OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Intel Core i7 5960X Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£840PassMark benchmark result:13659N. of physical cores:8CPU boost clock speed:3.5 GHzCPU socket:LGA2011-3TDP (Thermal design power):140 W

Intel Core i7 5960X Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

▲Better than 51% of processors

5.5

▼Worse than 51% of processors

8.3

▲Better than 83% of processors

3.5
Gaming
Gaming
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
3.5
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
3.8
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
3.3
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.9
L3 cache
8.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
6.1
Video editing
Video editing
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
6.4
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
20.0%
8.9
CPU threads
15.0%
2.9
L3 cache

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

#51inBest workstation CPUs

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7 5960X

5.8

Show more

Hide

Platform

7.6

Show more

Hide

Brand name

Intel

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

?

CPU architecture

Show more

Performance

5.7

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

Threads per core

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

Show more

Cache & Architecture

4.4

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

6.6

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated Graphics

4.0

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

3.9

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

Tau (power duration limit)

?

Configurable TDP

Show more

Intel Core i7 5960X vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i7 5960X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

24 more PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
40
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (40 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
40 vs 16
8 more CPU threads
CPU threads
16
▲ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
16 vs 8
Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
58.8% higher multi-core score
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
7,668
▲ Better than 66% of models
Market range: <763 – >14k
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (7,668 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
7,668 vs 4,829
45.9% more L3 per core
L3 per core
2.5 MB/core
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
Higher base clock
CPU base clock speed
8 x 3.0 GHz
▲ Better than 75% of models
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
8x3.0 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
2 more CPU cores
N. of physical cores
8
▲ Better than 63% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
8 vs 6

7.54x more popular
Intel Core i7 5960X is more popular than the average processor (7.54 vs 1).
7.54 vs 1
3.6% higher user score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Intel Core i7 5960X
the average processor
Intel Core i7 5960X has a higher user score than the average processor (8.28 vs 8.000).
8.28 vs 8

Higher-end processor class
Processor type
workstation
★ Better than 95% of models
This processor belongs to a higher-end processor class than the average processor (workstation vs mobile).
workstation vs mobile
Modern CPU socket
CPU socket
LGA2011-3
▲ Better than 60% of models
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA2011-3 vs FP4).
LGA2011-3 vs FP4

8 more CPU threads
CPU threads
16
▲ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
16 vs 8
Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
58.8% higher multi-core score
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
7,668
▲ Better than 66% of models
Market range: <763 – >14k
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (7,668 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
7,668 vs 4,829
Higher base clock
CPU base clock speed
8 x 3.0 GHz
▲ Better than 75% of models
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
8x3.0 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
2 more CPU cores
N. of physical cores
8
▲ Better than 63% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
8 vs 6
29.2% higher PassMark score
PassMark benchmark result
13,659
▲ Better than 57% of models
Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (13,659 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
13,659 vs 10,572.5

45.9% more L3 per core
L3 per core
2.5 MB/core
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
2.5x larger L3 cache
L3 cache
20 MB
▲ Better than 80% of models
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (20 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
20 MB vs 8 MB

24 more PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
40
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (40 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
40 vs 16
Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
48.5% higher memory bandwidth
Maximum memory bandwidth
68 GB/s
▲ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <25 GB/s – >100 GB/s
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (68 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
68 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s

5 °C higher TJ Max
Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
105 °C
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a higher TJ Max than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
105 °C vs 100 °C

Why is Intel Core i7 5960X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

18.6% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
3.5 GHz
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
3.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
83.3% larger process node
Semiconductor size
22 nm
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
22 nm vs 12 nm
No configurable TDP
Configurable TDP
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
3.11x higher base power
Base power (PL1)
140 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
140 W vs 45 W
2.33x higher boost power
Boost power (PL2)
140 W
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <25 W – >150 W
This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
140 W vs 60 W
15.9% weaker single-core performance
PassMark single-core benchmark score
2,103
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <1.4k – >4k
This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,103 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
2,103 vs 2,500
2.01x larger die size
Die size
356 mm²
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (356 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
356 mm² vs 177 mm²
Less advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Haswell
▼ Worse than 69% of models
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Haswell vs Kaby Lake).
Haswell vs Kaby Lake

3.36x more expensive
Intel Core i7 5960X is more expensive than the average processor (£840 vs £250).
£840 vs £250
12.2% worse value for money
Intel Core i7 5960X has worse value for money than the average processor (5.85 vs 6.6).
5.85 vs 6.56

6 years older release date
Release date
2014
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <2k – >2k
This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2014 vs 2020).
August 2014
2014 vs 2020
No crypto acceleration
Cryptographic acceleration
AES
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This processor does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
AES vs AES, SHA

