OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Qualcomm Adreno 506 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£260
Avg. price in US: ~$230
VRAM: ?
Memory bus width: 64 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): ?

Qualcomm Adreno 506 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

3.1

Poor

3.1

Poor

?

7.5
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
10
Floating-point performance
25.0%
?
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
8.1
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
?
VRAM
20.0%
10
Floating-point performance
15.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
8.4
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
10
Floating-point performance
25.0%
?
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
8.0
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
10
Floating-point performance
30.0%
?
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version
7.4
4K
Score components:
40.0%
10
Floating-point performance
35.0%
?
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
?
PCI Express (PCIe) version

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £260

Best rankings

#606 in Best Budget Graphic Cards
#2182 in Best Graphic Cards

Verdict

The Qualcomm Adreno 506 is a mid-range integrated mobile graphics card built on the Adreno 500 architecture and commonly found in the Snapdragon 625 and 626 chipsets. It features a clock speed of 650 MHz and is manufactured using a 14nm FinFET process, which provides a significant boost in power efficiency and thermal management compared to older 28nm alternatives. The GPU supports modern APIs including OpenGL ES 3.1+, Vulkan 1.0, and DirectX 12, while delivering roughly 120–130 GFLOPS of performance to comfortably handle 1080p Full HD displays. Its primary advantages include excellent energy efficiency for long gaming sessions and a high price-to-performance ratio for mid-tier devices. However, its main drawbacks are its inability to handle high-end 3D gaming at maximum settings and its lack of support for FP64 high-performance compute tasks.

Technical Specifications of graphics card Qualcomm Adreno 506

Overall score

3.1

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

2.7

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Memory

1.2

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

?

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

N/A

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

?

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

?

Show more

Platform & Features

5.9

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

?

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

?

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

5.0

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

?

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Power & Cooling

3.9

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

?

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

?

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

?

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

?

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Design

5.1

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

?

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

?

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

?

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Qualcomm Adreno 506 vs the average graphics card

Why is Qualcomm Adreno 506 better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

88 more compute units
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has more compute units than the average graphics card (128 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has more compute units than the average graphics card (128 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.128 vs 40
5.66x higher compute throughput
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (130 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.
Importance: LOW
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (130 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.130 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
30 °C lower load temperature
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (37 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
What it is: GPU temperature measured while the graphics card is under load.
When it matters: When you care how hot the GPU runs during long gaming or render sessions.
Importance: LOW
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (37 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.37 °C vs 67 °C
2.04x cheaper
Qualcomm Adreno 506 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £530).
Qualcomm Adreno 506 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £530).£260 vs £530
88 more compute units
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has more compute units than the average graphics card (128 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
5.66x higher compute throughput
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (130 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
30 °C lower load temperature
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (37 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.

Power & Cooling

Why is Qualcomm Adreno 506 worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

74.1% lower boost clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
40 fewer ray tracing cores
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
66.1% lower base clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
176 fewer TMUs
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (8 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
No CUDA support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
96.8% lower pixel rate
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (5.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
75.5% lower texture rate
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (93.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
144 fewer AI cores
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
99.5% lower FP32 performance
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
96.3% lower PassMark score
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (847 points vs 22,653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,653 points.
99.6% lower FP16 performance
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
4,256 fewer FP32 units
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (96 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
75% lower FP64 performance
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
100% lower INT8 performance
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
192 bit narrower memory bus
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
62.9% slower VRAM clock
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
2.8x larger process node
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
No DLSS support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
No FSR support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
8 older
Qualcomm Adreno 506 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2015 vs 2023).
December 2015
No AI upscalers
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
No mesh shaders
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
No XeSS support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
Older Vulkan version
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1 vs 1.4).
No DirectStorage support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
Worse SAM support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Older OpenCL version
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3.0).
Older shader model
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5 vs 6.8).
Older DirectX version
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
No sampler feedback
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
Older OpenGL version
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (3.2 vs 4.6).
No AV1 encoding
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
3 fewer displays supported
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (1 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
No AV1 decoding
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No DSC support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
No VRR support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
Older DisplayPort version
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
Narrower encode codec support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
Narrower decode codec support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
Lower display resolution
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (1920x1080 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
Older HDCP version
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
No HDMI output
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
Not VR ready
Qualcomm Adreno 506 is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
No overclocking support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support overclocking, the average graphics card does.
No dual BIOS
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No fan stop
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
No backplate
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
No RGB lighting
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
74.1% lower boost clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.650 MHz vs 2505 MHz
192 bit narrower memory bus
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.64 bit vs 256 bit
40 fewer ray tracing cores
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
What it is: Number of dedicated ray tracing processing cores or units
When it matters: When you care about ray-traced lighting, reflections, and shadows in newer games.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.0 vs 40
66.1% lower base clock speed
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.650 MHz vs 1920 MHz
2.8x larger process node
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.
Importance: MEDIUM
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.14 nm vs 5 nm
176 fewer TMUs
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (8 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.
Importance: HIGH
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (8 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.8 vs 184
No CUDA support
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports CUDA parallel computing platform
When it matters: When your apps or AI tools specifically depend on the CUDA software stack.
Importance: MEDIUM
Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
96.8% lower pixel rate
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (5.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
What it is: Number of pixels the GPU can render per second
When it matters: When you play at high resolutions or care about older raster-heavy games.
Importance: MEDIUM
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (5.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.5.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 506 and other products in the Graphics cards category

