Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Koss KDE250 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220Form factor:in-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Koss KDE250 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Koss KDE250
4.9/10

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

4.7

Technical score

20%

5.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of headphones
6.3

Value for money

Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 94%
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

4.3

Sound

20%

4.7

Features

10%

7.1

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.2

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 97%
5.7

User score

User score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

User ratings

30%

3.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 98%
  • koss-kde250
  • koss-kde250
koss-kde250
koss-kde250
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Koss KDE250

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

4.3

Sound

20%

4.7

Features

10%

7.1

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.2

Calls & Controls

4.7
User score
User score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

User ratings

30%

3.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
5.7
Popularity
Popularity
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Koss KDE250 has a popularity score of 3.5 points, which is lower than that of 68% of products in this category.
3.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

6.3
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
20 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 20 mm, smaller driver size than 82.2% of headphones.
Number of drivers
2
This pair of headphones uses 2 drivers, more drivers than 96% of headphones and equal to 2.5% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
40 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 40 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 99.4% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
?
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
?
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Koss
Form factor
in-ear
Weight
27 g
This pair of headphones weighs 27 g, lighter than 83.3% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
open-back
Clamp force
N/A
Show more

Koss KDE250 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 87.6% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (27 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    27 g vs 218 g
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Open-back design
    This pair of headphones uses an open-back design, while the average pair of headphones does not. 9.1% of headphones have an open-back design.
  • 87.6% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (27 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    27 g vs 218 g
  • Open-back design
    This pair of headphones uses an open-back design, while the average pair of headphones does not. 9.1% of headphones have an open-back design.
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • 20 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (20 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    20 mm vs 40 mm
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 7 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (95 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    95 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 22 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    40 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 0.4 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.7 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.7 % vs 0.3 %
  • 41.4% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Koss KDE250
    the average pair of headphones
    Koss KDE250 has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (5.66 vs 8).
    5.66 vs 8
  • 16.2% worse value for money
    Koss KDE250 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.26 vs 7.3).
    6.26 vs 7.27
  • 2.44x more expensive
    Koss KDE250 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£220 vs £90).
    £220 vs £90
  • 69.8% less popular
    Koss KDE250 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (3.46 vs 5.9).
    3.46 vs 5.87
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • Tangle-prone cable
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • 20 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (20 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    20 mm vs 40 mm
  • 7 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (95 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    95 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 22 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    40 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 0.4 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.7 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.7 % vs 0.3 %
  • 15 dB lower max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (95 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    95 dB vs 110 dB
  • 8 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (95 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    95 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 7 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2009 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    September 2009
    2009 vs 2016

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theabsolutesound.com
14/12/2010
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
05/05/2010
Summary of the review
F
firstpost.com
11/02/2012
Summary of the review
F
forum.headphones.com
03/03/2019
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
06/03/2009
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
20/11/2011
Summary of the review
K
kjihwan.wordpress.com
18/09/2016
Summary of the review
T
theabsolutesound.com
14/12/2010
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
05/05/2010
Summary of the review
L
lydogbilde.no
01/12/2009
Summary of the review
G
gamereactor.no
03/05/2009
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Koss KDE250

  • Unique dual-element design featuring a dedicated woofer and tweeter for detailed sound separation.
  • Impressive openness and a wide, airy soundstage compared to traditional earbuds.
  • Comes with three sets of adjustable ear clips (small, medium, large) for a customisable fit.
  • Strong, punchy mid-bass and clear, transparent midrange.
  • No ear canal pressure, providing a comfortable alternative for those who dislike traditional IEM seals.
  • Covered by the Koss Limited Lifetime Warranty.

What customers don't like about Koss KDE250

  • Finicky and difficult 'fiddly' fit that requires significant adjustment to find the optimal sound position.
  • Lack of sub-bass extension and physical punch in very deep low-end frequencies.
  • Minimal noise isolation; ambient sounds from the environment are easily heard.
  • Thin and fragile-feeling cables that are not detachable.
  • Treble can occasionally sound 'hot' or peaky (around 2400Hz) depending on the track.
  • Not suitable for active use as they can slide out of position with movement.

Verdict

The Koss KDE250 is a unique dual-element ear-clip headphone featuring a 20mm low-frequency transducer and a 13mm mid-high frequency transducer mounted at perpendicular angles. Its technical specifications include a frequency response of 40Hz–20kHz, 16 ohms impedance, and a sensitivity of 95 dB SPL, making it easy to drive with portable devices. Main characteristics include a highly customisable fit via a knurled height-adjustment knob and a hinge mechanism that modifies the transducer's attack angle into the ear canal. Pros include impressive openness, transparency, and a midrange-forward sound signature that allows for ambient awareness while listening. However, notable cons include a lack of deep bass extension, minimal noise isolation due to its open design, and a finicky fit that some users find difficult to secure comfortably.

Compare Koss KDE250 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Koss KDE250 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found