Name: AMD Pro A10 8700B
Brand: AMD

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Pro A10 8700B

Overall score

3.5

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

7.8

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Performance

3.0

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Cache & Architecture

3.0

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Memory & PCIe

3.1

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Integrated Graphics

6.5

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

Power & Thermal

7.4

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

AMD Pro A10 8700B vs the average processor

Why is AMD Pro A10 8700B better than the average processor?

Hide

66.7% lower base power
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
10 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
What it is: The reported operating temperature of the processor.
When it matters: When you monitor thermals, cooling, or system stability.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <100 °C
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.90 °C vs 100 °C
66.7% lower TDP
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <30 W
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
Includes crypto acceleration
AMD Pro A10 8700B includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
What it is: Built-in hardware support for accelerating encryption and cryptographic tasks.
When it matters: When encryption speed or secure workloads matter to you.
Importance: LOW
AMD Pro A10 8700B includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.AES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA
27.78x cheaper
AMD Pro A10 8700B is cheaper than the average processor (£9 vs £250).
AMD Pro A10 8700B is cheaper than the average processor (£9 vs £250).£9 vs £250
Includes crypto acceleration
AMD Pro A10 8700B includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
66.7% lower base power
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
10 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
66.7% lower TDP
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.

Why is AMD Pro A10 8700B worse than the average processor?

Hide

5 year/s older release date
AMD Pro A10 8700B has an older release date than the average processor (2,015 vs 2,020).
June 2015
Older TPM support
AMD Pro A10 8700B supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
55.8% weaker single-core performance
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,098 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
25.6% lower boost clock
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
65.9% weaker multi-core performance
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (949 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
79.4% lower PassMark score
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2,168 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
79.5% lower multi-core score
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (983 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
2 fewer CPU cores
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
No multithreading support
AMD Pro A10 8700B does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
4 fewer CPU threads
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
1 fewer threads per core
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
10 lower clock multiplier
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (18 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
2.33x larger process node
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a higher process node than the average processor (28 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Pro A10 8700B uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Carrizo vs Kaby Lake).
37.6% larger die size
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a higher die size than the average processor (245 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
Less advanced foundry
AMD Pro A10 8700B uses a less advanced foundry process than the average processor (GlobalFoundries 28 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
20% smaller L2 cache
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
37.4% fewer transistors
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer transistors than the average processor (3.1 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
Older DDR support
AMD Pro A10 8700B supports an older DDR generation than the average processor (DDR3 vs DDR4).
8 fewer PCIe lanes
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (8 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
25.5% lower memory bandwidth
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (34.1 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
27.3% lower memory speed
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2,133 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
50% less memory capacity
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
Inferior integrated GPU
AMD Pro A10 8700B uses an inferior integrated GPU to the average processor (Radeon R6 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
75% fewer GPU execution units
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (6 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
10 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
55.8% weaker single-core performance
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,098 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1,098 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.1,098 vs 2,483
25.6% lower boost clock
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.3.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
65.9% weaker multi-core performance
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (949 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.
When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4700
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (949 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.949 vs 2,783
2.33x larger process node
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a higher process node than the average processor (28 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <10 nm
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a higher process node than the average processor (28 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.28 nm vs 12 nm
79.4% lower PassMark score
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2,168 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (2,168 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.2,168 vs 10,532.5
79.5% lower multi-core score
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (983 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
AMD Pro A10 8700B has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (983 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.983 vs 4,793
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Pro A10 8700B uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Carrizo vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
AMD Pro A10 8700B uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Carrizo vs Kaby Lake).Carrizo vs Kaby Lake
2 fewer CPU cores
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
AMD Pro A10 8700B has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.4 vs 6

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Pro A10 8700B?

Good performance for office work, programming, and general multitasking
Strong integrated Radeon R6 graphics compared to contemporary entry-level Intel chips
Excellent compatibility with Linux operating systems
Low power consumption (15W TDP), making it energy efficient for its era
Great value for money in the second-hand or budget market

What customers dislike about AMD Pro A10 8700B?

