OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price: ~£550
PassMark benchmark result: 27,748
N. of physical cores: 16
CPU boost clock speed: 4 GHz

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

6.5

Good

6.1

Good

9.6

Exceptional

5.7
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
3.7
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
9.0
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
4.6
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
5.5
L3 cache
8.0%
6.7
N. of physical cores
6.1
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
4.2
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
6.7
N. of physical cores
20.0%
10
CPU threads
15.0%
5.5
L3 cache

Best prices in UK

£?

Best rankings

#27 in Best Workstation CPUs

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a high-end desktop processor based on the 14nm 'Zen' architecture, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads with a 3.4 GHz base clock and a 4.0 GHz boost frequency (up to 4.2 GHz via XFR). Designed for the TR4 socket on the X399 chipset, it boasts a massive 32MB L3 cache, quad-channel DDR4 memory support, and a class-leading 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes. Its primary strengths are exceptional multi-threaded performance for workstation tasks like 3D rendering and video editing, as well as a generous allocation of I/O for multiple GPUs and NVMe drives. However, it has a high 180W TDP requiring robust cooling, lower single-threaded performance compared to contemporary rivals, and an intricate installation process involving a specific torque wrench.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Overall score

6.5

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.2

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

6.1

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

6.1

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

8.0

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

?

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

?

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

2.8

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

3.4

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

?

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

24 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 16+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.32 vs 8
10 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.16 vs 6
48 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (64 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.
When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=20
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (64 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.64 vs 16
2.63x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (27748 vs 10532.5). The average processor scores 10532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (27748 vs 10532.5). The average processor scores 10532.5 in PassMark benchmark.27,748 vs 10,532.5
Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
What it is: Has an unlocked CPU multiplier, which makes manual CPU overclocking much easier on supported platforms.
When it matters: When you plan to push clock speeds beyond stock settings instead of leaving the processor completely at default behavior.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
32x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (2048 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=128 GB
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (2048 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.2048 GB vs 64 GB
4x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=16 MB
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.32 MB vs 8 MB
3.2x larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=6 MB
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.8 MB vs 2.5 MB
Higher-end processor class
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X belongs to a higher-end processor class than the average processor (workstation vs mobile).
Modern CPU socket
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (sTR4 vs FP2).
24 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
10 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
2.63x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (27748 vs 10532.5). The average processor scores 10532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
80% higher multi-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (8626 vs 4793). The average processor scores 4793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
2.92x better overclocked performance
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher overclocked performance than the average processor (26425 vs 9051). The average processor scores 9051 in overclocked PassMark.
4x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
3.2x larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
4x larger L1 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (1536 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
16.7% more L3 per core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
48 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (64 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
32x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (2048 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
86.2% higher memory bandwidth
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (85.3 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
Supports memory overclocking
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not.
Supports ECC memory
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports ECC memory, the average processor does not.
32 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Why is AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

3 year/s older release date
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an older release date than the average processor (2017 vs 2020).
August 2017
Older TPM support
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports an older TPM version than the average processor (TPM 1.2 vs PTT 2.0).
66.4% slower classroom rendering
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (265.9 vs 791.745). The average processor needs 791.745 for the Blender Classroom test.
15.1% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (411 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
7% lower boost clock
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
8% weaker single-core performance
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2285 vs 2483). The average processor scores 2483 in PassMark single-core.
16.7% larger process node
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Whitehaven vs Kaby Lake).
2 fewer memory channels
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has fewer memory channels than the average processor (4 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
Limited PCIe bifurcation
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x4/x4/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8).
No integrated graphics
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does.
4x higher base power
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
4x higher TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher TDP than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
32 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
No configurable TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
4x higher base power
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.180 W vs 45 W
66.4% slower classroom rendering
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (265.9 vs 791.745). The average processor needs 791.745 for the Blender Classroom test.
What it is: A Blender render result based on the Classroom scene, used to show how quickly the processor can complete a demanding rendering workload.
When it matters: When rendering speed matters for 3D work, content creation, or other workloads that behave like long multi-core renders.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1500
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (265.9 vs 791.745). The average processor needs 791.745 for the Blender Classroom test.265.92 vs 791.745
16.7% larger process node
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <10 nm
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.14 nm vs 12 nm
15.1% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (411 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >600
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (411 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.411 vs 484
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Whitehaven vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Whitehaven vs Kaby Lake).Whitehaven vs Kaby Lake
4x higher TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher TDP than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher TDP than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.180 W vs 45 W
32 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=100 °C
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.68 °C vs 100 °C
7% lower boost clock
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?

