OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Intel Celeron 6305 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£90
Avg. price in US: ~$110
PassMark benchmark result: 2037
N. of physical cores: 2
CPU boost clock speed: N/A GHz
CPU socket: FCBGA1449
TDP (Thermal design power): 15 W

Intel Celeron 6305 review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

3.9

Poor

3.9

Poor

?

7.4
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
?
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
?
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
?
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
?
L3 cache
8.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
6.6
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
?
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
20.0%
?
CPU threads
15.0%
?
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £90

Best rankings

#583 in Best Mobile CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Celeron 6305 is a power-efficient, dual-core SoC based on the 10nm SuperFin Tiger Lake-U architecture, featuring two Willow Cove cores and two threads with a fixed base frequency of 1.80 GHz. It includes 4 MB of Intel Smart Cache, supports up to 64 GB of DDR4-3200 or LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, and integrates Intel UHD Graphics with 48 execution units capable of supporting up to four displays. Main advantages include its low 15W TDP for enhanced battery life in laptops, support for modern technologies like WiFi 6, and improved integrated graphics performance over previous generations. However, its primary drawbacks are the lack of Intel Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading, which significantly limits multitasking and high-demand performance compared to Core-series processors.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Celeron 6305

Overall score

3.9

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

7.0

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: LOW

Intel

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: LOW

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: LOW

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: LOW

N/A

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Performance

1.9

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: LOW

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

N/A

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

6.4

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: LOW

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

6.2

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: LOW

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

7.8

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: LOW

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: LOW

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=24

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=350 MHz

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Thermal

8.2

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <50 W

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <=28 s

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Intel Celeron 6305 vs the average processor

Why is Intel Celeron 6305 better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

2.5x more L2 per core
Intel Celeron 6305 has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
What it is: The amount of L2 cache available to each CPU core.
When it matters: When you are comparing per-core cache resources in deeper architectural analysis.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=1 MB/core
Intel Celeron 6305 has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.1.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
More advanced microarchitecture
Intel Celeron 6305 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: HIGH
Intel Celeron 6305 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake).Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake
75% lower boost power
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <50 W
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.15 W vs 60 W
66.7% lower base power
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <30 W
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
Newer DDR support
Intel Celeron 6305 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.
Importance: LOW
Good value: DDR5
Intel Celeron 6305 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4
66.7% lower TDP
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <30 W
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
Advanced security extensions
Intel Celeron 6305 provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
What it is: The supported hardware security extensions provided by the processor.
When it matters: When you care about security, encryption, or enterprise features.
Importance: LOW
Intel Celeron 6305 provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
More advanced foundry
Intel Celeron 6305 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm).
What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.
When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.
Importance: LOW
Intel Celeron 6305 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm).Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm
Advanced security extensions
Intel Celeron 6305 provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
2.5x more L2 per core
Intel Celeron 6305 has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
More advanced microarchitecture
Intel Celeron 6305 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Tiger Lake vs Kaby Lake).
More advanced foundry
Intel Celeron 6305 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm SuperFin vs Intel 14 nm).
17.5% smaller die size
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower die size than the average processor (146 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
16.7% more L3 per core
Intel Celeron 6305 has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
16.7% smaller process node
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower process node than the average processor (10 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
Newer DDR support
Intel Celeron 6305 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4X vs DDR4).
30.3% higher memory bandwidth
Intel Celeron 6305 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (59.7 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
27.3% higher memory speed
Intel Celeron 6305 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (3,733 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
2x more GPU execution units
Intel Celeron 6305 has more GPU execution units than the average processor (48 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
1 more supported displays
Intel Celeron 6305 has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
75% lower boost power
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
66.7% lower base power
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
66.7% lower TDP
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Why is Intel Celeron 6305 worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Narrower instruction support
Intel Celeron 6305 supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
Older CPU socket
Intel Celeron 6305 uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1,449 vs FP4).
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Celeron 6305 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
80.7% lower PassMark score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2037 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
52.9% weaker single-core performance
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,177 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
84.9% lower multi-core score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (727 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
85.1% weaker multi-core performance
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (416 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
49% lower single-core score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (750 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
55.6% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (217 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
6 fewer CPU threads
Intel Celeron 6305 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
Lower base clock
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower base clock than the average processor (2x1.8 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
No multithreading support
Intel Celeron 6305 does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
50% lower bus speed
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
50% lower bus transfer rate
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
1 fewer threads per core
Intel Celeron 6305 has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
No Turbo Boost
Intel Celeron 6305 does not support Turbo Boost, the average processor does. 88.6% of processors support Turbo Boost.
10 lower clock multiplier
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (18 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
50% smaller L3 cache
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
58.3% smaller L1 cache
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (160 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
Narrower media codec support
Intel Celeron 6305 supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (AV1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Celeron 6305 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
Intel Celeron 6305 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.2 vs 6
80.7% lower PassMark score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2037 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2037 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.2,037 vs 10,572.5
84.9% lower multi-core score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (727 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (727 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.727 vs 4,829
52.9% weaker single-core performance
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,177 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,177 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.1,177 vs 2,500
85.1% weaker multi-core performance
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (416 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.
When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4700
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (416 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.416 vs 2,791
49% lower single-core score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (750 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (750 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.750 vs 1,471
55.6% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (217 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >600
Intel Celeron 6305 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (217 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.217 vs 489
6 fewer CPU threads
Intel Celeron 6305 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 16+
Intel Celeron 6305 has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (2 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.2 vs 8