18.6% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
3.5 GHz
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
3.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
15.9% weaker single-core performance
PassMark single-core benchmark score
2,103
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <1.4k – >4k
This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,103 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
2,103 vs 2,500
11.8% lower single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,298
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,298 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,298 vs 1,471
37.5% lower bus speed
Bus speed
5 GT/s
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <3 GT/s – >8 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus speed than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
37.5% lower bus transfer rate
Bus transfer rate
5 GT/s
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <4 GT/s – >19 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
5 GT/s vs 8 GT/s

83.3% larger process node
Semiconductor size
22 nm
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (22 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
22 nm vs 12 nm
2.01x larger die size
Die size
356 mm²
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (356 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
356 mm² vs 177 mm²
Less advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Haswell
▼ Worse than 69% of models
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Haswell vs Kaby Lake).
Haswell vs Kaby Lake
50% less L2 per core
L2 per core
0.25 MB/core
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <0.25 MB/core – >2 MB/core
This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
33.3% smaller L1 cache
L1 cache
256 KB
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <128 KB – >1.2k KB
This processor has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (256 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
256 KB vs 384 KB
20% smaller L2 cache
L2 cache
2 MB
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
2 MB vs 2.5 MB
Less advanced foundry
Foundry
Intel 22 nm
▼ Worse than 85% of models
This processor uses a less advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 22 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
Intel 22 nm vs Intel 14 nm
47.5% fewer transistors
N. of transistors
2.6 billion
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <1.303 billion – >25 billion
This processor has fewer transistors than the average processor (2.6 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
2.6 billion vs 4.95 billion

27.3% lower memory speed
Maximum memory speed
2,133 MHz
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2133 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
2,133 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
Lower JEDEC memory speed
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2133 MHz
▼ Worse than 78% of models
This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2133 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR4-2,133 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
Limited PCIe bifurcation
PCIe bifurcation modes
x16
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4).
x16 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4
2 fewer memory channels
Memory channels
4
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This processor has fewer memory channels than the average processor (4 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
4 vs 2

No integrated graphics
Integrated graphics
no
▼ Worse than 88% of models
This processor does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.

No configurable TDP
Configurable TDP
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
3.11x higher base power
Base power (PL1)
140 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
140 W vs 45 W
2.33x higher boost power
Boost power (PL2)
140 W
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <25 W – >150 W
This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
140 W vs 60 W
3.11x higher TDP
TDP (Thermal design power)
140 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
140 W vs 45 W
5 °C higher CPU temperature
CPU temperature
105 °C
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a higher CPU temperature than the average processor (105 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
105 °C vs 100 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

pcper.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Haswell-E: The Intel Core i7-5960X 8-core Processor Review

The PC Perspective review of the Intel Core i7-5960X highlights it as the first 8-core consumer processor, utilizing the X99 platform and DDR4 memory. Operating on the 22nm Haswell-E architecture, it boasts 16 threads, though it utilizes a lower 3.0 GHz base clock compared to previous models. While offering unparalleled multi-threaded performance in tasks like CineBench, its lower clock speed results in weaker single-threaded performance compared to the i7-4790K. The chip is considered excessive for gaming, making it best suited for content creation, but it boasts excellent 4.6 GHz overclocking potential, according to the review. The high entry cost for the CPU, motherboard, and RAM, along with the lack of integrated graphics, are noted as downsides.

tomshardware.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X, -5930K And -5820K CPU Review

The Intel Core i7-5960X review on Tom's Hardware introduces the first eight-core desktop processor for the enthusiast market, featuring 16 threads, 20MB of L3 cache, and support for quad-channel DDR4 memory. Based on the Haswell-E architecture, this CPU is designed to dominate heavily threaded tasks such as 4K video editing and 3D rendering due to its massive core count. Key pros include unmatched multi-threaded performance, the transition to efficient DDR4, high overclocking potential (4.3–4.5 GHz), and 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes ideal for multi-GPU setups. Conversely, cons center on the high $999 launch price and expensive platform, combined with lower single-threaded performance in gaming compared to higher-clocked alternatives. Additionally, the 140W TDP requires substantial cooling, making it a high-power, high-heat component.

tomshardware.com

22/07/2015

Summary of the review

Overclocking Retail Intel Core i7-5960X CPUs Would you like more details on the benchmarking methodology used in these specific reviews or perhaps a c...