Struggles with modern AAA gaming titles; better suited for older or light games
Performance is heavily dependent on the laptop's cooling solution and TDP configuration
Boost speeds often cannot be maintained for extended periods if configured at lower wattages
Lacks hardware support for newer technologies like CUDA or advanced AI acceleration
Outdated 28nm architecture makes it significantly slower than modern mobile processors

Expert reviews

browser.geekbench.com

29/03/2026

AMD PRO A10-8700B Benchmarks - Geekbench Browser

The AMD PRO A10-8700B is a 2015-era, 4-core "Carrizo" APU designed for business laptops, featuring integrated Radeon R6 graphics that generally outperform contemporary Intel Core i5 integrated solutions. While it offers specialized business support, benchmarking data shows it struggles with modern performance demands, earning average Geekbench 6 scores of 450 single-core and 983...Read more

cpubenchmark.net

AMD PRO A10-8700B - CPU Benchmarks

The AMD PRO A10-8700B is a 2015 "Carrizo" quad-core APU designed for mainstream business laptops, featuring integrated Radeon R7 graphics. While suitable for light gaming and daily tasks, it generally underperforms compared to contemporary Intel Core i5 alternatives in both single and multi-threaded applications. Key advantages include its configurable TDP (12W-35W) for flexible...Read more

notebookcheck.com

29/09/2015

AMD A-Series Pro A10-8700B Notebook Processor

The AMD PRO A10-8700B is a 2015 Carrizo-based, dual-module business APU featuring integrated Radeon R6 graphics and a configurable 12–35W TDP. While efficient for office work, its performance is highly dependent on cooling, with 15W configurations performing similarly to an Intel Core i3-5005U. Pros include strong video decoding and stability, while cons include heavy throttling at...Read more

valid.x86.fr

29/06/2026

CPU-Z Benchmark Validation for AMD PRO A10-8700B R6

The CPU-Z benchmark for the Intel Core i7-11700K running at 4711.6 MHz shows a single-thread score of 634 and a multi-thread score of 6357, paired with 32GB of DDR4-3600 RAM and a Gigabyte Z590 AORUS ELITE AX motherboard. Key advantages include strong, stable performance in gaming and productivity, supported by high-frequency memory and effective, sustained clock speeds. However,...Read more

AMD PRO A10-8700B - PassMark Benchmark Results

The AMD PRO A10-8700B is a 2015-era, 15W quad-core laptop processor designed for business, featuring an integrated Radeon R6 graphics unit that provides capable, albeit dated, performance for light tasks and multimedia. While boasting a respectable 3.2 GHz max boost and decent integrated graphics, its 28nm architecture shows its age, delivering an entry-level CPU Mark of 2,212 and...Read more

notebookcheck.nl

13/03/2026

Intel Core i3-4030U Laptop Processor (Including A10-8700B Comparison Results): Performance Comparison Between the "PRO" and Standard Consumer A10-8700...

The Intel Core i3-4030U is a 22nm Haswell-based, dual-core ULV processor designed for thin ultrabooks, featuring a 1.9 GHz base clock, Hyper-Threading, and no Turbo Boost. A key pro is its 15W TDP, which integrates the chipset for enhanced energy efficiency and thinner device designs. The integrated HD Graphics 4400 (up to 1000 MHz) offers a performance boost over previous...Read more

AMD Pro A10 8700B Review | 78 Data compared

Best prices in UK

Best prices in US

Best rankings

Verdict

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Pro A10 8700B

AMD Pro A10 8700B vs the average processor

Why is AMD Pro A10 8700B better than the average processor?

Why is AMD Pro A10 8700B worse than the average processor?

Graphic comparison of AMD Pro A10 8700B and other processors

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Pro A10 8700B?

What customers dislike about AMD Pro A10 8700B?

Expert reviews

Best alternatives

Compare AMD Pro A10 8700B with other processors