Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

TomTom Touch Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Battery life:?Screen size:?Heart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

TomTom Touch Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.2

Technical score

20%

5.9

User score

▼Worse than 54% of fitness-trackers
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

6.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.1

Battery

18%

7.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

7.4

Smart Features

8%

7.7

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Design & Durability

▲Better than 62% of fitness-trackers
5.9

User score

User score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.8

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on 233 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 94% of fitness-trackers
  • tomtom-touch
  • tomtom-touch
  • tomtom-touch
  • tomtom-touch
  • tomtom-touch
  • tomtom-touch
  • tomtom-touch
tomtom-touch
tomtom-touch
tomtom-touch
tomtom-touch
tomtom-touch
tomtom-touch
tomtom-touch

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker TomTom Touch

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

6.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.1

Battery

18%

7.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

7.4

Smart Features

8%

7.7

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Design & Durability

7.2
User score
User score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.8

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on 233 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
5.9
Popularity
Popularity
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
TomTom Touch has a popularity score of 6.2 points, which is higher than 60.1% of fitness trackers.
6.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
limited to call/SMS alerts.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4.1
Bluetooth version
4.1
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1 which is newer than in 56.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 2.5% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
?
Screen resolution
128x 32
Screen resolution
128x 32
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x32 which is lower than that of 51.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
148 ppi
Pixel density
148 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 148 ppi which is lower than that of 88.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
16 mm
Show more

TomTom Touch vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 60% lighter
    Thickness
    10 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (10 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Weight varies by size.
    10 g vs 25 g
  • Built-in gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via TomTom MySports Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via TomTom MySports Connect.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via TomTom MySports Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via TomTom MySports Connect.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.1
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.1 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.1 vs 4.0
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • 60% lighter
    Thickness
    10 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (10 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Weight varies by size.
    10 g vs 25 g
  • 29.3 mm lower height
    Height
    11.5 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (11.5 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    11.5 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 32
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IPX7
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IPX7 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IPX7 vs IP68
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 39.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    148 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (148 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    148 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • 36% lower user score
    User score
    5.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    TomTom Touch
    the average fitness tracker
    TomTom Touch has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (5.88 vs 8.000).
    5.88 vs 8
  • 57.1% more expensive
    TomTom Touch is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£110 vs £70).
    £110 vs £70
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 32
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • 39.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    148 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (148 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    148 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Limited firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    USB
    This fitness tracker uses a less convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    USB vs over-the-air
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IPX7
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IPX7 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IPX7 vs IP68
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
stuff.tv
23/12/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitaltrends.com
23/08/2019
Summary of the review
B
beccafarrelly.co.uk
19/11/2016
Summary of the review
G
gadgetsnow.indiatimes.com
11/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
01/12/2016
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
20/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
the5krunner.com
19/10/2016
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
08/12/2016
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
16/01/2018
Summary of the review
S
seeninthecity.co.uk
27/05/2019
Summary of the review
M
mellowmummy.co.uk
26/02/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
23/11/2016
Summary of the review
I
imaedia.de
13/11/2016
Summary of the review
R
runwithlars.de
07/11/2016
Summary of the review
E
eiswuerfelimschuh.de
04/12/2016
Summary of the review
P
pocketnavigation.de
08/04/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
15/03/2018
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
12/03/2017
Summary of the review
N
nakan.ch
22/12/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
19/11/2016
Summary of the review
B
barbichette.fr
14/02/2017
Summary of the review
G
globe-runners.fr
02/06/2017
Summary of the review
T
trentejours.com
06/05/2017
Summary of the review
G
geekbecois.com
08/02/2017
Summary of the review
T
trailandrunning.com
25/11/2016
Summary of the review
M
montre-cardio-gps.fr
24/07/2017
Summary of the review
S
sciencedirect.com
15/08/2022
Summary of the review
A
as.com
16/02/2018
Summary of the review
L
libertaddigital.com
28/12/2016
Summary of the review
A
acareddu.it
11/11/2017
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
06/02/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
29/12/2016
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
07/12/2016
Summary of the review
E
elle.be
21/07/2017
Summary of the review
R
running.be
06/10/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 233 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about TomTom Touch

  • Unique body composition feature that measures body fat and muscle mass
  • Slim, sleek, and comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear
  • Includes 24/7 heart rate monitoring and basic activity tracking (steps, sleep, calories)
  • Simple and intuitive companion app for viewing fitness data
  • Water-resistant and shower-proof build
  • Swappable bands allow for personalization

What we don't like about TomTom Touch

  • Short battery life, typically lasting only 3 to 5 days
  • Small OLED display is difficult to read in direct sunlight
  • Heart rate measurements and body composition results can be inconsistent or inaccurate
  • Finicky and occasionally unresponsive touch screen interface
  • Lacks built-in GPS for independent distance tracking
  • Software and goal-setting features feel basic compared to competitors like Fitbit

Verdict

The TomTom Touch is a slim, 0.22-inch touchscreen fitness tracker distinguished by its unique built-in body composition analyzer, which measures body fat and muscle mass via bio-impedance. It features 24/7 activity tracking for steps, calories, and sleep, alongside an integrated optical heart rate monitor and basic smartphone notifications for calls and texts. While it is lightweight and offers a splash-proof IPX7 rating with a five-day advertised battery life, it is primarily lauded for its compact design and innovative body scanning. However, it lacks built-in GPS, suffers from a notoriously difficult-to-navigate interface, and often fails to meet its battery estimates, with many users reporting only three days of actual use.

Compare TomTom Touch with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of TomTom Touch and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found