OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£410
Avg. price in US: ~$340
PassMark benchmark result: 29907
N. of physical cores: 8
CPU boost clock speed: 5.2 GHz

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

6.9

Good

6.9

Good

?

6.4
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
7.3
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
7.1
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
8.2
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
3.3
L3 cache
8.0%
3.5
N. of physical cores
4.8
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
5.7
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
3.5
N. of physical cores
20.0%
5.2
CPU threads
15.0%
3.3
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £410

Best rankings

#95 in Best Mobile CPUs

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is a high-end mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture and a 4nm TSMC process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a 4.0 GHz base clock and a 5.2 GHz boost frequency. Its main strengths include exceptional power efficiency for its performance class, a configurable TDP of 35W to 54W, and the integrated Radeon 780M RDNA 3 graphics, which is capable of 1080p gaming on low-to-medium settings. Furthermore, it introduces a dedicated XDNA AI engine for accelerated artificial intelligence workloads. However, potential drawbacks include high operating temperatures that can reach 100°C under sustained heavy loads, a lack of an unlocked multiplier for manual overclocking, and slightly higher idle power consumption compared to some competing Intel mobile chips.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

Overall score

6.9

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.7

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

6.4

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

7.3

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

8.5

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

8.6

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

?

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Thermal

6.3

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

35-54 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

35-54 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

?

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

55.4% better single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,858 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,858 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.3,858 vs 2,483
20.9% higher boost clock
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.5.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
2.58x higher multi-core score
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (12,348 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (12,348 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.12,348 vs 4,793
66% higher single-core score
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,442 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,442 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.2,442 vs 1,471
2.84x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (29,907 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (29,907 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.29,907 vs 10,532.5
More advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Phoenix vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Phoenix vs Kaby Lake).Phoenix vs Kaby Lake
4x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=128 GB
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.256 GB vs 64 GB
2.56x higher memory speed
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (7,500 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=4800 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (7,500 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.7500 MHz vs 2933 MHz
Advanced security extensions
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Memory Guard, Secure Processor, SME, SEV, Pluton vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
3 year/s newer release date
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a newer release date than the average processor (2023 vs 2020).
55.4% better single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,858 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
20.9% higher boost clock
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
2.58x higher multi-core score
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (12,348 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
66% higher single-core score
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,442 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2.84x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (29,907 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
8 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
2 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
12 higher clock multiplier
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (40 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
More advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Phoenix vs Kaby Lake).
66.7% smaller process node
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a lower process node than the average processor (4 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
3.2x larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (8 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
More advanced foundry
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
2x more L2 per core
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
5.05x more transistors
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more transistors than the average processor (25 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
2x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
16.7% more L3 per core
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
33.3% larger L1 cache
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (512 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
2.56x higher memory speed
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (7,500 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
4x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
Newer DDR support
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR5/LPDDR5X vs DDR4).
95.6% higher memory bandwidth
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (89.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
Newer PCIe version
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3.0).
Supports memory overclocking
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not.
4 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (20 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
Higher JEDEC memory speed
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (LPDDR5X-7500 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
Better integrated GPU
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Radeon 780M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
1 more supported displays
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Narrower instruction support
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ADX, RDRAND, RDSEED vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
Older TPM support
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
50% fewer GPU execution units
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (12 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
Narrower instruction support
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ADX, RDRAND, RDSEED vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
What it is: The supported CPU instruction sets and extensions.
When it matters: When you run software that depends on specific CPU instructions.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ADX, RDRAND, RDSEED vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, ADX, RDRAND, RDSEED vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
64% more expensive
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is more expensive than the average processor (£410 vs £250).
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is more expensive than the average processor (£410 vs £250).£410 vs £250
Older TPM support
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
What it is: The kind of TPM security support associated with the processor or its platform.
When it matters: When operating-system requirements, device encryption, enterprise security, or platform trust features matter.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
50% fewer GPU execution units
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (12 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.
When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=24
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (12 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.12 vs 24

Integrated Graphics

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS?