Tom’s Hardware tested five retail Intel Core i7-5960X CPUs to evaluate real-world overclocking, finding that these eight-core chips can reach impressive 4.7 to 4.8 GHz speeds while offering high bandwidth through DDR4-4000+ support. However, the testing revealed significant challenges, with high voltages causing temperatures to exceed 80°C and difficulties in achieving stable all-core overclocks. Despite being a powerful choice for workstations, the high price and minimal gaming gains make the Core i7-5820K a better value option, according to the review.

techradar.com

13/12/2014

Intel Core i7-5960X review - Page 3

Benchmark review · Eight-core desktop chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is very fast for multi-threaded work and runs cool, but it adds little to gaming.

expertreviews.co.uk

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X review

The Intel Core i7-5960X, featuring eight cores and 16 threads, offers exceptional multi-threaded performance, yielding high scores in video editing and multitasking. While the CPU boasts significant power, its high cost—compounded by the need for a new X99 motherboard and DDR4 memory—constitutes a major disadvantage. Despite its superior multi-core capabilities, the processor's lower base clock speed means it does not always outpace cheaper quad-core chips in single-core tasks. Ultimately, this chip is tailored for professional workstations rather than mainstream users.

kitguru.net

30/08/2014

Intel Core i7 5960X Haswell-E (8-core) CPU Review

Lab test · Overclocking results

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X overclocks easily to a stable 4.3 GHz and offers eight cores, but its lower clocks may slow single-core and gaming speed.

digitalfoundry.net

30/08/2014

Intel Core i7 5960X review | Digital Foundry(www.kitguru.net，u-review/all/1/) | August 30 2014 | Intel Core i7-5960X Haswell-E (8-core) CPU Review - K...

Lab test · Eight-core Haswell-E

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is suited to video encoding and heavy multi-core work, but its lower clocks leave it slower than the 4790K in single-core tasks.

techgage.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition Review: Intel's Overdue Desktop 8-Core Is Here

The Techgage review of the Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition marks the arrival of Intel’s first eight-core desktop processor, utilizing the Haswell-E architecture and X99 platform for massive multi-threaded performance. Boasting 16 threads and 20MB of L3 cache, the chip demonstrates up to 69% faster performance than quad-core alternatives in heavy workloads like video encoding, though its lower base clock can result in slightly trailing performance in less-threaded applications. While offering unmatched speed for workstations and support for new quad-channel DDR4 memory, the high platform cost, steep power consumption, and requirement for expensive LGA 2011-3 motherboards represent significant drawbacks.

bit-tech.net

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X Review, X99 Chipset and DDR4 - Bit-Tech

The Intel Core i7-5960X, a 22nm Haswell-E eight-core/16-thread CPU, introduces DDR4 support and the X99 chipset, offering substantial performance gains over previous Extreme Editions. Its key strength is dominant multi-threaded rendering performance, though a lower stock base clock (3GHz) results in weaker single-threaded, gaming, and basic application performance compared to top-tier quad-cores. While it features an efficient soldered heat spreader, the 140W CPU requires high-end cooling, and the platform demands a high total investment due to the steep CPU price and required new RAM/motherboard.

hexus.net

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Review: Intel Core i7-5960X (22nm Haswell) - CPU - HEXUS.net

The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition is a 22nm Haswell-based processor, recognized by HEXUS as the first consumer-grade eight-core, 16-thread CPU, offering massive 20MB L3 cache and 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. While its 3.0GHz base clock is conservative, the chip dominates in heavily threaded tasks like video rendering, outperforming previous flagships by up to 25%. The platform introduces quad-channel DDR4 memory for enhanced bandwidth, although early modules featured higher latencies. As a workstation-class, "untouchable" powerhouse for creators, the i7-5960X thrives in applications like Cinebench and HandBrake. However, the review notes minimal gains for gaming at 1080p or 4K compared to cheaper quad-core processors, as graphical bottlenecks often limit performance. Pros include unmatched multi-threaded performance and strong overclocking potential, often reaching 4.5GHz across all cores, while the major cons are the exceptionally high platform cost, requiring new X99 motherboards and expensive DDR4 RAM.

guru3d.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Core i7-5960X - 5930K and 5820K processor review - Guru 3d

The Guru3D review of Intel’s Haswell-E lineup showcases the 8-core Core i7-5960X, 6-core 5930K, and 5820K, marking a significant transition to DDR4 memory and the X99 chipset with native USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gbps. The platform, utilizing a 22nm process, offers massive quad-channel memory bandwidth, although it requires high-end liquid cooling for overclocking to 4.4-4.5 GHz. Pros include exceptional multi-threaded performance, improved power efficiency, and strong PCIe lane support for multi-GPU setups, while the high cost of entry, expensive DDR4 memory, and high power draw on the top-tier chip represent key cons.