Exceptional multi-threaded performance with 16 cores and 32 threads, ideal for rendering, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
Competitive value proposition, offering more cores and threads than Intel rivals at a similar price point.
High number of PCIe lanes (64) across the entire platform, supporting extensive multi-GPU and NVMe storage setups.
Support for ECC (Error Correction Code) memory, a feature often reserved for more expensive server-grade hardware.
Solder-based thermal interface material (TIM) provides better heat transfer compared to some competitors using thermal paste.

What customers dislike about AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?

Lower single-threaded performance and IPC (Instructions Per Clock) compared to contemporary Intel Core i9 and i7 processors.
Gaming performance can be inconsistent; some titles require a manual 'Game Mode' (disabling cores) and a system reboot to run optimally.
High power consumption and heat output (180W TDP), necessitating robust and often expensive liquid cooling solutions.
The X399 platform and compatible motherboards are significantly more expensive than mainstream consumer options.
Physical size and unique TR4 socket make installation more complex and limit choices for compatible air coolers.

Expert reviews

arstechnica.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Threadripper 1950X review: Better than Intel in almost every way

The Ars Technica review highlights the AMD Threadripper 1950X and 1920X as a,,major disruption to Intel's high-end desktop (HEDT) dominance, offering superior core counts, 64 PCIe lanes, and quad-channel memory across all models. The 16-core 1950X excels in multi-threaded production tasks like Blender and rendering, providing significant time savings over Intel’s comparable offerings, with additional advantages in ECC memory support and a large heat spreader that aids in cooling. Conversely, the review notes that the CPUs are less ideal for gaming due to lower single-core performance compared to Intel, higher power consumption with a 180W TDP, and the need for a system restart to switch between specialized performance modes.

hardwarecanucks.com

28/09/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X & 1950X Review

The Hardware Canucks review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X highlights these HEDT processors as dominant, high-thread-count solutions for professionals, featuring a secure, sled-based TR4 socket installation. Performance testing showcases exceptional multi-threaded capabilities in rendering and encoding, paired with 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes, though the platform requires substantial cooling for its high 180W TDP. While offering a superior price-to-performance ratio for workstations, the chips are limited by higher memory latency in gaming and a high overall cost for X399 motherboards.

tweaktown.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X CPU Review

TweakTown's review identifies the 16-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 12-core 1920X as transformative, high-value entries into the HEDT market, offering superior multi-threaded performance and 64 PCIe lanes for content creators. Key pros include exceptional multi-threaded performance, robust overclocking potential, and a premium, fully-featured platform, though the 180W TDP requires substantial cooling. While "Game Mode" improves performance, the processors' cons include lower single-threaded/gaming performance compared to high-frequency Intel chips and high total system costs.

vortez.net

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review – The HEDT King?

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, as reviewed by Vortez, is a "behemoth" 16-core, 32-thread processor designed for the X399 chipset, featuring a 3.4 GHz base clock and 4.0 GHz precision boost. Key technical strengths include 64 PCIe lanes and excellent multi-threaded performance, making it a "good choice" for creators. However, the review notes drawbacks in gaming performance, high 180W power consumption, and the high cost of X399 motherboards.

hothardware.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X And 1920X Review Would you like to see a comparison table of the benchmark results from these specific reviews?

HotHardware characterizes the first-generation AMD Ryzen Threadripper (1950X and 1920X) as a "beastly" disruption to the high-end desktop (HEDT) market, utilizing the Zen microarchitecture to deliver 16 cores and 32 threads. These processors are designed for creators and professionals, providing exceptional performance in multi-threaded tasks, 3D rendering, and parallel workloads. Performance analysis shows the $999 1950X dominating 10-core Intel competitors, offering substantial value and superior compute throughput for workstation tasks. Key strengths, or pros, include 64 PCIe lanes across the platform, supporting extensive storage and multi-GPU setups. Conversely, Intel maintains an advantage in single-threaded performance due to higher IPC and clock speeds. Cons include high platform entry costs, requiring expensive X399 motherboards and robust cooling solutions to handle the substantial thermal demands.