Excellent multi-core performance for demanding tasks like video editing and 3D rendering
Industry-leading integrated graphics (Radeon 780M) capable of 1080p gaming on low/medium settings
High power efficiency due to the 4nm Zen 4 architecture, leading to impressive battery life
Strong single-core responsiveness for everyday productivity and web browsing
Supports modern standards like DDR5 memory, USB4, and PCIe 4.0
Includes dedicated Ryzen AI hardware for accelerating compatible AI workloads

What customers dislike about AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS?

Susceptible to thermal throttling in compact chassis without robust cooling solutions
Laptops equipped with this flagship processor often command a high price premium
Limited performance gains over the slightly more affordable Ryzen 7 7840HS for some users
Significant performance drops can occur when running on battery power compared to being plugged in
Higher idle power consumption compared to some competing Intel or Apple silicon chips

Expert reviews

wccftech.com

02/02/2023

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS "Phoenix" CPU With Radeon 780M "RDNA 3" GPU Tested In 3DMark Time Spy

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS "Phoenix" APU, based on the 4nm Zen 4 architecture, demonstrates a significant 15-16% performance gain over the previous Ryzen 9 6900HX in 3DMark Time, with a CPU score of 11,343 at 54W TDP. Its Radeon 780M RDNA 3 iGPU delivers exceptional performance (2,791 graphics score), effectively rivaling discrete entry-level graphics such as the NVIDIA RTX 2050 in a power-efficient package. While highlighting strong, efficient performance suitable for thin-and-light gaming, the early testing indicates a need for active cooling to manage 54W loads and potential performance optimizations.

cnx-software.com

13/07/2024

Summary of the review

GEEKOM AE7 Review – An AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS mini PC tested with Windows 11 and Ubuntu 24.04

The GEEKOM AE7 is a high-performance mini PC featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor, 32GB RAM, and a 1TB SSD, housed in a robust, easily accessible silver aluminum chassis. It delivers strong performance in both Windows 11 and Ubuntu with extensive connectivity, including USB4 and a full-sized SD card reader, making it suitable for demanding tasks. Pros include excellent performance and port selection, while cons focus on high thermal output (>90°C) and loud fan noise under load, alongside limited storage expansion.

ultrabookreview.com

01/06/2023

Summary of the review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 review (GA402XY – Ryzen 9 7940HS, RTX 4090)

The Asus ROG Strix G18 and G16 offer high-end gaming performance, sharing DNA with the premium Scar series while providing a more accessible price point. The Asus VivoBook Pro 16X OLED is featured as a versatile, color-accurate creative tool, though its 16-inch form factor is less portable than dedicated thin-and-lights. Finally, the ROG Strix Scar 17 X3D provides top-tier gaming performance with its 3D V-Cache processor, but its high price and bulky design make it a niche choice for enthusiasts.

eurogamer.net

02/12/2023

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS review: does AI hardware make a difference?

Digital Foundry's review of the 2023 Razer Blade 14 highlights the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS's exceptional performance and efficiency, placing desktop-class power into a 14-inch form factor. The laptop pairs this with a bright 16:10 QHD+ display and user-upgradeable storage and memory, though it is held back by a high premium price tag and a shallow keyboard. While the machine is a top-tier performer, its value proposition is challenged by cheaper alternatives offering similar performance, alongside limited current utility for its integrated AI engine.

notebookcheck.net

18/01/2026

Summary of the review

Geekom A7 Max Mini-PC review: Elegant all-rounder with Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Geekom A7 Max is a well-built, compact 0.84-liter mini PC featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor that delivers strong multi-core performance for demanding tasks. However, the device suffers from "wasted performance" due to a single-channel 16 GB DDR5 RAM configuration, which severely bottlenecks the Radeon 780M iGPU's 3D capabilities, compounded by the lack of an OCuLink port. While boasting extensive I/O (dual USB4, dual 2.5 GbE), the unit presents difficult maintenance, requiring users to navigate glued-on rubber feet and delicate antenna cables for upgrades.

cnx-software.com

12/02/2024

Summary of the review

Testing AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS' AI Engine in Windows 11

