OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Processors Methodology v3.0
Processors Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Processors Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Processors Methodology v3.0

Intel Core 5 211TE review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£170PassMark multi-core score:11685N. of physical cores:10CPU boost clock speed:4.8 GHzCPU socket:LGA1700TDP (Thermal design power):45 W

Intel Core 5 211TE Review: Compare 74 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

40%

7.3

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 71% of processors
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–²Better than 86%
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components

60%

7.0

Performance

18%

7.9

Architecture

10%

7.8

Memory & PCIe

7%

6.5

Power & Thermal

4%

8.4

Platform

1%

8.0

Integrated graphics

â–²Better than 74%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £170
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
    Loading category ranking...

    Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core 5 211TE

    Technical score
    Technical score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
    Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
    Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Score components:

    60%

    7.0

    Performance

    18%

    7.9

    Architecture

    10%

    7.8

    Memory & PCIe

    7%

    6.5

    Power & Thermal

    4%

    8.4

    Platform

    1%

    8.0

    Integrated graphics

    7.3
    Reviews score
    7.2
    List score
    ?
    Value for money
    Value for money
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
    When it matters
    When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Score components:

    70%

    7.3

    Overall score

    30%

    9.6

    Price

    8.0
    Processor type
    embedded
    This processor belongs to the embedded processor class, which is less advanced than that of 93.1% of processors and equal to that of 6.9% of processors.
    CPU socket
    LGA1700
    This processor uses the LGA1700 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 84.5% of processors and equal to that of 8.4% of processors.
    Chipset
    H610, Q670, W680, R680E, Q670E, H610E
    This processor supports H610, Q670, W680, R680E, Q670E, H610E chipsets, which is broader compatibility than 83.5% of processors and equal to that of 0.9% of processors.
    CPU architecture
    x86-64
    This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.8% of processors and equal to that of 98.2% of processors.
    Instruction sets
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
    This processor supports SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 instruction sets, which is narrower support than 88.2% of processors and equal to that of 9.7% of processors.
    Show more
    N. of physical cores
    10
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This processor has 10 CPU cores, which is more than 75.2% of processors and equal to 4.6% of processors.
    CPU threads
    16
    Market range: <4 – >24
    This processor offers 16 CPU threads, which is more than 69% of processors and equal to 14.6% of processors.
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.8 GHz
    Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
    This processor reaches a boost clock of 4.8 GHz which is higher than that of 69.2% of processors and equal to that of 4.4% of processors.
    CPU base clock speed
    6x 1.7 GHz & 4x 1.3 GHz
    This processor has a base clock of 6x1.7 GHz & 4x1.3 GHz which is higher than that of 54.2% of processors.
    PassMark multi-core score
    11,685
    Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
    This processor scores 11,685 in PassMark, which is higher than 50.5% of processors.
    Show more
    Semiconductor size
    10 nm
    Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
    This processor uses a 10 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 50.8% of processors and equal to that of 19.5% of processors.
    Foundry
    Intel 7
    This processor is built on the Intel 7 foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 64.8% of processors and equal to that of 15.7% of processors.
    L3 cache
    20 MB
    Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
    This processor has an L3 cache of 20 MB which is larger than that of 78.1% of processors and equal to that of 1.7% of processors.
    L2 cache
    9.5 MB
    Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
    This processor has an L2 cache of 9.5 MB which is larger than that of 77.2% of processors and equal to that of 1.7% of processors.
    L1 cache
    ?
    Show more
    DDR memory version
    DDR4/DDR5
    This processor supports DDR DDR4/DDR5, which is newer than that of 77.1% of processors and equal to that of 10.7% of processors.
    Maximum memory speed
    4,800 MHz
    Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
    This processor supports memory speeds up to 4,800 MHz, which is higher than that of 64.6% of processors and equal to 6% of processors.
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    ?
    Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
    N/A
    Maximum memory capacity
    192 GB
    Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
    This processor supports up to 192 GB of memory, which is more than 82.2% of processors and equal to 6.8% of processors.
    Show more
    Integrated graphics
    yes
    This processor includes integrated graphics. 14.7% of processors offer this.
    Intel UHD Graphics 730
    Integrated GPU model
    ?
    Integrated GPU execution units
    24
    Market range: <6 – >64
    This processor has 24 GPU execution units, which is more than 49.1% of processors and equal to 20.8% of processors.
    Integrated GPU base frequency
    300 MHz
    Market range: <300 MHz – >800 MHz
    This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 300 MHz which is lower than that of 57.8% of processors and equal to that of 38.4% of processors.
    Integrated media encoders/decoders
    H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), VP8 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode
    Show more
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    45 W
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a TDP of 45 W which is lower than that of 41.9% of processors and equal to that of 10.8% of processors.
    Base power (PL1)
    45 W
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a base power of 45 W which is lower than that of 41.9% of processors and equal to that of 11% of processors.
    Boost power (PL2)
    121 W
    Market range: <25 W – >150 W
    This processor has a boost power of 121 W which is higher than that of 76.5% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
    Tau (power duration limit)
    28 seconds
    Market range: <8 seconds – >28 seconds
    This processor has a turbo duration of 28 seconds which is longer than that of 4.4% of processors and equal to that of 85.3% of processors.
    Configurable TDP
    ?
    Show more

