OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Ozone Neon M50 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:5000 DPIWeight:115.5 g

Ozone Neon M50 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Ozone Neon M50
5.2/10

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

80%

5.0

Technical score

20%

6.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 77% of mice
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

36%

5.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.9

Controls

16%

4.5

Design

14%

8.2

Features

7%

1.2

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 68%
6.2

User score

User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 97%
  • ozone-neon-m50
ozone-neon-m50
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Ozone Neon M50

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

36%

5.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.9

Controls

16%

4.5

Design

14%

8.2

Features

7%

1.2

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

5.0
User score
User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.2
Popularity
Popularity
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Popularity:
Ozone Neon M50 has a popularity score of 4 points, which is lower than that of 71.9% of products in this category.
4.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.7
Brand name
Ozone
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
115.5 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 115.5 g, which is heavier than 84.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
braided
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
3
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 3 onboard profiles, which is more than 69.8% of mice and equal to 8.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
128 KB
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has 128 KB of onboard memory, which is larger than 88.1% of mice and equal to 2.4% of mice.
Software name
Ozone Neon M50 Software
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Ozone Neon M50 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 2 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 3 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    3 vs 1
  • 94 DPI finer step size
    This mouse adjusts DPI in 1 DPI steps, while the average mouse adjusts DPI in 95 DPI steps.
    1 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 94 DPI finer step size
    This mouse adjusts DPI in 1 DPI steps, while the average mouse adjusts DPI in 95 DPI steps.
    1 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 2 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 3 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    3 vs 1
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • 40.9% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 115.5 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    115.5 g vs 82 g
  • 67.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 130 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    130 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 50% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 5,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    5,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 28.1% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Ozone Neon M50
    the average mouse
    Ozone Neon M50 has a lower user score than the average mouse (6.24 vs 8).
    6.24 vs 8
  • 28.1% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Ozone Neon M50
    the average mouse
    Ozone Neon M50 has a lower user score than the average mouse (6.24 vs 8).
    6.24 vs 8
  • 9.7% worse value for money
    Ozone Neon M50 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.67 vs 7.3).
    6.67 vs 7.31
  • 59.2% less popular
    Ozone Neon M50 is less popular than the average mouse (4.01 vs 6.4).
    4.01 vs 6.38
  • 67.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 130 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    130 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 50% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 5,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    5,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • 1 fewer stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 4 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    4 vs 5
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 40.9% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 115.5 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    115.5 g vs 82 g
  • 7.48 mm wider mouse width
    This mouse has a width of 73.5 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    73.48 mm vs 66 mm
  • 4 older release date
    This mouse has a release date of 2017, while the average mouse has a release date of 2021.
    January 2017
    2017 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Ozone Neon M50

  • Excellent ergonomic shape, particularly for right-handed palm and fingertip grip users
  • High-quality primary buttons with a satisfying, clean click feel
  • Effective rubber coating on the top surface that provides a grippy, premium feel
  • Smooth gliding performance thanks to high-quality large feet
  • Onboard memory allows for saving up to five different profiles directly to the device
  • Sturdy overall build quality with a braided cable for durability
  • Good value for money compared to similar models in its price range

What customers don't like about Ozone Neon M50

  • Sensor performance issues, specifically subtle but noticeable motion delay and smoothing
  • Right-handed only design, which excludes left-handed gamers
  • RGB lighting zones (logo and ring) cannot be customized independently
  • DPI accuracy is off, with actual CPI often measuring significantly higher than the nominal setting
  • Some users find the 115g weight too heavy for competitive FPS gaming
  • Software interface is basic and lacks advanced features like surface calibration
  • DPI selection switch is uniquely located on the base of the mouse, which can be inconvenient for on-the-fly changes

Verdict

The Ozone Neon M50 is a right-handed ergonomic gaming mouse featuring the Pixart PMW3310 optical sensor, which provides up to 5,000 DPI, 130 IPS tracking speed, and 30G acceleration. Key characteristics include six programmable buttons equipped with Omron switches, a 1000Hz polling rate, and a 128KB internal memory for saving up to three user profiles. Its design highlights include a 1.8-meter braided cable, 16.8 million color RGB illumination across two zones, and rubberized textured side grips for improved control. Main pros include its highly accurate sensor, comfortable ergonomic shape for palm or claw grips, and tactile scroll wheel performance. However, notable cons include its relatively high weight of 115.5g without adjustment options, a lack of individual color control for the RGB zones, and some reports of subtle motion delay or smoothing at higher CPI settings.

Compare Ozone Neon M50 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ozone Neon M50 and other products in the Mice category

No results found