OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

Qualcomm Adreno 506 Review | 118 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£260
  • Avg. price in US: ~$230
  • VRAM: N/A GB
  • Memory bus width: 64 bit
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP): ?

Qualcomm Adreno 506 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

2.0

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

1.9

Technical Score

10.0%

?

User score

Very poor
1.9

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

1.2

Performance

24.0%

1.2

Memory

12.0%

1.8

Power & Cooling

11.0%

4.7

Platform & Features

5.0%

4.0

Design

4.0%

4.9

Connectivity & Media

Very poor
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 8.0
    Gaming

    Score components:

    45.0%

    ?

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    ?

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 7.7
    Video editing

    Score components:

    35.0%

    7.0

    AV1 encode

    30.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Floating-point performance

    15.0%

    ?

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 8.0
    1080p

    Score components:

    55.0%

    ?

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    10.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    ?

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 8.0
    1440p

    Score components:

    50.0%

    ?

    Floating-point performance

    30.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    15.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    ?

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 8.0
    4K

    Score components:

    40.0%

    ?

    Floating-point performance

    35.0%

    ?

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    ?

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £260

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The Qualcomm Adreno 506 is a mid-range integrated mobile graphics card built on the Adreno 500 architecture and commonly found in the Snapdragon 625 and 626 chipsets. It features a clock speed of 650 MHz and is manufactured using a 14nm FinFET process, which provides a significant boost in power efficiency and thermal management compared to older 28nm alternatives. The GPU supports modern APIs including OpenGL ES 3.1+, Vulkan 1.0, and DirectX 12, while delivering roughly 120–130 GFLOPS of performance to comfortably handle 1080p Full HD displays. Its primary advantages include excellent energy efficiency for long gaming sessions and a high price-to-performance ratio for mid-tier devices. However, its main drawbacks are its inability to handle high-end 3D gaming at maximum settings and its lack of support for FP64 high-performance compute tasks.

Technical Specifications of Qualcomm Adreno 506

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

?

Performance

24.0%

?

Memory

12.0%

?

Power & Cooling

11.0%

?

Platform & Features

5.0%

?

Design

4.0%

?

Connectivity & Media

1.9
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a technical score of 1.95 points, which is lower than that of 100% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 55.9% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

2.0

Overall score

40.0%

9.2

Price

4.1
Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a quality-to-price ratio of 4.1 points, which is lower than 99.1% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.
When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?
3DMark Port Royal score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.
When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

N/A
PassMark (G3D) result
What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark
When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests
When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Floating-point performance
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more
VRAM
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

N/A
Memory type
What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)
When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

N/A
GDDR version
What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Memory bus width
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

64 bit
Qualcomm Adreno 506 uses a 64 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

7.46 GB/s
Qualcomm Adreno 506 reaches 7.46 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 100% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported
When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

N/A
PCIe lanes
What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication
When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

N/A
DirectX version
What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version
When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

?
Vulkan version
What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version
When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

1.0
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports Vulkan 1.0, which is older than on 98.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version
When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

3.2
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports OpenGL 3.2, which is older than on 99.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously
When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

?
Max digital resolution
What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution
When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

1920x1080
Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports a maximum digital resolution of 1920x1080, which is lower than that of 60.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs
When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

N/A
DisplayPort version
What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported
When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

N/A
DisplayPort link rates
What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections
When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

?
Power consumption while under peak load
What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Recommended PSU wattage
What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Board power limit
What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

?
PCIe power spec
What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed
When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Show more
Size
What it is: Physical size of the GPU card
When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?
Length
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Height
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Slot width
What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card
When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

N/A
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the graphics card
When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more

Qualcomm Adreno 506 vs the average graphics card

  • 2.04x cheaper
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £530).
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £530).£260 vs £530

Total
Overall
  • 66.1% lower base clock speed
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
  • 99.5% lower FP32 performance
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
  • 99.6% lower FP16 performance
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
  • 4,256 fewer FP32 units
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (96 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
  • 98.3% lower memory bandwidth
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (7.5 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • 62.9% slower VRAM clock
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
  • 2.8x larger process node
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
  • 8 older
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,015 vs 2,023).
  • No XeSS support
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1 vs 1.4).
  • No mesh shaders
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Older OpenCL version
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3.0).
  • Older shader model
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5 vs 6.8).
  • Older OpenGL version
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (3.2 vs 4.6).
  • No AV1 encoding
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (2 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 monitors per output type.
  • Lower display resolution
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (1920x1080 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
    When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

    Importance: HIGH

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 66.1% lower base clock speed
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
    What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
    When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.

    Importance: HIGH

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.650 MHz vs 1920 MHz
  • 2.8x larger process node
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
    When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.14 nm vs 5 nm
  • 98.3% lower memory bandwidth
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (7.5 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
    When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

    Importance: HIGH

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (7.5 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.7.46 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 99.5% lower FP32 performance
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
    What it is: Single-precision floating-point performance in TFLOPs
    When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.0.12 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS
  • 8 older
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,015 vs 2,023).
    What it is: Official release or launch date of the GPU
    When it matters: When you care about platform age, driver maturity, and how current the design is.