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Graphic comparison of Intel Celeron 6305 and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Celeron 6305?

Excellent value for money for budget-conscious users
Surprising integrated graphics performance for its class, capable of running light games like The Sims 4 and GTA V at low settings
Energy-efficient 10nm architecture leads to good battery life and low heat output
Solid performance for basic office work, virtual classes, and web browsing when paired with an SSD
Supports modern features like Wi-Fi 6 and higher RAM speeds (up to 3733 MHz)

What customers dislike about Intel Celeron 6305?

Lacks Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost, limiting it to only 2 cores and 2 threads
Performance is considered poor for multitasking or modern demanding applications
Extremely slow out-of-the-box if paired with a mechanical HDD or eMMC storage
Easily hits 100% CPU usage during basic tasks like Zoom calls or multiple browser tabs
Not suitable for heavy gaming or professional content creation

Expert reviews

cpubenchmark.net

29/03/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Celeron 6305 @ 1.80GHz - CPU Benchmarks

The Intel Celeron 6305 is an entry-level, 15W TDP dual-core processor from the Tiger Lake-U family, built on a 10nm process for budget laptops. Featuring modern architecture with integrated Gen 12 Xe-based graphics and Thunderbolt 4 support, it provides improved visual performance. Performance is constrained by a fixed 1.8 GHz clock speed and the absence of Hyper-Threading. While adequate for basic web browsing and office applications, the processor is not designed for heavy multitasking, as it is roughly 18-21% slower than older mobile Core i5 chips. For more details, visit PassMark. Copy

cpubenchmark.net

29/09/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Celeron 6305 vs i3-1115G4 - CPU Benchmarks For a comprehensive technical breakdown, visit Notebookcheck.

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 significantly outperforms the Celeron 6305, acting as a superior entry-level option with 4.1 GHz turbo speeds and Hyper-Threading, whereas the Celeron is locked at 1.8 GHz with only two threads. With a CPU Mark score roughly 186% higher, the i3 excels in responsiveness, while the Celeron 6305 struggles with modern, heavy multitasking. While the i3 offers better integrated graphics and a larger cache for improved efficiency, the Celeron is limited to basic, low-budget tasks. For the full benchmark comparison, visit PassMark Software. Copy

laptopmedia.com

29/09/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Celeron 6305 - LaptopMedia

The Intel Celeron 6305 is a 10nm Tiger Lake-U dual-core SoC designed for budget laptops, featuring a 1.8 GHz base clock without Turbo Boost or Hyper-Threading. While designed for basic tasks, it offers modern features like 15W TDP efficiency, 48 EU Xe-based graphics, Wi-Fi 6, and Thunderbolt 4 support. However, the processor lacks high-end performance, struggling with demanding applications and limiting itself to simple office work, web browsing, and media consumption. For more details, visit LaptopMedia. Copy

cpubenchmark.net

29/09/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Celeron 6305 Processor at 1.80 GHz - Performance Tests and Benchmarks

