OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

AMD Radeon 680M Review | 118 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£570
  • Avg. price in US: ~$430
  • VRAM: ?
  • Memory bus width: ?
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP): 50 W

AMD Radeon 680M review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

4.0

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

4.0

Technical Score

10.0%

?

User score

Poor
4.0

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

2.5

Performance

24.0%

1.4

Memory

12.0%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11.0%

8.9

Platform & Features

5.0%

7.0

Design

4.0%

7.6

Connectivity & Media

Poor
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 3.6
    Gaming

    Score components:

    45.0%

    1.1

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    20.0%

    1.0

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    8.8

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 6.4
    Video editing

    Score components:

    35.0%

    7.0

    AV1 encode

    30.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    20.0%

    1.1

    Floating-point performance

    15.0%

    8.8

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 3.6
    1080p

    Score components:

    55.0%

    1.1

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    10.0%

    1.0

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    8.8

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 3.6
    1440p

    Score components:

    50.0%

    1.1

    Floating-point performance

    30.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    15.0%

    1.0

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    8.8

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 3.9
    4K

    Score components:

    40.0%

    1.1

    Floating-point performance

    35.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    20.0%

    1.0

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    8.8

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £570

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The AMD Radeon 680M is a high-performance integrated graphics solution based on the 6nm RDNA 2 architecture, featuring 768 shading units, 12 ray tracing cores, and a boost clock speed of up to 2400 MHz. Its primary strengths include efficient 1080p gaming performance comparable to entry-level discrete cards like the GTX 1050 Ti, support for DirectX 12 Ultimate features such as hardware ray tracing and Variable Rate Shading, and excellent power efficiency with a maximum draw of 50W. However, its capabilities are heavily reliant on system RAM speed (ideally LPDDR5-6400), and it lacks the dedicated VRAM and raw power required for smooth performance in modern AAA titles at high settings or 4K resolutions.

Technical Specifications of AMD Radeon 680M

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

?

Performance

24.0%

?

Memory

12.0%

?

Power & Cooling

11.0%

?

Platform & Features

5.0%

?

Design

4.0%

?

Connectivity & Media

4.0
AMD Radeon 680M has a technical score of 4.05 points, which is lower than that of 89.3% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
AMD Radeon 680M has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 55.9% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

4.0

Overall score

40.0%

7.5

Price

5.1
AMD Radeon 680M has a quality-to-price ratio of 5.1 points, which is lower than 95.9% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.
When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?
3DMark Port Royal score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.
When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

?
PassMark (G3D) result
What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark
When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests
When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?
Floating-point performance
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

3.379 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon 680M delivers 3.379 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 93.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

?
Memory type
What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)
When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

N/A
GDDR version
What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Memory bus width
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

?
Maximum memory bandwidth
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

?
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported
When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

4.0
AMD Radeon 680M supports PCIe 4.0, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 52% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication
When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

x8
AMD Radeon 680M uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 68.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version
When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

12 Ultimate
AMD Radeon 680M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 12.5% of graphics cards and equal to 87.5% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version
When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

1.4
AMD Radeon 680M supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 26.6% of graphics cards and equal to 73.4% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version
When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

4.6
AMD Radeon 680M supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 4.8% of graphics cards and equal to 95.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously
When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

4
AMD Radeon 680M supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 7.8% of graphics cards and equal to 89.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution
When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

?
DisplayPort outputs
What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs
When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

?
DisplayPort version
What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported
When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

?
DisplayPort link rates
What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections
When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

8.1 Gbps
AMD Radeon 680M supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 50.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

50 W
AMD Radeon 680M has a TDP of 50 W, which is lower than that of 96.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

50 W
AMD Radeon 680M draws 50 W under peak load, which is lower than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Board power limit
What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

50 W
AMD Radeon 680M has a board power limit of 50 W, which is lower than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed
When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Show more
Size
What it is: Physical size of the GPU card
When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Length
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Height
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Slot width
What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card
When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the graphics card
When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more

AMD Radeon 680M vs the average graphics card

  • 76.7% lower TDP
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
    When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.50 W vs 215 W
  • Supports ECC memory
    AMD Radeon 680M supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
    What it is: Supports error-correcting code memory for higher reliability
    When it matters: When stability and error correction matter more than pure gaming value.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 680M supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 77.3% lower board power limit
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
    When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.50 W vs 220 W
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon 680M has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
    When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 680M has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
  • 77.3% lower peak power draw
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
    When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.50 W vs 220 W
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon 680M has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
  • Supports ECC memory
    AMD Radeon 680M supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 76.7% lower TDP
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (50 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
  • 77.3% lower board power limit
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
  • 77.3% lower peak power draw
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (50 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.

