OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

Intel N200 Review | 78 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£310
  • Avg. price in US: ~$190
  • PassMark benchmark result: 4607
  • N. of physical cores: 4
  • CPU boost clock speed: 3.7 GHz

Intel N200 review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

4.4

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

4.4

Technical Score

10.0%

?

User score

Poor
4.4

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

3.3

Performance

18.0%

6.2

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

4.5

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

6.2

Power & Thermal

4.0%

8.0

Platform

1.0%

7.1

Integrated Graphics

Poor
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 2.8
    Gaming

    Score components:

    30.0%

    2.4

    PassMark single-core benchmark score

    25.0%

    3.5

    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    3.7

    CPU boost clock speed

    17.0%

    1.8

    L3 cache

    8.0%

    1.8

    N. of physical cores

  • 2.0
    Video editing

    Score components:

    45.0%

    2.2

    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score

    20.0%

    1.8

    N. of physical cores

    20.0%

    1.6

    CPU threads

    15.0%

    1.8

    L3 cache

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £310

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU from the Alder Lake-N series, featuring 4 efficient cores (Gracemont architecture) and 4 threads with a max turbo frequency of 3.7 GHz. Built on the 10nm Intel 7 process, it includes 6MB of L3 cache, a very low 6W TDP, and integrated UHD Graphics with 32 execution units. Its main advantages are exceptional energy efficiency and a low heat profile that allows for fanless, silent operation in thin laptops and mini PCs, while supporting modern features like AV1 decoding and Wi-Fi 6E. However, its performance is limited by a lack of hyper-threading and a single-channel memory controller (supporting up to 16GB of DDR4-3200 or DDR5-4800), making it unsuitable for demanding gaming or heavy multitasking.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel N200

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.

When it matters: When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

60.0%

?

Performance

18.0%

?

Cache & Architecture

10.0%

?

Memory & PCIe

7.0%

?

Power & Thermal

4.0%

?

Platform

1.0%

?

Integrated Graphics

4.4
Intel N200 has a technical score of 4.39 points, which is lower than that of 68.8% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
1.0
Intel N200 has a popularity of 1 points, which is higher than 0% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

4.4

Overall score

40.0%

8.9

Price

5.7
Intel N200 has a quality-to-price ratio of 5.7 points, which is lower than 78% of products in this category.
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel
Processor type
What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.
When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

mobile
Intel N200 belongs to the mobile processor class, which is more advanced than that of 7.3% of processors and equal to that of 48.6% of processors.
laptop
CPU socket
What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.
When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

FCBGA1264
Intel N200 uses the FCBGA1264 CPU socket, which is older than that of 93.3% of processors and equal to that of 0.6% of processors.
Chipset
What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.
When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A
CPU architecture
What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

x86-64
Intel N200 uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

4
Intel N200 has 4 CPU cores, which is fewer than 50.7% of processors and equal to 28.5% of processors.
CPU threads
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

4
Intel N200 offers 4 CPU threads, which is fewer than 67.3% of processors and equal to 26.6% of processors.
Threads per core
What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.
When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

1
Intel N200 offers 1 threads per core, which is fewer than 69.7% of processors and equal to 30.3% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

3.7 GHz
Intel N200 reaches a boost clock of 3.7 GHz which is lower than that of 72.7% of processors and equal to that of 3.9% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

4 x 1.0 GHz
Intel N200 has a base clock of 4x1.0 GHz which is equal to that of 100% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

10 nm
Intel N200 uses a 10 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 52.3% of processors and equal to that of 19.1% of processors.
Foundry
What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.
When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel 7
Intel N200 is built on the Intel 7 foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 66.2% of processors and equal to that of 14.9% of processors.
L3 cache
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

6 MB
Intel N200 has an L3 cache of 6 MB which is smaller than that of 60.4% of processors and equal to that of 9.7% of processors.
L2 cache
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

2 MB
Intel N200 has an L2 cache of 2 MB which is smaller than that of 51.3% of processors and equal to that of 11.1% of processors.
L1 cache
What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.
When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

384 KB
Intel N200 has an L1 cache of 384 KB which is larger than that of 45% of processors and equal to that of 15.8% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5
Intel N200 supports DDR DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5, which is newer than that of 95.2% of processors and equal to that of 0.4% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

4,800 MHz
Intel N200 supports memory speeds up to 4800 MHz, which is higher than that of 66.4% of processors and equal to 5.6% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.
When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

DDR5-4800 MHz
Intel N200 supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR5-4800 MHz, which is higher than that of 66.5% of processors and equal to 5.6% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.
When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A
Maximum memory capacity
What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

16 GB
Intel N200 supports up to 16 GB of memory, which is less than 91.7% of processors and equal to 6.4% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.
When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

yes
Intel N200 includes integrated graphics. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.
When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel UHD Graphics 32EU
Intel N200 uses the Intel UHD Graphics 32EU integrated GPU, which is less advanced than that in 62.1% of processors and equal to that in 0.9% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.
When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

32
Intel N200 has 32 GPU execution units, which is more than 70.8% of processors and equal to 9.9% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.
When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