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Qualcomm Adreno 506?

Excellent thermal management; users report it remains cool (under 37°C) even during long gaming sessions.
Great price-to-performance ratio for mid-range devices like the Redmi Note 4 and Moto G5.
Highly power-efficient thanks to the 14nm FinFET manufacturing process.
Reliable performance for 1080p (Full HD) displays and casual mobile gaming.
Superior performance compared to its predecessor (Adreno 505) and contemporary competitors like the Mali-T830 MP2.

What customers dislike about Qualcomm Adreno 506?

Strictly a mid-range solution; struggles with high-end, demanding 3D games on maximum settings.
Aging architecture that cannot keep up with newer generations (like the Adreno 600 series) in modern benchmarks.
Performance is notably lower than enthusiast or flagship-tier GPUs, making it unsuitable for VR or 4K playback.
Users note that while 4GB of RAM is sufficient for standard gaming, the GPU can still face bottlenecks in hardware-intensive 'hardcore' scenarios.

Expert reviews

laptopmedia.com

24/08/2017

Summary of the review

Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 820 (+Adreno 530) vs Snapdragon 801 (+Adreno 330) performance and benchmark tests

The LaptopMedia comparison analyzes the performance of the Snapdragon 625 (Adreno 506), Snapdragon 820 (Adreno 530), and Snapdragon 801 (Adreno 330), showing that the SD820 offers superior computing and graphics power with 4K support, despite higher power consumption and thermal throttling. Conversely, the SD625 excels in power efficiency, offering excellent battery life and lower temperatures, but lags in GPU-heavy tasks, while the older SD801 struggles to compete with modern efficiency and performance standards. Pros for the Snapdragon 820 include high-end performance, whereas its cons are high power usage; for the SD625, the pros are efficiency, with the con of a weaker GPU. The legacy SD801 suffers from an outdated 28nm node and lacks 64-bit support compared to the newer options. For the full comparison, visit LaptopMedia.

laptopmedia.com

04/09/2017

Summary of the review

Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 617 (+Adreno 405) vs Snapdragon 430 (+Adreno 505) performance benchmarks and temperatures

The LaptopMedia comparison reveals the Snapdragon 625 (Adreno 506) as the performance leader, offering significantly faster CPU speeds and superior 3D Mark graphics scores compared to the Snapdragon 617 (Adreno 405) and Snapdragon 430 (Adreno 505). While the Snapdragon 430 provides a capable budget option with manageable temperatures, the Snapdragon 625’s 14nm process provides substantial power efficiency advantages. Pros for the Snapdragon 625 include its high-end performance, 4K video support, and lower power consumption, whereas the Snapdragon 617’s 28nm architecture represents a significant drawback with higher thermal output under load. The comparison highlights the 625 as the best balanced option, while the 617 suffers from outdated GPU technology.

laptopmedia.com

01/09/2017

Summary of the review

Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 650 (+Adreno 510) vs Snapdragon 430 (+Adreno 505) – performance, benchmarks and temperatures

