OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Monster Diamond Tears Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Form factor:on-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Monster Diamond Tears Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Monster Diamond Tears
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

80%

5.9

Technical score

20%

8.0

User score

â–²Better than 55% of headphones
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 67%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

52%

6.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

7.4

Design

8%

5.5

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

6.0

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 51%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 59%
  • monster-diamond-tears
  • monster-diamond-tears
  • monster-diamond-tears
  • monster-diamond-tears
  • monster-diamond-tears
  • monster-diamond-tears
  • monster-diamond-tears
monster-diamond-tears
monster-diamond-tears
monster-diamond-tears
monster-diamond-tears
monster-diamond-tears
monster-diamond-tears
monster-diamond-tears
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Monster Diamond Tears

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

52%

6.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

7.4

Design

8%

5.5

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

6.0

Calls & Controls

5.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Popularity:
Monster Diamond Tears has a popularity score of 6.5 points, which is higher than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
6.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.1
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
15 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 15 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 58.3% of headphones and equal to 5.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
0
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 0 microphones, fewer microphones than 73.2% of headphones and equal to 26.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Monster
Form factor
on-ear
Weight
231 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 231 g, heavier than 54.8% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Monster Diamond Tears vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Spatial audio support
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Quick mic mute
    This pair of headphones includes a quick mic mute, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.3% of headphones support a mute function.
  • 11 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    55 mm vs 44 mm
  • 3 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (15 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    15 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • 11 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    55 mm vs 44 mm
  • Spatial audio support
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • 3 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (15 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    15 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • Multipoint connections
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Quick mic mute
    This pair of headphones includes a quick mic mute, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.3% of headphones support a mute function.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 3 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (99 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    99 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 2.89x more expensive
    Monster Diamond Tears is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£260 vs £90).
    £260 vs £90
  • 6% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (231 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    231 g vs 218 g
  • 4 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2012 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    January 2012
    2012 vs 2016
  • 1.7% worse value for money
    Monster Diamond Tears has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7.15 vs 7.3).
    7.15 vs 7.27
  • 2.89x more expensive
    Monster Diamond Tears is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£260 vs £90).
    £260 vs £90
  • 1.7% worse value for money
    Monster Diamond Tears has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7.15 vs 7.3).
    7.15 vs 7.27
  • 6% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (231 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    231 g vs 218 g
  • 3 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (99 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    99 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 4 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2012 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    January 2012
    2012 vs 2016

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

10
New York King 718
✓ explicit
15/08/2021
Used pair unboxing · sound test after pad repair
Verdict
Monster Diamond Tears are balanced, great-sounding headphones that the creator rates very highly.
6.0
Gear Diary
≈ estimated
11/05/2013
Hands-on review · sound, fit and design
Verdict
Monster Diamond Tears deliver good but not great sound with tight clamping pressure, and are more a fashion piece than a top audio pick.
7.0
luvhate115
≈ estimated
23/01/2013
Hands-on review · sound and distortion test
Verdict
Monster Diamond Tears suits many listeners, but distortion at high volume and the price hold it back.
8.0
Onourshelf
✓ explicit
30/01/2013
Hands-on review · drop, sound leakage and gym tests
Verdict
Monster Diamond Tears are stylish and well built with good sound, though they show fingerprints and the white parts are hard to keep clean.
Not graded
Brand video
Brand video
Brand video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

gstylemag.com
26/11/2012
Hands-on review · Jewelry-style on-ear
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears is a stylish on-ear with clear, natural sound that suits vocal-led music, though bass lovers will want more punch.
cnet.com
18/01/2013
Hands-on test · Fashion on-ear
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears Edge suits buyers who want a flashy on-ear with good sound, but the price is hard to justify.
geardiary.com
10/05/2013
Hands-on review · Fashion headphones
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears Edge is a striking, crystal-studded fashion pair that sounds good but not great, and fits best on smaller heads.
M
memeburn.com
25/04/2014
Summary of the review
Monster Diamond Tears headphones review: beauty and the pain
theldndiaries.com
27/08/2015
Blog review · Fashion headphones
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears are flashy on-ears with clear sound that blocks outside noise, though the Powercard battery pack ran out early in one test.
gearlive.com
04/12/2013
Hands-on review · Fashion on-ears
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears Edge is a very comfortable, eye-catching on-ear that sounds clear for pop and classical, though bass lovers may want more.
kopfhoerer.de
14/01/2013
Hands-on test · Lifestyle on-ear
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears is a flashy lifestyle on-ear whose punchy, compact sound suits pop and EDM, though the tight band tires long sessions.
lesnumeriques.com
23/12/2013
Lab test · Flashy on-ear
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears is a flashy headphone whose voice-forward sound and loose parts disappoint on closer listening.
audiocasque.fr
18/02/2014
Hands-on test · Fashion on-ear
Verdict
The Monster Diamond Tears Edge is a neutral-sounding, flashy on-ear that suits average-sized heads, though its price is hard to justify.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Monster Diamond Tears

  • Flashy, eye-catching 'diamond' design that makes a strong fashion statement
  • Surprisingly balanced and detailed sound profile compared to other bass-heavy Monster models
  • Rich, clear midrange and treble that remains crisp even at higher volumes
  • Sturdy build quality despite being primarily made of plastic
  • Includes high-quality accessories like three tangle-free cables, a carrying case, and cleaning supplies
  • Foldable design makes them compact and easy to store
  • Good passive noise isolation that effectively blocks out ambient environment noise

What customers don't like about Monster Diamond Tears

  • High price point relative to overall performance; often seen as overpriced for the sound quality
  • Significant discomfort and ear 'squashing' during long listening sessions, particularly for those with larger ears or heads
  • Glossy finish is a massive 'fingerprint magnet' that requires frequent cleaning
  • Bass response may be too light for those used to the heavy bass of brands like Beats
  • The white ear pads and lining are difficult to keep clean and can discolor over time
  • Soundstage is somewhat narrow with limited depth for more complex audio tracks

Verdict

The Monster Diamond Tears are high-fidelity, on-ear headphones featuring high-definition 40mm drivers and proprietary ControlTalk Universal for hands-free calling. They are distinguished by their faceted, prism-like aesthetic and 'Edge-Motion' technology designed to deliver rapid transient response and punchy bass without digital signal processing. Key pros include a striking, jewellery-inspired design, a secure fold-up mechanism for portability, and a tangle-resistant flat cable. However, notable cons include potential discomfort during long listening sessions due to the rigid on-ear pressure and a highly reflective finish that is prone to visible fingerprints and smudges.

Compare Monster Diamond Tears with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Monster Diamond Tears and other products in the Headphones category

No results found