OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£750
Avg. price in US: ~$630
PassMark benchmark result: 29489
N. of physical cores: 16
CPU boost clock speed: 4.4 GHz

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

6.2

Good

5.8

Good

9.6

Exceptional

4.7
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
4.0
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
3.5
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
5.8
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
5.5
L3 cache
8.0%
6.7
N. of physical cores
6.1
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
4.2
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
6.7
N. of physical cores
20.0%
10
CPU threads
15.0%
5.5
L3 cache

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

#35 in Best Workstation CPUs

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a high-end desktop (HEDT) processor based on the 12nm Zen+ architecture, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads with a 3.5GHz base clock and a 4.4GHz max boost. It is designed for the sTR4 socket on the X399 platform, offering 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes, quad-channel DDR4-2933 memory support, and a combined 40MB of L2 and L3 cache within a 180W TDP. Main characteristics include its massive multitasking capabilities and professional-grade I/O, while its primary pros are exceptional multi-threaded performance for 4K video editing, 3D rendering, and strong value compared to rival 16-core chips. However, cons include high power consumption under load, the lack of an included thermal solution, and lower single-threaded efficiency compared to contemporary mainstream gaming CPUs.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Overall score

6.2

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.5

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

5.7

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

5.6

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

7.7

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

?

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

3.4

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

?

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

3.4

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

?

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

24 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 16+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.32 vs 8
10 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.16 vs 6
2.52x better multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,003 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.
When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4700
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,003 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.7,003 vs 2,783
48 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (64 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.
When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=20
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (64 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.64 vs 16
2.8x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (29,489 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (29,489 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.29,489 vs 10,532.5
Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
What it is: Has an unlocked CPU multiplier, which makes manual CPU overclocking much easier on supported platforms.
When it matters: When you plan to push clock speeds beyond stock settings instead of leaving the processor completely at default behavior.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
4x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=16 MB
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.32 MB vs 8 MB
2.05x higher memory bandwidth
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (93.9 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
What it is: The maximum theoretical memory bandwidth the processor can support.
When it matters: When memory-heavy workloads matter to you.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >75 GB/s
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (93.9 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.93.9 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
Higher-end processor class
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X belongs to a higher-end processor class than the average processor (workstation vs mobile).
Advanced security extensions
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, SME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
Includes crypto acceleration
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
Modern CPU socket
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (sTR4 vs FP2).
24 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more CPU threads than the average processor (32 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
10 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more CPU cores than the average processor (16 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
2.52x better multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (7,003 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
2.8x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (29,489 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not.
76.6% higher multi-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (8,463 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
4x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
3.2x larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
4x larger L1 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (1,536 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
16.7% more L3 per core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
More advanced foundry
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (GlobalFoundries 12 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
48 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (64 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
2.05x higher memory bandwidth
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (93.9 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
Supports memory overclocking
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not.
2x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
Supports ECC memory
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports ECC memory, the average processor does not.
32 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Why is AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

2 year/s older release date
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an older release date than the average processor (2018 vs 2020).
August 2018
Older TPM support
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
54.5% slower classroom rendering
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (360.4 vs 791.745). The average processor needs 791.745 for the Blender Classroom test.
14.8% lower single-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,254 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
7.2% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (449 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Colfax vs Kaby Lake).
2 fewer memory channels
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has fewer memory channels than the average processor (4 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
Limited PCIe bifurcation
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x4/x4/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8).
No integrated graphics
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does.
4x higher base power
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
4x higher TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher TDP than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
32 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
No configurable TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Colfax vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Colfax vs Kaby Lake).Colfax vs Kaby Lake
4x higher base power
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.180 W vs 45 W
54.5% slower classroom rendering
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (360.4 vs 791.745). The average processor needs 791.745 for the Blender Classroom test.
What it is: A Blender render result based on the Classroom scene, used to show how quickly the processor can complete a demanding rendering workload.
When it matters: When rendering speed matters for 3D work, content creation, or other workloads that behave like long multi-core renders.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1500
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (360.4 vs 791.745). The average processor needs 791.745 for the Blender Classroom test.360.4 vs 791.745
4x higher TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher TDP than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a higher TDP than the average processor (180 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.180 W vs 45 W
32 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=100 °C
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (68 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.68 °C vs 100 °C
14.8% lower single-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,254 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,254 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.1,254 vs 1,471
No configurable TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
3x more expensive
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is more expensive than the average processor (£750 vs £250).
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is more expensive than the average processor (£750 vs £250).£750 vs £250

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

Exceptional multi-threaded performance for rendering, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
Significant value compared to Intel's HEDT rivals like the Core i9-7960X and i9-7980XE.
Improved Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 provide better clock speeds and latency than the 1950X.
Massive connectivity with 64 PCIe Gen 3.0 lanes and quad-channel memory support.
Better balanced for mixed workloads (gaming and productivity) than the 32-core 2990WX.
Unlocked multiplier allows for substantial all-core overclocking headroom with proper cooling.