    Importance: LOW

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,015 vs 2,023).2,015 vs 2,023
  • No AV1 encoding
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    What it is: Supports hardware encoding of AV1 video codec
    When it matters: When you stream or export video and want efficient AV1 encoding on the GPU.

    Importance: LOW

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 62.9% slower VRAM clock
    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    What it is: Speed at which the GPU memory operates
    When it matters: When you want more context on how quickly the card's VRAM can move data.

    Importance: LOW

    Qualcomm Adreno 506 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (650 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.650 MHz vs 1750 MHz
Total
Overall
Performance
Memory
Platform & Features
Connectivity & Media

Graphic comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 506 and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Qualcomm Adreno 506?

  • Excellent thermal management; users report it remains cool (under 37°C) even during long gaming sessions.
  • Great price-to-performance ratio for mid-range devices like the Redmi Note 4 and Moto G5.
  • Highly power-efficient thanks to the 14nm FinFET manufacturing process.
  • Reliable performance for 1080p (Full HD) displays and casual mobile gaming.
  • Superior performance compared to its predecessor (Adreno 505) and contemporary competitors like the Mali-T830 MP2.

What customers dislike about Qualcomm Adreno 506?

  • Strictly a mid-range solution; struggles with high-end, demanding 3D games on maximum settings.
  • Aging architecture that cannot keep up with newer generations (like the Adreno 600 series) in modern benchmarks.
  • Performance is notably lower than enthusiast or flagship-tier GPUs, making it unsuitable for VR or 4K playback.
  • Users note that while 4GB of RAM is sufficient for standard gaming, the GPU can still face bottlenecks in hardware-intensive 'hardcore' scenarios.

Expert reviews

L
laptopmedia.com
24/08/2017
Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 820 (+Adreno 530) vs Snapdragon 801 (+Adreno 330) performance and benchmark tests

The LaptopMedia comparison analyzes the performance of the Snapdragon 625 (Adreno 506), Snapdragon 820 (Adreno 530), and Snapdragon 801 (Adreno 330), showing that the SD820 offers superior computing and graphics power with 4K support, despite higher power consumption and thermal throttling. Conversely, the SD625 excels in power efficiency, offering excellent battery life and lower...Read more

L
laptopmedia.com
04/09/2017
Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 617 (+Adreno 405) vs Snapdragon 430 (+Adreno 505) performance benchmarks and temperatures

The LaptopMedia comparison reveals the Snapdragon 625 (Adreno 506) as the performance leader, offering significantly faster CPU speeds and superior 3D Mark graphics scores compared to the Snapdragon 617 (Adreno 405) and Snapdragon 430 (Adreno 505). While the Snapdragon 430 provides a capable budget option with manageable temperatures, the Snapdragon 625’s 14nm process provides...Read more

L
laptopmedia.com
01/09/2017
Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 650 (+Adreno 510) vs Snapdragon 430 (+Adreno 505) – performance, benchmarks and temperatures

LaptopMedia compares the Snapdragon 650, 625, and 430, highlighting that the 650 offers superior raw performance with Cortex-A72 cores and Adreno 510 graphics but suffers from higher thermal output on a 28nm node. Conversely, the 625 excels in efficiency using a 14nm process, providing cool operation, while the budget-focused 430 delivers decent, cool daily performance at the cost...Read more

T
techcenturion.com
20/11/2019
Adreno 506 GPU: Specification and Review - Tech Centurion

The Tech Centurion review of the Adreno 506 GPU highlights it as one of the best mid-range graphics chips for its era, highly praised for its excellent price-to-performance ratio. Integrated into the popular Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and 626 system-on-chips (SoCs), this component is clocked at 650 MHz and leverages a 14nm FinFET manufacturing process to deliver smooth gaming at Full...Read more

L
laptopmedia.com
24/08/2017
Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 820 (+Adreno 530) vs Snapdragon 801 (+Adreno 330) performance and benchmark tests

The LaptopMedia analysis compares the Snapdragon 820, 625, and 801, highlighting the 820's 14nm efficiency and superior Adreno 530 graphics as the top performer. The Snapdragon 625 offers superior battery life (pro) but weaker graphics (con), while the aging 801, despite a 28nm node and high power consumption (cons), surprises with stronger graphics than the 625 in some tests....Read more

T
techcenturion.com
10/06/2018
Snapdragon 625 Review, Benchmark Score and Comparison

The Snapdragon 625 is an octa-core mid-range mobile processor built on a 14nm FinFET fabrication process, utilizing eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked up to 2.0 GHz and an Adreno 506 GPU. A major advantage of this chipset is its exceptional power efficiency and thermal management, which prevents throttling and keeps the device cool (under 37°C) even during continuous, high-demand...Read more

P
pcmasters.de
28/03/2019
Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite im Test - PC Masters

The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite is a budget-friendly Android One smartphone featuring a solid metal build and a modern 5.84-inch IPS display with a notch and a 1080x2280 resolution (432 ppi). Inside, it is powered by a dependable Snapdragon 625 octa-core processor and Adreno 506 GPU, combined with up to 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage. The phone delivers a clean software experience free of...Read more

(Translated)Show original
B
bouyguestelecom.fr
15/06/2019
Test du Fairphone 3 : le smartphone qui veut du bien à la ...

