Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fitbit Zip Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Battery life:180 daysScreen size:0.3 inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Fitbit Zip Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

▼Worse than 65% of fitness-trackers
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

6.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.4

Battery

18%

3.6

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

8.6

App & Wellness

4%

8.2

Connectivity

4%

6.6

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 83% of fitness-trackers
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

Based on 5,541 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 78% of fitness-trackers
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
  • fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip
fitbit-zip

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fitbit Zip

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

6.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.4

Battery

18%

3.6

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

8.6

App & Wellness

4%

8.2

Connectivity

4%

6.6

Design & Durability

6.2
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

Based on 5,541 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fitbit Zip has a popularity score of 9.2 points, which is higher than 81.2% of fitness trackers.
9.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
Vibrating alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 84.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Fitbit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 20 m which is higher than that of 80.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.7% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
180 days
Battery life
180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 180 days which is longer than that of 87.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 5.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
N/A
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
165 mAh
Battery capacity
165 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 165 mAh which is higher than that of 64.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.3 inch
Screen size
0.3 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.3 inch which is smaller than that of 99.3% of fitness trackers.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
This fitness tracker uses LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 68.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 4.6% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
clip-on
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
N/A
Show more

Fitbit Zip vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 170 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (180 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    180 days vs 10 days
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 37.6% lighter
    Thickness
    15.59 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (15.6 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Clip-on device with clip.
    15.59 g vs 25 g
  • 50% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    165 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (165 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    165 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
    Predicts ovulation via the Fitbit app.
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fitbit Zip
    the average fitness tracker
    Fitbit Zip has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 81.1% more popular
    Fitbit Zip has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.17 vs 5.1).
    9.17 vs 5.07
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
    Predicts ovulation via the Fitbit app.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 170 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (180 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    180 days vs 10 days
  • 50% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    165 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (165 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    165 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a removable battery, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.6% of fitness trackers have a removable battery.
    Uses a user-replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • Firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    over-the-air / USB
    This fitness tracker uses a more convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air
  • 37.6% lighter
    Thickness
    15.59 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (15.6 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Clip-on device with clip.
    15.59 g vs 25 g
  • 1.4 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9.6 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9.6 mm vs 11 mm
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • 0.74 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.3 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.3 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.3 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 3.5% worse value for money
    Fitbit Zip has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.65 vs 7.9).
    7.65 vs 7.92
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.2% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • No rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a rechargeable battery, while the average fitness tracker does. 86% of fitness trackers have a rechargeable battery.
    Uses a replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • 0.74 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.3 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.3 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.3 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    MIL-STD-810
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (MIL-STD-810 vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    MIL-STD-810 vs MIL-STD-810G
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • 4 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2012 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    September 2012
    2012 vs 2016
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
goughlui.com
04/07/2016
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
27/12/2012
Summary of the review
O
outdoorgearlab.com
11/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
15/02/2018
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
17/01/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
04/10/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
10/05/2016
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
29/10/2013
Summary of the review
O
onesmileymonkey.com
07/12/2012
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
29/10/2012
Summary of the review
G
gadfit.com
08/12/2013
Summary of the review
G
gizmodo.com
19/09/2012
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
15/07/2014
Summary of the review
L
livescience.com
21/03/2014
Summary of the review
F
futurezone.at
19/02/2014
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
09/01/2013
Summary of the review
M
macwelt.de
18/12/2012
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
21/05/2014
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
T
trentejours.com
28/10/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
06/07/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
04/11/2012
Summary of the review
E
eluniversal.com.co
16/06/2014
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
10/10/2012
Summary of the review
L
letemsvetemapplem.eu
23/07/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 5,541 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Fitbit Zip

  • Affordable entry-level price point compared to other Fitbit models
  • Compact and lightweight design makes it discreet and easy to clip onto clothing
  • Highly accurate step and distance tracking for basic activity monitoring
  • Long battery life of 4–6 months using a standard, user-replaceable CR2025 coin cell
  • Simple, user-friendly interface that relies on tapping the screen to cycle through stats
  • Water-resistant build that can survive splashes, rain, and occasionally accidental laundry cycles

What we don't like about Fitbit Zip

  • Lacks advanced tracking features such as heart rate monitoring and sleep tracking
  • Non-backlit display is difficult or impossible to read in dark environments
  • Frequent sync errors and connectivity issues reported by some users
  • Resistive touchscreen can be unresponsive and requires a firm tap to operate
  • Inconsistent low-battery indicators that may not provide adequate warning before the device dies

Verdict

The Fitbit Zip is a compact, entry-level activity tracker designed as a simple pedometer that clips onto clothing or fits inside a pocket. It features a low-resolution, non-backlit LCD tap display that cycles through real-time stats including steps taken, distance traveled, calories burned, and the time of day. Key specifications include wireless syncing via Bluetooth 4.0, a splash-proof and sweat-proof build, and an impressive battery life of four to six months powered by a user-replaceable CR2025 coin cell battery. Main pros are its extremely unobtrusive design, high step-tracking accuracy, and the fact that it never requires recharging. However, it lacks advanced features found in modern trackers, such as heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, an altimeter for floors climbed, and a backlit screen for viewing in the dark.

Compare Fitbit Zip with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Zip and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found