OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Review | 118 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£35
  • VRAM: 2 GB
  • Memory bus width: 128 bit
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP): 50 W

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

3.0

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

3.0

Technical Score

10.0%

?

User score

Poor
3.0

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

1.6

Performance

24.0%

1.4

Memory

12.0%

7.2

Power & Cooling

11.0%

5.8

Platform & Features

5.0%

4.0

Design

4.0%

7.3

Connectivity & Media

Poor
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 7.1
    Gaming

    Score components:

    45.0%

    10

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 5.9
    Video editing

    Score components:

    35.0%

    7.0

    AV1 encode

    30.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    10

    Floating-point performance

    15.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 7.3
    1080p

    Score components:

    55.0%

    10

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    10.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 6.9
    1440p

    Score components:

    50.0%

    10

    Floating-point performance

    30.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    15.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 6.3
    4K

    Score components:

    40.0%

    10

    Floating-point performance

    35.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £35

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M is a mobile graphics card launched in 2013 based on the 28nm Kepler architecture and the GK107 chip. It features 384 CUDA cores, a base clock of 941 MHz (boostable to 967 MHz), and is typically paired with up to 4 GB of DDR3 or GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit interface. Key strengths include its low 50W power draw and support for technologies like SLI, Optimus, and PhysX, making it efficient for mid-range multimedia laptops and light gaming at the time of its release. However, it lacks support for modern DirectX 12 feature levels, does not feature ray tracing or DLSS, and struggles significantly with modern AAA titles or high-resolution external displays.

Technical Specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

?

Performance

24.0%

?

Memory

12.0%

?

Power & Cooling

11.0%

?

Platform & Features

5.0%

?

Design

4.0%

?

Connectivity & Media

3.0
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a technical score of 3.02 points, which is lower than that of 97.5% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 55.9% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

3.0

Overall score

40.0%

10

Price

5.1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a quality-to-price ratio of 5.1 points, which is lower than 95.9% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.
When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?
3DMark Port Royal score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.
When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

N/A
PassMark (G3D) result
What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark
When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests
When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?
Floating-point performance
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

742.7 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M delivers 742.7 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 99.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

2 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Memory type
What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)
When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

GDDR5
GDDR version
What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

GDDR5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

128 bit
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26.1% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

64.19 GB/s
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M reaches 64.19 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 97.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported
When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

3.0
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports PCIe 3.0, which is older than on 77.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication
When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

x16
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 31.5% of graphics cards and equal to 68.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version
When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

?
Vulkan version
What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version
When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

1.2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports Vulkan 1.2, which is older than on 96% of graphics cards and equal to 2.5% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version
When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

4.6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 4.8% of graphics cards and equal to 95.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously
When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 7.8% of graphics cards and equal to 89.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution
When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

?
DisplayPort outputs
What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs
When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

N/A
DisplayPort version
What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported
When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

1.2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.6% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections
When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

50 W
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a TDP of 50 W, which is lower than that of 96.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

50 W
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M draws 50 W under peak load, which is lower than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

?
Board power limit
What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

50 W
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a board power limit of 50 W, which is lower than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed
When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Show more
Size
What it is: Physical size of the GPU card
When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?
Length
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Height
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Slot width
What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card
When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the graphics card
When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs the average graphics card

  • 76.7% lower TDP
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
    When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.50 W vs 215 W
  • 8x larger L2 cache
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (256 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
    What it is: Total size of the GPU’s L2 cache memory
    When it matters: When cache size can help the GPU feed data faster in demanding scenes.

    Importance: LOW

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (256 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.256 MB vs 32 MB
  • 77.3% lower board power limit
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
    When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

    Importance: LOW

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.50 W vs 220 W
  • 15.14x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M is cheaper than the average graphics card (£35 vs £530).
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M is cheaper than the average graphics card (£35 vs £530).£35 vs £530
  • 32.14x higher compute throughput
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (742.7 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.
    What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
    When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

    Importance: LOW

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (742.7 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.742.7 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS
  • 77.3% lower peak power draw
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
    When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

    Importance: LOW

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.50 W vs 220 W
  • 61.2% smaller GPU die
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (118 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
    What it is: Total die area of the GPU chip
    When it matters: When you are comparing how physically large different GPU chips are across generations and tiers.

    Importance: LOW

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (118 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².118 mm² vs 304.25 mm²
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
    What it is: Supports NVIDIA SLI or AMD CrossFire multi-GPU setup
    When it matters: When you still run legacy multi-GPU gaming or rendering workflows.

    Importance: LOW

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 32.14x higher compute throughput
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (742.7 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.
  • Better FP64 ratio
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:24 vs 1:64).
  • 8x larger L2 cache
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (256 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
  • 61.2% smaller GPU die
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (118 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 76.7% lower TDP
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
  • 77.3% lower board power limit
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
  • 77.3% lower peak power draw
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.

Total
Overall
Performance
Memory
Platform & Features
Power & Cooling
  • 61.3% lower boost clock speed
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (967 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
  • 38 fewer compute units
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (2 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
  • 51% lower base clock speed
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (941 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
  • 152 fewer TMUs
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (32 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
  • 91.8% lower texture rate
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (30.9 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
  • 95.3% lower pixel rate
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (7.7 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
  • 96.8% lower FP32 performance
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.7 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
  • 3,968 fewer FP32 units
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (384 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
  • 85.7% lower memory bandwidth
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (64.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • 78.9% slower memory speed
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (4,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
  • 42.7% slower VRAM clock
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,003 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
  • 5.6x larger process node
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
  • No DLSS support
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 10 older
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,013 vs 2,023).
  • Older PCIe version
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4.0).
  • No XeSS support
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4).
  • Worse SAM support
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
  • No sampler feedback
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • Older shader model
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.5 vs 6.8).
  • 94.2% fewer transistors
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1,270 million vs 21,900 million). The average graphics card has 21,900 million transistors.
  • No AV1 encoding
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
  • Older DisplayPort version
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
  • No VRR support
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
  • 24 °C higher load temperature
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (91 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
  • 61.3% lower boost clock speed
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (967 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
    What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
    When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.

