Name: Intel Core M7 6y75
Brand: Intel

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £310

Best rankings

#524 in Best Mobile CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Core m7-6Y75 is a dual-core, four-thread mobile SoC from the 6th Generation Skylake family, featuring a base clock of 1.2 GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of 3.1 GHz. Built on a 14 nm process, it includes 4 MB of Intel Smart Cache and an integrated Intel HD Graphics 515 GPU with a 300–1000 MHz dynamic range. Its primary advantage is extreme power efficiency, operating at a standard TDP of just 4.5W (configurable from 3.5W to 7W), which allows for fanless, silent designs in thin tablets and 2-in-1 laptops. However, its performance is highly dependent on the device's thermal management, often leading to significant clock speed throttling during sustained heavy workloads compared to standard 15W mobile processors.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core M7 6y75

Overall score

3.9

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

7.1

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Performance

3.1

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Cache & Architecture

4.7

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Memory & PCIe

3.1

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Integrated Graphics

6.4

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

Power & Thermal

7.6

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Intel Core M7 6y75 vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core M7 6y75 better than the average processor?

Hide

90% lower base power
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (4.5 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (4.5 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.4.5 W vs 45 W
89.1% lower boost power
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (7 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <50 W
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (7 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.7 W vs 64 W
44.4% smaller die size
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower die size than the average processor (99 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
What it is: The physical area of the processor die, usually measured in square millimeters.
When it matters: When you are comparing chip scale, packaging density, or broader design differences rather than direct user-visible performance.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <150 mm²
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower die size than the average processor (99 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².99 mm² vs 178 mm²
90% lower TDP
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower TDP than the average processor (4.5 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <30 W
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower TDP than the average processor (4.5 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.4.5 W vs 45 W
16.7% more L3 per core
Intel Core M7 6y75 has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
What it is: The amount of L3 cache effectively available per CPU core.
When it matters: When you are comparing how much shared cache each core can draw on in deeper technical analysis.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=2 MB/core
Intel Core M7 6y75 has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
44.4% smaller die size
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower die size than the average processor (99 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
16.7% more L3 per core
Intel Core M7 6y75 has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
90% lower base power
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (4.5 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
89.1% lower boost power
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (7 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
90% lower TDP
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower TDP than the average processor (4.5 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.

Total

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Why is Intel Core M7 6y75 worse than the average processor?

Hide

5 year/s older release date
Intel Core M7 6y75 has an older release date than the average processor (2,015 vs 2,020).
September 2015
Narrower instruction support
Intel Core M7 6y75 supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
No crypto acceleration
Intel Core M7 6y75 does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does.
Older CPU socket
Intel Core M7 6y75 uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1,515 vs FP2).
45.9% weaker single-core performance
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,343 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
27.9% lower boost clock
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Core M7 6y75 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
43.8% lower single-core score
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (826 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
77.7% lower PassMark score
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2,346 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
68.2% lower multi-core score
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,524 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
4 fewer CPU threads
Intel Core M7 6y75 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
50% lower bus transfer rate
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
50% lower bus speed
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
16 lower clock multiplier
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (12 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
80% smaller L2 cache
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
16.7% larger process node
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
66.7% smaller L1 cache
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (128 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
50% less L2 per core
Intel Core M7 6y75 has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
50% smaller L3 cache
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
Less advanced microarchitecture
Intel Core M7 6y75 uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Skylake vs Kaby Lake).
Older DDR support
Intel Core M7 6y75 supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
34.9% lower memory bandwidth
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (29.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
6 fewer PCIe lanes
Intel Core M7 6y75 has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (10 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
36.4% lower memory speed
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (1,866 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
75% less memory capacity
Intel Core M7 6y75 has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
Limited PCIe bifurcation
Intel Core M7 6y75 supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x4, x2/x2, x2/x1/x1, x1/x1/x1/x1 vs x16, x8/x8).
Narrower media codec support
Intel Core M7 6y75 supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode), VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
Inferior integrated GPU
Intel Core M7 6y75 uses an inferior integrated GPU to the average processor (Intel HD Graphics 515 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
45.9% weaker single-core performance
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,343 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,343 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.1,343 vs 2,483
27.9% lower boost clock
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.3.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Core M7 6y75 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
Intel Core M7 6y75 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.2 vs 6
43.8% lower single-core score
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (826 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (826 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.826 vs 1,471
77.7% lower PassMark score
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2,346 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2,346 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.2,346 vs 10,532.5
68.2% lower multi-core score
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,524 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,524 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.1,524 vs 4,793
80% smaller L2 cache
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=6 MB
Intel Core M7 6y75 has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB
Older DDR support
Intel Core M7 6y75 supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: DDR5
Intel Core M7 6y75 supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).DDR3 vs DDR4

Graphic comparison of Intel Core M7 6y75 and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core M7 6y75?