hothardware.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Haswell-E Debuts: Intel Core i7-5960X Processor Review - HotHardware

The HotHardware review of the Intel Core i7-5960X spotlights the chip as the first 8-core desktop flagship using the Haswell-E architecture and X99 chipset, introducing support for quad-channel DDR4 memory. It features 16 threads, a 3.0GHz base clock, and a 20MB L3 cache, delivering exceptional performance in content creation tasks compared to previous 6-core models. While offering superior multi-threaded power, the CPU is expensive and requires a full platform upgrade to LGA 2011-v3, with lower stock clock speeds resulting in only marginal gains for certain single-threaded applications. Overclocking to 4.4GHz is highly effective but significantly increases power consumption. Copy

pugetsystems.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Core i7 5960X vs. 4960X Performance Comparison

The Puget Systems review of the Intel Core i7-5960X (Haswell-E) highlights a transition to eight cores and DDR4 support, resulting in superior multi-threaded performance despite lower base clock speeds compared to the i7-4960X. Testing on the X99 platform showed significant advantages in AVX2-optimized tasks, with up to 114% faster results in Linpack and a 30% boost in Adobe Premiere Pro, while also improving power efficiency by using 30-40 watts less under load. Conversely, the lower clock speed led to a 5% performance drop in single-threaded apps like Photoshop and a minor 1% decrease in gaming, making the processor ideal for rendering workstations rather than general desktop or gaming use. Copy

overclockers.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel i7 5960X Haswell-E CPU Review - Overclockers

The Intel Core i7-5960X, reviewed at Overclockers.com, introduces the first 8-core consumer desktop processor on the X99 platform, featuring 16 threads, 20MB L3 cache, and native DDR4 support. It provides immense multi-threaded performance (80% faster than previous flagships in tasks like Cinebench) and 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes, making it ideal for workstations, while showing exceptional overclocking potential to 4.625 GHz. However, the processor suffers from lower stock clocks impacting single-threaded performance, carries a $999 price tag, and demands costly DDR4 memory, making it less ideal for standard gaming compared to cheaper alternatives. Copy

uk.pcmag.com

26/09/2014

Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition - Review 2014 - PCMag UK

Review · Power user processor

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is the most powerful consumer chip for heavily threaded work, but it only suits buyers who put raw CPU power first.

technic3d.com

29/08/2014

Intel Core i7-5960X Haswell-E Processor | Review | Technic3D

Hands-on test · Overclocking results

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X offers eight cores that overclock to about 4.1 GHz on all cores, but it needs a new platform and draws a lot of power.

chip.de

23/10/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X (Desktop Processor) Review - CHIP

The Intel Core i7-5960X, a "Haswell-E" flagship, is a high-end 8-core, 16-thread processor designed for demanding, multi-threaded tasks like 4K video editing and 3D rendering. It introduces the X99 platform with DDR4 memory support and 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes for enthusiasts, though it carries a high cost and has lower stock clock speeds compared to previous Extreme Edition chips. Pros include exceptional multi-threading performance, high overclocking headroom, and modern platform features, while cons include extreme, total-system expense and minimal gaming performance gains over cheaper processors.

gamestar.de

29/08/2014

Intel Core i7 5960X - Eight processor cores for a hallelujah?

Lab test · Eight-core Intel chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is Intel's first eight-core desktop chip, but few games use all its cores, so it suits heavy multi-core work more than gaming.

pcgameshardware.de

30/08/2014

Haswell Extreme: Intel Core i7-5960X and i7-5820K (ES) Review

Lab test · Eight-core CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is Intel's first eight-core desktop chip, built for heavy multi-core work, though its lower clock speeds may slow games.

overclocking.com

08/09/2014

Summary of the review

Testing the Intel Core i7-5960X, Haswell-E, and LGA2011-3

The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition, a 22nm Haswell-E 8-core/16-thread processor, marked a shift toward high-core-count consumer CPUs, operating at 3.0 GHz with a 140W TDP. It necessitates an X99 motherboard and introduces DDR4 memory and 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, providing robust support for multi-GPU configurations. Pros include exceptional multi-threading performance for heavy content creation and workstation tasks, alongside significant overclocking potential to reach 4.4 GHz+. However, cons include high thermal/power demands, a high initial cost, and lower base single-core speeds compared to mainstream, higher-clocked alternatives, which may affect gaming performance. Overall, the 5960X offers substantial, though older, "monstrous" performance for tasks that utilize all cores effectively. Used units are now available, offering a budget-friendly option for entering the LGA 2011-v3 platform, as seen on sites like CeX and eBay.

generation-nt.com

01/09/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X Review: What performance for the unlocked processor?