What customers dislike about AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

High power consumption and thermal output requiring a high-end liquid cooling solution.
Single-core gaming performance still lags behind mainstream flagship CPUs like the i7-8700K.
Total platform cost is high when factoring in expensive X399 motherboards and quad-channel RAM.
Performance is highly sensitive to memory speeds and timings.
Does not include a CPU cooler in the box.
Diminishing returns for users who only perform basic desktop tasks or pure gaming.

Expert reviews

extremetech.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review: Pulverizing Intel's Core i9-7900X

The ExtremeTech review declares the 16-core AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X a dominant, better-valued alternative to Intel’s Core i9-7900X, winning most workstation benchmarks at a lower price point. Pros include improved Precision Boost 2/XFR 2 technologies for better frequency scaling and 64 PCIe lanes, making it ideal for high-end professional workstations. However, cons include a high 180W TDP necessitating robust cooling, lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel, and a lack of native Thunderbolt 3 on the X399 platform. For more details, visit ExtremeTech.

hothardware.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD 2nd Gen Ryzen Threadripper 2950X And 2990WX Review

HotHardware reviews the 16-core Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and 32-core 2990WX, highlighting them as powerful, Zen+ based HEDT options that utilize Precision Boost 2 for improved performance. The 2950X is identified as an excellent all-rounder with strong value, though it lacks an included cooler and may not justify an upgrade for 1950X owners. Conversely, the 2990WX offers unmatched multi-threaded rendering performance but suffers from higher memory latency on two of its dies, resulting in poorer performance in light applications. Both CPUs, especially with Precision Boost Overdrive, are recommended for professionals and enthusiasts, albeit with high power consumption.

pcmag.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review - PCMag

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor offering a 6% multi-threaded performance boost over its predecessor with an aggressive $899 price point. It utilizes advanced Precision Boost 2 technology to optimize clock speeds based on thermal conditions, outperforming competitors in heavy rendering tasks. While excelling in content creation, the chip still trails Intel slightly in legacy applications and high-refresh 1080p gaming, requiring Ryzen Master for, in some cases, optimal performance. Key advantages include massive 64 PCIe lanes and backward compatibility with X399 motherboards, though it lacks native Thunderbolt 3 and does not include a cooler. Pros include exceptional value for workstation tasks, high core count, and improved efficiency, while cons involve high power consumption (180W TDP) and 1080p gaming performance lagging behind Intel alternatives.

techspot.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX & 2950X Review - TechSpot

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is identified as a versatile 16-core HEDT CPU, offering improved Precision Boost 2 performance over its predecessor with better power efficiency. Pros include high-end performance and value, though it offers only minor speed improvements over the 1950X. Conversely, the 32-core 2990WX excels in rendering, yet suffers from significant, inconsistent performance in memory-sensitive applications due to architectural bandwidth limitations. While the 2990WX provides superior, specialized multi-threaded performance, it requires extreme cooling and high-end power supplies for its immense power draw. The 2950X remains the superior all-around choice for most, while the 2990WX serves as a niche tool.

tomshardware.com

28/09/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review: Striking The Balance Would you like to compare the benchmarks from these reviews or see the specific motherboard...

The Tom's Hardware review highlights the second-gen Ryzen Threadripper series, with the 16-core 2950X serving as a balanced high-end desktop processor, while the 32-core 2990WX acts as a specialized, extreme-workload "compute monster". The 2950X boasts 12nm Zen+ architecture, 4.4 GHz boost clocks, and aggressive pricing as key pros, though it still lags behind pure gaming CPUs, say reviewers. Conversely, the 2990WX delivers unparalleled multi-threaded performance but suffers from memory access issues across its quad-die design, limiting performance in some applications. Both processors offer high value but require robust cooling, with the 2950X recommended for most enthusiasts over the specialized 2990WX.

guru3d.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X review - Guru 3d

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, reviewed by Guru3D, is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on 12nm Zen+ architecture, offering high-end productivity with improved clock speeds via Precision Boost 2. Pros include exceptional value-per-core, superior performance in rendering and video editing, and extensive connectivity with 64 PCIe lanes. Cons noted by Guru3D include lower gaming performance compared to mainstream alternatives and high power consumption when overclocked, requiring robust cooling.

