OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Amazon Halo Band review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£70Battery life:7 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Amazon Halo Band Review: Compare 163 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

35%

6.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.4

Reviews score

10%

6.4

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 86% of fitness trackers
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▼Worse than 87%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

5.0

Battery

18%

7.9

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

4.8

Smart functions

8%

9.0

Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design

▼Worse than 77%
6.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models

6.4

Mark 7.2 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.0

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (20)
11 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 83%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £70
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Amazon Halo Band

Based on 10 · 9

The light, comfortable band and solid activity and sleep tracking win praise, but the body scan and short battery life disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #222 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Amazon Halo Band

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

5.0

Battery

18%

7.9

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

4.8

Smart functions

8%

9.0

Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design

6.4
Reviews score
6.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.7
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
What reviewers say
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 14.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 85.6% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
What reviewers say
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 72.7% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 86.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
What reviewers say
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Halo app
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.7% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 64% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Via Halo membership.
Show more
What reviewers say
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 68% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 17.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Market range: <9 m – >30 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 64.5% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 56.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 21.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 74.2% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 23.4% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Quick-release band system.
Band width
16 mm
Show more
What reviewers say

Amazon Halo Band vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Tracks HRV
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.1% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
    Nighttime only.
  • 4x larger internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.3 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.256 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Via Halo membership.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.4% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin temperature during sleep.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Night-time trend only.
  • N. of microphones
    This fitness tracker has more microphones than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 microphone/s.
    Dual microphones for tone analysis.
    2 vs 0
  • Ovulation prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 44.1% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Tracks HRV
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.1% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
    Nighttime only.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.4% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin temperature during sleep.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Night-time trend only.
  • Ovulation prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 44.1% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5 vs 4.1
  • 4x larger internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.3 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.256 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • N. of microphones
    This fitness tracker has more microphones than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 microphone/s.
    Dual microphones for tone analysis.
    2 vs 0
  • 1 more physical buttons
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Via Halo membership.
  • Points-based system
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.2% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses Activity Points.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No notifications
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.3% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • No vibrating alerts
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 85.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No silent alarm
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 82.2% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • 12.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models

    6.4

    Mark 7.2 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    11 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.4 vs 7.3
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 12.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models

