OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

AMD A4 3310MX Review | 78 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£20
  • PassMark benchmark result: 789
  • N. of physical cores: 2
  • CPU boost clock speed: 2.5 GHz

AMD A4 3310MX review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

3.8

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

3.5

Technical Score

10.0%

6.2

User score

Poor
3.5

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

2.7

Performance

18.0%

3.2

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

5.5

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

6.7

Power & Thermal

4.0%

6.7

Platform

1.0%

6.5

Integrated Graphics

Poor
6.2

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

7.8

User reviews

30.0%

2.6

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(16)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

Good
  • 1.0
    Gaming

    Score components:

    30.0%

    1.0

    PassMark single-core benchmark score

    25.0%

    1.1

    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    1.0

    CPU boost clock speed

    17.0%

    1.0

    L3 cache

    8.0%

    1.0

    N. of physical cores

  • 1.0
    Video editing

    Score components:

    45.0%

    1.0

    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    1.0

    N. of physical cores

    20.0%

    1.0

    CPU threads

    15.0%

    1.0

    L3 cache

  • amd-a4-3310mx
  • amd-a4-3310mx
  • amd-a4-3310mx
  • amd-a4-3310mx
amd-a4-3310mx
amd-a4-3310mx
amd-a4-3310mx
amd-a4-3310mx

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The AMD A4-3310MX is a dual-core mobile processor from the Llano series, built on a 32nm process with a base clock speed of 2.1 GHz and a Turbo Core frequency of up to 2.5 GHz. It features 2 MB of L2 cache, an integrated DDR3-1333 memory controller, and a Radeon HD 6480G integrated graphics unit with 240 shader cores. Key advantages include its capable integrated UVD3 video processor for HD decoding and a DirectX 11-compatible GPU that outperformed many contemporary entry-level discrete chips. However, its main drawbacks are a high 45W TDP that limits its use to larger laptops and the lack of a Level 3 cache, which results in lower per-clock performance compared to Intel's Sandy Bridge architecture.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD A4 3310MX

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

2.7

Performance

18.0%

3.2

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

5.5

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

6.7

Power & Thermal

4.0%

6.7

Platform

1.0%

6.5

Integrated Graphics

3.5
AMD A4 3310MX has a technical score of 3.52 points, which is lower than that of 94.4% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

7.8

User reviews

30.0%

2.6

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
(16)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

6.2
AMD A4 3310MX has a user score of 6.24 points, which is lower than that of 97.8% of products in this category.
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
2.6
AMD A4 3310MX has a popularity of 2.6 points, which is higher than 77.5% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

3.8

Overall score

40.0%

10

Price

5.7
AMD A4 3310MX has a quality-to-price ratio of 5.7 points, which is lower than 78% of products in this category.
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD
Processor type
What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.
When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

mobile
AMD A4 3310MX belongs to the mobile processor class, which is more advanced than that of 7.3% of processors and equal to that of 48.6% of processors.
CPU socket
What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.
When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Socket FS1
Chipset
What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.
When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A
CPU architecture
What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

x86-64
AMD A4 3310MX uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

2
AMD A4 3310MX has 2 CPU cores, which is fewer than 79.3% of processors and equal to 20.6% of processors.
CPU threads
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

2
AMD A4 3310MX offers 2 CPU threads, which is fewer than 93.9% of processors and equal to 6% of processors.
Threads per core
What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.
When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

1
AMD A4 3310MX offers 1 threads per core, which is fewer than 69.7% of processors and equal to 30.3% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

2.5 GHz
AMD A4 3310MX reaches a boost clock of 2.5 GHz which is lower than that of 98% of processors and equal to that of 0.2% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

2 x 2.1 GHz
AMD A4 3310MX has a base clock of 2x2.1 GHz which is equal to that of 100% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

32 nm
AMD A4 3310MX uses a 32 nm process node, which is older than that of 97.8% of processors and equal to that of 2.3% of processors.
Foundry
What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.
When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

GlobalFoundries 32 nm
AMD A4 3310MX is built on the GlobalFoundries 32 nm foundry process, which is less advanced than that of 98.2% of processors and equal to that of 1.8% of processors.
L3 cache
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

0 MB
AMD A4 3310MX has an L3 cache of 0 MB which is smaller than that of 93.6% of processors and equal to that of 6.4% of processors.
L2 cache
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

2 MB
AMD A4 3310MX has an L2 cache of 2 MB which is smaller than that of 51.3% of processors and equal to that of 11.1% of processors.
L1 cache
What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.
When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

256 KB
AMD A4 3310MX has an L1 cache of 256 KB which is smaller than that of 59.4% of processors and equal to that of 18.5% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

DDR3
AMD A4 3310MX supports DDR DDR3, which is older than that of 86.3% of processors and equal to that of 13.7% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