pugetsystems.com

21/09/2018

Summary of the review

Are 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper CPUs good for video editing? AnandTech

Puget Systems concludes that 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper CPUs excel in video editing, with the 16-core 2950X offering superior balance over the 32-core 2990WX, which struggles due to software optimization limits. Pros include top-tier performance in Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and RED media workflows, alongside extensive PCIe lanes. Cons involve poor scaling of the 2990WX in motion graphics and slight, 5% lower live playback performance compared to Intel for non-RED media.

techgage.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 16-core 2950X & 32-core 2990WX Review

According to Techgage, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is a 32-core/64-thread workstation processor based on 12nm Zen+ architecture that dominates in rendering tasks. It offers exceptional multi-threaded performance in applications like Blender and POV-Ray, making it a "rendering monster" for professionals while maintaining compatibility with X399 motherboards. Pros include unmatched 3D rendering speeds and high value, but cons involve lower performance in memory-intensive apps and significant heat production, requiring robust cooling.

pcper.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and 2990WX Review

The PC Perspective review identifies the 16-core Ryzen Threadripper 2950X as a superior "all-arounder" for HEDT users, offering improved efficiency via the 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2, though gaming performance remains slightly below Intel's mainstream offerings. The 32-core Threadripper 2990WX is positioned as a specialized workstation "beast" that dominates in highly parallelized tasks like rendering, but suffers from high memory latency and severe performance regressions in unoptimized, bandwidth-intensive applications. Ultimately, the 2950X is recommended as the more balanced choice, while the 2990WX, despite its unmatched compute power, is deemed a niche, power-hungry product with "harsh edges" regarding software scaling and architectural complexity.

lowyat.net

20/12/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review: Successor To The First Beastly CPU

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, a 16-core, 32-thread 12nm processor, serves as a refined, high-performance successor to the 1950X, targeting prosumer content creators with 3.5GHz base and 4.4GHz boost clocks. Key strengths include consistent, non-throttling performance under load and excellent multithreaded capabilities that compete with more expensive rivals, all at a competitive launch price of RM3,899. However, the processor is highly power-hungry, drawing over 400 watts when overclocked, and generates extreme heat, while not being optimized for pure gaming performance compared to mainstream alternatives. Lowyat.NET

techradar.com

31/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X review - TechRadar

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, a 16-core, 32-thread processor using the Zen+ 12nm architecture, offers significant performance gains over its predecessor with a 4.4GHz boost clock and improved, lower voltage requirements. A major strength noted by TechRadar is its exceptional value at $899, providing competitive performance against much costlier 16 and 18-core Intel HEDT rivals. Designed for workstation productivity, the 2950X excels at handling intensive tasks like 4K streaming and video encoding while maintaining 64 PCIe lanes for superior connectivity. Furthermore, it supports existing TR4 motherboards via a BIOS update, offering a cost-effective upgrade path for users, a key advantage highlighted in the review. However, the processor exhibits increased power consumption and does not run cooler than previous models, marking a drawback in efficiency. While powerful, its gaming performance is not superior to cheaper mainstream chips, and the high total cost of the X399 ecosystem remains a significant barrier for new builds.

hexus.net

15/08/2018

Summary of the review

Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CPU - HEXUS.net

a little longer The HEXUS review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X praises the 16-core, 32-thread CPU as a significant 12nm improvement over the 1950X, delivering roughly 5% better performance via Precision Boost 2. At an $899 launch price, the 2950X offers superior value, outperforming the Intel Core i9-7900X in multi-threaded tasks, though it requires a robust, separate cooler for its 180W TDP. While memory latency is relatively high and single-thread performance lags behind Intel, the 2950X is deemed an ideal HEDT processor for creators needing high multi-core performance.

overclock3d.net

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Threadripper 2950X and 2990WX Review - Overclock 3D

The Overclock3D review highlights the AMD Threadripper 2950X and 2990WX as HEDT performance leaders, with the 32-core 2990WX doubling Intel i9-7980XE Cinebench scores and the 2950X offering improved, highly overclockable 16-core performance. Key advantages include unrivaled workstation rendering performance, efficient Precision Boost 2/XFR2 technology, and socket compatibility. However, the 2990WX shows inconsistent performance in non-threaded tasks and gaming due to memory access limitations, requiring substantial cooling solutions for both chips.

pcper.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and 2990WX Review

PC Perspective's review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and 2990WX highlights a split gaming performance scenario, where the 16-core 2950X excels as a high-performance all-rounder, while the 32-core 2990WX suffers from severe bottlenecks due to its massive 64-thread count. Pros include the 2950X’s strong, competitive frame rates and the inclusion of "Legacy Compatibility Mode" in Ryzen Master software, which allows the 2990WX to boost gaming performance by disabling inactive dies. However, the major cons involve significant, game-breaking performance hits and application crashes in titles like Far Cry 5 on the 2990WX, along with the requirement of a full system reboot to toggle between productivity and gaming modes. Copy

tomshardware.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen Threadripper 2 (2990WX and 2950X) Review: AMD ...

