GPU execution units
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (6 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
No configurable TDP
Intel Celeron G1620t does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
85.5% lower PassMark score
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (1,532 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (1,532 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.1,532 vs 10,572.5
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.2 vs 6
85.5% lower multi-core score
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (701 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (701 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.701 vs 4,829
74.6% lower single-core score
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (374 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (374 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.374 vs 1,471
46.9% weaker single-core performance
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,327 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
Intel Celeron G1620t has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,327 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.1,327 vs 2,500
83.3% larger process node
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <10 nm
Intel Celeron G1620t has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.22 nm vs 12 nm
6 fewer CPU threads
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 16+
Intel Celeron G1620t has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.2 vs 8
No configurable TDP
Intel Celeron G1620t does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.
Importance: LOW
Intel Celeron G1620t does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of Intel Celeron G1620t and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about Intel Celeron G1620t?

Excellent value for money, often described as 'best bang for your buck' for basic home or business systems.
Low power consumption with a thermal design power (TDP) of only 35W, making it energy efficient.
Highly reliable for basic computing needs such as emailing, word processing, and tracking home finances.
Supports Error Correction Code (ECC) memory, which is uncommon for entry-level consumer processors.
Stays relatively cool during operation due to fewer active components and lower power draw.

What customers dislike about Intel Celeron G1620t?

Weak performance for modern standards, making it unsuitable for gaming or data-heavy tasks.
Lacks Intel Hyper-Threading technology, limiting it to only two threads which hinders multitasking.
Very small cache sizes (2MB L3 cache) which significantly limits performance in more demanding applications.
No Turbo Boost support, meaning it cannot dynamically increase its clock speed under load.
Outdated architecture (Ivy Bridge) and socket (LGA 1155) that are no longer competitive with newer hardware.

Expert reviews

cpubenchmark.net

29/03/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Celeron G1620T @ 2.40GHz - CPU Benchmarks

The Intel Celeron G1620T is a dual-core, 2.40 GHz processor based on the Ivy Bridge architecture, designed for energy-efficient, budget-friendly desktop systems. It features 2 MB of cache, supports DDR3 memory, and is suited for basic tasks like document editing and web browsing. A key advantage is its low 35W TDP for cooler operation, along with ECC memory support and integrated graphics that can drive up to three displays. However, with a PassMark score of approximately 1,507, it falls into the low-end category and lacks the performance for modern, heavy multitasking or gaming. The chip also misses out on Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading, utilizing the aging LGA1155 socket, which makes it suitable only for legacy or specialized, low-cost applications. For more details, visit PassMark Software.

hardwareluxx.de

04/04/2011

Summary of the review

Everyday Desktop Systems with 10W Idle Power Consumption [User Test including G1620T]

The Hardwareluxx community thread focuses on optimizing PC hardware, particularly Intel Alder Lake-N platforms, for extreme energy efficiency, targeting sub-10W idle consumption through specific BIOS configurations like Deep Package C-States. Pros include remarkably low operational costs (5.5W-10.3W idle) and quiet operation, making these setups ideal for 24/7, low-power, "always-on" home server applications. However, achieving these results requires specific hardware, specialized power supplies like picoPSU-90, and careful BIOS tuning to overcome limitations in motherboard power management and component selection.

au-ja.de

07/05/2013

Summary of the review

Testing Intel's Pentium G2120 and Celeron G1620 [Includes G1620T data comparison]

Au-Ja! evaluates the Intel Pentium G2120 (3.1 GHz) and Celeron G1620 (2.7 GHz) based on 22nm Ivy Bridge architecture, positioning them as energy-efficient, low-power desktop solutions. These processors, while lacking features like Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost, provide sufficient performance for basic tasks, with the Celeron demonstrated to operate with exceptionally low power consumption. The review highlights that the Pentium G2120 offers stronger performance with 3MB L3 cache and supports ECC memory, though both chips are limited by PCIe 2.0 and weak integrated graphics. Pros: Exceptional energy efficiency (under 45W in tests), cost-effective 22nm performance, and ECC memory support for low-cost servers. Cons: Lack of AES-NI, Hyper-Threading, and Turbo Boost; limited PCIe 2.0 connectivity; and basic graphics performance unsuitable for gaming.

valid.x86.fr

Mars 2026

Summary of the review

CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Celeron G1620T (2T) Would you like performance comparisons between this model and the standard G1620?

The Intel Core i9-14900KS, as detailed in the CPU-Z benchmark, represents the peak of the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, featuring 24 cores and a 6.2 GHz boost clock designed for extreme performance. Its primary pros include unmatched single-threaded performance ideal for high-frame-rate gaming and a 3-5% multi-threaded improvement over the standard i9-14900K, coupled with Intel Application Optimization (APO) support for enhanced, specific application performance. However, significant cons include extreme power consumption exceeding 400W and severe thermal demands, often leading to throttling at 100°C+, making it an inefficient choice for most users due to high cost and cooling requirements. For detailed benchmarking data, visit CPU-Z Validator.

secondgoelectro.nl

15/01/2024

Summary of the review

Intel Celeron G1620T SR169 Processor Product Information

The Intel Celeron G1620T (SR169) is a budget-friendly, 2.40 GHz dual-core Ivy Bridge processor designed for basic tasks in LGA 1155 systems. Key advantages include its low 35W TDP for energy efficiency and ECC memory support, ideal for small-form-factor PCs or NAS devices. However, with only 2 cores and 2 threads, it faces performance limitations in modern tasks and lacks advanced features, making it suitable only for low-demand, legacy computing. For more details, visit Intel.

hardware.info

28/05/2013

Summary of the review

45 processors reviewed: from Intel Celeron to Core i7, from AMD A4 to FX

This Hardware.info review analyzes 45 processors, positioning Intel Celeron/Pentium for budget, power-efficient office tasks and AMD A4/A6 APUs as stronger, lower-cost options for light gaming and HD video. Mid-range to high-end tasks are dominated by Intel Core i5 and i7, providing superior speed (pro) but requiring better cooling (con), while AMD FX-series chips are noted as high-core-count, budget-friendly alternatives that lack single-core efficiency. Ultimately, the review finds that while AMD often delivers better "cores per dollar," Intel maintains a performance-per-clock advantage, leading to better responsiveness in daily applications. For more details, visit the Hardware.info analysis. Copy

Video reviews

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE

Processors

Intel Core i3 7100

Processors

Intel Core i5 4690K

Processors

Intel Core i5 4670K

Processors

Intel Core i5 7600T

Processors

Intel Core i7 4770

Processors

AMD Athlon 200GE

Processors

Intel Core i3 4130

Processors

Intel Core i5 6400

Processors

Intel Core i7 4770T

Processors

Intel Core i7 2700K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 2200GE

Processors

Compare Intel Celeron G1620t with other processors

Compare