1,333 MHz
AMD A4 3310MX supports memory speeds up to 1333 MHz, which is lower than that of 98.7% of processors and equal to 1.4% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.
When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

DDR3-1333 MHz
AMD A4 3310MX supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR3-1333 MHz, which is lower than that of 98.7% of processors and equal to 1.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.
When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A
Maximum memory capacity
What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

?
Show more
Integrated graphics
What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.
When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

yes
AMD A4 3310MX includes integrated graphics. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.
When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Radeon HD 6480G
AMD A4 3310MX uses the Radeon HD 6480G integrated GPU, which is less advanced than that in 87.1% of processors and equal to that in 0.2% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.
When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

?
Integrated GPU base frequency
What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.
When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

444 MHz
AMD A4 3310MX has an integrated GPU clock of 444 MHz which is higher than that of 81.3% of processors and equal to that of 0.5% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.
When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

H.264 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode)
AMD A4 3310MX supports H.264 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode) media codecs, which is narrower support than 59.8% of processors and equal to 0.3% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

45 W
AMD A4 3310MX has a TDP of 45 W which is lower than that of 39.9% of processors and equal to that of 11.4% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

45 W
AMD A4 3310MX has a base power of 45 W which is lower than that of 39.7% of processors and equal to that of 11.6% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

?
Tau (power duration limit)
What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.
When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

N/A
Configurable TDP
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

yes
AMD A4 3310MX supports configurable TDP. 52.9% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

AMD A4 3310MX vs the average processor

  • 2x more L2 per core
    AMD A4 3310MX has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    What it is: The amount of L2 cache available to each CPU core.
    When it matters: When you are comparing per-core cache resources in deeper architectural analysis.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=1 MB/core

    AMD A4 3310MX has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 12.5x cheaper
    AMD A4 3310MX is cheaper than the average processor (£20 vs £250).
    AMD A4 3310MX is cheaper than the average processor (£20 vs £250).£20 vs £250
  • 2.59x more popular
    AMD A4 3310MX is more popular than the average processor (2.59 vs 1.000).
    What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
    When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
    AMD A4 3310MX is more popular than the average processor (2.59 vs 1.000).2.59 vs 1
  • 2x more L2 per core
    AMD A4 3310MX has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.

Total
Overall
Cache & Architecture
  • 9 year/s older release date
    AMD A4 3310MX has an older release date than the average processor (2,011 vs 2,020).
    June 2011
  • Older CPU socket
    AMD A4 3310MX uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (Socket FS1 vs FP2).
  • 72.8% weaker single-core performance
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (676 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
  • 41.9% lower boost clock
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
  • 69.7% lower single-core score
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (446 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
  • 4 fewer CPU cores
    AMD A4 3310MX has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
  • 90.7% lower multi-core score
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (446 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
  • 92.5% lower PassMark score
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (789 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    AMD A4 3310MX has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
  • No multithreading support
    AMD A4 3310MX does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
  • 1 fewer threads per core
    AMD A4 3310MX has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
  • 37.5% lower bus speed
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower bus speed than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
  • 7 lower clock multiplier
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (21 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
  • 2.67x larger process node
    AMD A4 3310MX has a higher process node than the average processor (32 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
  • Less advanced microarchitecture
    AMD A4 3310MX uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Llano vs Kaby Lake).
  • 28.1% larger die size
    AMD A4 3310MX has a higher die size than the average processor (228 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
  • 76.2% fewer transistors
    AMD A4 3310MX has fewer transistors than the average processor (1.2 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
  • 33.3% smaller L1 cache
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (256 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
  • Less advanced foundry
    AMD A4 3310MX uses a less advanced foundry process than the average processor (GlobalFoundries 32 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
  • 20% smaller L2 cache
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
  • Older DDR support
    AMD A4 3310MX supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
  • 54.6% lower memory speed
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (1,333 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
  • Older PCIe version
    AMD A4 3310MX supports an older PCIe version than the average processor (2 vs 3.0).
  • Inferior integrated GPU
    AMD A4 3310MX uses an inferior integrated GPU to the average processor (Radeon HD 6,480G vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
  • 72.8% weaker single-core performance
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (676 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
    What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
    When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >3200

    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (676 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.676 vs 2,483
  • 41.9% lower boost clock
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
    When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >4.7 GHz

    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 69.7% lower single-core score
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (446 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
    When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >2000

    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (446 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.446 vs 1,471
  • 4 fewer CPU cores
    AMD A4 3310MX has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
    When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: 8+

    AMD A4 3310MX has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.2 vs 6
  • 90.7% lower multi-core score
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (446 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
    When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >8500

    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (446 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.446 vs 4,793
  • 92.5% lower PassMark score
    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (789 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
    When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >19000

    AMD A4 3310MX has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (789 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.789 vs 10,532.5
  • 2.67x larger process node
    AMD A4 3310MX has a higher process node than the average processor (32 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
    When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: <10 nm

    AMD A4 3310MX has a higher process node than the average processor (32 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.32 nm vs 12 nm
  • Less advanced microarchitecture
    AMD A4 3310MX uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Llano vs Kaby Lake).
    What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
    When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD A4 3310MX uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Llano vs Kaby Lake).Llano vs Kaby Lake
Total
Overall
Platform
Performance
Cache & Architecture
Memory & PCIe
Integrated Graphics

Graphic comparison of AMD A4 3310MX and other processors

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom
amazon
3.9
16 Reviews

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about AMD A4 3310MX?