Extremely low power consumption (4.5W TDP), making it ideal for fanless, silent devices
Capable of handling everyday productivity tasks like office work, web browsing, and student research smoothly
Surprising performance in short bursts, sometimes beating older 15W dual-core i7 chips in synthetic benchmarks
Support for business-oriented features like Intel vPro technology
Allows for very thin and portable device designs like the 12-inch MacBook or Dell Latitude 13

What customers dislike about Intel Core M7 6y75?

Performance drops significantly under continuous full load due to thermal throttling in fanless designs
Struggles with resource-intensive tasks like high-resolution video rendering and professional photo editing in Photoshop/Lightroom
Integrated graphics (HD 515) are weak, only capable of running older or very simple games at low settings
High initial cost compared to more powerful U-series processors, leading to poor value-for-money for some users
Outdated by modern standards, with significantly better efficiency and performance found in newer budget chips

Expert reviews

techradar.com

20/05/2016

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 review - TechRadar

The Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 acts as a value-focused 2-in-1 hybrid, delivering a premium metal design with a "watchband" hinge and including the keyboard and stylus, unlike rivals such as the Surface Pro. It offers solid, silent performance for general productivity with its Intel Core m-series processors and a high-resolution 12-inch display, though it falls short in heavy-duty tasks...Read more

techradar.com

30/11/2016

Hands on: HP EliteBook 1030 review - TechRadar

The TechRadar review of the HP EliteBook 1030 spotlights a premium, fanless, and durable all-metal, 13.3-inch business laptop designed for silent, portable use. It features an edge-to-edge display with minimal bezels and a compact footprint. Performance is driven by Intel Core M processors, offering surprising speed for productivity tasks alongside a high-quality, backlit,...Read more

techradar.com

23/12/2015

HP Spectre x2 (2015) review - TechRadar

USB-C ports, yet the audio from the quad-speaker setup is noted as flat. Key drawbacks include inconsistent, moderate battery life (four to eight hours) and a finicky trackpad that often registers accidental clicks. While the fanless design allows for silent operation, the stylus experience suffers from noticeable lag compared to competitors. Despite these limitations, the device is...Read more

techradar.com

11/01/2016

Acer Aspire Switch 11 V review - TechRadar

The Acer Aspire Switch 11 V is a budget-focused 2-in-1 featuring a highly functional, utilitarian design with a durable magnetic hinge for easy transitions, according to TechRadar. Its 1080p IPS display is a highlight, offering high brightness and wide viewing angles, though it struggles with glare. Key pros include an excellent keyboard and responsive trackpad, while a significant...Read more

techradar.com

15/11/2016

HP EliteBook Folio G1 review - TechRadar

The HP EliteBook Folio G1 is an ultraportable business laptop featuring a sleek, fanless aluminum chassis designed for high portability. Key pros include a superior, comfortable keyboard and dual USB-C ports with Thunderbolt 3 support, offering better connectivity than its 12-inch MacBook rival. However, performance is limited by Intel Core M-series processors, which handle everyday...Read more

digitaltrends.com

23/08/2019

Dell Latitude 12 7000 Series 2-in-1 review - Digital Trends

The Digital Trends review of the Dell Latitude 12 7000 Series (7275) highlights a shift toward a modern, high-end 2-in-1 design, featuring a thin, 0.32-inch tablet profile, a unique herringbone fabric folio, and a capable Core m7 processor. Key strengths include a brilliant 12.5-inch 1080p display, a superior, tactile keyboard, two USB-C Thunderbolt 3 ports, and a completely...Read more

hardwareluxx.de

19/08/2016

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Review - Hardwareluxx

The Hardwareluxx review highlights the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet (1st Gen) as a modular, business-oriented 2-in-1, featuring a fanless design for silent operation and durable "milspec" construction with a magnesium frame. Key advantages include an excellent detachable keyboard with the iconic TrackPoint, a sharp 12-inch 2160x1440 IPS display, and unique optional modules for enhanced...Read more

hardwareluxx.de

09/07/2016

Lenovo Yoga 900S 12ISK Review - Hardwareluxx

The Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK is recognized for its outstanding build quality, ultra-portable 999g design, and the iconic watchband hinge that enables smooth 360-degree transitions, notes Hardwareluxx. The fanless, silent-operating device boasts a premium carbon fiber chassis and an Intel Core m7-6Y75 processor with a fast NVMe SSD, significantly improving upon its predecessor. While...Read more

macg.co

10/05/2016

Review of the Early 2016 12" MacBook Core m7 (1.3 GHz)