The Intel Celeron 6305 is an entry-level, 10nm Tiger Lake-U processor operating at a fixed 1.80 GHz with two cores and two threads. It features a 15W TDP, Gen 12 UHD Graphics, and modern support for Wi-Fi 6 and DDR4-3200, but lacks Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading, resulting in poor multi-threaded performance compared to contemporary budget options. While designed for efficient, low-power laptops, its limited processing power makes it unsuitable for intensive tasks, trailing over 60% behind newer alternatives like the Intel N100. For more details, visit PassMark Software.

smartworld.it

31/01/2022

Summary of the review

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 Chromebook Review: The All-Rounder

The Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 Chromebook is a balanced 2-in-1, offering a premium, tactile typing experience and a sturdy build with a 360-degree hinge. Performance is driven by an Intel Core i3 and 8GB RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking, supported by reliable 8–12 hour battery life. While praised for performance, drawbacks include limited display brightness under 300 nits, lackluster speakers, and a Mylar trackpad. Copy

notebookcheck.nl

13/03/2026

Summary of the review

AMD A-Series A8-6410 Notebook Processor (including current benchmark comparison with the Celeron 6305). Would you like me to dive deeper into specific...

The AMD A8-6410 is a Beema-family, quad-core mobile SoC (2.0 - 2.4 GHz) designed for entry-level, thin-and-light laptops, featuring Puma+ cores that compete with low-voltage Intel Core i3 (Haswell) processors. A key advantage is its efficient 15-watt TDP, offering sufficient performance for everyday office tasks and multimedia consumption. However, the integrated Radeon R5 GPU, while supporting older titles, serves as a limitation for modern gaming, and the system is restricted by single-channel DDR3L memory bandwidth. The processor presents a balanced, budget-friendly option for basic productivity, but it quickly hits a performance ceiling with heavy multitasking or intensive graphical tasks.

laptopmedia.com

14/03/2023

Summary of the review

Intel Celeron 6305 - Specifications and Benchmarks

The Intel Celeron 6305 is a 10nm Tiger Lake-U dual-core SoC, operating at a fixed 1.80 GHz with a low 15W TDP, making it suited for entry-level, power-efficient, or fanless laptops. It lacks Turbo Boost, limiting raw power, and with only two cores and two threads, multitasking capability is quite restricted. Benchmark performance is modest (approx. 1072 in Cinebench R23), placing it in the budget category alongside the Celeron N4505. However, the integrated Gen 12 Intel UHD Graphics (48 EUs) provide capable media playback and support for up to four displays. Pros include support for fast 3733 MHz RAM, modern Wi-Fi 6, and Thunderbolt functionality, which are ideal for basic office work, web browsing, and video conferencing. Cons are significant, as the lack of Turbo Boost and the dual-thread limitation cause high usage (100%) during moderate multitasking, making it a "bare essentials" chip that may struggle over time. For the full technical analysis, visit LaptopMedia.

notebookcheck.nl

18/06/2026

Summary of the review

Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 Review: A Quiet, Affordable Office Laptop

The Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 is an affordable 14-inch office laptop characterized by quiet, cool operation and a portable 1.41 kg plastic chassis. It offers strong performance for daily tasks, featuring a comfortable keyboard and a PWM-free display that avoids screen flickering. However, the laptop suffers from a low-coverage sRGB display, weak 38Wh battery, and lackluster speakers.

tweakers.net

07/01/2025

Summary of the review

Laptop Best Buy Guide - Best Chromebook

The January 2025 Tweakers review of top Chromebooks highlights a significant performance gap, favoring devices with faster Intel Core processors over models using older Celeron N4500 chips. The analysis emphasizes that while budget-friendly options, such as the HP Chromebook 14a-nf0080nd, feature better IPS panels, they often suffer from limited 32GB to 64GB eMMC storage and flimsy keyboard builds. The "Chromebook Plus" segment is recommended for its guaranteed hardware, including at least an Intel Core i3 or AMD Ryzen 3 7000, 8GB of RAM, and superior 1080p webcams with temporal noise reduction. A major drawback for these premium models is their higher price, which challenges the value proposition compared to traditional Windows laptops. Overall, the review highlights that choosing the right device depends on balancing specific hardware requirements like screen brightness and multitasking capabilities against the budget. To view the full evaluation, visit Tweakers. Copy

Video reviews

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

Intel Core i7 13700T

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

Intel Core i5 13600K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Processors

Intel Core i5 14500

Processors

Compare Intel Celeron 6305 with other processors

Compare