OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 Review | 78 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£1,530
  • Avg. price in US: ~$1,700
  • PassMark benchmark result: 31861
  • N. of physical cores: 8
  • CPU boost clock speed: 5.0 GHz

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

7.0

Technical Score

10.0%

?

User score

Very good
7.0

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

6.5

Performance

18.0%

8.1

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

7.5

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

6.0

Power & Thermal

4.0%

8.2

Platform

1.0%

9.2

Integrated Graphics

Very good
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 6.8
    Gaming

    Score components:

    30.0%

    7.6

    PassMark single-core benchmark score

    25.0%

    7.2

    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    7.6

    CPU boost clock speed

    17.0%

    5.5

    L3 cache

    8.0%

    3.5

    N. of physical cores

  • 5.5
    Video editing

    Score components:

    45.0%

    6.5

    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    3.5

    N. of physical cores

    20.0%

    5.2

    CPU threads

    15.0%

    5.5

    L3 cache

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £1,530

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 is a high-performance 'Strix Halo' processor built on the 4nm Zen 5 architecture, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a 3.6 GHz base clock and up to 5.0 GHz boost. Its standout feature is the powerful integrated Radeon 8050S graphics with 32 RDNA 3.5 compute units, supported by a 256-bit LPDDR5x-8000 memory interface that can address up to 128GB of unified memory. It excels in AI-driven workloads with a dedicated XDNA 2 NPU providing up to 50 TOPS (106 TOPS total), while also including AMD PRO technologies for enhanced security and manageability in professional environments. Main pros include its exceptional integrated graphics performance that competes with entry-level discrete GPUs and its massive unified memory bandwidth, making it ideal for compact workstations and local AI model execution. However, some cons include a high configurable TDP (up to 120W) that may challenge thermal management in smaller devices, and its 8-core configuration provides less multi-threaded headroom compared to higher-tier 12 or 16-core models in the same series.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

?

Performance

18.0%

?

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

?

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

?

Power & Thermal

4.0%

?

Platform

1.0%

?

Integrated Graphics

7.0
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a technical score of 6.96 points, which is higher than that of 83.8% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
1.0
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a popularity of 1 points, which is higher than 0% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

7.0

Overall score

40.0%

2.4

Price

5.6
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a quality-to-price ratio of 5.6 points, which is lower than 82.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD
Processor type
What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.
When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

mobile
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 belongs to the mobile processor class, which is more advanced than that of 7.3% of processors and equal to that of 48.6% of processors.
CPU socket
What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.
When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

FP11
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses the FP11 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 53.1% of processors and equal to that of 0.5% of processors.
Chipset
What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.
When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A
CPU architecture
What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

x86-64
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

8
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has 8 CPU cores, which is more than 63.4% of processors and equal to 13.6% of processors.
CPU threads
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

16
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 offers 16 CPU threads, which is more than 71.1% of processors and equal to 13.9% of processors.
Threads per core
What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.
When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

2
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 offers 2 threads per core, which is more than 30.4% of processors and equal to 69.6% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

5.0 GHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 reaches a boost clock of 5.0 GHz which is higher than that of 80.3% of processors and equal to that of 5.7% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

8 x 3.6 GHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a base clock of 8x3.6 GHz which is equal to that of 100% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

4 nm
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses a 4 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 88.4% of processors and equal to that of 7.5% of processors.
Foundry
What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.
When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

TSMC 4 nm
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 is built on the TSMC 4 nm foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 87% of processors and equal to that of 7.5% of processors.
L3 cache
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

32 MB
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has an L3 cache of 32 MB which is larger than that of 89.6% of processors and equal to that of 2.6% of processors.
L2 cache
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

8 MB
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has an L2 cache of 8 MB which is larger than that of 73.5% of processors and equal to that of 4.3% of processors.
L1 cache
What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.
When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

640 KB
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has an L1 cache of 640 KB which is larger than that of 74.6% of processors and equal to that of 2.5% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

LPDDR5X
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports DDR LPDDR5X, which is newer than that of 89.9% of processors and equal to that of 1.5% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