300 MHz
Intel N200 has an integrated GPU clock of 300 MHz which is lower than that of 57% of processors and equal to that of 38.7% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.
When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
Intel N200 supports H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode) media codecs, which is broader support than 85% of processors and equal to 5.6% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

6 W
Intel N200 has a TDP of 6 W which is lower than that of 96.9% of processors and equal to that of 1.7% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

6 W
Intel N200 has a base power of 6 W which is lower than that of 96.8% of processors and equal to that of 1.7% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

25 W
Intel N200 has a boost power of 25 W which is lower than that of 83.1% of processors and equal to that of 9.2% of processors.
Tau (power duration limit)
What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.
When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

28 seconds
Intel N200 has a turbo duration of 28 seconds which is longer than that of 3.8% of processors and equal to that of 85% of processors.
Configurable TDP
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

no
Intel N200 does not support configurable TDP. 52.9% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

Intel N200 vs the average processor

  • Newer DDR support
    Intel N200 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5 vs DDR4).
    What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
    When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: DDR5

    Intel N200 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5 vs DDR4).DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5 vs DDR4
  • 86.7% lower base power
    Intel N200 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (6 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
    When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <30 W

    Intel N200 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (6 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.6 W vs 45 W
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Intel N200 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Alder Lake vs Kaby Lake).
    What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
    When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.

    Importance: LOW

    Intel N200 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Alder Lake vs Kaby Lake).Alder Lake vs Kaby Lake
  • 60.9% lower boost power
    Intel N200 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (25 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
    What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
    When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <50 W

    Intel N200 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (25 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.25 W vs 64 W
  • 5 °C higher TJ Max
    Intel N200 has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
    What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
    When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: >=100 °C

    Intel N200 has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.105 °C vs 100 °C
  • 86.7% lower TDP
    Intel N200 has a lower TDP than the average processor (6 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
    When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: <30 W

    Intel N200 has a lower TDP than the average processor (6 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.6 W vs 45 W
  • More advanced foundry
    Intel N200 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm).
    What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.
    When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Intel N200 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm).Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm
  • 63.7% higher memory speed
    Intel N200 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (4,800 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
    What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
    When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >=4800 MHz

    Intel N200 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (4,800 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.4800 MHz vs 2933 MHz
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Intel N200 has a newer release date than the average processor (2,023 vs 2,020).
  • Includes crypto acceleration
    Intel N200 includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
  • 2 wider front-end design
    Intel N200 has a higher front-end width than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Intel N200 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Alder Lake vs Kaby Lake).
  • More advanced foundry
    Intel N200 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 7 vs Intel 14 nm).
  • 16.7% smaller process node
    Intel N200 has a lower process node than the average processor (10 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
  • Newer DDR support
    Intel N200 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/DDR5/LPDDR5 vs DDR4).
  • 63.7% higher memory speed
    Intel N200 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (4,800 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
  • 86.7% lower base power
    Intel N200 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (6 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
  • 60.9% lower boost power
    Intel N200 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (25 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
  • 5 °C higher TJ Max
    Intel N200 has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
  • 86.7% lower TDP
    Intel N200 has a lower TDP than the average processor (6 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.

Total
Platform
Performance
Cache & Architecture
Memory & PCIe
Power & Thermal
  • Older CPU socket
    Intel N200 uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1,264 vs FP2).
  • 28.8% weaker single-core performance
    Intel N200 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,767 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
  • 45.2% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Intel N200 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (265 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
  • 14% lower boost clock
    Intel N200 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    Intel N200 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
  • 56.3% lower PassMark score
    Intel N200 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (4,607 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
  • No multithreading support
    Intel N200 does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    Intel N200 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
  • 15.8% lower single-core score
    Intel N200 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,238 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
  • 24.5% lower multi-core score
    Intel N200 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (3,617 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
  • 1 fewer threads per core
    Intel N200 has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
  • 12.5% less L3 per core
    Intel N200 has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
  • 20% smaller L2 cache
    Intel N200 has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
  • 25% smaller L3 cache
    Intel N200 has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (6 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
  • 7 fewer PCIe lanes
    Intel N200 has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (9 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
  • 75% less memory capacity
    Intel N200 has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
  • 16.2% lower memory bandwidth
    Intel N200 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (38.4 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
  • 1 fewer memory channels
    Intel N200 has fewer memory channels than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
  • 50% less memory per DIMM
    Intel N200 has fewer memory per DIMM than the average processor (16 GB vs 32 GB). The average processor supports 32 GB of memory per DIMM.
  • No configurable TDP
    Intel N200 does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
  • 5 °C higher CPU temperature
    Intel N200 has a higher CPU temperature than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
  • 28.8% weaker single-core performance
    Intel N200 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,767 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
    What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
    When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >3200

    Intel N200 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,767 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.1,767 vs 2,483
  • 45.2% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Intel N200 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (265 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
    When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >600

    Intel N200 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (265 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.265 vs 484
  • 14% lower boost clock
    Intel N200 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
    When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >4.7 GHz

    Intel N200 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 2 fewer CPU cores
    Intel N200 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
    When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: 8+

    Intel N200 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.4 vs 6
  • 56.3% lower PassMark score
    Intel N200 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (4,607 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
    When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >19000

    Intel N200 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (4,607 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.4,607 vs 10,532.5
  • No multithreading support
    Intel N200 does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
    What it is: Lets each physical core run more than one thread at the same time, such as with Hyper-Threading or SMT.
    When it matters: When multitasking, rendering, compiling, virtualization, or other thread-heavy work benefits from more total processing threads.