    Intel Core 5 211TE vs the average processor

    246810TotalPlatformPerformanceArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated graphicsPower & Thermal
    • More advanced microarchitecture
      This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Bartlett Lake vs Kaby Lake).
      Bartlett Lake vs Kaby Lake
    • 44.5% better single-core performance
      This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,697 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
      3,697 vs 2,558
    • 8 more CPU threads
      This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
      16 vs 8
    • 4 more CPU cores
      This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (10 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
      10 vs 6
    • Newer PCIe version
      This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (5 vs 3).
      5 vs 3
    • 2.5x more L2 per core
      This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
      E-core cluster: 2 MB shared
      1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
    • 3.17x larger L2 cache
      This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (9.5 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
      9.5 MB vs 3 MB
    • 3x more memory capacity
      This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (192 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
      192 GB vs 64 GB
    • 9.8% better value for money
      Intel Core 5 211TE has better value for money than the average processor (8 vs 7.3).
      8 vs 7.29
    • Modern CPU socket
      This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA1700 vs FP5).
      LGA1700 vs FP5
    • 5 years newer release date
      This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2025 vs 2020).
      2025 vs 2020
    • Supports heterogeneous scheduling
      This processor uses heterogeneous multi-processing, while the average processor does not. 24.8% of processors use it.
    • 44.5% better single-core performance
      This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,697 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
      3,697 vs 2,558
    • 8 more CPU threads
      This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
      16 vs 8
    • 4 more CPU cores
      This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (10 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
      10 vs 6
    • 9.1% higher boost clock
      This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
      4.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
    • More advanced microarchitecture
      This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Bartlett Lake vs Kaby Lake).
      Bartlett Lake vs Kaby Lake
    • 2.5x more L2 per core
      This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
      E-core cluster: 2 MB shared
      1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
    • 3.17x larger L2 cache
      This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (9.5 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
      9.5 MB vs 3 MB
    • Mixed big and small cores
      This processor uses a big.LITTLE design, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors use one.
      P-cores + E-cores
    • More advanced foundry
      This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm).
      Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm
    • 2.22x larger L3 cache
      This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (20 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
      20 MB vs 9 MB
    • 8.1% more L3 per core
      This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
      2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
    • Newer PCIe version
      This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (5 vs 3).
      5 vs 3
    • 3x more memory capacity
      This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (192 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
      192 GB vs 64 GB
    • Newer DDR support
      This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/DDR5 vs DDR4).
      DDR4/DDR5 vs DDR4
    • 4 more PCIe lanes
      This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (20 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
      20 vs 16
    • Supports ECC memory
      This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.
    • 50% higher memory speed
      This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (4,800 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
      4,800 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
    • Narrower instruction support
      This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
      SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
    • Narrower media codec support
      This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), VP8 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
      H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), VP8 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
    • 89.1% higher boost power
      This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (121 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
      121 W vs 64 W
    • Limited PCIe bifurcation
      This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
      x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
    • Narrower instruction support
      This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
      SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
    • Limited PCIe bifurcation
      This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
      x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
    • Narrower media codec support
      This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), VP8 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
      H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), VP8 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
    • 89.1% higher boost power
      This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (121 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
      121 W vs 64 W

    Third-party reviews

    What customers like about Intel Core 5 211TE

    • High core and thread count (10 cores, 16 threads) for efficient multitasking in its class
    • Support for modern DDR5 memory with speeds up to 5600 MHz
    • Features PCIe 5.0 support, providing high-speed bandwidth for newer SSDs and GPUs
    • Includes ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory support, making it suitable for professional or server-like reliability
    • Relatively large 20 MB L3 cache compared to similar entry-level processors
    • Support for a large maximum memory capacity of up to 192 GB

    What customers don't like about Intel Core 5 211TE

    • Low base clock speeds (1.7 GHz Performance-cores / 1.3 GHz Efficient-cores)
    • Weak single-thread performance compared to competitors and older high-clocked i5 models
    • Locked multiplier prevents easy overclocking for performance boosts
    • Integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730) are relatively weak with only 24 execution units
    • Market positioning shift; critics view the 'Core 5' branding as representing entry-level rather than mid-range performance
    • Higher 45W TDP compared to more power-efficient mobile chips in the same family

    Verdict

    The Intel Core 5 211TE is a 10-core embedded processor from the Series 2 lineup (launched Q1'25), featuring 6 Performance-cores and 4 Efficient-cores with a total of 16 threads and a 20 MB Smart Cache. It operates at a base power of 45W, reaching a max turbo frequency of 4.8 GHz, and supports up to 192 GB of DDR5-4800 or DDR4-3200 memory with ECC support and PCIe 5.0/4.0 connectivity. Key pros include high multitasking efficiency for its power class and modern feature support like Intel UHD Graphics 730 and deep learning acceleration. However, it lacks support for Intel Adaptive Boost Technology, has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and generally shows lower single-thread performance compared to its higher-tier '221TE' counterpart.

    Compare Intel Core 5 211TE with other processors

    1Product to compare no. 1
    VS
    2Product to compare no. 2
    VS
    3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

    Graphic comparison of Intel Core 5 211TE and other processors

    No results found