The 2016 12-inch MacBook, configured with an Intel Core m7 processor, delivers a notable 15–20% CPU performance boost over its predecessor through "Skylake" architecture while remaining a silent, fanless device. This high-end iteration excels in portability, featuring a lightweight 0.9 kg design, a high-resolution Retina display, and improved battery life for mobile productivity,...Read more

laptopmedia.com

01/01/2016

Intel Core m7-6Y75 | LaptopMedia.com

The Intel Core m7-6Y75 is a 14nm Skylake-based, dual-core processor designed for fanless, passively cooled ultrabooks and 2-in-1 devices, characterized by a very low 4.5W TDP. While offering strong burst performance that can outperform older 15W chips in short tasks, the processor suffers from significant thermal throttling under sustained loads. Proved by its extreme energy...Read more

tweakers.net

05/09/2015

Lenovo Miix 700 Preview - Tweakers

The Lenovo Miix 700 is a 12-inch, 2160x1440 resolution Windows tablet designed as a direct competitor to the Surface Pro 3, featuring a distinct "watchband" kickstand hinge and including a keyboard cover and stylus for better value. Performance is quiet due to a fanless Core m processor, and connectivity is better than its rival with two USB ports. However, the device suffers from...Read more

tweakers.net

15/06/2016

Dell Latitude 7370-J56MR - Bicycle Bell - Product reviews - Tweakers

The Dell Latitude 7370 J56MR is a premium 13.3-inch business ultrabook featuring a fanless design and a signature InfinityEdge display in a lightweight (1.12kg) carbon fiber chassis. Key pros include excellent portability, a high-quality tactile keyboard, and dual Thunderbolt 3 ports. However, significant cons involve lower performance from the Intel Core m5 processor compared to...Read more

tweakers.net

17/01/2017

Acer Swift 7 Review

The Acer Swift 7 (2016) review from Tweakers highlights a laptop that prioritises extreme portability, featuring a 9.98mm thick, 1.1kg chassis with a fanless, silent design. Key advantages include a premium, black-and-gold aluminium body and a high-quality 13.3-inch Full HD IPS screen. However, the ultra-slim design necessitates compromises, resulting in low-power performance from...Read more

tweakers.net

09/05/2016

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Review - Tweakers

The Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 is presented as a cost-effective alternative to the Surface Pro 4, featuring a 2-in-1 design with a durable watchband hinge and an included keyboard cover. Its fanless Core m processor ensures silent operation and, combined with a sharp 12-inch 2160x1440 display, makes it a capable device for general productivity. However, the performance is limited under...Read more

techpulse.be

18/04/2016

HP Elite x2 Review: An Aluminium Surface Rival

The HP Spectre x2 is a premium 2-in-1 Windows tablet featuring a high-end, dark aluminum design with a functional U-shaped kickstand that tilts to 165 degrees. It boasts a high-resolution, bright 12.3-inch "3K2K" display and offers superior value by including the backlit keyboard cover and active pen in the box. Performance is driven by 7th-generation Intel Core i5 or i7 processors,...Read more

techzine.nl

22/01/2016

HP Spectre x2 Review (Model 12-a030nd with m7-6Y75)

The HP Spectre x2 12-a005nd is a premium, fanless 2-in-1 designed to compete with the Surface Pro, offering a high-end aluminum chassis and a value-driven bundle that includes both a detachable backlit keyboard and an active stylus. The device features a 12-inch, 1920 x 1280 (3:2) IPS display and includes dual USB-C ports alongside built-in LTE capabilities, making it a highly...Read more

notebookcheck.nl

08/06/2016

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Review

The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet (1st Gen) is a premium 2-in-1 designed for business, featuring a modular design that allows for specialized modules to expand battery and add functionality like a projector, though its core performance is limited to office tasks due to fanless Intel Core m processors. Key strengths include a high-resolution 12-inch IPS display, a quality keyboard with a...Read more

Intel Core M7 6y75 Review | 78 Data compared

Best prices in UK

Best prices in US

Best rankings

Verdict

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core M7 6y75

Intel Core M7 6y75 vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core M7 6y75 better than the average processor?

Why is Intel Core M7 6y75 worse than the average processor?

Graphic comparison of Intel Core M7 6y75 and other processors

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core M7 6y75?

What customers dislike about Intel Core M7 6y75?

Expert reviews

Best alternatives

Compare Intel Core M7 6y75 with other processors