    Importance: HIGH

    Intel N200 does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    Intel N200 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
    When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: 16+

    Intel N200 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.4 vs 8
  • 7 fewer PCIe lanes
    Intel N200 has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (9 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.
    When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >=20

    Intel N200 has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (9 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.9 vs 16
Total
Overall
Platform
Performance
Cache & Architecture
Memory & PCIe
Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of Intel N200 and other processors

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel N200?

  • Extremely power-efficient with a 6W TDP, leading to excellent battery life in portable devices
  • Capable of fanless cooling, allowing for completely silent operation in mini-PCs and tablets
  • Good performance for everyday office tasks, web browsing, and 4K video streaming
  • Modern feature set including AV1 hardware decoding, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.2 support
  • Solid multitasking for a budget chip when paired with sufficient RAM (e.g., 16GB)
  • Significant efficiency and performance gains over older entry-level chips like the Athlon Silver 3050e

What customers dislike about Intel N200?

  • Very limited gaming performance due to low iGPU clock speeds (750 MHz) and low execution unit count
  • Strict single-channel memory support significantly handicaps potential graphics and system bandwidth
  • Lack of Hyper-Threading (4 cores, 4 threads) limits performance in heavily multithreaded workloads
  • Only a marginal performance improvement (~8-10%) over the cheaper and more common Intel N100
  • TDP limits can cause the chip to throttle or underperform in sustained heavy tasks
  • Limited PCIe lanes and lack of Thunderbolt support compared to higher-end mobile processors

Expert reviews

T
techradar.com
17/05/2024
Asus ExpertBook BR1204F review

The Asus ExpertBook BR1204F is a rugged, 360-degree 2-in-1 laptop tailored for the K-12 education sector, featuring a spill-resistant keyboard, Gorilla Glass protection, and a garaged, self-charging stylus. Its design focuses on extreme durability and ease of maintenance, allowing for quick, tool-free repairs of key components like the screen and battery by school IT staff. While...Read more

T
techradar.com
30/01/2024
Microsoft Surface Go 4 for Business review

a little longer The Microsoft Surface Go 4 for Business is deemed a disappointing, high-cost solution by TechRadar, failing to justify its price with lackluster Intel N200 processor performance. While offering a lightweight 521g design, excellent 10.5-inch display, and improved repairability, the device suffers from dated, thick bezels and limited connectivity, along with poor...Read more

S
servethehome.com
29/07/2023
Fanless Intel N200 Firewall and Virtualization Appliance Review

The ServeTheHome review of the fanless Intel N200 firewall and virtualization appliance highlights a significant generational leap, driven by the Alder Lake-N architecture and superior DDR5 SODIMM memory bandwidth. It boasts four Intel i226-V 2.5GbE ports, offering roughly 8-10% higher per-core performance than the N100, which is competitive with older 35W desktop CPUs. Improvements...Read more

C
computerbild.de
28/07/2024
CSL R'Evolve C15 N200 Review: Cheap or Good Value?

The CSL R'Evolve C15 N200 is a budget-friendly, silent laptop priced around €440, offering generous 1 TB SSD and 16 GB RAM storage for basic office tasks and media consumption. However, performance is limited by the "leisurely" Intel N200 processor, and the device suffers from poor battery endurance, lasting under four hours. While featuring a modern, slim design with necessary...Read more

(Translated)Show original
S
score.nero.com
N/A
Intel N200 Benchmarks - Nero Score

The Intel N200, an entry-level Alder Lake-N processor, is designed for energy-efficient, fanless, and quiet devices, boasting a 6W TDP. It features four Gracemont E-cores reaching up to 3.7 GHz, delivering capable performance for daily tasks and 4K streaming while offering improved AI processing compared to previous generations. Despite the advantages of supporting DDR5 and modern...Read more

(Translated)Show original
E
edc.intel.com
No specific date
Intel® Processors - 2 | Performance Index

The Intel Performance Index serves as a comprehensive, first-party database providing detailed technical benchmarks, system configurations, and power data for Intel processors, ranging from Core Ultra 200S series to N-series. It acts as a transparent, specialized repository for validating performance claims, such as specific gaming improvements in newer mobile chips compared to...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

intel-core-ultra-9-285k
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

8.9
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9965wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9995wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-9960x
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

8.8
amd-ryzen-threadripper-7970x
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

8.7
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9985wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

8.7
intel-core-ultra-9-285
Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-9975wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-7985wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

8.6
amd-ryzen-9-9950x3d
AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

8.6
intel-core-i9-13900k
Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

8.5
amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-7965wx
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

8.5

Compare Intel N200 with other processors

VS
VS

Compare