LaptopMedia compares the Snapdragon 650, 625, and 430, highlighting that the 650 offers superior raw performance with Cortex-A72 cores and Adreno 510 graphics but suffers from higher thermal output on a 28nm node. Conversely, the 625 excels in efficiency using a 14nm process, providing cool operation, while the budget-focused 430 delivers decent, cool daily performance at the cost of lower benchmarks and older 28nm technology. The 650 handles demanding tasks best, the 625 offers the best balance of battery and performance, and the 430 is limited to entry-level usage.

techcenturion.com

20/11/2019

Summary of the review

Adreno 506 GPU: Specification and Review - Tech Centurion

The Tech Centurion review of the Adreno 506 GPU highlights it as one of the best mid-range graphics chips for its era, highly praised for its excellent price-to-performance ratio. Integrated into the popular Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and 626 system-on-chips (SoCs), this component is clocked at 650 MHz and leverages a 14nm FinFET manufacturing process to deliver smooth gaming at Full HD (1080p) resolutions. Benchmark metrics demonstrate its capability, showcasing solid frame rates in titles like Dead Trigger 2 (averaging 55 FPS) and playable performance in Asphalt 8 (averaging 31 FPS). The author highly recommends it for budget-conscious gamers looking at popular devices like the Moto G5 Plus, Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and Asus Zenfone 3. A specific breakdown of the pros and cons reveals a highly optimized, yet distinctly mid-tier hardware profile: Pros: The chip features an efficient 14nm FinFET design that keeps temperatures exceptionally low—staying under 37 degrees Celsius during continuous gaming—making it ideal for long gaming sessions without overheating or thermal throttling. It also provides robust API support, including OpenGL ES 3.1+, alongside full native support for 1080p...

laptopmedia.com

24/08/2017

Summary of the review

Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 820 (+Adreno 530) vs Snapdragon 801 (+Adreno 330) performance and benchmark tests

The LaptopMedia analysis compares the Snapdragon 820, 625, and 801, highlighting the 820's 14nm efficiency and superior Adreno 530 graphics as the top performer. The Snapdragon 625 offers superior battery life (pro) but weaker graphics (con), while the aging 801, despite a 28nm node and high power consumption (cons), surprises with stronger graphics than the 625 in some tests. Benchmarks confirm the Snapdragon 820 as the definitive choice for high-end gaming and 4K performance. While the 625 excels in efficiency and modern features (Quick Charge 3.0), it cannot compete with the raw power of the flagship chips, leading to a conclusion that favors the 820 for performance or the 625 for endurance. For the full comparison, visit LaptopMedia.

techcenturion.com

10/06/2018

Summary of the review

Snapdragon 625 Review, Benchmark Score and Comparison

The Snapdragon 625 is an octa-core mid-range mobile processor built on a 14nm FinFET fabrication process, utilizing eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked up to 2.0 GHz and an Adreno 506 GPU. A major advantage of this chipset is its exceptional power efficiency and thermal management, which prevents throttling and keeps the device cool (under 37°C) even during continuous, high-demand 1080p gaming. Furthermore, it offers a great price-to-performance ratio for mid-budget smartphones, delivering highly optimized, stable real-world performance that often beats competing chips in day-to-day app loading times. On the downside, the processor is held back by older technology limitations, such as support for only single-channel LPDDR3 RAM and eMMC 5.1 storage. Its Cortex-A53 cores are inherently weaker and generate lower benchmark scores (around 60k+ on AnTuTu) compared to more powerful Cortex-A72 or A73 alternatives found in the Snapdragon 65X series. Additionally, it features an older Bluetooth 4.1 version and relies on the smartphone manufacturer to enable its Quick Charge 3.0 capability, meaning some devices using this chip lack fast charging entirely.

pcmasters.de

28/03/2019

Summary of the review

Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite im Test - PC Masters

The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite is a budget-friendly Android One smartphone featuring a solid metal build and a modern 5.84-inch IPS display with a notch and a 1080x2280 resolution (432 ppi). Inside, it is powered by a dependable Snapdragon 625 octa-core processor and Adreno 506 GPU, combined with up to 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage. The phone delivers a clean software experience free of Xiaomi's bloatware, running a lightweight, frequently updated version of Android. It offers great gaming capabilities for titles like PUBG Mobile and includes a rear 12 MP + 5 MP dual camera setup. Several key pros and cons define the device's overall value: Pros: Excellent Battery Life: The massive 4,000 mAh battery easily lasts five days under casual use and outperformed flagships like the Galaxy Note 8 in benchmarks. True Triple-Card Slot: The card tray accommodates two nano-SIMs and a microSD card simultaneously without forcing compromises. Premium Build and Hardware Extras: Features a flawless anodised aluminium chassis, accurate rear fingerprint sensor, 3.5mm headphone jack, and an infrared blaster. Cons: Outdated Port: It relies...