    Importance: HIGH

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (967 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.967 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
    When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

    Importance: HIGH

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 38 fewer compute units
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (2 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
    When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.

    Importance: HIGH

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (2 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.2 vs 40
  • 5.6x larger process node
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
    When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
    When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

    Importance: HIGH

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 51% lower base clock speed
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (941 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
    What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
    When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.

    Importance: HIGH

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (941 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.941 MHz vs 1920 MHz
  • 152 fewer TMUs
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (32 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
    When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.

    Importance: HIGH

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (32 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.32 vs 184
  • 91.8% lower texture rate
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (30.9 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
    What it is: Number of textured pixels the GPU can process per second
    When it matters: When fast texture handling matters in high-refresh gaming workloads.

    Importance: HIGH

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (30.9 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.30.94 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s
Total
Overall
Performance
Memory
Platform & Features
Connectivity & Media
Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M?

  • Capable of handling casual e-sports and older AAA titles like GTA V and Skyrim on low to medium settings
  • Supports multi-display technology for more immersive setups
  • Relatively low power consumption (50W TDP) compared to desktop counterparts
  • Offers a significant performance boost over integrated graphics of its era, like the HD Graphics 4000
  • Included feature support for DirectX 12 (at feature level 11_0) and OpenCL 3.0
  • Can be used in SLI configurations in certain laptop models to significantly improve performance in supported games

What customers dislike about NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M?

  • Severely outdated for modern AAA gaming, often struggling to reach 30 FPS even on lowest settings
  • Limited VRAM (typically 1GB or 2GB) causes stuttering and performance drops in modern textures
  • Susceptible to thermal throttling in slim laptop chassis, requiring undervolting or cooling pads for stability
  • Known issues with random FPS drops in some DX9 titles, possibly due to driver or hardware design flaws
  • Lacks support for modern features like Ray Tracing and DLSS upscaling
  • DirectX 12 support is limited to feature level 11_0, causing compatibility issues with newer DX12-only titles

Expert reviews

R
reviewed.com
17/06/2014
Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display (Nvidia GT 750M Laptop Review) I can help you look up more hardware details if you specify whether your Nvidia c...

The 2014 15-inch Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display, equipped with an Intel Core i7 processor and an Nvidia GeForce GT 750M discrete graphics card, represents a pinnacle of performance for creative professionals. The laptop excels with outstanding horsepower, blistering read/write storage speeds, and a gorgeous, pixel-dense 2880x1800 IPS display that offers excellent contrast and...Read more

H
hardwareluxx.de
21/11/2013
Acer Aspire V5-573G im Test - Technische Daten

The Hardwareluxx review covers the Acer Aspire V5-573G (specifically the 54208G50akk variant), a 15.6-inch laptop blending multimedia and everyday computing capabilities into a highly compact chassis. Retailing around €699, it pairs a modern dual-core Intel Core i5-4200U processor (1.6 GHz base, 2.6 GHz Turbo) with 8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 500 GB mechanical HDD. Multimedia and casual...Read more

(Translated)Show original
G
geeknetic.es
30/05/2013
GeForce GTX 700M. Llegan las gráficas de alto rendimiento para portátiles de Nvidia

The GeForce GTX 700M series marks Nvidia's high-performance push into gaming laptops, introducing the Kepler-based GTX 760M, GTX 770M, and GTX 780M models to complement its existing lower-end mobile lineup. Architecturally, the top-tier GTX 780M utilizes the robust GK104 chip with enhanced core clock speeds, while the other variants run on the GK106 chip. These graphic cards are...Read more

(Translated)Show original
Z
zonamovilidad.es
07/11/2014
Prueba Mac Bookpro Retina 15. Un ordenador llamado deseo

The 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display is described by Zonamovilidad as a minimalist, artistic device featuring a crisp, high-resolution screen, SSD-driven speed, and powerful Intel Core i7 performance. The review highlights its exceptional display quality, lightweight design, and raw processing power as key advantages for professional users. · Conversely, the review notes...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

msi-geforce-gtx-760
MSI GeForce GTX 760

Graphics cards

4.1
xfx-radeon-hd-7870
XFX Radeon HD 7870

Graphics cards

3.6
msi-geforce-gtx-960
MSI GeForce GTX 960

Graphics cards

3.5
No image
AMD Radeon HD 6950

Graphics cards

3.3
gigabyte-hd-6670-2gb
GIGABYTE HD 6670 2GB

Graphics cards

3.3
nvidia-quadro-600
NVIDIA Quadro 600

Graphics cards

3.1
amd-radeon-550x
AMD Radeon 550X

Graphics cards

3.0
nvidia-geforce-gtx-970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Graphics cards

4.7
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-970-windforce-3x-oc
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 970 WINDFORCE 3X OC

Graphics cards

4.7
evga-geforce-gtx-970-gaming
EVGA GeForce GTX 970 Gaming

Graphics cards

4.7
msi-geforce-gtx-970-gaming
MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming

Graphics cards

4.6
gigabyte-geforce-gtx-760-windforce-3x-oc
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 760 WINDFORCE 3X OC

Graphics cards

4.4

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with

VS
VS

Compare