OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

Kodak Luma 350 Review | 85 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price in UK: ~£400
  • Avg. price in US: ~$350
  • ANSI lumens: 200
  • Native panel resolution: 854x480
  • Throw ratio: ?

Kodak Luma 350 review. Compare 85 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among projectors and if it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the projector's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best projectors on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

5.2

Technical Score

10.0%

6.8

User score

Good
5.2

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the projector's technical performance, covering eight key areas: image quality, brightness, contrast, connectivity, gaming features, smart features, audio, and design.

When it matters: When you want to compare projectors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

42.0%

4.3

Image Quality

22.0%

6.1

Projection & Lens

12.0%

4.9

HDMI & Gaming

10.0%

6.8

Audio & Features

8.0%

5.0

Connectivity

6.0%

6.8

Design & Power

Good
6.8

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the projector.

When it matters: When you want to know how a projector performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

7.0

User reviews

30.0%

6.2

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.6
(33)
amazon
3.1
(28)
amazon
3.8
(22)
amazon
5.0
(1)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

Good
  • 3.7
    Gaming

    Score components:

    35.0%

    3.6

    Input lag

    25.0%

    1.0

    Refresh rate

    20.0%

    5.1

    Output Resolution

    10.0%

    10

    HDR10 support

    10.0%

    1.5

    Audio output power

  • 9.6
    Portable

    Score components:

    35.0%

    10

    Weight

    20.0%

    ?

    Has A Built-In Speaker

    15.0%

    10

    Bluetooth connectivity

    15.0%

    10

    Wi-Fi connectivity

    15.0%

    10

    Smart TV features

  • 5.1
    Home theatre

    Score components:

    30.0%

    5.1

    Output Resolution

    25.0%

    10

    HDR10 support

    20.0%

    1.0

    Dolby Vision support

    15.0%

    1.0

    ANSI lumens

    10.0%

    7.2

    Audible noise

  • kodak-luma-350
  • kodak-luma-350
  • kodak-luma-350
  • kodak-luma-350
kodak-luma-350
kodak-luma-350
kodak-luma-350
kodak-luma-350

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The Kodak Luma 350 is a pocket-sized DLP smart projector that features a native resolution of 854 x 480, supports 4K input, and delivers a brightness of 200 ANSI lumens with a 3,500:1 contrast ratio. Its main characteristics include an integrated Android 6.0 interface for direct app streaming, dual 1.5W speakers, and comprehensive wireless connectivity via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Miracast. The primary pros are its extreme portability (weighing just 12 ounces), an internal rechargeable battery providing up to 2 hours of playtime, and convenient auto-vertical keystone correction. However, notable cons include limited brightness that requires a pitch-black room for large displays, poor out-of-the-box color accuracy, and an outdated operating system that may not support the newest app updates.

Technical Specifications of Kodak Luma 350

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the projector's technical performance, covering eight key areas: image quality, brightness, contrast, connectivity, gaming features, smart features, audio, and design.

When it matters: When you want to compare projectors based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

42.0%

4.3

Image Quality

22.0%

6.1

Projection & Lens

12.0%

4.9

HDMI & Gaming

10.0%

6.8

Audio & Features

8.0%

5.0

Connectivity

6.0%

6.8

Design & Power

5.2
Kodak Luma 350 has a technical score of 5.24 points, which is lower than 74% of projectors.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the projector.

When it matters: When you want to know how a projector performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.

Score components:

70.0%

7.0

User reviews

30.0%

6.2

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
3.6
(33)
amazon
3.1
(28)
amazon
3.8
(22)
amazon
5.0
(1)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

6.8
Kodak Luma 350 has a user score of 6.78 points, which is lower than 86.2% of projectors.
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the projector.
When it matters: When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
6.2
Kodak Luma 350 has a popularity of 6.2 points, which is higher than 73.4% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the projector's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a projector with a good balance between quality and price.

Score components:

60.0%

5.4

Overall score

40.0%

8.4

Price

6.3
Kodak Luma 350 has a quality-to-price ratio of 6.3 points, which is higher than 56.4% of products in this category.
ANSI lumens
What it is: Brightness output measured in ANSI lumens.
When it matters: When you watch with ambient light or on a large screen, higher brightness matters.

Importance: HIGH

200
Kodak Luma 350 reaches 200 ANSI lumens, dimmer than 93.7% of projectors and equal to 2.5% of projectors.
Contrast ratio
What it is: Ratio of brightest white to darkest black displayed by the projector.
When it matters: When you watch movies in a dark room, stronger contrast matters.

Importance: HIGH

3,500:1
Kodak Luma 350 has a contrast ratio of 3500:1, lower than 61.3% of projectors and equal to 0.2% of projectors.
Native panel resolution
What it is: Native resolution of the display panel or imaging device.
When it matters: When picture sharpness matters enough that you want to know the projector's true native imaging resolution, not just supported input formats.

Importance: HIGH

854x480
Kodak Luma 350 uses a native resolution of 854x480, lower than 95.1% of projectors and equal to 2.4% of projectors.
Output Resolution
What it is: The resolution the projector can actually display through its imaging system.
When it matters: When you want to know the actual image detail the projector can put on screen rather than just the source format it accepts.