bouyguestelecom.fr

15/06/2019

Summary of the review

Test du Fairphone 3 : le smartphone qui veut du bien à la ...

Fairphone 3 Review Summary The Fairphone 3 stands out as a unique, eco-friendly smartphone designed with a strong focus on sustainability, repairability, and ethical sourcing rather than raw performance. Released in September 2019, it features a modular design that allows users to easily replace individual components—such as the screen, battery, 12-megapixel Sony camera module, and USB Type-C port—using just a screwdriver. Powered by a mid-range Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 processor and 4 GB of RAM, it handles everyday tasks and casual gaming smoothly without overheating. It is equipped with a 5.65-inch IPS LCD display, a long-lasting 3080 mAh battery that provides up to two days of standard use, dual-SIM capabilities, and an IP54 rating for splash resistance. True to its environmental mission, the phone ships without a charger or cable to encourage recycling, and the company guarantees five years of software updates and spare parts availability. The smartphone offers several distinct advantages alongside a few noticeable drawbacks. On the positive side, its exceptional ease of disassembly, long-term availability of replacement parts, and highly sustainable construction make it a pioneer in ethical...

xataka.com

26/09/2016

Summary of the review

ASUS Zenfone 3 (ZE552KL), análisis - Xataka

The ASUS Zenfone 3 (ZE552KL) is a premium mid-range smartphone that bridges the gap between mid-tier and high-end devices by offering high-quality construction and solid hardware without the steep price tag of flagship phones. Built with a robust metallic frame and 2.5D Gorilla Glass 3 on both sides, the phone boasts an attractive design and excellent structural integrity. Performance is driven by an efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 processor paired with an impressive 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of expandable storage, ensuring smooth multitasking and daily usage. Standout features include its highly praise-worthy battery life, a fast 360-degree fingerprint scanner, a clear 5.5-inch Super IPS+ FullHD screen, and high-quality SonicMaster 3.0 audio. Despite these strong points, the device suffers from a few notable drawbacks that hold it back from true greatness. Visually and ergonomically, its massive footprint and excessive width make it awkward to manage comfortably with just one hand, and the camera module features a prominent, unappealing rear protrusion. On the software side, the ZenUI 3.0 interface layer is heavily bogged down by an excessive amount of pre-installed...

profesionalreview.com

05/08/2018

Summary of the review

Xiaomi Redmi S2 Review en español (Análisis completo) - Profesional Review

The Xiaomi Redmi S2 is a mid-range smartphone launched in 2018 that heavily borrows its design language and structural dimensions from the earlier Redmi 5 Plus. It features a 5.99-inch IPS LCD display with a modest HD+ resolution (720 x 1440) and 269 ppi, running on the reliable but aging Snapdragon 625 octa-core processor alongside an Adreno 506 GPU. Built with a well-finished metallic-style plastic chassis, the device sheds some weight compared to its predecessors, weighing in at 170 grams. It ships with Android 8.1 Oreo overlaid with Xiaomi's custom MIUI skin, offering smooth day-to-day multitasking and standard navigation gestures, though it opts for an older microUSB Type-B charging port and retains a traditional 3.5mm audio jack and an infrared remote sensor. The absolute highlight of the phone is its competitive price tag (around €110–€140) paired with its camera performance, notably its dual rear system (12 MP + 5 MP) and a powerful 16 MP front selfie camera that both deliver excellent Bokeh/Portrait mode results. Furthermore, despite its relatively small 3,080 mAh capacity, the battery provides great overall autonomy, lasting...

laptopmedia.com

04/09/2017

Summary of the review

Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 617 (+Adreno 405) vs Snapdragon 430 (+Adreno 505) – pruebas de rendimiento y temperatura - LaptopMedia

