Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Stax Sr 207 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£400Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Stax Sr 207 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9/10

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

4.9

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of headphones
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 95%
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

5.4

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

5.9

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.3

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 94%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £400
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Stax Sr 207

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

5.4

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

5.9

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

4.3

Calls & Controls

4.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Stax Sr 207 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

6.0
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
electrostatic
Driver size
100 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 100 mm, larger driver size than 98.7% of headphones and equal to 0.4% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
7 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 7 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 83.2% of headphones and equal to 1.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
no
This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while 15.1% is. 84.9% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
?
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Stax
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 340 g, heavier than 89.6% of headphones and equal to 1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
open-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Stax Sr 207 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 60 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (100 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    100 mm vs 40 mm
  • 11 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (7 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    7 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 21,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (41,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    41,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 0.29 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.01 % vs 0.3 %
  • 1.3 m longer cable length
    This pair of headphones offers a more useful cable length than the average pair of headphones (2.5 m vs 1.2 m). The average headphones have a cable length of 1.2 m.
    2.5 m vs 1.2 m
  • Open-back design
    This pair of headphones uses an open-back design, while the average pair of headphones does not. 9.1% of headphones have an open-back design.
  • 1.3 m longer cable length
    This pair of headphones offers a more useful cable length than the average pair of headphones (2.5 m vs 1.2 m). The average headphones have a cable length of 1.2 m.
    2.5 m vs 1.2 m
  • Open-back design
    This pair of headphones uses an open-back design, while the average pair of headphones does not. 9.1% of headphones have an open-back design.
  • 60 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (100 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    100 mm vs 40 mm
  • 11 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (7 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    7 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 21,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (41,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    41,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 0.29 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.01 % vs 0.3 %
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • 56% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (340 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    340 g vs 218 g
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 4.44x more expensive
    Stax Sr 207 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£400 vs £90).
    £400 vs £90
  • 21.8% worse value for money
    Stax Sr 207 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (5.97 vs 7.3).
    5.97 vs 7.27
  • 5.87x less popular
    Stax Sr 207 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 4.44x more expensive
    Stax Sr 207 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£400 vs £90).
    £400 vs £90
  • 21.8% worse value for money
    Stax Sr 207 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (5.97 vs 7.3).
    5.97 vs 7.27
  • 5.87x less popular
    Stax Sr 207 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 56% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (340 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    340 g vs 218 g
  • Tangle-prone cable
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • No travel bag
    This pair of headphones does not include a travel bag, the average pair of headphones does. 65.4% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • No neodymium magnet
    This pair of headphones does not use neodymium magnets, the average pair of headphones does. 81.9% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
    non-magnetic driver design.
  • 1 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (101 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    101 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Stax Sr 207

  • Exceptional clarity and transparency for the price
  • Lightning-fast transient response and high detail retrieval
  • Lightweight and comfortable for long listening sessions
  • Excellent value for an entry-level electrostatic system
  • Sturdier build quality compared to some newer Lambda models like the L300
  • Accurate sound imaging and a wide, airy soundstage
  • Often considered more balanced and even-sounding than the SR-507

What customers don't like about Stax Sr 207

  • Lack of 'visceral' bass impact or 'slam' compared to dynamic or planar headphones
  • Pronounced 1.5kHz midrange 'shout' or 'bump' that some find intrusive
  • Sub-bass roll-off is more sudden than higher-end Stax models
  • Earpads can be difficult to get a perfect seal with due to being somewhat stiff
  • Open-back design leaks sound and provides zero isolation from room noise
  • Proprietary 5-pin 'Pro-bias' connector limits compatibility with standard audio gear

Verdict

The Stax SR-207 is an entry-level open-back electrostatic 'earspeaker' featuring a 2-micron thick diaphragm and a push-pull driver system that delivers a frequency response of 7 Hz to 41 kHz with a sensitivity of 101 dB. Weighing 340g and utilising a 580V DC bias voltage, it is primarily celebrated for its exceptional transparency, lifelike detail retrieval, and fast transient response that outpaces most dynamic and planar magnetic alternatives. Key strengths include a wide soundstage, lightweight comfort for long sessions, and high-quality genuine sheep leather earpads. However, its performance is limited by a requirement for a dedicated electrostatic energizer (amp), a roll-off in sub-bass weight, and occasional sibilance in the higher frequencies.

Compare Stax Sr 207 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Stax Sr 207 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found