CNX Software evaluated the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AI Engine (NPU) on Windows 11, highlighting the potential for efficient, dedicated AI processing to offload tasks like Windows Studio Effects. While the hardware works for local inference, the review notes a significant drawback in the highly complex, developer-centric setup process requiring manual installation of dependencies. The testing revealed a "beta-like" software experience, with poor documentation and a difficult configuration process for simple demos. Despite these setup challenges, the NPU demonstrated functional capability for running AI models on the AMD Ryzen AI platform once properly configured. Ultimately, while offering future-proof potential for applications like Topaz AI, the Ryzen 9 7940HS AI Engine currently lacks "plug-and-play" support. This makes the technology, though promising, a niche tool requiring high technical expertise to utilize effectively. Copy

notebookcheck.com

20/07/2023

Summary of the review

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Review: Outperforming the Competition with AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and Radeon 780M

The Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro is a high-performance mini PC featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor and Radeon 780M graphics, offering exceptional processing power that outperforms many competitors. Key strengths include a robust metal chassis, comprehensive USB4 port selection, and an effective "Cold Wave 2.0" cooling system. The device excels in multitasking and light-to-medium gaming, providing high expandability with support for up to 64GB DDR5-5600 RAM and dual M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs. It supports up to four 4K displays and includes a graphical BIOS, making it a capable desktop replacement. Potential drawbacks include audible fan noise under heavy loads, a less-than-ideal internal component cooling fan, and mediocre wireless antenna range. Additionally, the unit lacks a 2.5-inch SATA drive slot and requires removing adhesive feet to open, with some users reporting initial driver stability issues.

notebookcheck.com

02/03/2024

Summary of the review

Geekom A7 In-Depth Review: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS delivers solid performance in a tiny 0.5L chassis

The Geekom A7 is an ultra-compact 0.5-liter mini PC featuring a premium aluminum chassis and the powerful AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor, often configured with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM and a 2 TB SSD. It offers excellent performance for demanding tasks, supported by Radeon 780M graphics, strong port selection including USB4, and good upgradeability. While praised for its design, the unit suffers from potential thermal throttling under sustained heavy loads, high fan noise, and occasionally weak Wi-Fi signal strength, though it remains a capable, premium all-rounder.

igorslab.de

29/01/2026

Summary of the review

Geekom A7 Max Mini-PC Review – 7940HS with a Hunger for RAM

The Geekom A7 Max is identified as a potent "power dwarf" featuring a robust AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor and a compact aluminum chassis with excellent connectivity, including dual 2.5 GbE and USB4 ports. However, the review highlights a significant con, as the single-channel 16GB DDR5 memory configuration severely bottlenecks the Radeon 780M graphics, which can be fixed with a second RAM stick. Despite efficient cooling, the device is considered a "tough pick" over the similar A8 model due to this memory constraint, making it best for users requiring extensive ports who plan to upgrade the RAM immediately. igor´ Copy

igorslab.de

29/03/2024

Summary of the review

Geekom A7 Mini PC Review: Striking Similarities and the 7940HS as the New Frontrunner

The Geekom A7 Max, featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, is praised in the Igor'sLAB review for its premium aluminum design, strong productivity performance, and efficient cooling system. Key advantages include exceptional CPU throughput and robust connectivity, though it arrives with a single 16GB DDR5-5600 stick, creating a "RAM crisis" that cripples the Radeon 780M graphics performance by forcing single-channel operation. Furthermore, the review notes a challenging disassembly process with risky, short Wi-Fi antenna cables, though it concludes the unit offers high-performance 4K capabilities and a 3-year warranty. igor´ Copy

cnx-software.com

12/02/2024

Summary of the review

Testing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Processor's AI Engine in Windows 11", "AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AI Engine Test on Windows 11", "Benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS...