8,000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports memory speeds up to 8000 MHz, which is higher than that of 97.2% of processors and equal to 1.2% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.
When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

LPDDR5X-8000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports JEDEC memory speeds up to LPDDR5X-8000 MHz, which is higher than that of 97.3% of processors and equal to 1.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.
When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A
Maximum memory capacity
What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

128 GB
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports up to 128 GB of memory, which is more than 61.9% of processors and equal to 21.4% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.
When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

yes
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 includes integrated graphics. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.
When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Radeon 8050S
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses the Radeon 8050S integrated GPU, which is more advanced than that in 98.5% of processors and equal to that in 0.2% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.
When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

32
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has 32 GPU execution units, which is more than 70.8% of processors and equal to 9.9% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.
When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

?
Integrated media encoders/decoders
What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.
When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

55 W
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a TDP of 55 W which is higher than that of 63.9% of processors and equal to that of 4.2% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

55 W
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a base power of 55 W which is higher than that of 64.1% of processors and equal to that of 4.1% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

120 W
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a boost power of 120 W which is higher than that of 79.2% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
Tau (power duration limit)
What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.
When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

?
Configurable TDP
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

yes
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports configurable TDP. 52.9% of processors support configurable TDP.
cTDP: 45-120 W
Show more

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 vs the average processor

  • 59.8% better single-core performance
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,967 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
    What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
    When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >3200

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,967 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.3,967 vs 2,483
  • 2.95x higher multi-core score
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (14,136 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
    When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >8500

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (14,136 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.14,136 vs 4,793
  • 3.03x higher PassMark score
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (31,861 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
    When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >19000

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (31,861 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.31,861 vs 10,532.5
  • 69.2% higher single-core score
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,489 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
    When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >2000

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,489 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.2,489 vs 1,471
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Strix Halo vs Kaby Lake).
    What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
    When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Strix Halo vs Kaby Lake).Strix Halo vs Kaby Lake
  • 16.3% higher boost clock
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
    When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >4.7 GHz

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.5.0 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 4x larger L3 cache
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
    When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >=16 MB

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.32 MB vs 8 MB
  • 2.73x higher memory speed
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (8,000 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
    What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
    When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >=4800 MHz

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (8,000 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.8000 MHz vs 2933 MHz
  • 5 year/s newer release date
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a newer release date than the average processor (2,025 vs 2,020).
  • 59.8% better single-core performance
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,967 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
  • 2.95x higher multi-core score
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (14,136 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
  • 3.03x higher PassMark score
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (31,861 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
  • 69.2% higher single-core score
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,489 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
  • 16.3% higher boost clock
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
  • 8 more CPU threads
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
  • 2 more CPU cores
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
  • 4 wider front-end design
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher front-end width than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Strix Halo vs Kaby Lake).
  • 4x larger L3 cache
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
  • 66.7% smaller process node
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a lower process node than the average processor (4 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
  • 2.33x more L3 per core
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (4 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
  • 3.2x larger L2 cache
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
  • More advanced foundry
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
  • 2x more L2 per core
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
  • 66.7% larger L1 cache
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (640 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
  • 2.73x higher memory speed
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (8,000 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
  • 5.59x higher memory bandwidth
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (256 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
  • Newer DDR support
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (LPDDR5X vs DDR4).
  • Newer PCIe version
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3.0).
  • 2x more memory capacity
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
  • Supports ECC memory
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports ECC memory, the average processor does not.
  • Better integrated GPU
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Radeon 8,050S vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
  • 1 more supported displays
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.

