OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon HD 6750 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25VRAM:1 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):86 W

AMD Radeon HD 6750 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

3.7/10

Overall score

Score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

90%

3.7

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of graphics cards
5.6

Value for money

Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

3.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
3.7

Technical score

Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

44%

2.7

Performance

24%

1.2

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

5.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.5

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 97%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £25
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #2174 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon HD 6750

Technical score
Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

44%

2.7

Performance

24%

1.2

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

5.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.5

Connectivity & Media

3.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
AMD Radeon HD 6750 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

3.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

5.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
1,047 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 1,047 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 99.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
?
Floating-point performance
1.01 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 1.01 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 98.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
1 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 1 GB of VRAM, which is less than 98.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 73.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 97.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.1
This graphics card supports PCIe 2.1, which is older than on 98.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
11.2
This graphics card supports DirectX 11.2, which is older than on 98.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
?
OpenGL version
4.4
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.4, which is older than on 98.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
2560x1600
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 2560x1600, which is lower than that of 97.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.1, which is older than on 99.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
2.7 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 2.7 Gbps, which is slower than on 94% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
86 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 86 W, which is lower than that of 90% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
86 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 86 W under peak load, which is lower than 91.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
250 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 250 W PSU, which is lower than that of 99.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
86 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 86 W, which is lower than that of 91.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
86 W
Show more
Size
170x 127x 43 mm
Length
170 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 170 mm long, which is shorter than 94.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
340 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 340 g, which is lighter than 96.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon HD 6750 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 61.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (250 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    250 W vs 650 W
  • 60% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (86 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    86 W vs 215 W
  • 115 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    170 mm vs 285 mm
  • 61.8% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (86 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    86 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 21.2x cheaper
    AMD Radeon HD 6750 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£25 vs £530).
    £25 vs £530
  • 21.2x cheaper
    AMD Radeon HD 6750 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£25 vs £530).
    £25 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:4 vs 1:64).
    1:4 vs 1:64
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 43.7% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (166 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    166 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 61.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (250 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    250 W vs 650 W
  • 60% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (86 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    86 W vs 215 W
  • 61.8% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (86 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    86 W vs 225 W
  • 60.9% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (86 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    86 W vs 220 W
  • 115 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    170 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 66.7% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (340 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    340 g vs 1,021 g
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (40 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    40 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 31 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (9 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    9 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 63.5% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (700 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    700 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 28.8% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon HD 6750 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.59 vs 7.2).
    5.59 vs 7.2
  • 4.22x less popular
    AMD Radeon HD 6750 is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 31 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (9 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    9 vs 40
  • 63.5% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (700 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    700 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 148 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (36 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    36 vs 184
  • 93.4% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (25.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    25.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 93.1% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (11.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    11.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    16 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 95.5% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    1.01 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 95.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (1047 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    1,047 points vs 22,653 points
  • 95.6% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (1 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    1.01 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 3,632 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (720 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    720 vs 4,352
  • 79.2% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 83.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (73.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    73.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 75.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (4600 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    4,600 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 34.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1150 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,150 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 93.8% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (8 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    8 vs 128
  • 8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (40 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    40 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 4).
    2.1 vs 4.0
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • 12 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2011 vs 2023).
    January 2011
    2,011 vs 2,023
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (11.2 vs 12 Ultimate).
    11.2 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 3).
    1.2 vs 3.0
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5 vs 6.8).
    5.0 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older OpenGL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (4.4 vs 4.6).
    4.4 vs 4.6
  • 95.9% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (950 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    950 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
    1.4a vs 2.1
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.1 vs 1.4a).
    1.1 vs 1.4a
  • No VRR support
    This graphics card does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 2.3).
    1.3 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (2560x1600 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    2560x1600 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 86.5% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (2.7 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    2.7 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 33 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (33 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    33 dB vs 0 dB
  • 5.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclockers.com
16/06/2011
Summary of the review
Sapphire HD 6750 Video Card Review - Overclockers
H
hardware-mag.de
29/09/2011
Summary of the review
Test: Aufgebohrt: Sapphire Vapor-X HD 6750 ComputerBase
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
07/01/2011
Summary of the review
CES: Hands-on Microsoft Surface v2.0 - Review If you need further hardware comparisons or require benchmarks for older generations of AMD graphics car...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about AMD Radeon HD 6750

  • Excellent value for budget-conscious users when first launched
  • Strong overclocking potential, often reaching the performance levels of the HD 6770
  • Compact form factor (approximately 7.25 inches) fits easily in smaller cases
  • Low power consumption, typically requiring only a single 6-pin connector
  • Provides versatile connectivity with options like HDMI, DVI, and mini-DisplayPort
  • Reliable and quiet operation for non-demanding daily tasks and HTPC use

What we don't like about AMD Radeon HD 6750

  • Significantly outdated for modern AAA gaming, struggling even at minimum settings
  • Limited to 1GB or 2GB GDDR5 VRAM, which is insufficient for today's high-resolution textures
  • Performance falls behind newer entry-level cards like the GTX 1050 Ti by a massive margin
  • Lacks support for modern APIs like DirectX 12, limiting compatibility with recent software
  • CrossFireX scaling was noted as inconsistent in certain legacy gaming benchmarks
  • Hardware-level video decoding is dated compared to modern 4K/HEVC standards

Verdict

The AMD Radeon HD 6750 is a mid-range graphics card released in early 2011, built on the 40 nm process with the TeraScale 2 architecture. It features a Juniper PRO graphics processor with 720 shading units, 36 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, operating at a core clock speed of 700 MHz. This dual-slot card typically comes with 1GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 73.6 GB/s and supporting DirectX 11.2 and OpenGL 4.4. Main pros include its low entry price point, support for AMD Eyefinity multi-display technology for up to three monitors, and a relatively compact 170mm length suitable for smaller builds. However, its cons include a higher power draw of 86W requiring a 6-pin connector compared to newer entry-level cards, its status as a legacy product with no further driver updates, and limited performance that struggles with modern, demanding games.

Compare AMD Radeon HD 6750 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon HD 6750 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found