Testing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AI engine within a GEEKOM A7 mini PC, CNX Software found that while the XDNA-based NPU provides dedicated, power-efficient hardware for AI tasks, the ecosystem is in early stages requiring complex, manual setup. The review highlights pros such as improved system efficiency through offloaded workloads and potential for future, specialized edge AI applications. However, significant cons include challenging software configuration, a lack of widespread third-party app support, and limited accessibility for average users at this stage.

lesnumeriques.com

25/06/2023

Summary of the review

Lab Test – The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: The Perfect Companion for Thin and Powerful Laptops

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is identified as an exceptionally efficient processor, delivering 4.05 points per watt, which marks a significant, "impressive" efficiency leap over the previous generation, according to Les Numériques. It outperforms the Intel Core i9-13900H in efficiency by 18%, offering strong, sustained performance for thin-and-light laptops, featuring the capable Radeon 780M iGPU for 1080p gaming, DDR5-5600 support, and Ryzen AI. While highly efficient, the chip's performance gains over the previous generation are a modest 10%, it lacks an unlocked multiplier, and it can reach high temperatures (up to 95°C) requiring robust cooling to avoid throttling.

geeknetic.es

20/06/2023

Summary of the review

Razer Blade 14 Review with AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

The 2023 Razer Blade 14, featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and NVIDIA RTX 4070, packs high-end performance into a 17.99mm chassis with a 240Hz QHD+ display and user-upgradable DDR5 RAM. While offering top-tier performance, a significant con is that the processor operates at high temperatures exceeding 100ºC under heavy loads. Although the cooling system keeps the laptop unexpectedly quiet, this can cause thermal throttling in certain scenarios. Despite a high price point and the premium, sometimes costly nature of the device, the 2023 model shines with over 10 hours of battery life during light use, according to Geeknetic.

profesionalreview.com

03/02/2023

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS “Phoenix” with Radeon 780M GPU outperforms the Core i9-12900HK

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS "Phoenix" processor, built on a 4nm Zen 4 architecture with 8 cores and 16 threads, represents a significant leap for high-performance laptops. Featuring integrated Ryzen AI for hardware acceleration and a boost clock of up to 5.2 GHz, it balances high productivity with efficient mobile performance. The standout Radeon 780M iGPU, based on RDNA 3, offers performance comparable to entry-level discrete cards like the RTX 2050. The integrated graphics allow for 1080p gaming on medium-high settings, marking a 12-15% improvement over its predecessor. While CPU performance is strong, it may trail behind top-tier Intel alternatives in some multi-threaded scenarios, notes Profesional Review. The processor's performance is also highly dependent on fast RAM, specifically DDR5-5600, to achieve maximum iGPU results. Key pros include excellent integrated graphics performance, efficient power usage, and advanced AI features. Conversely, limitations consist of high sensitivity to RAM speed and potential thermal throttling in thin devices.

noticias3d.com

20/06/2023

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Review: Testing it in the new Razer Blade 14

The Noticias3D review of the Razer Blade 14 highlights the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS as a highly efficient 4nm "Phoenix" processor, delivering significant performance gains over the 6900HS and featuring an integrated XDNA AI engine. The laptop combines this CPU with an NVIDIA RTX 4070 (140W TGP) and a 240Hz WQXGA display, maintaining superior power efficiency compared to Intel alternatives. Key advantages include its premium, compact aluminum chassis and user-upgradable RAM and SSD, though it is balanced against a high price point, limited 8GB VRAM, high noise levels under load, and lack of Ethernet.

smartworld.it

09/01/2026

Summary of the review

Recensione GEEKOM A7 Max: mini PC con Ryzen 9 7940HS

a little longer The SmartWorld.it review highlights the GEEKOM A7 Max as a compact, high-performance mini PC driven by an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor and a robust aluminium chassis. Key strengths include extensive connectivity, such as dual USB4 ports and dual 2.5G LAN, alongside efficient, quiet cooling for demanding tasks. However, the review notes that the standard single-stick 16GB RAM configuration hampers the integrated GPU, and the internal design offers limited expansion with only one M.2 slot and complex, delicate assembly for upgrades.

geekom.co.uk

31/12/2025

Summary of the review

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen 9 7940HS: Which One to Choose in 2026?