pcper.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X Review

The PC Perspective review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X highlights a shift in the HEDT market, with AMD offering high core counts and 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes as a direct competitor to Intel's X299 platform. Pros include class-leading multi-threaded performance in rendering and video encoding, where the 1950X often beats the i9-7900X, paired with improved memory compatibility. However, cons include high power consumption, lower single-threaded performance compared to Intel, and the need for robust cooling solutions to handle the 180W TDP.

gamersnexus.net

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Threadripper 1950X & 1920X Review: MCM Bet Pays Off

The Gamers Nexus review highlights the AMD Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) as exceptional workstation CPUs for rendering and video encoding, offering superior multi-threaded performance and 64 PCIe lanes. While offering immense value for production, the review notes a significant con in gaming, where the high thread count causes inconsistent performance, requiring a "Game Mode" toggle that demands a system restart. Despite high power consumption under load and the need for robust cooling, the 1950X is heavily recommended for workstations over Intel's alternatives for the same price, according to the Gamers Nexus review.

techspot.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X & 1920X Review

The TechSpot review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X highlights a major shift in the high-end desktop market, with the 16-core 1950X delivering a 39% multi-threaded performance increase over the Intel Core i9-7900X in Cinebench at the same price point. Key strengths include exceptional workstation performance in rendering and encryption, high efficiency with lower power consumption than competitors, and a superior platform offering 64 PCIe lanes. However, the processors lag slightly in high-frame-rate gaming and single-core tasks compared to Intel, while requiring expensive X399 motherboards and complex memory mode management for optimal performance.

techradar.com

15/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, reviewed by TechRadar, is a 16-core, 32-thread CPU that brings enterprise-level performance to the HEDT market for content creators and "mega-taskers". Boasting high multi-threaded performance, user-friendly installation, and 64 PCIe lanes for massive expansion, it offers superior value in multi-core tasks compared to its Intel counterparts at the time. However, the chip requires significant investment in X399 motherboards, high-end cooling for its 180W TDP, and offers minor gaming performance, with "Game Mode" requiring restarts for minimal gains.

pcmag.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review

The PCMag review highlights the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X as a powerful 16-core, 32-thread processor designed for intensive content creation, offering exceptional multi-core performance and 64 PCIe lanes. While delivering strong value for workstation tasks, the platform features a complex installation process and demands robust cooling to handle its high thermal output. Although outperforming competitor CPUs in heavily threaded applications, the chip lags in light-threaded tasks and peak 1080p gaming, making it a specialized tool rather than a general-purpose processor.

tomshardware.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review

The Tom's Hardware review highlights the 16-core, 32-thread AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X as a groundbreaking HEDT processor that dominates in workstation tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding, offering superior value with 64 PCIe lanes. While praised for its immense productivity power, the CPU faces limitations in gaming due to lower clock speeds and high latency, necessitating "Game" and "Creator" mode switching. The platform requires heavy-duty cooling for its 180W TDP and high-cost X399 motherboards, though it benefits from soldered IHS for better thermals.

kitguru.net

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16C32T) & 1920X (12C24T) CPU Review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16C/32T) and 1920X (12C/24T) review by KitGuru highlights AMD's entry into the high-end desktop market, offering immense multi-threaded performance via the Socket TR4 platform, which features quad-channel DDR4 and 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes. The 1950X excels in productivity tasks like rendering and video editing, often outperforming competing 10-core Intel processors while offering better value. While offering superior multi-threaded capabilities and ECC support, the processors have higher power consumption (180W TDP) and slightly lower gaming performance compared to competitors, often requiring "Game Mode" to optimize performance. Copy

pcper.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X Review

The PC Perspective review highlights the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X as disruptive high-end desktop (HEDT) processors, offering exceptional multi-threaded performance in applications like Cinebench, where the 16-core 1950X significantly outperforms similarly priced Intel competitors. A major advantage is the platform's 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes, providing superior connectivity for workstations. However, the chips show lower gaming performance compared to Intel due to higher memory latency, necessitating a "Game Mode" that requires a system reboot. Additionally, the 180W TDP demands robust liquid cooling, as full-load power consumption can exceed 260W. Copy

techadvisor.com

11/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a 16-core, 32-thread HEDT processor offering superior workstation performance for tasks like rendering and video editing. Key pros include exceptional multi-core value, 64 PCIe lanes for extensive connectivity, and support for ECC RAM. Cons focus on high power consumption, expensive ecosystem requirements (TR4 motherboard, high-end cooling), and lower gaming performance compared to mainstream chips. Copy

phoronix.com

28/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Threadripper 1950X Linux Benchmarks Review

