OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Amazon Halo View review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£60Battery life:7 daysScreen size:1.2 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Amazon Halo View Review: Compare 163 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

Amazon Halo View
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 59% of models
Score components

35%

7.1

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.7

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▲Better than 59% of fitness trackers
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▲Better than 61%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 54% of models
Score components

20%

6.3

Sports

20%

4.4

Battery

18%

8.7

Health

18%

8.0

Display

8%

7.4

Smart functions

8%

9.0

Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design

▲Better than 54%
7.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (21)
12 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 51%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • amazon-halo-view
amazon-halo-view
Where to buy
    N/A~ £60
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Amazon Halo View

Based on 10 · 9

Reviewers like the clear display, tough build and workouts, but the bands disappoint, GPS is missing, and opinions split on the membership.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Amazon Halo View

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 54% of models
Score components:

20%

6.3

Sports

20%

4.4

Battery

18%

8.7

Health

18%

8.0

Display

8%

7.4

Smart functions

8%

9.0

Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design

7.1
Reviews score
7.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 68.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
On-demand readings.
Show more
What reviewers say
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 14.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 85.6% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
What reviewers say
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Halo app
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.7% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 64% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Via Halo membership.
Show more
What reviewers say
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 68% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 17.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Market range: <9 m – >30 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 64.5% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 56.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 21.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
95 mAh
Market range: <45 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 95 mAh which is lower than that of 65.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
What reviewers say
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.2 inch
Market range: <0.72 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.2 inch which is larger than that of 60.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.5% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.9% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
120x 240
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 120x240 which is higher than that of 71.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.6% of fitness trackers.
Resolution supported by extracted display specs.
Pixel density
282 ppi
Market range: <146 ppi – >326 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 282 ppi which is higher than that of 54.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 14.5% of fitness trackers.
Calculated from published resolution and display size.
Show more
What reviewers say
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 23.4% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Quick-release band system.
Band width
19 mm
Show more
What reviewers say

Amazon Halo View vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
    On-demand readings.
  • Measures VO2 max
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.6% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
    App estimate.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Via Halo membership.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 19% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.4% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin temperature during sleep.
  • 5.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 51% of models