The Intel Core i7-5960X, as analyzed by Generation-NT, represents a significant milestone as Intel's first 8-core desktop processor, utilizing the 22nm Haswell-E architecture and DDR4 memory support. The chip delivers exceptional performance in heavily threaded tasks—like video rendering—outpacing predecessors by up to 30%, while offering substantial overclocking potential and 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes for multi-GPU setups. However, the $1,000 launch price, lower relative performance in single-threaded applications, and high cost of mandatory platform upgrades (X99 motherboard, DDR4) make it a niche, high-cost option with high power consumption.

tomshardware.fr

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Haswell-E is finally here: Core i7-5960X, i7-5930K and i7-5820K review

The Tom's Hardware review of Intel’s Haswell-E platform highlights the debut of the 8-core Core i7-5960X and 6-core i7-5930K/i7-5820K, marking the transition to the X99 chipset and DDR4 memory, which delivers higher bandwidth and lower voltages. While the 22nm architecture provides a significant boost for heavily threaded professional applications and video rendering, gaming performance gains are modest due to lower base clock speeds. Pros include the high-performance-to-price ratio of the i7-5820K, which is identified as the "best buy" for enthusiast, and the 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes available on higher-end models, enabling extensive multi-GPU setups. Additionally, the use of indium-based solder for the integrated heat spreader (IHS) improves thermal efficiency and overclocking stability over previous generations. Conversely, the platform has a high total cost of ownership, requiring expensive X99 motherboards and new DDR4 memory. The i7-5960X faces lower performance in lightly threaded apps, the i7-5820K is limited to 28 PCIe lanes, and the 140W TDP results in high power consumption and requires robust cooling.

clubic.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Core i7 5960X review: testing the new 8-core €1000 powerhouse

a little longer The Clubic review of the Haswell-E architecture introduces the Core i7-5960X and i7-5820K as Intel's first 8-core desktop processors, highlighting the flagship 5960X as a "beast" for professional, multi-threaded tasks. The 5820K is positioned as a high-value, 6-core alternative, making the platform accessible to enthusiasts despite the high cost of the required X99 chipset and DDR4 memory. Performance benchmarks show significant gains in rendering, although the 5960X's lower base clock can result in slower performance than quad-core chips in single-threaded applications. Key pros highlighted include exceptional multi-core performance, robust PCIe 3.0 lanes for multi-GPU setups, and strong overclocking potential, with the 5960X reaching up to 4.5GHz. Cons focus on the mandatory, expensive platform migration to DDR4 and LGA 2011-3, along with the 5820K's limited 28 PCIe lanes compared to the 40 on higher-end models. Ultimately, while the 5960X dominates in productivity, the 5820K is highlighted as the best price-to-performance option in the X99 ecosystem. For more details, visit Clubic.

cowcotland.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X Processor Review

The Intel Core i7-5960X, as analyzed by Cowcotland, was a landmark 22nm Haswell-E 8-core/16-thread processor, introducing DDR4 support and the X99 platform with substantial 20MB L3 cache and 40 PCIe lanes. It offered exceptional multi-threaded performance, yielding over 30% gains in content creation tasks, alongside significant overclocking capability to 4.3–4.5GHz. However, the high $1,000 launch price, coupled with mandatory X99/DDR4 investments and lower relative gaming performance compared to cheaper quad-core alternatives, marked it as a niche professional chip.

journalmetro.com

17/12/2014

Intel Core i7-5960X: Testing an Eight-Core Processor - Tom’s Hardware

Hands-on test · Eight-core desktop chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is a very fast eight-core chip for builders who want top performance, but some games use its cores poorly and lighter chips can do better.

ginjfo.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition Review: 8 Cores and DDR4 in Action

The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition review from Ginjfo highlights this 22nm Haswell-E processor as a significant milestone, being Intel's first eight-core, 16-thread desktop CPU, while introducing DDR4 memory support on the X99 platform. It delivers massive performance in heavily multithreaded tasks like 4K rendering, outperforming older six-core chips by over 30%, though its 3.0GHz base clock can lead to lower performance in single-core scenarios compared to top-tier quad-core models. The processor is praised for its exceptional raw power and overclocking potential but criticized for its very high cost, which, when combined with mandatory platform upgrades to X99 and DDR4, results in a poor price-to-performance ratio for gamers. Pros: Exceptional multithreaded performance for rendering; first to support DDR4; high overclocking capability. Cons: Prohibitive entry cost for the entire platform; lower stock clock speeds; high power consumption and heat output. Copy

cowcotland.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X Processor Review: What a Beast", "Intel Core i7-5960X Test: An Absolute Monster

