OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Intel Celeron 1000M Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£70
Avg. price in US: ~$90
PassMark benchmark result: 1062
N. of physical cores: 2
CPU boost clock speed: N/A GHz

Intel Celeron 1000M review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

3.5

Poor

3.5

Poor

?

0.8
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
1.0
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
1.0
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
0.0
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
1.3
L3 cache
8.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
1.0
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
1.0
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
20.0%
1.0
CPU threads
15.0%
1.3
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £70

Best rankings

#602 in Best Mobile CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Celeron 1000M is an entry-level mobile dual-core processor released in Q1 2013, based on the 22nm Ivy Bridge architecture. It features a base frequency of 1.80 GHz, 2 MB of Intel Smart Cache, and a 35W Thermal Design Power (TDP) compatible with the FCPGA988 socket. Key advantages include its efficient performance for basic office tasks and web browsing, support for up to 32 GB of DDR3/L 1600 memory, and integrated Intel HD Graphics (650-1000 MHz). However, it faces significant limitations due to the absence of advanced features such as Intel Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, and AES-NI, making it unsuitable for demanding multitasking or modern gaming.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Celeron 1000M

Overall score

3.5

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

6.8

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

2.8

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

N/A

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

3.8

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

3.4

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

8.6

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

?

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

?

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Power & Thermal

5.9

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

?

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Intel Celeron 1000M vs the average processor

Why is Intel Celeron 1000M better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

33.7% smaller die size
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower die size than the average processor (118 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
What it is: The physical area of the processor die, usually measured in square millimeters.
When it matters: When you are comparing chip scale, packaging density, or broader design differences rather than direct user-visible performance.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <150 mm²
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower die size than the average processor (118 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².118 mm² vs 178 mm²
5 °C higher TJ Max
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=100 °C
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.105 °C vs 100 °C
45.3% lower boost power
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <50 W
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.35 W vs 64 W
3.57x cheaper
Intel Celeron 1000M is cheaper than the average processor (£70 vs £250).
Intel Celeron 1000M is cheaper than the average processor (£70 vs £250).£70 vs £250
22.2% lower base power
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower base power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower base power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.35 W vs 45 W
85.7% higher GPU clock speed
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (650 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.
When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=350 MHz
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (650 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.650 MHz vs 350 MHz
33.7% smaller die size
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower die size than the average processor (118 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
85.7% higher GPU clock speed
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (650 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
5 °C higher TJ Max
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
45.3% lower boost power
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
22.2% lower base power
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower base power draw than the average processor (35 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Why is Intel Celeron 1000M worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Narrower instruction support
Intel Celeron 1000M supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
7 year/s older release date
Intel Celeron 1000M has an older release date than the average processor (2,013 vs 2,020).
January 2013
61% weaker single-core performance
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (968 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
79.7% lower single-core score
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (298 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Celeron 1000M has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
93.8% lower multi-core score
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (299 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
89.9% lower PassMark score
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (1,062 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
6 fewer CPU threads
Intel Celeron 1000M has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
No multithreading support
Intel Celeron 1000M does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
37.5% lower bus transfer rate
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
1 fewer threads per core
Intel Celeron 1000M has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
37.5% lower bus speed
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower bus speed than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
No Turbo Boost
Intel Celeron 1000M does not support Turbo Boost, the average processor does.
10 lower clock multiplier
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (18 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
83.3% larger process node
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
41.7% less L3 per core
Intel Celeron 1000M has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
80% smaller L2 cache
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
75% smaller L3 cache
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
66.7% smaller L1 cache
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (128 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
50% less L2 per core
Intel Celeron 1000M has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
Less advanced microarchitecture
Intel Celeron 1000M uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Ivy Bridge vs Kaby Lake).
71.7% fewer transistors
Intel Celeron 1000M has fewer transistors than the average processor (1.4 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
Less advanced foundry
Intel Celeron 1000M uses a less advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 22 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
Older DDR support
Intel Celeron 1000M supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
44.1% lower memory bandwidth
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (25.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
45.4% lower memory speed
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (1,600 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
Older PCIe version
Intel Celeron 1000M supports an older PCIe version than the average processor (2 vs 3.0).
50% less memory capacity
Intel Celeron 1000M has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
No configurable TDP
Intel Celeron 1000M does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
5 °C higher CPU temperature
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher CPU temperature than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
61% weaker single-core performance
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (968 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (968 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.968 vs 2,483
79.7% lower single-core score
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (298 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (298 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.298 vs 1,471
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Celeron 1000M has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
Intel Celeron 1000M has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.2 vs 6
93.8% lower multi-core score
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (299 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (299 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.299 vs 4,793
89.9% lower PassMark score
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (1,062 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
Intel Celeron 1000M has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (1,062 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.1,062 vs 10,532.5
83.3% larger process node
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <10 nm
Intel Celeron 1000M has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.22 nm vs 12 nm
Narrower instruction support
Intel Celeron 1000M supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
What it is: The supported CPU instruction sets and extensions.
When it matters: When you run software that depends on specific CPU instructions.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel Celeron 1000M supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).SSE4.1, SSE4.2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
41.7% less L3 per core
Intel Celeron 1000M has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
What it is: The amount of L3 cache effectively available per CPU core.
When it matters: When you are comparing how much shared cache each core can draw on in deeper technical analysis.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=2 MB/core
Intel Celeron 1000M has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of Intel Celeron 1000M and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Celeron 1000M?