The Geekom comparison of the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 9 7940HS highlights that while both share the same 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 architecture, the Ryzen 9 offers higher 4.0 GHz base and 5.2 GHz boost clocks. The Ryzen 9 excels in demanding multi-threaded tasks, but its drawbacks include higher power consumption and greater thermal output. Conversely, the Ryzen 7 7840HS provides better efficiency for, with excellent power-to-performance ratio and lower thermal output, though it lacks some enthusiast-level tuning capabilities. Both processors support modern standards like DDR5 memory, with the choice depending on whether the user prioritizes raw professional performance or balanced, efficient, everyday computing. Copy

tweakers.net

04/07/2026

Summary of the review

Beelink GTR7 7840HS Review - Mini PC with Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 (includes test results for GTR7 Pro with 7940HS)

The Tweakers review highlights the Beelink GTR7 7840HS as a powerful, early adoption mini-PC featuring the Zen 4-based Ryzen 7 7840HS, which offers 20% to 30% better performance over previous models. The device is highly praised for its sturdy metal chassis, generous port selection including dual 2.5Gb Ethernet and USB4, and user-accessible internal components for easy upgrades to the dual M.2 slots and DDR5 RAM. However, the high-performance processor results in increased power consumption, significant heat, and a notably loud cooling fan under heavy, sustained workloads. Key drawbacks identified in the review include the reliance on a proprietary magnetic power connector, which makes finding replacements difficult, and initial driver stability issues. While the integrated Radeon 780M graphics excel at 1080p gaming, the fan noise can be disruptive during intensive tasks, and the Wi-Fi standard is slightly lower (Wi-Fi 6) compared to some competitors. The review concludes that while it is an excellent performer, users should be aware of the cooling limitations and the proprietary charger.

notebookcheck.nl

06/10/2023

Summary of the review

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV (2023) Review: Slim gaming convertible that packs a punch

The 2023 Asus ROG Flow X13 (GV302XV) is a premium 13.4-inch, 2-in-1 gaming laptop featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor and a 60W Nvidia RTX 4060, offering a significant performance boost over previous models. Its professional-looking aluminum chassis excels in versatility, while the 75 Wh battery delivers strong runtime and the 165 Hz QHD+ display ensures high-quality visuals. The device's primary drawbacks include elevated heat and fan noise during heavy loads, soldered RAM restricted to 16 GB in most configurations, and a fingerprint-prone surface.

notebookcheck.nl

01/05/2023

Summary of the review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 Review - Compact Gaming Laptop with AMD Zen4 Phoenix & RTX 4090

According to Notebookcheck, the 2023 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 is a high-performance 14-inch laptop featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and NVIDIA RTX 4090, often outperforming larger competitors. It boasts a high-quality Mini LED (Nebula HDR) display, superior build quality, and excellent speakers, weighing roughly 1.7 kg. The main drawbacks include high surface temperatures under load, significant fan noise, and reduced battery life compared to predecessors.

techfi.nl

20/03/2024

Summary of the review

Razer Blade 14 (2023) review: an excellent AMD gaming laptop

The 2023 Razer Blade 14 is a premium, compact gaming laptop featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor and up to an NVIDIA RTX 4070 GPU, housed in a robust 1.84kg aluminum chassis. A significant update is the introduction of a 16:10 QHD+ 240Hz display and user-upgradable DDR5 RAM, allowing for up to 64GB of memory. It offers impressive performance and excellent battery life, lasting nearly 10 hours in productivity tests, alongside a bright, vibrant display. Despite its strengths, the high-end device comes with a premium price tag often exceeding its competitors. While the vapor chamber cooling provides high power in a small form factor, it results in loud fan noise under heavy loads, and the matte chassis is a significant fingerprint magnet. Additionally, the keyboard offers a shallow 1mm travel, and the system lacks an SD card reader and Ethernet port. Overall, this model addresses past criticisms of non-upgradable RAM, creating a powerful, future-proof, and portable gaming machine. It is best suited for users prioritizing a thin-and-light form factor over a high price-to-performance ratio.

hardware.info

06/10/2023

Summary of the review

SimplyNUC Moonstone R9: Fast mini PC with an AMD Ryzen 9

The SimplyNUC Moonstone R9 is a compact, high-performance mini PC featuring an AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor and integrated Radeon 780M graphics, offering strong multi-core performance for productivity. The device supports up to four 4K displays with robust connectivity including USB4, though it operates with a potentially loud cooling fan under heavy loads. While praised for performance and versatility, the premium-priced, 1,100+ euro unit is hampered by slower DDR5-4800 memory and a mediocre stock 256GB SSD, according to the review. Copy

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS with other processors

Compare