    6.4

    Mark 7.2 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    11 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.4 vs 7.3
  • 19.0% lower sentiment score
    6.4 vs 7.9
  • 4.8% worse value for money
    Amazon Halo Band has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.7 vs 8.1).
    7.7 vs 8.07
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • No display
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 73.9% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • No notifications
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.3% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • No silent alarm
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 82.2% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 85.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No stopwatch
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 60.5% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No achievements
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.4% of fitness trackers support achievements.
  • No BMI tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.2% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • Paid app
    This fitness tracker does not have a free app, while the average fitness tracker does. 96.7% of fitness trackers have a free app.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0
5after12
≈ estimated
27/07/2021
Unboxing and one-month review · daily use
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band works fine, but offers little real-world value, so it isn't worth keeping.
8.0
It's Matt B
≈ estimated
04/01/2021
Full review · body fat scan and tone tests
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band is valuable for tracking body fat and activity, but it doesn't replace a sports watch.
8.0
Justin_tech
≈ estimated
30/12/2020
Hands-on review · two weeks of use, feature tests
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band is one of the most interesting fitness bands, but most features need a paid membership.
9.0
Coach Schuyler | Fat Loss Expert
≈ estimated
03/12/2020
Hands-on review · comfort, body scan, labs and tone
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band is an impressive band overall, though the tone feature raises some doubts.
4.0
Jordan Harrod
≈ estimated
01/12/2020
Hands-on review · one month of daily use
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band is not recommended: its fitness features are unremarkable, and the voice and body-fat features feel unnecessary and intrusive.
7.0
Mark Tsai
≈ estimated
14/11/2020
Two-month review · body scan, tone and battery tests
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band suits people who want a barely noticeable sleep and activity tracker, but tone features and battery life limit it.
9.0
Madi Wilson
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Hands-on review · two weeks of testing, pros and cons
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band is a strong all-round pick for anyone wanting to improve health and mindfulness, and it is well worth buying.
9.0
Train.Recover.Repeat.
≈ estimated
17/10/2020
Hands-on review · three weeks of use, compared with another band
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band motivates more daily activity, and the reviewer likes it, though its goal settings need work.
7.0
JASON THE TRY-ATHLETE
≈ estimated
08/10/2020
Unboxing · first impressions and setup
Verdict
Amazon Halo Band feels good so far, but its bottom charging clip and missing alarm are drawbacks.
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
26/04/2023
Long-term review · Screenless tracker
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a comfortable, light tracker whose Discover workouts and sleep score suit people who want to move more, though its Tone and Body features feel gimmicky.
8.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
15/02/2022
Hands-on review · Health wearable
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a comfortable, well-designed tracker whose voice analysis and body scan are interesting but unsettling, so it suits people who don't mind being monitored.
9.0
mikhalevi.ch
✓ explicit
06/02/2022
Personal review · Minimalist tracker
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a screenless tracker lasting about five days with Tone off, and its generous activity points and posture assessment suit people who want steady movement.
4.0
gq.com
≈ estimated
26/01/2021
Personal opinion · Privacy concerns
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a well-made tracker whose tone analysis and body fat slider feel invasive, so it suits people who are fine with constant monitoring.
6.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
28/01/2021
Hands-on review · Health tools
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a comfortable, screenless band with an excellent app, but its Tone and body fat scans feel creepy, so it suits people who love health data.
7.0
zdnet.com
≈ estimated
14/12/2020
Long-term review · Mood and wellness
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a comfortable, screenless tracker that blends in well, suiting people who are at ease with its mood-listening and body-scan features.
4.0
appleinsider.com
✓ explicit
02/12/2020
Hands-on review · Privacy concerns
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a comfortable tracker with a detailed sleep graph and a fascinating tone feature, but its always-on microphone and photo scan make it hard to trust.
8.0
1justinbarnett.medium.com
≈ estimated
02/11/2020
First impressions · Screenless fitness band
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a screenless, comfortable-looking band with detailed sleep tracking, though its voice tone and body composition features remain unproven.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
23/02/2021
Hands-on review · Screenless tracker
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a screenless tracker whose Fitness Score accounts for rest days, so it suits people who want to avoid distracting alerts.
8.0
1justinbarnett.medium.com
✓ explicit
23/11/2020
Personal review · Former athlete
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a comfortable, low-profile band whose activity score and sleep tracking suit everyday movers, though its app makes past workouts hard to revisit.
4.0
msweetwood.com
≈ estimated
28/11/2020
Week-long test · Fitbit comparison
Verdict
The Amazon Halo Band is a light, attractive band for sleep and steps, but its heart rate, body fat and tone results felt less reliable than a Fitbit Charge 4.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazon Halo Band

  • Unobtrusive, minimalist design without a distracting screen
  • Lightweight and comfortable enough to wear during sleep
  • Automatic workout and sleep tracking features perform reliably
  • Innovative 'Movement Health' tool offers useful mobility assessments
  • Fast charging capabilities (roughly 90 minutes to full)
  • Comprehensive app with diverse workouts, recipes, and wellness programs

What customers don't like about Amazon Halo Band

  • Privacy concerns regarding tone-of-voice and body-fat photo analysis
  • Requires a monthly subscription to access most features beyond basic steps
  • Abysmal battery life (approx. 2 days) when the 'Tone' microphone is active
  • No screen makes it impossible to check stats like heart rate during a workout
  • Inaccurate body fat measurements compared to professional clinical tools
  • Proprietary charger clip can be difficult to align correctly
  • Stock fabric band is abrasive and difficult to keep clean

Verdict

The Amazon Halo Band is a screenless fitness tracker designed for unobtrusive, distraction-free health monitoring. Its core hardware includes an optical heart rate monitor, an accelerometer, a skin temperature sensor, and two microphones housed in a water-resistant capsule (5 ATM) that fits into interchangeable fabric or silicone bands. Key features include activity tracking using a points-based system, comprehensive sleep stage analysis, and unique tools like Tone of Voice analysis and 3D body fat composition via the companion app. Pros include a lightweight, minimalist design that is easy to wear 24/7, a battery life of up to seven days (with the microphone off), and accurate sleep and temperature tracking. Main cons include the lack of a display or vibration for notifications, significant privacy concerns regarding voice and body scans, and the requirement of a monthly subscription to access advanced health metrics and historical data.

Compare Amazon Halo Band with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Halo Band and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found