Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

BodyMedia Fit Core Armband Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Battery life:14 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:0 m

BodyMedia Fit Core Armband Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 94% of fitness-trackers
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

6.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.6

Battery

18%

5.7

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

8.2

App & Wellness

4%

5.5

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 94% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £95

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker BodyMedia Fit Core Armband

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

6.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.6

Battery

18%

5.7

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

8.2

App & Wellness

4%

5.5

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Design & Durability

5.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
BodyMedia Fit Core Armband has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.0
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
Vibrating alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 84.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via BodyMedia Activity Manager
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 60.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 13.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
armband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

BodyMedia Fit Core Armband vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 4 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin or ambient temperature sensor.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    Skin temperature tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Tracks skin temperature trends.
  • 36% lighter
    Thickness
    16 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (16 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    16 g vs 25 g
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via BodyMedia Sync.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via BodyMedia Sync.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Sweat tracking
    Sweat tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 7.7% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
    Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin or ambient temperature sensor.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    Skin temperature tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Tracks skin temperature trends.
  • Sweat tracking
    Sweat tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 7.7% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
    Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
  • EDA sensor
    EDA sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an EDA sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.6% of fitness trackers have an EDA sensor.
    Galvanic skin response sensor.
  • 4 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via BodyMedia Sync.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via BodyMedia Sync.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 36% lighter
    Thickness
    16 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (16 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    16 g vs 25 g
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Tracks temperature
    Temperature tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • 50 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    0 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (0 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    Not waterproof.
    0 m vs 50 m
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • 13.3% worse value for money
    BodyMedia Fit Core Armband has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (6.99 vs 7.9).
    6.99 vs 7.92
  • 5.07x less popular
    BodyMedia Fit Core Armband has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 35.7% more expensive
    BodyMedia Fit Core Armband is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£95 vs £70).
    £95 vs £70
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.2% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • Not compatible with Android
    Compatible with Android
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with Android, while the average fitness tracker is. 98.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with Android.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • Limited firmware update method
    Firmware update method
    USB
    This fitness tracker uses a less convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
    USB vs over-the-air
  • 50 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    0 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (0 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    Not waterproof.
    0 m vs 50 m
  • 6.2 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    17.2 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (17.2 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    17.2 mm vs 11 mm
  • 4 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2012 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    January 2012
    2012 vs 2016
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • Paid app
    Free app
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a free app, while the average fitness tracker does. 96.2% of fitness trackers have a free app.
    Paid membership needed to access data.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
healthland.time.com
31/12/2011
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
06/03/2014
Summary of the review
F
futurezone.at
18/09/2013
Summary of the review
A
aesirsports.de
19/04/2015
Summary of the review
A
aesirsports.de
12/03/2015
Summary of the review
A
aesirsports.de
12/04/2015
Summary of the review
A
aesirsports.de
12/03/2015
Summary of the review
A
archipel.uqam.ca
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
R
rrd.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
18/06/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about BodyMedia Fit Core Armband

  • High accuracy in calorie burn estimation compared to wrist-based trackers due to multi-sensor technology (skin temperature, heat flux, and galvanic skin response)
  • Comprehensive data tracking including calories, physical activity, steps, and detailed sleep duration and efficiency
  • Effective weight-loss tool that provides strong motivation through real-time calorie deficit tracking
  • Automatic activity detection that starts tracking without manual input
  • Long battery life, typically lasting around 4 days between charges

What we don't like about BodyMedia Fit Core Armband

  • Mandatory monthly subscription fee required to access and view tracked data
  • Bulky and unsightly design that is difficult to wear discreetly under tight-fitting clothing
  • Physical discomfort reported by many users, including irritation from metal sensors and pressure marks when sleeping
  • The Core model lacks Bluetooth connectivity, requiring a USB connection to a computer to sync data
  • Not waterproof; must be removed for showering or swimming
  • Limited food database in the companion app, making manual nutrition logging tedious

Verdict

The BodyMedia Fit Core Armband is a professional-grade wearable designed for high-accuracy health monitoring, utilizing a multi-sensor array including a 3-axis accelerometer, skin temperature sensor, heat flux sensor, and galvanic skin response sensor to capture over 5,000 data points per minute. Its main characteristics include precise tracking of calories burned, physical activity, steps, and detailed sleep efficiency based on physiological changes. The primary pros are its clinical-level accuracy, lightweight 1-ounce design that is 33% smaller than previous models, and a long battery life of up to 14 days. However, notable cons include a mandatory monthly subscription fee to access personal data, a lack of built-in Bluetooth for real-time syncing (requiring a USB connection to a computer), and an aesthetic that some users find clunky or unattractive.

Compare BodyMedia Fit Core Armband with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of BodyMedia Fit Core Armband and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found