The LaptopMedia analysis compares the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (Adreno 506), 617 (Adreno 405), and 430 (Adreno 505), highlighting the 625's superior performance and efficiency. Pros for the 625 include its 14nm process, which offers up to 35% better efficiency, 4K support, and high benchmarks (13823 in 3DMark), while the 617 and 430 provide accessible, stable performance with Quick Charge 3.0. Cons focus on the older 28nm process for the 617 and 430, causing lower energy efficiency, with the 430 limited by a 1.4GHz clock and Cat. 4 LTE. Furthermore, testing revealed higher surface temperatures on the 617-based Moto G4 compared to the others during intensive,, though not overheating, loads. For the full comparison, visit LaptopMedia.

xataka.com

29/06/2017

Summary of the review

BQ Aquaris X Pro, análisis: un paso adelante para triunfar en la gama media - Xataka

The BQ Aquaris X Pro is a mid-range smartphone featuring a 5.2-inch Full HD LTPS display, a Snapdragon 626 processor, 4 GB of RAM, and a premium glass back design that marks a significant aesthetic upgrade for the brand. A key highlight is its improved photographic performance, powered by a 12-megapixel Samsung Dual Pixel rear camera with an f/1.8 aperture and Multi-Image Processing designed to capture cleaner night shots. On the plus side, the phone offers an elegant design with an integrated, non-protruding camera, excellent day-to-day and multitasking performance fueled by the extra RAM, a clean Android 7.1.1 software experience free of bloatware, and robust battery life of up to 24 hours paired with Quick Charge 3.0.

nextgentech.it

26/04/2026

Summary of the review

Motorola Moto G7 Play - Recensione

Review Overview The Motorola Moto G7 Play is an entry-level smartphone designed for users seeking a compact, lightweight device with a focus on "old school" ergonomics. Weighing just 149 grams, it features a rounded design and a matte, slip-resistant plastic back-cover that makes single-handed usage comfortable and secure. The phone operates on stock Android 9 Pie, powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 processor with 2 GB of RAM and 32 GB of expandable storage. Its strongest points include excellent phone reception, flawless GPS connectivity, dual-SIM capabilities, and a 3,000 mAh battery that yields good autonomy due to the low-power hardware. Drawbacks and Conclusion However, the smartphone requires several significant compromises that hold it back from being a well-rounded choice. The 5.7-inch IPS LCD display is a major weak point, offering low HD+ resolution, poor brightness, and dull colour reproduction. Multimedia performance is also subpar; the 13 MP rear and 8 MP front cameras deliver mediocre results with a basic camera app, while the single mono speaker lacks depth. Additionally, a wide screen notch is needed to accommodate the front sensors....

tweakers.net

29/05/2018

Summary of the review

Moto G6 en G6 Plus Review

The Moto G6 and G6 Plus are premium-looking mid-range smartphones built with a glass chassis, departing from the plastic and metal designs of earlier models. While this glass back panel gives both phones a luxurious, high-end appearance, it makes them highly fragile and acts as a major magnet for fingerprint smudges and stains. In terms of performance, both phones include useful legacy hardware features like a 3.5mm headphone jack, a non-hybrid tray supporting dual SIM cards alongside an expandable microSD slot, and clean stock Android software. However, Motorola's update commitment falls short of contemporary competitors, offering only a vague promise of up to one major OS upgrade and sporadic security patches. The more expensive Moto G6 Plus significantly outshines the standard G6 across almost all technical fronts, proving itself well worth the extra €50 upgrade cost. The Plus variant features a larger and much superior 5.93-inch LCD panel that can reach a brilliant 609 cd/m² maximum brightness, whereas the standard G6 relies on a smaller 5.7-inch display plagued by a poor, overly blue 9200K color temperature and a dimmer 461...

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel ARC A770 16GB

Graphics cards

Acer Nitro ARC B580 OC

Graphics cards

ASRock ARC B580 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

SPARKLE ARC B580 Titan OC

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7600 Gaming OC

Graphics cards

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile

Graphics cards

ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

Graphics cards

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 7600 OC Edition

Graphics cards

XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Xtreme 11G

Graphics cards

Compare Qualcomm Adreno 506 with other products in the Graphics cards category

Compare