The Intel Core i7-5960X, as reviewed on Cowcotland, is a landmark 22nm Haswell-E processor introducing the first 8-core, 16-thread consumer chip paired with DDR4 memory and the X99 chipset. While featuring a 3.0 GHz base clock, its 20MB L3 cache makes it a powerhouse for workstation-level tasks at home, notes Cowcotland. Performance benchmarks reveal that the i7-5960X dominates in multi-threaded applications like 3D rendering and 4K video editing, surpassing predecessors by up to 32%. However, its lower base frequency can result in weaker performance in single-threaded tasks and certain games compared to higher-clocked quad-core processors, says the review. Key advantages, according to Cowcotland, are the stellar multi-core performance and strong overclocking potential, often reaching 4.5 GHz. Major drawbacks include the high $1,000 price point, the cost of DDR4/X99 platforms, and a 140W TDP, marking it as a premium, high-investment platform. Copy

comptoir-hardware.com

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Test: Intel X99 and Core i7-5960X - Hardware Bench

The Comptoir-Hardware review highlights the Intel Core i7-5960X and X99 platform as a significant leap for high-end desktops, featuring the first 8-core consumer processor and DDR4 support. While delivering superior performance in heavily multi-threaded, professional applications (up to 32% faster), its lower base clock of 3.0 GHz can result in slightly lower gaming performance compared to higher-clocked quad-core processors, says Comptoir-Hardware. Pros include unmatched 16-thread processing for workstation tasks, enhanced efficiency with a soldered heat spreader, and the X99 chipset's support for 40 PCIe lanes and DDR4, according to Comptoir-Hardware. Cons center on the very high cost of entry (CPU, motherboard, DDR4), lower base frequency, and high power consumption when overclocked to 4.5 GHz, as noted in the Comptoir-Hardware review. The review concludes that the platform is ideal for creators needing maximum multi-core power, but less practical for average users or pure gaming rigs, notes Comptoir-Hardware. Copy

hardware.fr

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Core i7-5960X, i7-5930K and i7-5820K - Intel Haswell-E, LGA 2011-v3 and DDR4

The Hardware.fr review of Intel’s Haswell-E family (i7-5960X, i7-5930K, i7-5820K) marks a significant, high-performance shift to the X99 platform and DDR4 memory. The 8-core i7-5960X offers massive multi-threaded gains, while the 6-core 5930K and 5820K differ mainly in PCIe lanes, with the 5820K highlighted for its superior price-to-performance ratio. Key advantages include unparalleled workstation performance and platform longevity, while drawbacks are limited to the high total cost of ownership and 140W TDP, alongside minimal gaming advantages over cheaper alternatives. The detailed review of the Haswell-E processors can be found at Hardware.fr. Copy

profesionalreview.com

26/01/2015

Intel Core i7-5960X Review

Lab review · Eight-core chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X suits demanding workstation work with eight cores, 16 threads and strong overclocking, but gaming needs an overclock.

geeknetic.es

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X Haswell-E [Full Review]

The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition (Haswell-E) introduces the first native eight-core desktop processor with 16 threads, built on a 22nm process, 20MB L3 cache, and 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes. It serves as the flagship for the X99 platform, ushering in DDR4 memory and the LGA 2011-v3 socket, primarily catering to professional content creation with its superior multi-threaded performance. Performance-wise, the chip dominates in 4K video editing and 3D rendering, offering substantial gains over its predecessor, though its 3.0GHz base clock can hinder performance in less optimized, single-threaded applications. A notable advantage is its overclocking potential, with many units reaching 4.3GHz to 4.7GHz on high-end air or water cooling. Pros include unrivaled multi-threaded throughput, extensive PCIe lane availability, and a flexible, overclockable platform. Conversely, cons are centered on high power consumption, a $999+ price point, and the necessity of investing in a new motherboard and RAM, which is detailed in reviews like the one at KitGuru.

tomshw.it

30/07/2015

Summary of the review

Testing Five Intel Core i7-5960X Processors in Overclocking

Tom’s Hardware tested five retail Intel Core i7-5960X processors to evaluate overclocking consistency, finding that all chips could achieve a stable 4.5–4.6 GHz on the X99 platform, offering significant multi-threaded performance gains. The processors demonstrated good voltage-to-frequency scaling with high-quality cooling, making the high-core-count CPU a strong performer for content creation tasks. However, the review noted that achieving these speeds results in extreme power consumption and thermal output, with significant voltage increases required for maximum overclocks, alongside a very high overall platform cost.

tomshw.it

01/09/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X, 5930K, and 5820K CPU Review

