OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

RHA MA750i Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Form factor:in-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

RHA MA750i Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

RHA MA750i
5.6/10

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

80%

5.6

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 83% of headphones
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 79%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

52%

6.1

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

7.0

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.2

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 68%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
  • rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
rha-ma750i
Where to buy
    N/A~ £90
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones RHA MA750i

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

52%

6.1

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

7.0

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.2

Calls & Controls

5.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
RHA MA750i has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.9
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
10 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 10 mm, smaller driver size than 87.7% of headphones and equal to 4.1% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
16 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 16 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 54.1% of headphones and equal to 4.2% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
RHA
Form factor
in-ear
Weight
36 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 36 g, lighter than 81.9% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
N/A
Show more

RHA MA750i vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 83.5% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (36 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    36 g vs 218 g
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 2,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 83.5% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (36 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    36 g vs 218 g
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 2,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 30 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (10 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    10 mm vs 40 mm
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 0.7 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    1 % vs 0.3 %
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 5.87x less popular
    RHA MA750i is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 5.1% worse value for money
    RHA MA750i has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.92 vs 7.3).
    6.92 vs 7.27
  • 5.87x less popular
    RHA MA750i is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 5.1% worse value for money
    RHA MA750i has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.92 vs 7.3).
    6.92 vs 7.27
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 30 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (10 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    10 mm vs 40 mm
  • 0.7 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 95% lower input power handling
    This pair of headphones has a lower max input power than the average pair of headphones (5 mW vs 100 mW). The average headphones handle max input power of 100 mW.
    5 mW vs 100 mW
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Z Reviews
≈ estimated
28/08/2015
Hands-on review · build, sound and microphone tests
Verdict
RHA MA750i has excellent build and fit and good sound, though the reviewer finds it hard to judge against others.
9.0
Sam Pullen (samjpullen)
≈ estimated
19/03/2015
Hands-on review · a day of listening and controls
Verdict
RHA MA750i has impressive sound and build, with a fiddly middle button and tangle-prone cable, but it is recommended.
9.0
Jordan Ash
≈ estimated
03/12/2016
Hands-on review · fit, build and sound impressions
Verdict
RHA MA750i is a great overall pick, best suited to flat, neutral listening rather than bass lovers.
9.0
Geekanoids
≈ estimated
22/07/2014
Unboxing and first impressions · sound and call tests
Verdict
RHA MA750i is well built and clearly recommended, with clean, smooth sound that should not disappoint.
9.0
UrAvgConsumer
≈ estimated
19/11/2013
Hands-on review · unboxing, design and sound
Verdict
RHA MA750i is well built and comfortable, with clear sound and strong bass, and it is recommended as a solid earbud.
Not graded
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