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (21)
    12 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.7 vs 7.3
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
    On-demand readings.
  • Measures VO2 max
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.6% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
    App estimate.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.4% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin temperature during sleep.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Night-time trend only.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Cycle start prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.8% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • 91.5 more exercise modes
    This fitness tracker has more exercise modes than the average fitness tracker (100 vs 8.5). The average fitness tracker offers 8.5 exercise modes.
    10 workout categories on device; broader list in app.
    100 vs 8.5
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 19% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass.
  • 0.14 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.2 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.2 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • 14.2% higher pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (282 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    Calculated from published resolution and display size.
    282 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5 vs 4.1
  • Passcode protection
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
    Uses an off-wrist lock.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Gesture control
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.6% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Via Halo membership.
  • Points-based system
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.2% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses Activity Points.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No distance tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support distance tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 95.4% of fitness trackers support distance tracking.
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (120x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    Resolution supported by extracted display specs.
    120x240 vs 194x368
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 24% smaller battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (95 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    95 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No distance tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support distance tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 95.4% of fitness trackers support distance tracking.
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 24% smaller battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (95 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    95 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (120x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    Resolution supported by extracted display specs.
    120x240 vs 194x368
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 5.42 mm greater height
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (46.7 mm vs 41.3 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 41.325 mm.
    Capsule length.
    46.74 mm vs 41.325 mm
  • 0.94 mm thicker design
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (11.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.94 mm vs 11 mm
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No achievements
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.4% of fitness trackers support achievements.
  • No BMI tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.2% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • Paid app
    This fitness tracker does not have a free app, while the average fitness tracker does. 96.7% of fitness trackers have a free app.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Erin Lawrence
≈ estimated
30/10/2022
Hands-on review · feature, app and accuracy tests
Verdict
Amazon Halo View is a decent budget tracker for basic wellness use, but no GPS and the membership fee limit its appeal.
8.0
Ardently Tech
≈ estimated
11/08/2022
Long-term review · one month of daily use
Verdict
Amazon Halo View is recommended mainly on sale and with the membership, but the watch itself is not amazing.
4.0
Fitness With Frost
≈ estimated
14/01/2022
Hands-on review · sync, sleep and heart rate tests
Verdict
Amazon Halo View is not recommended: a weak fitness band, though its sleep tracking is good.
9.0
The French Glow
≈ estimated
06/01/2022
Hands-on review · one week of workouts and app use
Verdict
Amazon Halo View's app and bundled membership make it excellent value for the money.
7.0
Digital David
≈ estimated
06/01/2022
Hands-on review · water test and app walkthrough
Verdict
Amazon Halo View is good value, though battery life and the cluttered app need work.
8.0
CNET
≈ estimated
08/12/2021
Hands-on review · workouts, body fat tool and value
Verdict
Amazon Halo View is an affordable basic tracker with long battery life, but its appeal depends on paying for the monthly membership.
8.0
Connect The Watts
≈ estimated
19/12/2021
First look · unboxing and initial impressions
Verdict
Amazon Halo View is a solid pick for beginners at this price, though its body fat readings may be significantly off.
8.0
Revu2u
✓ explicit
17/12/2021
Hands-on review · charging and step tests · giveaway at the end
Verdict
Amazon Halo View offers good value for its premium features, though the charging clip is awkward.
9.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
11/12/2021
First look · unboxing, setup and first impressions
Verdict
Amazon Halo View feels like a good-quality Fitbit alternative, with step and heart rate accuracy close to a smartwatch.
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
08/12/2021
Hands-on review · Screen tracker
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View adds a color screen and sleep tracking, but Amazon shut the Halo service down in 2023 and its devices were set to stop working.
9.0
royallypink.com
≈ estimated
01/03/2022
Long-term review · Sleep tracking
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is a small, light tracker whose detailed sleep data and wellness app suit people who want insight without constant alerts.
10
livingetc.com
✓ explicit
15/04/2022
Feature overview · Health tracking
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is a slim tracker with plenty of health metrics and a solid app, but it can't make phone calls like an Apple Watch.
6.0
geardiary.com
✓ explicit
12/08/2022
Hands-on review · Rugged tracker
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is a comfortable, sturdy tracker for steps and sleep, but its body scan can feel invasive and nutrition tools are basic.
7.0
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
20/10/2022
Full review · Discontinued tracker
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is discontinued, but it was a light, rugged tracker with a bright screen that suits basic step and sleep tracking.
8.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
26/04/2023
Hands-on test · Fitness features
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is a color-screen tracker with long battery life and water resistance for swimming, but its heart rate readings were inconsistent and it has no GPS.
5.0
theverge.com
✓ explicit
15/12/2021
Critical review · Privacy concerns
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View looks and acts like a Fitbit, but its body fat scan and Tone feature feel unsettling, so it suits basic tracking.
8.0
screenrant.com
≈ estimated
05/03/2022
Hands-on test · Two-week trial
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is a light, bright tracker with accurate core tracking and a good app, but it lacks GPS and locks much of its content behind membership.
7.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
08/12/2021
Hands-on review · Wellness tracker
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is an average tracker that suits people who want Halo Fitness classes, but it doesn't track distance or use GPS.
7.0
cnn.com
≈ estimated
13/12/2021
Week-long test · Fitness classes
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View suits anyone wanting a Fitbit-style tracker with a clearer color screen and workout classes, though its battery falls short of seven days.
9.0
momontheside.com
≈ estimated
12/03/2023
Long-term review · Sleep and steps
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is being shut down, but its accurate step counts, detailed sleep data and water resistance held up for one wearer over 15 months.
7.0
howtogeek.com
✓ explicit
07/07/2022
Hands-on test · Movement workouts
Verdict
The Amazon Halo View is a simple tracker whose Movement workouts stand out, but its optional Body and Tone features feel creepy.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazon Halo View

  • Affordable price point compared to major competitors
  • Lightweight and comfortable design for 24/7 wear
  • Bright and clear AMOLED color touchscreen for viewing stats
  • Comprehensive sleep tracking including sleep stages and temperature
  • Long battery life lasting up to 7 days on a single charge
  • Includes one year of Halo Membership with access to many workouts and recipes
  • Waterproof design suitable for swimming and showering

What customers don't like about Amazon Halo View

  • Amazon has discontinued the Halo service, making the device non-functional as of August 2023
  • Lack of built-in GPS requires a paired phone for distance and pace tracking
  • Heart rate accuracy can be inconsistent during high-intensity workouts
  • Requires a paid monthly subscription to access most features after the trial
  • Privacy concerns regarding the body fat scan and tone-of-voice analysis features
  • Limited smartwatch features with very basic notification support
  • Proprietary charging clip can be difficult to align correctly

Verdict

The Amazon Halo View is a lightweight, swimproof fitness tracker featuring a 1.2-inch AMOLED color touchscreen and a silicone sport band. Key specifications include sensors for heart rate, blood oxygen (SpO2), and skin temperature, alongside an accelerometer for tracking steps and diverse exercise modes like HIIT, yoga, and swimming. It is characterized by its long battery life of up to 7 days and its integration with the Halo app for advanced metrics like body composition and movement health analysis. Main pros include its highly affordable price point, comprehensive sleep tracking, and a minimalist, comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, inconsistent heart rate accuracy during high-intensity workouts, and a heavy reliance on a paid monthly subscription to access its most unique features.

Compare Amazon Halo View with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Halo View and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found