Fairphone 3 Review Summary The Fairphone 3 stands out as a unique, eco-friendly smartphone designed with a strong focus on sustainability, repairability, and ethical sourcing rather than raw performance. Released in September 2019, it features a modular design that allows users to easily replace individual components—such as the screen, battery, 12-megapixel Sony camera module, and...Read more

(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
26/09/2016
ASUS Zenfone 3 (ZE552KL), análisis - Xataka

The ASUS Zenfone 3 (ZE552KL) is a premium mid-range smartphone that bridges the gap between mid-tier and high-end devices by offering high-quality construction and solid hardware without the steep price tag of flagship phones. Built with a robust metallic frame and 2.5D Gorilla Glass 3 on both sides, the phone boasts an attractive design and excellent structural integrity....Read more

(Translated)Show original
P
profesionalreview.com
05/08/2018
Xiaomi Redmi S2 Review en español (Análisis completo) - Profesional Review

The Xiaomi Redmi S2 is a mid-range smartphone launched in 2018 that heavily borrows its design language and structural dimensions from the earlier Redmi 5 Plus. It features a 5.99-inch IPS LCD display with a modest HD+ resolution (720 x 1440) and 269 ppi, running on the reliable but aging Snapdragon 625 octa-core processor alongside an Adreno 506 GPU. Built with a well-finished...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
04/09/2017
Snapdragon 625 (+Adreno 506) vs Snapdragon 617 (+Adreno 405) vs Snapdragon 430 (+Adreno 505) – pruebas de rendimiento y temperatura - LaptopMedia

The LaptopMedia analysis compares the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (Adreno 506), 617 (Adreno 405), and 430 (Adreno 505), highlighting the 625's superior performance and efficiency. Pros for the 625 include its 14nm process, which offers up to 35% better efficiency, 4K support, and high benchmarks (13823 in 3DMark), while the 617 and 430 provide accessible, stable performance with Quick...Read more

(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
29/06/2017
BQ Aquaris X Pro, análisis: un paso adelante para triunfar en la gama media - Xataka

The BQ Aquaris X Pro is a mid-range smartphone featuring a 5.2-inch Full HD LTPS display, a Snapdragon 626 processor, 4 GB of RAM, and a premium glass back design that marks a significant aesthetic upgrade for the brand. A key highlight is its improved photographic performance, powered by a 12-megapixel Samsung Dual Pixel rear camera with an f/1.8 aperture and Multi-Image Processing...Read more

(Translated)Show original
N
nextgentech.it
26/04/2026
Motorola Moto G7 Play - Recensione

Review Overview The Motorola Moto G7 Play is an entry-level smartphone designed for users seeking a compact, lightweight device with a focus on "old school" ergonomics. Weighing just 149 grams, it features a rounded design and a matte, slip-resistant plastic back-cover that makes single-handed usage comfortable and secure. The phone operates on stock Android 9 Pie, powered by a...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
29/05/2018
Moto G6 en G6 Plus Review

The Moto G6 and G6 Plus are premium-looking mid-range smartphones built with a glass chassis, departing from the plastic and metal designs of earlier models. While this glass back panel gives both phones a luxurious, high-end appearance, it makes them highly fragile and acts as a major magnet for fingerprint smudges and stains. In terms of performance, both phones include useful...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

intel-arc-a770-16gb
Intel ARC A770 16GB

Graphics cards

7.3
asus-prime-geforce-rtx-5060-oc-edition
ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition

Graphics cards

6.9
sparkle-arc-b580-titan-oc
SPARKLE ARC B580 Titan OC

Graphics cards

6.6
No image
Acer Nitro ARC B580 OC

Graphics cards

6.3
asrock-arc-b580-challenger-oc
ASRock ARC B580 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

6.4
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5060-oc-low-profile
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile

Graphics cards

6.4
asrock-radeon-rx-7600-challenger-oc
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

6.1
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-xtreme-11g
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Xtreme 11G

Graphics cards

7.1
nvidia-titan-v
NVIDIA Titan V

Graphics cards

6.1
intel-arc-b580
Intel ARC B580

Graphics cards

6.6
asus-geforce-rog-strix-rtx-2080-ti-gaming-oc
ASUS GeForce ROG Strix RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC

Graphics cards

7.1
gigabyte-radeon-rx-7600-gaming-oc
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7600 Gaming OC

Graphics cards

6.0

Compare Qualcomm Adreno 506 with

VS
VS

Compare