Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Sony Smartband Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Battery life:5 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:3 m

Sony Smartband Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.9

Technical score

20%

6.9

User score

▼Worse than 88% of fitness-trackers
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.8

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.1

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.6

Smart Features

8%

8.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.0

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 91% of fitness-trackers
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on 138 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 84% of fitness-trackers
  • sony-smartband
  • sony-smartband
  • sony-smartband
  • sony-smartband
  • sony-smartband
  • sony-smartband
  • sony-smartband
sony-smartband
sony-smartband
sony-smartband
sony-smartband
sony-smartband
sony-smartband
sony-smartband

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Sony Smartband

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.8

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.1

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.6

Smart Features

8%

8.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.0

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

5.9
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on 138 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.9
Popularity
Popularity
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sony Smartband has a popularity score of 5.7 points, which is higher than 57.3% of fitness trackers.
5.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.3
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
vibration/LED alerts only.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Lifelog app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
yes
NFC
yes
This fitness tracker has NFC. 87.5% of fitness trackers have NFC.
NFC is for pairing only.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
35 mAh
Battery capacity
35 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 35 mAh which is lower than that of 94.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
20 mm
Show more

Sony Smartband vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
    Vibrating alarm based on sleep cycle.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 8,000x higher RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    16 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (16 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    16 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 3.2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    7.8 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (7.8 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    7.8 mm vs 11 mm
  • NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This fitness tracker has NFC, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
    NFC is for pairing only.
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Uses connected phone GPS for route maps.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Works via the Smart Connect camera extension.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This fitness tracker has NFC, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
    NFC is for pairing only.
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
    Vibrating alarm based on sleep cycle.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 8,000x higher RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    16 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (16 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    16 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Works via the Smart Connect camera extension.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Haptic motor type
    Haptic motor type
    LRA
    This fitness tracker uses a more advanced haptic motor type than the average fitness tracker (LRA vs ERM). The average fitness tracker uses a ERM haptic motor type.
    LRA vs ERM
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 3.2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    7.8 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (7.8 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    7.8 mm vs 11 mm
  • 16% lighter
    Thickness
    21 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (21 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    21 g vs 25 g
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses Activity Points.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • 68.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    35 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (35 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    35 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 47 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    3 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (3 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    3 m vs 50 m
  • 99.2% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.000256 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.000256 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    none
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810G
  • 8.9% worse value for money
    Sony Smartband has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.27 vs 7.9).
    7.27 vs 7.92
  • 16.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sony Smartband
    the average fitness tracker
    Sony Smartband has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (6.88 vs 8.000).
    6.88 vs 8
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 68.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    35 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (35 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    35 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • 99.2% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.000256 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.000256 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 47 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    3 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (3 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    3 m vs 50 m
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    none
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810G
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP58
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP58 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP58 vs IP68
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
wareable.com
08/08/2014
Summary of the review
A
androidauthority.com
15/06/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
11/06/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
13/06/2014
Summary of the review
N
nzherald.co.nz
01/06/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
11/06/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomsguide.com
18/06/2014
Summary of the review
F
firstpost.com
12/07/2014
Summary of the review
G
gadgetguy.com.au
06/06/2014
Summary of the review
G
gadfit.com
27/06/2014
Summary of the review
C
coachweb.com
07/12/2014
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
01/06/2014
Summary of the review
S
stadt-bremerhaven.de
08/08/2014
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
27/05/2014
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
11/07/2014
Summary of the review
K
kollermedia.at
23/08/2014
Summary of the review
U
unsimpleclic.com
06/10/2014
Summary of the review
S
stuffi.fr
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
2
20minutes.fr
12/05/2014
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
20/06/2014
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
04/06/2014
Summary of the review
G
gizlogic.com
30/03/2015
Summary of the review
A
applicantes.com
11/07/2014
Summary of the review
P
pisapapeles.net
06/11/2014
Summary of the review
W
wired.it
19/08/2014
Summary of the review
I
intogadgets.nl
04/11/2020
Summary of the review
T
techzine.nl
17/07/2014
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
09/10/2014
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
01/07/2014
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
27/07/2014
Summary of the review
G
gadgetgear.nl
25/08/2014
Summary of the review
A
androidplanet.nl
29/06/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 138 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sony Smartband

  • Extremely lightweight and comfortable for 24/7 wear
  • Waterproof and dustproof with IP58/IP68 certification
  • Visual and feature-rich companion 'Lifelog' app
  • Quick charging time (approx. 30–60 minutes)
  • Solid battery life (up to 5 days on standard models)
  • NFC pairing makes initial connection to Android devices easy
  • Versatile design with a removable 'Core' unit and swappable bands

What we don't like about Sony Smartband

  • No built-in display on standard models (requires phone for all data)
  • Inaccurate activity tracking, especially for running and non-step exercises
  • Proprietary band closures can be finicky or prone to popping open
  • Notification system and media controls can be confusing or unresponsive
  • Limited fitness metrics; lacks depth for serious athletes
  • Short battery life on SmartBand 2 when heart rate monitoring is active
  • Setup process and multi-app requirement (Smart Connect, Lifelog, etc.) is cumbersome

Verdict

The Sony SmartBand SWR10 is a screenless fitness tracker centered around a removable 'Core' module that weighs just 6 grams and features an IP58 waterproof rating. It tracks steps, calories, and sleep cycles, syncing via Bluetooth 4.0 and NFC to the Sony Lifelog app, while offering up to 5 days of battery life from a 35mAh cell. Key advantages include its extremely lightweight, comfortable design, 30-minute fast charging, and unique vibration alerts for smartphone notifications and smart alarms. However, its lack of an integrated display requires users to check their phones for all data, and the device has been noted for a finicky band closure, no iOS support, and a lack of built-in GPS or heart rate monitoring.

Compare Sony Smartband with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Smartband and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found