The Phoronix review of the 16-core AMD Threadripper 1950X on Ubuntu 17.04 highlights the $999 USD chip as a dominant force for heavily threaded Linux workloads, often outperforming the Intel Core i9-7900X in parallel tasks. Key advantages include exceptional multi-threaded performance-per-dollar, particularly in compiling and scientific workloads, alongside a robust platform supporting 64 PCI-E lanes. However, the 1950X faces cons related to lower single-threaded IPC performance, high power consumption, and early Linux-specific issues such as lacking native temperature monitoring at launch. Copy

hexus.net

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X

The HEXUS review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) positions them as major HEDT disruptors, offering superior multi-core value with 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes and quad-channel memory. While the 1950X dominates in multi-threaded tasks, outperforming competitors in Cinebench, both chips suffer from lower single-threaded performance and necessitate high-end, 180W TDP cooling solutions. Despite requiring users to navigate complex "Game" and "Creator" modes for optimal performance, the processors deliver a robust platform for content creators and high-end workstations. Copy

bit-tech.net

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X Review

Bit-Tech's 2017 review highlights the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) as a major HEDT shift, offering unprecedented core counts and 64 PCIe lanes at competitive prices, utilizing the TR4 socket. The processors excel in heavily threaded production workloads, with the 1950X outperforming the Intel Core i9-7900X in Cinebench and video encoding, making them ideal for content creators. However, they suffer from lower single-threaded performance and higher power draw, leading to inferior gaming performance compared to mainstream alternatives like the i7-7700K. Pros: Exceptional multi-threaded performance, 64 PCIe lanes for extensive connectivity, and a robust X399 platform.Cons: High power consumption (over 300W), challenging cooling requirements (180W TDP), and lower gaming performance. Copy

gamezoom.net

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - Test/Review: Would you like more details on benchmark results or specific motherboard recommendations for this processo...

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, reviewed by GameZoom, is a 16-core, 32-thread HEDT processor utilizing 14nm "Zen" architecture, 64 PCIe 3.0 lanes, and quad-channel memory. It offers exceptional multi-threaded performance in rendering and encoding, frequently outpacing Intel’s competing i9-7900X, while offering a 3.4 GHz base and 4.0 GHz boost clock. Performance is largely defined by its superior multi-core capabilities, though its complex multi-die design introduces higher memory latency. While the "Game Mode" improves compatibility, single-threaded performance still trails top gaming processors. The review highlights the 1950X's strength in productivity, but notes its 180W TDP and high platform costs (X399 motherboards) as primary drawbacks. Pros include industry-leading multi-core performance, abundant PCIe connectivity, and effective thermal management via a soldered heatspreader. Conversely, cons include high total platform costs, the necessity of reboots for gaming optimization, and a large, demanding physical installation process.

chip.de

15/09/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, reviewed by CHIP.de, is a high-performance 16-core, 32-thread processor dominating in workstation tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, notably offering 64 PCIe lanes for extensive connectivity. While praised for its multi-threaded power, the 180W TDP processor requires robust, expensive cooling, and its gaming performance falls behind Intel rivals due to lower single-core speeds. Despite a high total cost of ownership driven by expensive X399 motherboards, the 1950X offers exceptional value for creative professionals, though it is not recommended for pure gaming builds.

gamestar.de

17/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review: 16-Core Benchmark Comparison

The GameStar review highlights the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X as a groundbreaking 16-core, 32-thread CPU that redefined the 2017 high-end desktop (HEDT) market, utilizing a dual-die Zen architecture for massive productivity performance. The X399 platform provides 64 PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory, offering superior workstation capabilities compared to contemporary competitors. While the processor dominates in rendering and encoding, single-threaded gaming performance is lower, leading to the inclusion of a "Game Mode" for improved compatibility. Pros include exceptional multi-core performance, competitive pricing, and a soldered heat spreader, while cons focus on high power consumption and less-than-ideal gaming performance.

pcgameshardware.de

11/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X & 1920X Review vs. Intel Core i9-7900X

