OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Attack Shark X2 Pro Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:4000 DPIWeight:109 g

Attack Shark X2 Pro Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

80%

6.0

Technical Score

20%

7.7

User score

â–²Better than 55% of mice
6.0

Technical Score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

36%

4.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.5

Controls

16%

5.0

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

9.4

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 56% of mice
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 692 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 70% of mice
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
  • attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro
attack-shark-x2-pro

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Attack Shark X2 Pro is a versatile tri-mode gaming mouse featuring 2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth 5.0, and USB-C wired connectivity, powered by a PixArt PAW3212 optical sensor with five adjustable DPI levels up to 4000. It is distinguished by its unique transparent shell with an oleophobic coating, 3D RGB lighting, and a rear-facing digital screen for real-time battery monitoring. Main pros include its silent-click buttons, ergonomic right-handed design, and the inclusion of a magnetic RGB charging dock that offers five hours of use from a ten-minute charge. However, notable cons include a relatively low max DPI for modern gaming, a heavier build at 109g compared to ultralight competitors, reported inconsistencies in sensor tracking (stuttering), and potential long-term quality control issues with buttons and scroll wheels.

Technical Specifications of mouse Attack Shark X2 Pro

Technical Score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

36%

4.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.5

Controls

16%

5.0

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

9.4

Battery & Charging

6.0
Attack Shark X2 Pro has a technical score of 6 points, which is higher than that of 55.6% of products in this category.
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 692 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Attack Shark X2 Pro has a user score of 7.74 points, which is lower than that of 70.4% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Popularity:
Attack Shark X2 Pro has a popularity score of 6.4 points, which is higher than that of 49.6% of products in this category.
6.4
Attack Shark X2 Pro has a popularity score of 6.4 points, which is higher than that of 49.6% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Attack Shark X2 Pro has a value-for-money score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 51.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
Attack
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5.2
Bluetooth version
5.2
★ Better than 93% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5.2, which is newer than 92.5% of mice and equal to 4.6% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
300 hours
Battery life
300 hours
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse lasts 300 hours on a charge, which is longer than 96% of mice and equal to 2% of mice.
Battery capacity
300 mAh
Battery capacity
300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, which is smaller than 70.3% of mice and equal to 19.9% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
N. of buttons
7
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
N. of programmable buttons
7
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
?
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
109 g
Weight
109 g
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 109 g, which is heavier than 79.7% of mice and equal to 0.7% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
Attack Shark Driver
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Attack Shark X2 Pro vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 215 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    300 hours
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 300 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    300 hours vs 85 hours
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Charging dock included
    Charging dock included
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This mouse includes a charging dock, while the average mouse does not. 5.4% of mice include a charging dock.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 215 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    300 hours
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 300 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    300 hours vs 85 hours
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Charging dock included
    Charging dock included
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This mouse includes a charging dock, while the average mouse does not. 5.4% of mice include a charging dock.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This mouse supports wireless charging, while the average mouse does not. 10.6% of mice support wireless charging.
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    September 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • 32.9% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    109 g
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 109 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    109 g vs 82 g
  • 85% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    60 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 60 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    60 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 60% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    4,000 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 4000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    4,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 50% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    20 G
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 20 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    20 G vs 40 G
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    42 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 3.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Attack Shark X2 Pro
    the average mouse
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Attack Shark X2 Pro has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.74 vs 8.000).
    7.74 vs 8
  • 85% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    60 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 60 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    60 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 60% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    4,000 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 4000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    4,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 50% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    20 G
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 20 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    20 G vs 40 G
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 32.9% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    109 g
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 109 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    109 g vs 82 g
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    42 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Graphic comparison of Attack Shark X2 Pro and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 692 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Attack Shark X2 Pro?

  • Unique transparent design with 3D RGB lighting is highly aesthetic
  • Included magnetic charging dock is convenient and functional
  • Silent left and right click buttons are ideal for quiet environments
  • Real-time battery percentage display on the mouse is very useful
  • Excellent value for money as a budget-friendly tri-mode mouse
  • Comfortable ergonomic shape that fits medium to large hands well
  • Fast charging capabilities and decent overall battery life

What customers dislike about Attack Shark X2 Pro?

  • Software customization is often unavailable or difficult to find
  • RGB lighting can significantly drain battery life when left on
  • Sensor (PAW3212) may experience stuttering or lag during fast movements
  • Build quality concerns, including reported failures of the scroll wheel and left click
  • Magnet strength on the charging dock is relatively weak
  • Limited RGB customization with no option for static colors
  • The smooth surface of the shell can feel strange or less premium to some users

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Attack Shark X2 Pro with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)