Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

LifeTrak Move C300 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Battery life:365 daysScreen size:0.96 inchHeart rate monitor:?GPS:noWaterproof depth rating:30 m

LifeTrak Move C300 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.1

Technical score

20%

?

User score

▲Better than 53% of fitness-trackers
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

6.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.8

Battery

18%

6.2

Health

18%

6.1

Display

8%

6.4

Smart Features

8%

7.9

App & Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.6

Design & Durability

▲Better than 54% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £70

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker LifeTrak Move C300

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

6.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.8

Battery

18%

6.2

Health

18%

6.1

Display

8%

6.4

Smart Features

8%

7.9

App & Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.6

Design & Durability

7.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
LifeTrak Move C300 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.0
Heart rate monitor
?
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
?
Vibrating alerts
?
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
365 days
Battery life
365 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 365 days which is longer than that of 95.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.5% of fitness trackers.
Some estimates go to about 425 days.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
225 mAh
Battery capacity
225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 225 mAh which is higher than that of 85.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 7.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.96 inch
Screen size
0.96 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.96 inch which is smaller than that of 53.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
This fitness tracker uses LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 68.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 4.6% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
22 mm
Show more

LifeTrak Move C300 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 355 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    365 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (365 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Some estimates go to about 425 days.
    365 days vs 10 days
  • 2.05x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (225 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    225 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
    0-59 minute wake window.
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
  • 3 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    3
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (3 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • ECG lead type
    ECG lead type
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports advanced ECG leads, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support advanced ECG leads.
    single-lead ECG.
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
    Standalone use supported.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a removable battery, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.6% of fitness trackers have a removable battery.
    Uses a user-replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
  • ECG lead type
    ECG lead type
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports advanced ECG leads, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support advanced ECG leads.
    single-lead ECG.
  • 355 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    365 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (365 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Some estimates go to about 425 days.
    365 days vs 10 days
  • 2.05x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (225 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    225 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a removable battery, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.6% of fitness trackers have a removable battery.
    Uses a user-replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
    0-59 minute wake window.
  • 3 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    3
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (3 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
    Standalone use supported.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.2% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • 2 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    3 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (3 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    3 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 20 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    30 m reported in some sources.
    30 m vs 50 m
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 5.07x less popular
    LifeTrak Move C300 has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 87.2% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • No rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a rechargeable battery, while the average fitness tracker does. 86% of fitness trackers have a rechargeable battery.
    Uses a replaceable non-rechargeable battery.
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    polycarbonate
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (polycarbonate vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    polycarbonate vs glass
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • 2 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    3 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (3 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    3 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 20 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    30 m reported in some sources.
    30 m vs 50 m
  • 12.05 mm greater height
    Height
    52.85 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (52.9 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    52.85 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2013 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    2013 vs 2016
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
09/08/2013
Summary of the review
9
9to5mac.com
11/08/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/06/2018
Summary of the review
J
justcreateawesome.com
18/09/2015
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
10/08/2013
Summary of the review
W
weartested.org
25/09/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
08/10/2014
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
10/08/2013
Summary of the review
S
staringatphones.com
13/04/2014
Summary of the review
W
weartested.org
25/09/2013
Summary of the review
9
9to5mac.com
11/08/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
09/08/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about LifeTrak Move C300

  • Extremely affordable price point for a tracker with heart rate monitoring
  • Long battery life using a replaceable coin cell battery, requiring no regular charging
  • Includes a clear, always-on display for viewing metrics directly on the wrist
  • Waterproof up to 30 meters, making it suitable for swimming
  • Comfortable and secure band design with reversible color options
  • Accurate heart rate monitoring using ECG-style pulse technology

What we don't like about LifeTrak Move C300

  • Highly inaccurate data tracking during certain activities, particularly bicycling
  • Lacks built-in sleep tracking capabilities
  • Display is prone to scuffs and lacks high contrast for viewing in dark conditions
  • Missing advanced features like an altimeter, silent vibrating alarms, or GPS
  • Dated dot-matrix screen appearance compared to modern competitors
  • Syncing with the companion app (Argus) can be inconsistent or buggy

Verdict

The LifeTrak Move C300 is a watch-style activity tracker featuring a low-power LCD and a long-lasting, replaceable CR2032 coin cell battery that can last up to 14 months, eliminating the need for daily charging. Key characteristics include an integrated ECG-accurate heart rate monitor, Bluetooth Smart connectivity for syncing with health apps, and water resistance up to 30 meters. It automatically tracks steps, distance, and calories burned using a pace-based algorithm that identifies walking, jogging, or running. Main pros include its highly affordable price point, always-on display, and reversible, interchangeable bands. However, notable cons include its dated dot-matrix display, lack of a vibration motor for silent alarms or sleep tracking, and reported inaccuracies during activities like bicycling.

Compare LifeTrak Move C300 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of LifeTrak Move C300 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found