Total
Performance
Memory
Power & Cooling
  • 28 fewer compute units
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (12 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
  • 79.2% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
  • 36 fewer ray tracing cores
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (12 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.
  • 136 fewer TMUs
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
  • 72% lower texture rate
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (105.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
  • 12% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,200 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
  • 85.2% lower FP32 performance
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (3.4 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
  • 77.1% lower FP16 performance
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (6.8 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
  • 3,584 fewer FP32 units
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (768 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
  • 85.4% lower compute throughput
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (3.4 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.
  • 54.6% lower FP64 performance
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.4651 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.4651 TFLOPS.
  • 93.8% smaller L2 cache
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
  • No DLSS support
    AMD Radeon 680M does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
  • 20% larger process node
    AMD Radeon 680M has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
  • 1 older
    AMD Radeon 680M was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,022 vs 2,023).
  • No AV1 encoding
    AMD Radeon 680M does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No backplate
    AMD Radeon 680M does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    AMD Radeon 680M does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 28 fewer compute units
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (12 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
    When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (12 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.12 vs 40
  • 36 fewer ray tracing cores
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (12 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.
    What it is: Number of dedicated ray tracing processing cores or units
    When it matters: When you care about ray-traced lighting, reflections, and shadows in newer games.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (12 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.12 vs 48
  • 79.2% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
    What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
    When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (400 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.400 MHz vs 1920 MHz
  • 136 fewer TMUs
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
    When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.48 vs 184
  • 72% lower texture rate
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (105.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
    What it is: Number of textured pixels the GPU can process per second
    When it matters: When fast texture handling matters in high-refresh gaming workloads.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (105.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.105.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s
  • 12% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,200 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
    What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
    When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 680M has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,200 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.2200 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    AMD Radeon 680M does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
    What it is: Supports NVIDIA DLSS upscaling technology
    When it matters: When you play NVIDIA-supported games and want better frame rates at higher settings.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon 680M does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    What it is: Total number of render output units on the GPU
    When it matters: When you want more context on pixel output capacity, especially for high-resolution play and older raster-heavy engines.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon 680M has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.32 vs 64
Total
Overall
Performance
Memory
Platform & Features
Connectivity & Media
Design

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon 680M and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Radeon 680M?

  • Impressive 1080p gaming performance for an integrated GPU, capable of running AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Forza Horizon 5 at playable frame rates with FSR enabled.
  • Significant generational leap, delivering nearly double the performance of the previous Vega 8 iGPU.
  • Highly power-efficient 6nm architecture, allowing for decent gaming in thin-and-light laptops and mini PCs without excessive heat.
  • Support for modern features like DirectX 12 Ultimate and hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the latter is primarily for feature compatibility.
  • Strong performance in emulation, including smooth playback for PS2, PS3, and Switch games.
  • Excellent driver support on Linux platforms via Mesa.

What customers dislike about AMD Radeon 680M?

  • Heavy dependence on system RAM speed; performance is significantly bottlenecked when paired with slower DDR5-4800 memory versus LPDDR5-6400.
  • Ray tracing performance is too slow for practical use in most modern games despite hardware support.
  • Performance is highly sensitive to TDP limits; ultra-portable 15-25W implementations see a 20%+ performance drop compared to 50W+ versions.
  • Occasional stuttering and high frame time variance in demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone 2 or Battlefield 2042.
  • Limited VRAM allocation in some system BIOS settings can lead to crashes or unplayable performance in modern titles.
  • Already superseded by the newer Radeon 780M and 890M, making it less ideal for buyers seeking the best current value in new hardware.

Expert reviews

T
techpowerup.com
03/03/2022
AMD Radeon 680M (Ryzen 6000 "Rembrandt" iGPU) Proves its Mettle with Cyberpunk 2077

The AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics, based on RDNA2 architecture, demonstrated strong 1080p gaming performance in an ASUS TUF Gaming notebook equipped with a Ryzen 7 6800H, successfully running Cyberpunk 2077. As a 12 Compute Unit iGPU with 768 stream processors, it positions itself as an entry-level discrete-GPU alternative capable of modern gaming with FidelityFX Super...Read more

P
phoronix.com
25/07/2022
AMD Radeon 680M Graphics Are A Great Upgrade With RDNA2, Excellent On Linux Review

The Phoronix review of the AMD Radeon 680M (RDNA2) integrated graphics, tested with the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U on Ubuntu 22.04, highlights a major performance leap over previous Vega architectures, offering exceptional performance-per-watt and immediate, stable open-source Linux driver support. Key advantages include outperforming Intel Alder Lake graphics in many titles and delivering...Read more