whathifi.com
17/01/2014
Long-term test · In-ear earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA750i sounds harsh until it has been broken in for about a week, then offers balanced, clear sound, though its over-ear cable is fiddly.
avforums.com
30/09/2013
Hands-on review · In-ear earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a lively, fairly neutral in-ear with strong isolation, suiting commuters and casual listeners more than studio monitoring.
hifiplus.com
08/05/2014
Hands-on review · Stainless steel in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a well-built in-ear with a smooth, detailed midrange, best for listeners who don't need extra bass and have a good portable amp.
H
headfonia.com
20/11/2013
Summary of the review
RHA MA600i and MA750i: Scottish Lowlanders - Headfonia
reviewed.com
02/02/2015
Lab test · Stainless steel in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i has a tough stainless steel build and suits classical music, but its light bass doesn't justify its price.
theheadphonelist.com
07/01/2014
Hands-on review · Warm-sounding in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a warm, well-built in-ear with deep bass and a spacious stage, best for listeners who want bass with clarity.
majorhifi.com
14/07/2018
Hands-on review · Warm iPhone in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a fat, warm, fun in-ear with a big soundstage, best for pop, rock and EDM rather than acoustic music.
bestearphonesguide.co.uk
28/04/2017
Hands-on review · Stainless steel in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a well-built in-ear with rich, detailed sound, suited to listeners who don't mind heavier earpieces.
resonancereviews.com
28/06/2016
Hands-on review · Stainless steel in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i offers an airy, refined soundstage and energetic treble, but its dry bass and softer female vocals may not suit everyone.
uk.pcmag.com
30/10/2013
Lab test · In-ear earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a solid in-ear with powerful, clean bass, best for big bass fans, though its high-mids could be crisper.
headfonics.com
09/11/2013
Hands-on test · Source pairing
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a detailed, well-controlled in-ear that rewards a good source, sounding best from the Ibasso DX50 and worst from an iPod 7th Gen.
charliewhite.net
03/01/2014
Hands-on test · Sound comparison
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a premium-feeling in-ear with tight bass and a wide soundstage, but the cheaper MA600i gives better value.
pcmag.com
06/11/2013
Hands-on test · Bass-boosted earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a powerful, well-built earphone with deep bass that stays clean, though its mids could use more presence for crisper vocals.
techadvisor.com
14/05/2015
Hands-on review · Neutral in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is well made with a natural, neutral sound, so it suits reference-minded buyers rather than bass fans.
geardiary.com
20/11/2013
Hands-on review · Premium in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a solidly built, comfortable in-ear with a generous accessory kit, though its sound is good rather than exceptional.
soundandvision.com
20/03/2014
Hands-on review · Stylish in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a stylish, comfortable in-ear that keeps rock and electronic music lively, best for fun listening rather than mixing.
hometheaterhifi.com
16/12/2013
Month-long test · Premium earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is built to survive hard daily use, with accurate sound that never turns harsh, even on demanding recordings.
engadget.com
20/09/2013
Hands-on review · Noise-isolating in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a well-built, comfortable in-ear with balanced, detailed sound, a good pick for audiophiles on a limited budget.
the-gadgeteer.com
29/10/2014
Listening test · Premium in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is a sturdily built, naturally balanced in-ear that sounds only slightly better than cheaper RHA models, so buy it for build quality.
lesnumeriques.com
20/02/2014
Lab test · Premium in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA750i is solidly built and comfortable with a handy remote, but unpleasant treble and sibilance hold back its sound.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about RHA MA750i

  • Exceptional build quality with 303F grade stainless steel housing
  • Vast and open soundstage, rare for in-ear monitors at this price point
  • Generous accessory package including 10 pairs of various ear tips and a premium carry case
  • Industry-leading 3-year warranty and highly responsive customer service
  • Balanced yet fun sound signature with 'punchy' and well-controlled bass
  • Strong noise isolation, especially when used with the included Comply foam tips
  • High-quality, thick, and tangle-resistant oxygen-free copper cable with a spring-reinforced jack

What customers don't like about RHA MA750i

  • Requires a significant 'burn-in' period (up to 50+ hours) to reduce initial harshness in the treble
  • Non-detachable cable makes the unit irreparable if the wire fails
  • Over-ear loop design can be 'fiddly' to fit and may not suit all users
  • The 3.5mm jack's straight design and length can be cumbersome compared to right-angle plugs
  • Substantial weight due to the all-metal build can cause fatigue during very long sessions
  • Treble can occasionally be perceived as slightly 'piercing' or sibilant on certain recordings
  • Inline remote is optimized for Apple devices and may have limited functionality on Android

Verdict

The RHA MA750i is a premium in-ear monitor featuring handmade 560.1 dynamic drivers housed in 303F grade stainless steel using a signature 'Aerophonic' design. Key specifications include a frequency range of 16Hz to 40,000Hz, 16-ohm impedance, 100dB sensitivity, and a 1.35m steel-reinforced oxygen-free copper cable with a gold-plated 3.5mm jack. Its main characteristics are a robust build, an over-ear hook design for secure fit, and a three-button inline remote for Apple devices. Pros include an expansive soundstage, high-resolution audio with rich bass and clear mids, a generous accessory kit with ten pairs of ear tips, and a three-year warranty. Cons include a thick, non-detachable cable that can be somewhat unruly, a learning curve for the over-ear fit, and potential treble sharpness that can be unforgiving on lower-quality recordings.

Compare RHA MA750i with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of RHA MA750i and other products in the Headphones category

No results found