Cost-effective for budget-conscious users and students
Energy efficient with low power consumption (35W TDP)
Consistent performance under light, real-world conditions
Adequate for basic tasks like web browsing, email, and word processing
Lower heat output, often allowing for quieter laptop operation
Reliable and stable for simple office productivity

What customers dislike about Intel Celeron 1000M?

Weak multitasking due to having only 2 cores and 2 threads
Lacks advanced features like Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading
Poor gaming performance; struggles with even older 3D titles
Insufficient for heavy workloads like video editing or CAD
Slow system responsiveness when running modern, background-heavy OS like Windows 10
Small cache size (2MB L3) limits data processing speed
Obsolete by modern standards, struggling with complex web applications

Expert reviews

cpu-world.com

21/05/2025

Intel Celeron 1000M Mobile processor - AW8063801120200

The Intel Celeron 1000M is a 22nm Ivy Bridge mobile processor from early 2013, operating at a fixed 1.8 GHz with 2 MB L3 cache and a 35W TDP. Pros include efficient memory management supporting DDR3-1600, while cons include the lack of Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, and AES-NI, along with a high TDP for its performance class. The 1000M is suitable only for basic tasks and offers an...Read more

browser.geekbench.com

30/03/2026

Intel Celeron 1000M Benchmarks - Geekbench Browser

The Intel Celeron 1000M is a 2013 Ivy Bridge-based dual-core budget laptop processor with a fixed 1.8 GHz clock speed. Benchmarks show very low performance, with typical multi-core scores around 298, reflecting its position at the bottom of the Ivy Bridge charts. Key features include integrated Intel HD Graphics and support for 32GB of DDR3-1600 RAM. Pros include improved 22nm...Read more

cpubenchmark.net

29/03/2026

Intel Celeron 1000M @ 1.80GHz - CPU Benchmarks

The Intel Celeron 1000M is a 2013-era Ivy Bridge, 1.80 GHz dual-core mobile processor designed for budget laptops, featuring integrated HD Graphics with a 35W TDP. While suitable for basic tasks, web browsing, and 1080p media, it is hindered by a lack of Hyper-threading and Turbo Boost. Ranking near the bottom of laptop CPU benchmarks, it struggles with modern applications, though...Read more

hardwareluxx.de

16/02/2014

The most efficient systems (<30W idle)

The Hardwareluxx forum discussion highlights the Fujitsu D3517 motherboard paired with a Xeon E3-1245v6 processor as a premier, cost-effective choice for ultra-low-power, idle-focused systems, with reported idle draws of only 2–3 Watts. Proponents praise the "industrial" build quality and high efficiency of these used,, often warrantied, workstation components. Challenges noted in...Read more

forum.tomshw.it

10/07/2013

OFFICIAL - Toshiba Satellite C850-1G3 Review

The Toshiba Satellite C850-1G3 is a budget-friendly laptop featuring an Intel Celeron 1000M processor, suited for basic everyday tasks, and a textured, fingerprint-resistant matte finish. While it boasts decent connectivity including USB 3.0 and a comfortable full-size keyboard, the device is limited by a "plasticky" build, imprecise touchpad, and sluggish performance with...Read more

tomshw.it

21/01/2013

Pentium, Celeron and beyond: Intel Ivy Bridge at full throttle

The Tom’s Hardware Italy review details the expansion of Intel's 22nm Ivy Bridge architecture into budget-friendly Pentium (e.g., G2020) and Celeron (e.g., G1610) lines, bringing improved energy efficiency and performance-per-clock to entry-level computing. Key advantages include faster DDR3-1333 memory support and improved integrated graphics with Quick Sync for enhanced multimedia...Read more

tweakers.net

01/10/2013

Laptop Best Buy Guide: October 2013

a little longer The October 2013 Tweakers Laptop Best Buy Guide recommends the Lenovo Essential G500s (~€400) for budget users, praising its strong price-to-performance ratio with an i3-3120M processor, while noting poor screen quality and mediocre build as key cons. The €700 mainstream choice is the Samsung Series 4 450R5E-X02, valued for its dedicated Nvidia GPU and matte screen,...Read more

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare Intel Celeron 1000M with other processors

Compare