OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

RHA MA650 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Form factor:in-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:12 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

RHA MA650 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

RHA MA650
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 68% of headphones
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 70%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

52%

6.8

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

7.2

Design

8%

7.1

Connectivity

6%

5.3

Battery

4%

8.0

Calls & Controls

â–²Better than 66%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 73%
  • rha-ma650
  • rha-ma650
  • rha-ma650
  • rha-ma650
  • rha-ma650
  • rha-ma650
  • rha-ma650
  • rha-ma650
rha-ma650
rha-ma650
rha-ma650
rha-ma650
rha-ma650
rha-ma650
rha-ma650
rha-ma650
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones RHA MA650

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

52%

6.8

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

7.2

Design

8%

7.1

Connectivity

6%

5.3

Battery

4%

8.0

Calls & Controls

6.3
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Popularity:
RHA MA650 has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 70.1% of products in this category.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.7
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
38 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 38 mm, smaller driver size than 71.5% of headphones and equal to 1% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
16 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 16 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 54.1% of headphones and equal to 4.2% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
4.1
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 4.1, newer Bluetooth version than 62.3% of headphones and equal to 5.4% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Market range: <10 m – >15 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.7% of headphones and equal to 80.6% of headphones.
Audio latency
80 ms
Market range: <40 ms – >222 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 80 ms, lower audio latency than 57.8% of headphones and equal to 4.3% of headphones.
Multipoint support
yes
This pair of headphones supports multipoint. 69.4% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <10 hours – >70 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 12 hours, lower battery life than 85.4% of headphones and equal to 3.8% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
2.5 hours
Market range: <1.5 hours – >3.5 hours
This pair of headphones needs 2.5 hours to charge, higher charging time than 53% of headphones and equal to 13% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
170 mAh
Market range: <290 mAh – >1k mAh
This pair of headphones has a battery capacity of 170 mAh, lower battery capacity than 96.6% of headphones and equal to 0.4% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
RHA
Form factor
in-ear
Weight
15 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 15 g, lighter than 88.7% of headphones and equal to 0.8% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
N/A
Show more

RHA MA650 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 93.1% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (15 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    15 g vs 218 g
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 20,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • 93.1% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (15 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    15 g vs 218 g
  • Water resistance
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 20,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • USB-C charging
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • AAC codec support
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • 70 ms lower audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (80 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    80 ms vs 150 ms
  • NFC pairing
    This pair of headphones supports NFC pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.7% of headphones support NFC pairing.
  • AptX support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • Multipoint connections
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Wind noise reduction
    This pair of headphones reduces wind noise, the average pair of headphones does not. 34.3% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 18 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (12 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    12 hours vs 30 hours
  • 2 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (38 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    38 mm vs 40 mm
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (2.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 70.7% lower battery capacity
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (170 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    170 mAh vs 580 mAh
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 10 dB lower max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (100 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    100 dB vs 110 dB
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 2 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (38 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    38 mm vs 40 mm
  • 2 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    100 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 10 dB lower max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (100 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    100 dB vs 110 dB
  • 95% lower input power handling
    This pair of headphones has a lower max input power than the average pair of headphones (5 mW vs 100 mW). The average headphones handle max input power of 100 mW.
    5 mW vs 100 mW
  • 18 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (12 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    12 hours vs 30 hours
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (2.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 70.7% lower battery capacity
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (170 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    170 mAh vs 580 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
InsideTech
≈ estimated
13/03/2019
Hands-on review · comfort, battery, connection and sound
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a classy, comfortable neckband earphone that is a compelling buy for the price, though not for everyone.
8.0
Gadget Bridge
≈ estimated
20/06/2018
Unboxing · first look at contents, controls and build
Verdict
The RHA MA650 has a premium look and feel, though the price is slightly steep for the market.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com
25/10/2017
Hands-on test · Neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a solid, good-value neckband with strong wireless performance, though its upper mids are harder than ideal.
trustedreviews.com
05/11/2017
Hands-on review · Neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a solid neckband with good detail and power, a comfortable fit and good value, though its upper mids have a slightly hard edge.
headfonia.com
05/12/2017
Hands-on review · Neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is one of the most comfortable neckband earphones, with a very flexible band, a stable connection up to 35 paces and long battery life.
wired.com
10/02/2018
Hands-on review · Neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a comfortable, portable neckband with a very long battery, though its mid-to-high pitches can sound prickly on some music.
pcmag.com
01/03/2018
Hands-on test · Exercise neckband
Verdict
The RHA MA650 Wireless gives rich bass and bright highs for the price, though its cable slack makes it less suited to intense workouts.
soundguys.com
09/03/2018
Hands-on review · Wired earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a lightweight wired earphone with strong noise isolation and great value, though its bass is recessed and the remote is Android-only.
headphonereview.com
02/07/2018
Hands-on test · Neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a good-value neckband with a generous set of ear tips, but boosted high mids and an earbud fit that often slips hold it back.
F
forbes.com
21/07/2018
Summary of the review
RHA MA650 Review: Scottish Audio Company's Affordable Wireless Earbuds
M
majorhifi.com
28/07/2018
Summary of the review
RHA MA650 Wireless In-Ear Headphones Review Would you like to see a comparison between the wired and wireless versions of this specific model?
T
techadvisor.com
26/04/2018
Summary of the review
RHA MA650 Wireless Review
androidcentral.com
21/06/2018
Hands-on review · Wired Android earbuds
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a well-built wired pair whose three-button remote works on most Android phones, but it isn't built for running.
majorhifi.com
06/07/2018
Review · Wired Android earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a good-value wired pair for Android users, with punchy bass, clear highs and a remote that works with Google Assistant.
kopfhoerer.de
27/08/2018
Hands-on test · Sport neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 Wireless is a comfortable, sweat-resistant neckband earphone with warm, full sound that suits sport and commuting rather than critical listening.
netzwelt.de
18/04/2018
Review · Mid-range Bluetooth earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 Wireless is a warm, balanced neckband earphone that handles sport and everyday use well, though its sound is only average.
testr.at
15/03/2018
Product test · Sport neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 Wireless is a light, sturdy neckband earphone with balanced, detailed sound, roughly 11 hours of playback and a large set of tips.
frandroid.com
19/11/2017
Hands-on test · Wired in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA650 is a warm, punchy wired in-ear with good value, though it suits pop and electronic music better than styles needing refined highs.
ericboisseau.com
18/05/2018
Hands-on test · Bluetooth neckband
Verdict
The RHA MA650 Wireless is a comfortable Bluetooth neckband with a long battery and no drop-outs, suited to commuting and workouts.
F
forum.lesnumeriques.com
02/05/2018
Summary of the review
[Megathread] Audio Headphones Test: RHA MA650 Wireless
(Translated)Show original
lesnumeriques.com
02/05/2018
Lab test · Neckband earphones
Verdict
The RHA MA650 Wireless is a comfortable, long-lasting neckband whose bass is balanced, but its upper mids are very prominent.
proandroid.com
04/01/2018
Hands-on test · Bluetooth in-ears
Verdict
The RHA MA650 Wireless is a warm, comfortable Bluetooth in-ear with long battery life and good accessories, suited to pop, electronic and rap but less so to rock.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about RHA MA650