The Tom's Hardware review of Intel’s Haswell-E processors (i7-5960X, 5930K, 5820K) marks a significant shift, introducing the first 8-core desktop CPU (i7-5960X) alongside the X99 chipset, LGA 2011-3 socket, and DDR4 memory support. The flagship 5960X delivers unmatched multi-threaded performance for content creation, while the 5930K and 5820K offer 6-core alternatives with higher clock speeds beneficial for gaming, though the 5820K is restricted to 28 PCIe lanes compared to the 40 lanes on the higher-end models. Despite high costs for the platform and DDR4 memory, the series provides superior efficiency over previous generations, with the 5820K highlighted as a top value option for enthusiasts.

hwupgrade.it

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7 5960X: The 8-Core Enthusiast CPU

The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition represents a milestone as Intel's first 8-core desktop consumer processor, utilizing the 22nm Haswell-E architecture with 16 threads, 20MB L3 cache, and DDR4 memory support on the X99 platform. It delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, excelling in content creation tasks, and offers significant overclocking potential, often exceeding 4.5 GHz. However, the CPU features a lower base clock speed than its 6-core predecessors and has a 140W TDP, demanding robust cooling, with the high cost of the processor, X99 motherboard, and DDR4 RAM posing a steep entry barrier for users. For a detailed review of this processor, visit hwupgrade.it.

multiplayer.it

23/09/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X - Special Edition - Processors

The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition, a 22nm Haswell-E processor with eight cores and 16 threads, introduces the LGA 2011-v3 socket, X99 chipset, and DDR4 memory, offering a substantial performance leap for professional, multi-threaded workloads. While it excels in tasks like 4K rendering, its gaming performance is comparable to higher-clocked quad-core processors, notes the review by Multiplayer.it. The CPU boasts significant overclocking potential and superior multi-GPU support, but comes with a high price tag, expensive platform requirements, and high power consumption. For more details, visit Multiplayer.it. Copy

hwupgrade.it

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-5960X: The 8-Core Enthusiast CPU

The Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition is a 22nm Haswell-E processor, representing Intel's first 8-core desktop chip with 16 threads and 20MB of L3 cache. It offers massive performance gains, up to 80% faster than previous 6-core models in fully threaded tasks such as 4K rendering. Pros include unmatched multi-core performance, 40 PCIe lanes for advanced graphics configurations, and overclocking support. However, the 3.0GHz base clock results in lower performance for single-threaded tasks and older applications compared to higher-clocked, cheaper quad-core processors like the i7-4790K. Furthermore, its high 140W TDP results in significant power consumption and heat generation, demanding premium cooling solutions, especially when overclocked to its 4.2GHz+ potential. As a $1,000 launch-price, top-tier product, the i7-5960X is a niche choice requiring expensive investments in LGA 2011-v3 motherboards and quad-channel DDR4 memory. It excels as a workstation solution for content creators but is difficult to justify for pure gaming workloads. Copy

nl.hardware.info

02/08/2015

Summary of the review

From air cooling to LN2: how far can you go with each cooling method? (Testing the i7 5960X)

Liquid nitrogen (LN2) cooling provides unmatched performance for extreme overclocking by keeping CPUs under −100∘𝐶, allowing for world-record-breaking speeds, though it is limited to temporary use due to constant evaporation. The process requires a copper pot for manual LN2 pouring, enabling high voltages, but requires meticulous insulation with materials like foam or eraser to prevent short circuits from severe condensation, which is a major, high-risk, time-consuming challenge. While more accessible than other cryogenic methods, LN2 demands specialized storage and poses extreme safety hazards, including instant frostbite and asphyxiation risks due to massive gas expansion in unventilated spaces.

nl.hardware.info

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7 5960X / 5930K / 5820K Haswell-E review: 8 cores at last

The Hardware.info review of Intel’s Haswell-E platform, featuring the 8-core Core i7-5960X, highlights its significant leap in multi-threaded performance, supported by the new X99 chipset and DDR4 memory. While the 5960X dominates in rendering and encoding, the 6-core i7-5930K and i7-5820K offer strong, high-value alternatives for professional workloads. The platform excels in demanding applications, with 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes allowing for high-end multi-GPU configurations, although the review notes that the performance advantages of 8 cores are less pronounced in gaming, where lower base clocks can limit performance compared to mainstream chips. Key advantages include unmatched multi-core rendering capabilities, high-speed DDR4 support, and excellent overclocking potential, balanced against high total platform costs, 140W TDP power consumption, and diminishing gaming returns.

hardware.info

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7 5960X / 5930K / 5820K Haswell-E review: 8 cores at last