  • Integrated Radeon HD 6480G graphics provide decent performance for basic DirectX 11 tasks compared to older integrated solutions.
  • TurboCore technology allows the dual cores to overclock from 2.1 GHz up to 2.5 GHz for better single-threaded performance.
  • Includes an integrated UVD3 video processor that helps with smooth decoding of HD video formats like H.264 and MPEG4.
  • Integrated dual-channel memory controller supports DDR3(L)-1333 for improved data transfer speeds over single-channel systems.
  • Entry-level pricing makes it a budget-friendly option for simple, everyday office and web-browsing tasks.

What customers dislike about AMD A4 3310MX?

  • Overall performance is significantly lower than contemporary competitors, such as Intel's Sandy Bridge Core i3-2310M.
  • A high TDP of 45 Watts results in higher power consumption and heat generation compared to more modern or efficient mobile processors.
  • Limited to only two physical cores and two threads, which leads to poor multitasking and slow performance in multi-threaded applications.
  • Lacks a Level 3 (L3) cache, which can limit the speed of data access and overall system responsiveness.
  • Considered obsolete for modern gaming and demanding software, with benchmarks showing it struggles with even older titles at higher settings.

Expert reviews

N
notebookcheck.net
01/07/2023
AMD A4-3310MX vs AMD A8-3520M - Notebookcheck Note: For database-driven sites like PassMark (cpubenchmark.net) and Versus, the "date of review" reflec...

The AMD A8-3520M is a quad-core processor that significantly outperforms the dual-core A4-3310MX in multi-threaded tasks, boasting double the cores and L2 cache as key advantages. While both chips offer 2.5 GHz TurboCore speeds, the A8-3520M provides superior performance in benchmarks like PassMark. However, a shared drawback for both is the lack of L3 cache, limiting their...Read more

C
cpubenchmark.net
29/03/2026
AMD A4-3310MX APU - CPU Benchmarks

The AMD A4-3310MX is a dual-core laptop APU from late 2011 that operates at a base clockspeed of 2.1 GHz with a turbo boost of up to 2.3 GHz. Built on the FS1 socket with a typical TDP of 45W, it features L2 cache of 2048 KB and integrated Radeon HD Graphics. In current synthetic testing, it yields an average CPU Mark of 789 and a single-thread rating of 845, placing it in the lower...Read more

C
cpubenchmark.net
Updated Daily
AMD A4-3310MX APU vs Intel Pentium B940 - CPU Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-2600K outperforms the i5-2500K with roughly 24% to 33% higher multi-threaded performance, driven by Hyper-Threading, a 3.4 GHz base clock, and an 8MB L3 cache. While both processors feature unlocked multipliers for easy overclocking, the i7 is superior for productivity tasks, whereas the i5 is a high-value option for gaming, as single-thread performance is nearly...Read more

V
valid.x86.fr
01/12/2025
CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD A4-3310MX (Single-Thread)

The Intel Core i9-14900K, a 14th Gen Raptor Lake Refresh processor featuring 24 cores (8P + 16E) and 32 threads, showcases a 6.0 GHz boost frequency. It provides industry-leading single-core performance (approx. 978 points in CPU-Z), a ~19% gain over the i9-12900K, and offers a straightforward upgrade path on existing LGA1700 platforms. However, the chip requires high-end cooling...Read more

(Translated)Show original
V
valid.x86.fr
30/03/2026
CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD A4-3310MX (Single-Core)

This CPU-Z validation highlights an AMD A4-3310MX mobile processor overclocked to 2894.65 MHz, representing a significant boost over its 2.1 GHz base clock. The entry-level, dual-core Llano-family chip exhibits notable overclocking success, providing legacy x86-64 support and integrated graphics capabilities. However, the processor’s 32nm architecture is heavily outdated, with...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

intel-core-ultra-9-285k
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

8.9
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9965wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9995wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-9960x
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-7970x
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

8.7
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9985wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

8.7
intel-core-ultra-9-285
Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9975wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-7985wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-9-9950x3d
AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

8.6
intel-core-i9-13900k
Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

8.5
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-7965wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

8.5

Compare AMD A4 3310MX with other processors

VS
VS

Compare