  • Impressive battery life, often exceeding the advertised 12 hours and reaching up to 14 hours in some tests.
  • Premium build quality with high-grade aluminum housings and a flexible, comfortable silicone neckband.
  • Excellent value for money, frequently cited as punching above its price class in sound quality.
  • Generous selection of included ear tips (up to 10 pairs), including Comply memory foam options for a better seal.
  • Well-balanced and clear sound signature with punchy bass and detailed instrument separation.
  • Practical features like magnetic earbuds that click together, USB-C charging, and IPX4 sweat resistance.
  • Strong wireless performance with stable Bluetooth connection and support for aptX and AAC codecs.

What customers don't like about RHA MA650

  • High frequencies and upper-mids can sometimes sound harsh, prickly, or overly bright, leading to listening fatigue.
  • The inline remote is positioned awkwardly close to the earbud and lacks distinct tactile markings, making it hard to use by feel.
  • Occasional background hiss or 'tape hiss' can be audible during quiet passages or between tracks.
  • Potential fit issues; some users found the earbuds prone to falling out despite the large variety of included tips.
  • Neckband design may slide backward if the user lies down or leans back, potentially tugging the buds out of the ears.
  • Included USB-C charging cable is noted by some as being too short for convenient use while charging.

Verdict

The RHA MA650 Wireless is a neckband-style in-ear headphone featuring custom 380.1 dynamic drivers housed in high-grade 6063 aluminum aerophonic chambers, designed to deliver clear, balanced audio with a frequency range of 16Hz – 22,000Hz. Key characteristics include Bluetooth 4.1 connectivity with support for aptX and AAC codecs, NFC for quick pairing, and an IPX4 splash and sweat resistance rating. Main pros consist of a respectable 12-hour battery life (extending up to 14 hours in some tests), a lightweight 33g build with a flexible SecureFlex neckband, and a generous inclusion of nine pairs of ear tips, including Comply foam. Cons include occasional harshness or sibilance in the upper mids and treble, lack of active noise cancellation, and a relatively short USB-C charging cable that prevents use while charging.

Compare RHA MA650 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of RHA MA650 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found