Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8163

Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8/10

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 95% of tablets
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▼Worse than 83%
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

2.3

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 92%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £55
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
1GB + 16GB1GB + 32GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

2.3

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

4.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
1 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8163
This tablet uses the MediaTek MT8163 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 93% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×600
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1024×600 which is lower than that of 92.8% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
171 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 171 ppi which is lower than that of 76% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Aluminosilicate Glass
This tablet uses Aluminosilicate Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 58% of tablets and equal to that on 7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than that of 93.5% of tablets and equal to that of 5.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,400 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 2,400 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 99.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
5 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 5 W which is slower than in 96% of tablets and equal to speeds in 3.3% of tablets.
Battery life
7 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 7 hours, which is shorter than that of 85.4% of tablets and equal to that of 5.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Fire OS 5
This tablet uses the Fire OS 5 operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 81.8%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
?
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
313 g
This tablet weighs 313 g which is lighter than 90.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 36.1% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (313 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    313 g vs 490 g
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 60.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (115 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    115 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • 4.73x cheaper
    Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£55 vs £260).
    £55 vs £260
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 4.73x cheaper
    Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£55 vs £260).
    £55 vs £260
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • 36.1% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (313 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    313 g vs 490 g
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 60.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (115 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    115 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 63.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (2,400 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    2,400 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-450 MP4 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-450 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 4.81x less popular
    Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 11.1% worse value for money
    Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.39 vs 7.1).
    6.39 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-450 MP4 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-450 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 35% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 75% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • 78 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (323 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    323 nits vs 401 nits
  • 23.7% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (171 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    171 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (850:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    850:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 50 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (171 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    171 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 63.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (2,400 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    2,400 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • 72.2% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (5 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    5 W vs 18 W
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Fire OS 5 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Fire OS 5 vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 3.4 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11.4 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    11.4 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
SmartWorld
≈ estimated
02/12/2015
Hands-on review · setup, camera, speaker and app tests
Verdict
Amazon Fire is an excellent Christmas gift for light use such as films, books and music, with clear limits.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

U
uk.pcmag.com
19/11/2025
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
21/02/2026
Summary of the review
G
gb.readly.com
31/01/2024
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
02/03/2026
Summary of the review
M
mumsnet.com
19/08/2025
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
14/11/2025
Summary of the review
O
onetinyleap.com
19/07/2017
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.fr
25/04/2024
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
29/03/2024
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
08/07/2022
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/02/2017
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
27/08/2022
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.fr
05/08/2022
Summary of the review
L
lapresse.ca
12/07/2020
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.fr
18/11/2022
Summary of the review
L
lesalexiens.fr
10/08/2022
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
29/10/2012
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
01/08/2022
Summary of the review
M
multiplayer.it
11/08/2022
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
03/08/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB)

  • Extreme affordability with frequent sales on [Amazon](https://www.wired.com/gallery/best-amazon-fire-tablet/)
  • Comprehensive parental controls and robust 'Kids Edition' bundles [Use code with caution.jsonConsumer ReportsUse code with caution.json](https://www.consumerreports.org/tablets/amazon-fire-tablets-dont-score-well-in-consumer-reports-tests-you-might-want-one-anyway/)
  • Seamless integration with Amazon services like Prime Video, Kindle, and Audible [PCMag UK](https://uk.pcmag.com/tablets/10395/the-best-tablets)
  • Expandable storage up to 1TB via microSD card [Use code with caution.jsonMarket.comUse code with caution.json](https://www.market.com/computers-tablets/tablets/amazon-fire/)
  • Solid battery life, often lasting 10-14 hours on a single charge [Use code with caution.jsonMarket.comUse code with caution.json](https://www.market.com/computers-tablets/tablets/amazon-fire/)
  • Durable build quality suitable for travel and children [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/1hi4qes/is_the_amazon_fire_kids_tablet_really_that_bad/)

What customers don't like about Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB)

  • No native access to the Google Play Store or standard Google apps like YouTube and Gmail [Mashable](https://mashable.com/roundup/best-tablets-2026)
  • Underpowered processors leading to sluggish performance or lag during multitasking [WIRED](https://www.wired.com/gallery/best-amazon-fire-tablet/)
  • Fire OS interface can feel clunky and is heavily populated with Amazon ads [Mashable](https://mashable.com/roundup/best-tablets-2026)
  • Limited app selection within the official Amazon Appstore compared to competitors [TechBuzz](https://www.techbuzz.ai/articles/amazon-s-fire-tablets-get-mixed-verdict-in-new-review)
  • Basic camera quality that is generally insufficient for high-quality photography [Kindle Fire For Kid](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://kindlefireforkid.com/fire-tablet-buyers-guide-2025/Use code with caution.json)
  • Lower-end models (like the Fire 7) feature low-resolution, cramped displays [WIRED](https://www.wired.com/gallery/best-amazon-fire-tablet/)

Verdict

The Amazon Fire 7 (16GB) is an entry-level 7-inch tablet featuring a 1024 x 600 display, a 1.3 GHz quad-core processor, and 1GB of RAM, with storage expandable up to 512GB via microSD. Its main strengths lie in its extreme affordability, durable build, and seamless integration with the Amazon ecosystem for Prime Video and Kindle content. However, the limited 1GB of RAM leads to sluggish multitasking, the screen resolution is low by modern standards, and it lacks access to the official Google Play Store.

Compare Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Fire (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found