Total
Platform
Performance
Cache & Architecture
Memory & PCIe
Integrated Graphics
  • Older TPM support
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
  • 87.5% higher boost power
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (120 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
  • 22.2% higher base power
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher base power draw than the average processor (55 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
  • 22.2% higher TDP
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher TDP than the average processor (55 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
  • 87.5% higher boost power
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (120 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
    What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
    When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <50 W

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (120 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.120 W vs 64 W
  • 6.12x more expensive
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 is more expensive than the average processor (£1,530 vs £250).
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 is more expensive than the average processor (£1,530 vs £250).£1,530 vs £250
  • 13.6% worse value for money
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has worse value for money than the average processor (5.60 vs 6.367).
    What it is: An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
    When it matters: When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has worse value for money than the average processor (5.60 vs 6.367).5.6 vs 6.37
  • 22.2% higher base power
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher base power draw than the average processor (55 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
    When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <30 W

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher base power draw than the average processor (55 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.55 W vs 45 W
  • Older TPM support
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
    What it is: The kind of TPM security support associated with the processor or its platform.
    When it matters: When operating-system requirements, device encryption, enterprise security, or platform trust features matter.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 22.2% higher TDP
    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher TDP than the average processor (55 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
    When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: <30 W

    AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher TDP than the average processor (55 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.55 W vs 45 W
Total
Overall
Platform
Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 and other processors

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385?

  • Exceptional integrated graphics performance with the Radeon 8050S, capable of running games at 1080p on Ultra settings
  • Massive unified memory support (up to 128GB LPDDR5x-8000) allows assigning up to 96GB to the iGPU, ideal for large AI models and deep learning
  • Dedicated XDNA 2 NPU delivers 50 TOPS of AI performance, meeting Copilot+ PC requirements while keeping the CPU free for other tasks
  • Balanced performance-to-cost ratio, offering a more affordable entry point into the high-end Strix Halo ecosystem compared to the flagship 395 SKU
  • Efficient thermal management in compact designs, with users reporting low noise and stable temperatures even under load
  • Professional-grade features including ECC memory support, hardware virtualization, and AMD PRO technologies

What customers dislike about AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385?

  • Significantly lower multi-core performance compared to higher SKUs like the Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 due to having only 8 Zen 5 cores
  • Lacks support for the newer VVC (H.266) video codec, unlike some competitors such as Intel's Lunar Lake chips
  • High power consumption at peak loads (configurable up to 120W), which can limit battery life in mobile workstations
  • Lower L3 cache (32MB) compared to the 64MB found on the higher-end 390 and 395 models
  • Overclocking potential is limited as the processor features a locked multiplier
  • Currently has limited availability in the market as manufacturers often prioritize higher-margin flagship SKUs first

Expert reviews

C
cpubenchmark.net
30/03/2026
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 - CPU Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is an 8-core, 16-thread "Strix Halo" APU based on Zen 5 architecture, designed for high-performance laptops with a 3.6 GHz base clock and 5.0 GHz boost. It features integrated Radeon 8050S graphics with 32 RDNA 3+ Compute Units, offering performance comparable to entry-level discrete desktop GPUs, along with an XDNA 2 NPU delivering up to 106 TOPS of...Read more

H
heise.de
22/05/2025
AMD Mobile Processor with Graphics Power: Laptops with Ryzen AI Max Put to the Test

The Heise review examines the MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio and Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025), both powered by the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor, which delivers impressive multi-core performance and strong integrated graphics capability. The MSI model is noted for its robust magnesium-aluminum chassis, full-sized keyboard, and large 99.9Wh battery, whereas the lighter Asus Zephyrus G16...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
06/01/2026
Ryzen AI Max+ processors sit between existing AI Max CPUs

AMD's Ryzen AI Max+ (Strix Halo) processors deliver high-performance workstation capabilities, featuring up to 16 Zen 5 cores and Radeon 8060S integrated graphics with 40 compute units, reportedly outperforming discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA RTX 4070. Key advantages include a unified memory architecture supporting 128GB of LPDDR5x-8000 RAM and a powerful XDNA 2 NPU designed to run...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

intel-core-ultra-9-285k
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

8.9
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9965wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9995wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-9960x
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-7970x
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

8.7
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9985wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

8.7
intel-core-ultra-9-285
Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9975wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-7985wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-9-9950x3d
AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

8.6
intel-core-i9-13900k
Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

8.5
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-7965wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

8.5

Compare AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 with other processors

VS
VS

Compare