The Hardware Info review of Intel's Haswell-E platform highlights the introduction of 8-core desktop processors, with the Core i7-5960X offering 8 cores/16 threads and 20MB L3 cache. The i7-5930K and i7-5820K bring 6 cores/12 threads, with the platform introducing the X99 chipset, DDR4 memory support, and 40 PCIe lanes for higher-end models. Key advantages include massive multi-threaded performance for content creation and overclocking potential, while drawbacks involve high platform costs, lower base clocks on the 5960X impacting single-thread speed, and 140W TDP. For the full, detailed review in English, visit Hardware Info.

tweakers.net

29/08/2014

Summary of the review

Intel X99 Platform Review: The X99 Platform with Haswell-E

Intel's X99 platform with Haswell-E processors introduces the first consumer 8-core CPU (Core i7-5960X) and DDR4 memory support, aiming at high-end desktop (HEDT) performance. It offers increased PCIe lanes (up to 40) for multi-GPU configurations, making it ideal for professional workstation tasks like 3D rendering. The platform also features native USB 3.0 and 10 SATA 6Gbps ports for enhanced storage performance. Pros include superior multi-threaded performance, with up to 50% faster transcoding and rendering compared to previous generations. The X99 chipset provides excellent overclocking capabilities through redesigned, more stable voltage regulation. DDR4 support also offers increased bandwidth, improving efficiency for data-heavy applications. Cons include a high total cost of ownership due to premium pricing for CPUs, motherboards, and DDR4 memory, alongside a 140W TDP. The platform lacks backward compatibility with previous LGA2011 sockets. Furthermore, performance gains in gaming and single-threaded applications are marginal compared to cheaper alternatives.

id.nl

14/11/2014

Intel Haswell-E - The world's fastest CPU

Benchmark test · Haswell-E chips

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is the fastest processor here, suited to video editing, 3D rendering and CAD, though it needs a new motherboard and DDR4 memory.

tweakers.net

31/05/2016

Summary of the review

Broadwell-E Review (Includes benchmarks comparing against the i7-5960X)

The Tweakers review of the Intel Broadwell-E platform highlights the Core i7-6950X as the first 10-core, 20-thread consumer desktop processor, utilizing a 14nm process within a 140W TDP. The platform introduces Turbo Boost Max 3.0 to optimize single-threaded performance for these high-core-count chips. Key advantages include "monster" multi-threaded performance, making it excellent for 4K video encoding, 3D rendering, and heavy multitasking, with improved power efficiency over previous generations. The platform retains compatibility with existing X99 motherboards, providing an upgrade path. Conversely, the primary drawback is the extreme launch price of roughly $1,723 USD, resulting in a poor value proposition for most users. While powerful, the 6950X can be outperformed in gaming and single-threaded tasks by cheaper quad-core processors, and high-end cooling is required to overcome significant heat output during heavy usage. For more details, visit the Tweakers review. Copy

Third-party reviews

Based on 146 buyer reviews from online shops.

Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Intel Core i7 5960X

Unmatched multi-threaded performance due to 8 cores and 16 threads
Excellent for professional content creation, such as 4K video editing and 3D rendering
High overclocking potential, with many users reaching 4.4GHz or higher stably
Provides a full 40 PCIe lanes, ideal for multi-GPU configurations
Runs impressively cool and efficient for its power class
Supports DDR4 memory and the modern X99 chipset platform

What we don't like about Intel Core i7 5960X

Extremely high initial launch price (approx. £760 / $1,050)
Requires expensive platform upgrades (new X99 motherboard and DDR4 RAM)
Limited performance gains in gaming compared to much cheaper quad-core processors
Lower stock base clock speed (3.0 GHz) than some previous-generation flagships
Single-threaded tasks are often handled better by higher-clocked mainstream CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-5960X is a high-end desktop processor based on the Haswell-E architecture, featuring 8 physical cores and 16 threads with a 3.0 GHz base clock and a 3.5 GHz Turbo Boost. Built on a 22nm process, it was the first consumer CPU to support quad-channel DDR4 memory (up to 2133 MHz) and offers a massive 20MB of L3 Smart Cache along with 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes for multi-GPU configurations. Its primary strengths include exceptional multi-threaded performance for 4K video editing or 3D rendering and an unlocked multiplier that provides significant overclocking headroom. However, its main drawbacks include a high 140W TDP that requires robust cooling, the lack of integrated graphics, and the necessity of a specific X99 motherboard with an LGA 2011-v3 socket, making for an expensive platform entry.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9955WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Intel Core i7 5960X with other processors

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7 5960X and other processors

No results found