According to Tom's Hardware, the 32-core Threadripper 2990WX delivers unparalleled, record-setting rendering performance but suffers from inconsistent results in memory-sensitive, non-optimized applications. While offering unmatched multi-threaded horsepower and 64 threads, its cons include high power consumption and limited performance in specific tasks. Conversely, the 16-core 2950X is identified as the better-balanced option for enthusiasts, providing significantly improved Zen+ performance, higher clocks, and excellent PBO scaling over its predecessor. Pros for the 2950X include a reasonable $899 MSRP and excellent all-around productivity, while primary cons involve high platform costs and higher power draw than mainsteam alternatives. Ultimately, the review recommends the 2990WX for specialized, workstation-bound rendering, while favoring the 2950X for superior versatility and value in the HEDT market.

chip.de

20/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review - CHIP

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a 16-core, 12nm Zen+ HEDT processor offering significant, energy-efficient performance gains over its predecessor, utilizing Precision Boost 2 for optimal clock speeds. It excels in workstation tasks like rendering and video editing, boasting 64 PCIe lanes for extensive connectivity, all while providing strong value against Intel competitors. While not ideal for pure gaming, the 180W TDP processor requires heavy-duty cooling, which is not included in the box.

hardware-journal.de

22/11/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, reviewed by Hardware-Journal, leverages the Zen+ 12nm architecture to provide 16 cores and 32 threads with improved clock speeds. This 180W TDP processor offers superior memory latency and performance over its predecessor, targeting a mix of workstation and high-end desktop users. Key strengths include exceptional multi-threaded performance in rendering and transcoding, along with 64 PCIe lanes for extensive expansion. Pros highlight the 2950X's improved value proposition, better thermal management via Indium soldering, and compatibility with existing X399 motherboards. However, the review notes that while improved, it remains a niche product for gamers compared to mainstream CPUs, and requires substantial cooling solutions, which are not included. Optimal performance is also heavily reliant on fast quad-channel memory configuration. For the full, detailed review, visit Hardware-Journal.

heise.de

05/09/2018

Summary of the review

High-end AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and 2950X processors

The Heise review of second-generation AMD Ryzen Threadripper CPUs highlights a major shift in the high-end desktop market, with the 32-core 2990WX designed for professional rendering workloads and the 16-core 2950X positioned as a balanced choice for enthusiasts. While the 2990WX delivers unprecedented multi-threaded performance, its complex architecture can cause bottlenecks in memory-sensitive applications. Conversely, the 2950X is praised as an "all-arounder" offering excellent value and better gaming performance compared to its 32-core sibling, though it slightly trails top-tier Intel CPUs in single-threaded tasks.

chip.de

23/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (Desktop CPU) Review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, a 16-core/32-thread processor based on 12nm "Zen+" architecture, delivers significant multi-threaded performance gains and lower latency compared to its predecessor, featuring a 3.5 GHz base and 4.4 GHz boost clock. Positioned for high-end desktop (HEDT) workstations, it offers excellent value with 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes and Precision Boost 2 technology, often matching or exceeding more expensive competitors in rendering and encoding. While exceptional for productivity, the 180W TDP requires substantial cooling (no cooler is included), and it faces performance limitations in gaming compared to mainstream CPUs. For a detailed review, visit TechRadar.

hardwareluxx.de

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and 2950X Review: Full Speed Ahead Past Intel

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX (32 cores) and 2950X (16 cores) represent a significant shift in the HEDT market, with the 2990WX dominating in heavy multi-threaded tasks like rendering, while the 2950X serves as a versatile, consistent performer. While offering unmatched core counts, the 2990WX's four-die architecture introduces memory latency bottlenecks and necessitates specialized cooling for its 250W TDP. The series boasts excellent value and compatibility with existing X399 motherboards, though the 2990WX requires specific optimizations to overcome performance inconsistencies. Ultimately, the 2990WX is a specialized, record-breaking workstation chip, whereas the 2950X is the superior, better-rounded choice for general high-end users. The introduction of "Dynamic Local Mode" attempts to address 2990WX latency issues, balancing raw multi-core efficiency against high power consumption and specific architectural demands.

