Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fitbit Charge Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Battery life:7 daysScreen size:0.7 inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Fitbit Charge Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical score

20%

7.6

User score

▼Worse than 74% of fitness-trackers
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.0

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.8

Battery

18%

5.2

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

7.2

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

8.8

Connectivity

4%

5.6

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 84% of fitness-trackers
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

Based on 164 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 79% of fitness-trackers
  • fitbit-charge
fitbit-charge

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fitbit Charge

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.0

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.8

Battery

18%

5.2

Health

18%

5.6

Display

8%

7.2

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

8.8

Connectivity

4%

5.6

Design & Durability

6.2
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

Based on 164 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fitbit Charge has a popularity score of 5.8 points, which is higher than 57.8% of fitness trackers.
5.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
limited to call/SMS alerts.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Fitbit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 20 m which is higher than that of 80.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.7% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
?
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
50 mAh
Battery capacity
50 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 50 mAh which is lower than that of 86.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.3% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.7 inch
Screen size
0.7 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.7 inch which is smaller than that of 90.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 32
Screen resolution
128x 32
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x32 which is lower than that of 51.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
21 mm
Show more

Fitbit Charge vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Tracks elevation
    Elevation tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
    Floors climbed via altimeter
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Built-in barometer
    Barometer
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a barometer, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers have a barometer.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    over-the-air / USB
    This fitness tracker uses a more convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 32
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 0.34 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.7 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 54.5% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    50 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (50 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    50 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 71.4% more expensive
    Fitbit Charge is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£120 vs £70).
    £120 vs £70
  • 5.7% worse value for money
    Fitbit Charge has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.49 vs 7.9).
    7.49 vs 7.92
  • 4.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fitbit Charge
    the average fitness tracker
    Fitbit Charge has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.63 vs 8.000).
    7.63 vs 8
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 54.5% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    50 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (50 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    50 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.2% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 32
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • 0.34 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.7 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.7 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 4 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    1 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    1 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
30/12/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
06/12/2014
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
07/12/2015
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
06/12/2014
Summary of the review
T
telegraph.co.uk
05/12/2014
Summary of the review
B
bemissioncapable.com
18/03/2015
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
26/02/2015
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
20/11/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
06/12/2014
Summary of the review
F
fitforfun.de
15/02/2021
Summary of the review
F
fitness-factory.net
15/10/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
16/11/2023
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
01/01/2024
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
20/10/2023
Summary of the review
I
imtest.de
29/03/2026
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
15/12/2023
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
19/12/2014
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/12/2014
Summary of the review
L
labolsadelcorredor.com
26/02/2015
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
18/12/2014
Summary of the review
L
labolsadelcorredor.com
26/02/2015
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
16/11/2023
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
12/11/2023
Summary of the review
R
robadainformatici.it
28/10/2025
Summary of the review
T
tech.everyeye.it
23/11/2021
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
04/05/2020
Summary of the review
M
manuelagostini.com
12/02/2017
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
02/06/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 164 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Fitbit Charge

  • Sleek and lightweight design that remains comfortable for all-day and overnight wear.
  • Highly accurate sleep tracking and detailed sleep stage analysis compared to competitors.
  • Strong battery life, lasting up to 7 days with normal use, outperforming many full smartwatches.
  • Bright and responsive AMOLED touchscreen that is easily readable in broad daylight.
  • Helpful integration with Google apps like Google Maps, Google Wallet, and YouTube Music.
  • Broad set of advanced health sensors, including ECG, EDA (stress), and SpO2 (blood oxygen).
  • Ability to broadcast heart rate data to compatible gym equipment like Peloton and NordicTrack.

What we don't like about Fitbit Charge

  • Unreliable built-in GPS that frequently loses signal, especially if the wrist strap is fastened tightly.
  • Important advanced metrics like 'Daily Readiness' and deeper sleep data are paywalled behind a Fitbit Premium subscription.
  • Lack of an altimeter sensor means it cannot track elevation or floors climbed.
  • Limited music integration that only supports YouTube Music, with no native support for Spotify controls.
  • Durability and reliability concerns, with reports of technical glitches and hardware failures after less than two years.
  • Small screen size makes reading long text notifications or navigating menus difficult for some users.
  • Heart rate sensors may fail to work properly for users with wrist tattoos.

Verdict

The Fitbit Charge 6 is a high-performance fitness tracker featuring a 1.04-inch AMOLED color touchscreen with Gorilla Glass 3, integrated GPS/GLONASS, and water resistance up to 50 meters. It tracks over 40 exercise modes and utilizes advanced sensors for heart rate, SpO2, ECG, and EDA stress monitoring, alongside Google integration for Maps and Wallet. Key pros include a slim lightweight design, accurate heart rate tracking during workouts, and a solid 7-day battery life. However, notable cons include the requirement of a Fitbit Premium subscription for deep health metrics, limited music controls restricted to YouTube Music, and occasional GPS connectivity issues if the strap is fastened too tightly.

Compare Fitbit Charge with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Charge and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found