U
ultrabookreview.com
31/10/2023
AMD Radeon 680M benchmarks, review (RDNA2 AMD iGPU) vs Iris Xe, Intel

The AMD Radeon 680M (RDNA2) integrated GPU offers significant performance improvements, delivering nearly double the frame rates of the previous Vega 8 and outperforming Intel's Iris Xe by 30-50% in 3DMark, making it capable of 1080p gaming in thin-and-light laptops. Key benefits include high power efficiency and strong scaling up to 42% performance gains at higher TDP levels....Read more

N
notebookcheck.net
22/01/2023
Beelink SER6 ProGo to product viewer dialog for this item. review: The AMD Radeon 680M is stunning on a mini PC

The Beelink SER6 Pro is a high-value mini PC retailing between $600 and $700 USD that delivers exceptional performance-per-dollar, particularly putting Intel NUC Iris Xe solutions to shame. Powered by an upgraded AMD Ryzen 7 6800H CPU and an integrated Radeon 680M GPU, the system achieves a 70 to 100 percent graphics leap over older Radeon Vega solutions. This allows users to...Read more

L
laptopmedia.com
04/04/2023
AMD Radeon 680M in 23 gameplay videos with benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 680M is highlighted as a top-tier integrated GPU capable of impressive 1080p performance in fast-paced titles, such as 100 FPS in Apex Legends and 132 FPS in Overwatch 2 on low settings, provided it is paired with fast RAM and adequate cooling. While offering playable frame rates in demanding titles like Shadow of the Tomb Raider (42 FPS on Medium), the iGPU requires...Read more

C
computerbase.de
21/09/2022
Core i-1200P/U vs. Ryzen 6000HS/U im Test: Mobile iGPUs von AMD und Intel im Gaming-Duell

summary of the review: This 2022 review evaluates the performance of Intel’s 12th-generation Alder Lake P and U-series notebook processors (Core i7-1280P, i7-1260P, and i5-1255U) against AMD’s Ryzen 6000 Rembrandt H and U-series mobile chips (Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 7 6800U, and Ryzen 5 Pro 6650U). In single-core applications, Intel displays dominant processing power, outperforming...Read more

(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
07/07/2022
Test Asus Zenbook S13 OLED : notre avis complet sur le PC ultraportable

Asus Zenbook S13 OLED Review Summary The Asus Zenbook S13 OLED is a highly compact and lightweight ultraportable laptop made entirely of aluminum, matching the dimensions of an A4 sheet of paper and weighing just 1 kg. It features a 13.3-inch 2.8K tactile OLED display with a 16:10 aspect ratio and Pantone color validation, powered by an AMD Ryzen 7 6800U processor, AMD Radeon 680M...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
02/08/2022
Labo – Retour sur les étonnantes performances vidéoludiques du Ryzen 7 6800U d'AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Review Summary The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U processor, tested inside the Asus ZenBook S 13 Oled, introduces the Radeon 680M integrated graphics card (iGPU) featuring 12 compute units powered by the desktop-class RDNA 2 architecture. In benchmarks and real-world gaming tests, this new chip delivers massive generational leaps, nearly doubling the performance of the older...Read more

(Translated)Show original
E
elchapuzasinformatico.com
19/03/2025
GEEKOM A6, review del mini-PC más compacto de la marca

The GEEKOM A6 is identified by El Chapuzas Informático as a highly efficient, ultra-compact mini-PC featuring an AMD Ryzen 7 6800H processor and Radeon 680M integrated graphics suitable for multimedia and light gaming. Pros include its exceptionally small form factor and the ability to achieve playable 1080p framerates with FSR, though it lacks dedicated graphics power. Conversely,...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

No image
PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT

Graphics cards

7.9
asrock-radeon-rx-9070-xt-steel-legend
ASRock Radeon RX 9070 XT Steel Legend

Graphics cards

7.9
amd-radeon-rx-6950-xt
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Graphics cards

8.0
asus-prime-radeon-rx-9070-xt-oc-edition
ASUS Prime Radeon RX 9070 XT OC Edition

Graphics cards

8.0
xfx-swift-radeon-rx-9070-xt-triple-fan-gaming-edition
XFX Swift Radeon RX 9070 XT Triple Fan Gaming Edition

Graphics cards

7.9
powercolor-red-devil-radeon-rx-7900-gre
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Graphics cards

7.9
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Graphics cards

7.9
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7900-gre
PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Graphics cards

8.0
xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT

Graphics cards

8.2
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-9070-xt
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9070 XT

Graphics cards

7.9
amd-radeon-rx-7900-gre
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Graphics cards

7.8
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7900-gre-gaming-oc
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7900 GRE Gaming OC

Graphics cards

7.8

Compare AMD Radeon 680M with

VS
VS

Compare