tomshardware.fr

28/11/2018

Summary of the review

Core i9-9980XE Review: 18 Cores vs. AMD Threadripper

The Tom's Hardware review characterizes the Intel Core i9-9980XE as a refined, top-tier processor featuring 18 cores, 36 threads, and a soldered heat spreader (STIM) that enables higher 4.5GHz boost frequencies and improved heat dissipation. While it maintains an edge in single-threaded performance and gaming, it faces stiff competition from AMD's Threadripper 2990WX in multi-threaded, content-creation tasks. Despite its impressive performance, the review highlights high power consumption, the necessity of expensive cooling and supporting hardware, and a high $2,000 price point as key downsides.

comptoir-hardware.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

Review: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X / 2990WX

The Comptoir-Hardware review identifies the 32-core Threadripper 2990WX and 16-core 2950X as major advancements in HEDT performance, utilizing 12nm Zen+ architecture for higher clocks and better efficiency. Pros include the 2990WX's unmatched multi-threaded rendering performance and the 2950X's versatility as a high-performance, all-purpose workstation CPU. Conversely, significant cons involve the 2990WX’s NUMA memory architecture causing bottlenecks in specific tasks, along with high power consumption, elevated thermal output, and lower relative performance in gaming for both chips. For more details, visit Comptoir-Hardware. Le

lesnumeriques.com

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review: A Formidable 16-Core CPU

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, a 16-core/32-thread Zen+ processor, offers exceptional multi-threaded performance for HEDT users, particularly in rendering and workstation tasks. With a 3.5 GHz base clock and 64 PCIe lanes, it excels at productivity while providing 32MB of L3 cache for improved latency over its predecessor. Pros include top-tier multi-core performance, strong value against competitors, and improved efficiency, though it requires robust cooling for its 180W TDP and expensive X399 motherboards. For more details, visit Les Numériques.

notebookcheck.org

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (16 cores, 32 threads) Review - Notebookcheck

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the 12nm Zen+ architecture, featuring a 3.5 GHz base clock and a 180W TDP. Enhanced with XFR2 and PBO technology, it offers superior multi-threaded performance, making it highly effective for rendering, video transcoding, and workstation tasks while providing 64 PCIe Gen3 lanes for expanded connectivity. While it improves upon the first-gen Threadripper in gaming and offers better value compared to contemporaneous Intel HEDT alternatives, it requires robust, user-provided cooling to manage its power consumption and operates on the costly X399 platform.

geeknetic.es

26/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Review

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, a 16-core, 32-thread 12nm Zen+ processor, offers significant multi-threaded performance improvements over its predecessor for professionals. Notable pros include an exceptional price-to-performance ratio, enhanced Precision Boost 2 and XFR 2 technology, and improved energy efficiency, despite a high 180W TDP. The processor excels in productivity workloads, with a dedicated "Game Mode" helping to alleviate multi-die latency issues. Drawbacks, or cons, include the lack of an included thermal cooler, high power requirements, and lower single-threaded performance compared to mainstream flagships, making it less ideal for pure gaming. For more details, visit Geeknetic.

tomshw.it

11/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and 2950X Review

The Tom’s Hardware review of AMD's 2nd Gen Threadripper processors highlights the 16-core 2950X as a versatile, high-performance HEDT chip with improved memory latency and Precision Boost Overdrive, while the 32-core 2990WX acts as a niche, extreme-performance workstation "beast" for heavily threaded tasks. Key advantages include aggressive pricing against Intel, soldered heat spreaders, and 60 PCIe 3.0 lanes, though the 2990WX suffers from severe performance regressions in bandwidth-hungry applications due to its unique architectural design. Other drawbacks include high power consumption and the significant cost of X399 motherboards, making the 2950X a better choice for all-around use and the 2990WX better suited for specialized rendering workloads. For the full, detailed review, visit Tom's Hardware. Copy

nl.hardware.info

13/08/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX & 2950X review: A core too far - Conclusion

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers unprecedented 32-core performance for rendering, yet suffers from significant, memory-sensitive performance bottlenecks in general applications due to its unique architectural design. Conversely, the 16-core 2950X is praised as a more versatile, well-rounded high-end desktop (HEDT) processor with improved clock speeds over its predecessor. Both processors utilize the X399 platform and Precision Boost 2, making the 2990WX a specialized tool for heavily threaded tasks and the 2950X the better choice for general productivity. Copy

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X with other processors

Compare