The PC Games Hardware review of the 12-core/24-thread AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X highlights its strength in workstation tasks, offering 64 PCI Express lanes and quad-channel memory. While delivering exceptional multi-threaded performance that rivals the Intel Core i9-7900X in rendering, the 180W TDP processor requires significant cooling and can suffer from lower gaming performance compared to mainstream alternatives. Positioned as a high-value prosumer option, the 1920X is best suited for content creation, though it requires specific BIOS settings for optimal performance and carries high platform costs.

computerbild.de

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Threadripper 1950X and 1920X Review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16 cores/32 threads) and 1920X (12 cores/24 threads) redefine high-end desktop computing by providing superior multi-threaded performance compared to Intel's offerings at similar price points. Targeted at content creators, these processors utilize the TR4 platform, featuring 64 PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory, making them ideal for heavy tasks like 3D rendering and 4K video editing. Key advantages include immense multi-core strength, offering significantly better value for workstations than competing Intel Core i9 processors, along with ample connectivity for multiple GPUs. However, the processors are less suited for pure gaming due to lower single-core performance compared to top-tier consumer chips, and they require high-end cooling for their 180W TDP. Additionally, the platform involves high total costs due to expensive X399 motherboards, making them a specialized choice for professional workloads rather than general consumer use.

igorslab.de

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X - igor’sLAB

Igor'sLAB reviews the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X, positioning them as premier professional workstation tools rather than mainstream gaming CPUs, with a focus on 2017-era performance. A key advantage is the soldered heat spreader, which improves thermal management, and the platform's 64 PCIe 3.0 lanes, offering superior connectivity over Intel competitors. However, the processors suffer in gaming, where high core counts cannot compensate for lower clock speeds compared to standard desktop alternatives. igor´ While Threadripper provides exceptional value for workstation tasks, the review notes it is overkill for pure gaming, and performance in older, less-threaded games can be suboptimal. To improve gaming performance, the review highlights AMD's "Game Mode" in Ryzen Master, which helps mitigate latency by disabling some cores. Ultimately, the review concludes that "clock goes before core count" in gaming, making this platform ideal for productivity, not high-end gaming. igor´ For the full, detailed review, visit igor'sLAB.

hardwareluxx.de

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X

Hardwareluxx reviews AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core), which utilize the TR4 socket/X399 chipset to enter the high-end desktop (HEDT) market, boasting 64 PCIe lanes for extensive connectivity. The processors excel in multi-threaded tasks like rendering and video encoding, outperforming competition in parallel workloads, though they lag slightly in single-threaded performance and gaming, sometimes requiring a specialized "Game Mode". Key strengths include exceptional multi-tasking performance and high value, while drawbacks include high 180W TDP power consumption, cooling requirements, and expensive X399 motherboards.

computerbase.de

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Review: 1950X and 1920X Duel with Core i9

The ComputerBase review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16 cores) and 1920X (12 cores) highlights them as powerful high-end desktop (HEDT) competitors to Intel's Core X series, utilizing the new TR4 socket with 4,094 pins. These processors offer exceptional multi-threaded performance, particularly in rendering tasks like Cinebench R15, and feature 64 PCIe lanes across all models, although they suffer from lower single-core performance compared to Intel. Key pros include strong productivity performance and competitive pricing, while cons include higher power consumption, lower gaming performance, and the need for robust cooling.

lesnumeriques.com

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review: A Processor with Heart

The Les Numériques review highlights the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X as a 16-core, 32-thread powerhouse aimed at professionals, offering massive I/O via 64 PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory. It excels in heavily threaded tasks like video rendering and 3D modeling, with superior performance in benchmarks such as Cinebench compared to Intel counterparts. However, the chip’s high 180W TDP requires substantial liquid cooling, and its gaming/single-threaded performance, while solid, lags behind top-tier Intel alternatives. The processor necessitates a substantial investment in a new TR4 socket motherboard, making it a high-cost platform, though it is praised for its relative energy efficiency in productivity workflows. Overall, it is recommended for content creators and "mega-taskers" who can fully utilize its high core count. Pros: Exceptional multi-threaded performance, 64 PCIe lanes, and strong relative efficiency. Cons: High thermal output (180W TDP), lower single-threaded/gaming performance, and high platform cost (X399 motherboard).

tomshardware.fr

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Review: A Matter of Heart

The Tom's Hardware France review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X highlights the 16-core/32-thread processor as a transformative HEDT chip, utilizing dual-die "Zeppelin" architecture for massive parallel power. It shines in workstation tasks, offering 64 PCIe 3.0 lanes, solder for superior thermal management, and unmatched performance in rendering and video encoding against competitors. However, the review notes significant gaming and latency trade-offs, high idle power consumption, and a high total platform cost, often requiring a special "Game Mode" for optimal performance. Tom’

comptoir-hardware.com

12/09/2017

Summary of the review

Review: AMD X399 / Threadripper 1950X

The Comptoir-Hardware review of the 16-core, 32-thread AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X highlights its immense capabilities in heavy multi-threaded workstation environments, backed by 64 PCIe 3.0 lanes and quad-channel DDR4 memory. The review finds the CPU excels in 3D rendering and video encoding, though it notes that the 180W TDP requires substantial cooling and that gaming performance often lags behind higher-clocked mainstream CPUs. Additionally, the platform requires expensive X399 motherboards and necessitates managing memory modes (NUMA/UMA) for optimal performance, according to the analysis. Le Copy

3dcollective.es

17/01/2018

Summary of the review

Hardware Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, a 16-core/32-thread CPU based on 14nm "Zen" architecture, offers exceptional multi-threaded performance for professionals, featuring 64 PCIe lanes and quad-channel DDR4 memory support. It excels in rendering and heavy multitasking, though its single-threaded performance is outmatched by some Intel counterparts. Key pros include high-end value and massive bandwidth, while cons involve a high 180W TDP, costly X399 platform requirements, and lower gaming performance without using "Game Mode".

tomshw.it

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

Overclocking, Cooling, and Temperatures - Tom's Hardware

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X review highlights a high-performance 16-core processor that faces significant thermal and power challenges when overclocked, despite featuring a soldered integrated heat spreader (IHS) for efficient heat transfer. While stock settings are manageable, overclocking tests—achieving up to 3.9 GHz at 1.35V—can drive power consumption well over 300W. A key finding emphasizes that meticulous, full-coverage thermal paste application is essential to mitigate high temperatures due to the large die size, which can lower load temperatures by as much as 19°C. Pros of the Threadripper 1950X include exceptional multi-threaded performance in rendering tasks, soldered IHS for better thermals, and 64 PCIe lanes. Conversely, cons involve extremely high power consumption exceeding 325W, heavy cooling requirements that standard AIOs may not meet, and complex, reboot-intensive "Game Mode" settings. The review notes that while multi-core performance gains are substantial, single-core performance sees minimal improvement from overclocking.

hwupgrade.it

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X e 1920X: la battaglia dei 16 core

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16 cores/32 threads) and 1920X (12 cores/24 threads) redefine the high-end desktop (HEDT) market, delivering exceptional multi-threaded performance for professionals and content creators. Utilizing the TR4 socket and X399 chipset, these processors offer 64 PCIe Gen 3 lanes and quad-channel DDR4 memory, often surpassing Intel's 10-core Core i9-7900X in rendering tasks. Key performance, such as for gaming, is managed via Local (NUMA) and Distributed (UMA) memory modes, designed to mitigate latency issues. YouTubePros include unmatched multi-threading value at the $999 price point, extensive PCIe connectivity, and ECC memory support. Cons involve high 180W TDP necessitating robust cooling, lower gaming performance compared to mainstream alternatives due to cross-die latency, and a higher overall platform cost.

tweakers.net

10/08/2017

Summary of the review

Threadripper 1950X, 1920X and X399 - AMD's sixteen-core monster

The Tweakers review characterizes the AMD Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) as HEDT, or high-end desktop, processors that redefine market performance standards through exceptional multi-threaded capabilities in rendering and encoding. Key advantages include the X399 platform's 64 PCIe lanes for extensive connectivity and strong price-to-performance value compared to Intel alternatives, though these benefits are primarily targeted at professionals rather than gamers. Significant drawbacks highlighted in the analysis involve high power consumption, the necessity for robust liquid cooling, and lower gaming performance compared to mainstream, single-die processors.

id.nl

04/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and 1950X review

The ID.nl review highlights the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core) and 1920X (12-core) as HEDT powerhouses designed for content creation, outperforming Intel competitors by up to 30% in heavily threaded tasks. A key advantage is the "no-compromise" platform featuring 64 PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory, alongside efficient cooling due to soldered heat spreaders. While offering immense value and "mega-tasking" capabilities, the platform has limitations including lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel, the need for a reboot to switch between performance modes, and high entry costs for motherboards and cooling. Copy

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X with other processors

Compare