Importance: HIGH

854x480
Kodak Luma 350 supports output resolution up to 854x480, lower than 95.3% of projectors and equal to 2.4% of projectors.
Supports 4K input.
Projection technology
What it is: Projection imaging technology used by the projector.
When it matters: When color character, contrast behavior, and overall image personality matter before you compare brightness alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

DLP
Show more
Throw ratio
What it is: Ratio between projection distance and image width.
When it matters: When room size and screen size have to match properly instead of guessing whether the projector will fit the space.

Importance: MEDIUM

?
Min throw distance
What it is: Minimum distance required between projector and screen.
When it matters: When room depth is limited and you still need a large image from a short placement distance.

Importance: MEDIUM

?
Max projection size
What it is: Maximum supported image size for projection, measured diagonally.
When it matters: When you want a cinema-size picture, maximum projection size matters.

Importance: MEDIUM

?
Zoom ratio
What it is: Optical zoom capability expressed as a ratio.
When it matters: When projector placement is not ideal and you need optical zoom to frame the image correctly.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A
Motorized zoom
What it is: Motorized control of the optical zoom function.
When it matters: When the projector position is fixed but screen size or framing still needs to be adjusted from a distance.

Importance: LOW

no
Kodak Luma 350 does not have motorized zoom. 16.3% of projectors have motorized zoom.
Show more
Input lag
What it is: Time delay between input signal and displayed image, measured in milliseconds.
When it matters: When gaming responsiveness matters and you want controls to feel more immediate on fast titles.

Importance: MEDIUM

67.3 ms
Kodak Luma 350 has input lag of 67.3 ms, higher than 89.9% of projectors.
At 1080P/60Hz.
Auto low latency mode (ALLM)
What it is: Automatically reduces input lag when gaming.
When it matters: When you play fast games, lower latency matters.

Importance: LOW

no
Kodak Luma 350 does not support ALLM. 20.3% of projectors support ALLM.
Variable refresh rate (VRR)
What it is: Support for variable refresh rate to reduce screen tearing.
When it matters: When gaming matters and you want the projector to handle variable frame rates with less tearing or stutter.

Importance: LOW

no
Kodak Luma 350 does not support VRR. 1.9% of projectors support VRR.
HDMI version
What it is: Version of the HDMI standard supported.
When it matters: When source devices push newer HDMI features, refresh rates, or bandwidth levels that older ports may limit.

Importance: LOW

2.0
Kodak Luma 350 supports HDMI 2.0, more modern than 45.5% of projectors and equal to 36.7% of projectors.
Different HDMI ports use 2.0 and 1.4.
Max HDMI bandwidth
What it is: Maximum bandwidth supported by HDMI inputs, measured in Gbps.
When it matters: When newer consoles, gaming PCs, or media boxes need more HDMI throughput than older projectors can handle.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more
N. of HDMI ports
What it is: Number of available HDMI input ports.
When it matters: When you need a console, streamer, set-top box, and another source connected at the same time without swapping cables.

Importance: LOW

1
Kodak Luma 350 has 1 HDMI port/s, fewer than 54.6% of projectors and equal to 42.2% of projectors.
Wi-Fi connectivity
What it is: Support for Wi-Fi network connectivity.
When it matters: When the projector should handle network features, updates, or streaming functions without needing wired Ethernet only.

Importance: LOW

yes
Kodak Luma 350 supports Wi-Fi. 47.4% of projectors support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
What it is: Supported Wi-Fi standard version.
When it matters: When wireless stability and throughput matter for streaming, updates, or projector ecosystem features.

Importance: LOW

Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Kodak Luma 350 supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), more modern than 49.8% of projectors and equal to 5.6% of projectors.
Bluetooth connectivity
What it is: Support for Bluetooth wireless connectivity.
When it matters: When you plan to pair wireless speakers, headphones, remotes, or other accessories directly with the projector.

Importance: LOW

yes
Kodak Luma 350 supports Bluetooth. 50.1% of projectors support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
What it is: Supported Bluetooth version.
When it matters: When wireless accessory compatibility and connection quality matter beyond Bluetooth being a simple checkbox.

Importance: LOW

5.0
Kodak Luma 350 supports Bluetooth 5.0, more modern than 62.9% of projectors and equal to 17.7% of projectors.
Show more
Smart TV features
What it is: Includes built-in Smart TV functions or operating system.
When it matters: When you prefer built-in apps and streaming convenience instead of adding an external media stick or box.

Importance: LOW

yes
Kodak Luma 350 has smart TV features. 56.3% of projectors have smart TV features.
Android-based smart OS.
Operating system
What it is: The built-in software platform that runs the projector interface, streaming apps, and smart features.
When it matters: When you care about which apps are available, how modern the smart interface feels, and whether the projector includes a built-in streaming platform.

Importance: LOW

Android
Android OS

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
Dedicated smartphone app
What it is: Availability of a dedicated smartphone control app.
When it matters: When you want setup, input switching, or basic control handled from your phone without always reaching for a remote.

Importance: LOW

?
Remote control
What it is: Comes with a dedicated remote control for operation.
When it matters: When you want easier everyday control without extra gear, built-in convenience features matter.

Importance: LOW

yes
Kodak Luma 350 includes a remote control. 1.6% of projectors include a remote control.
Show more
Light source type
What it is: Type of light source used by the projector.
When it matters: When maintenance expectations, startup behavior, brightness stability, and long-term running costs all matter in the buying decision.

Importance: LOW

led
Kodak Luma 350 uses led light source technology, more advanced than 33.1% of projectors and equal to 39% of projectors.
Laser Light Source
What it is: Whether the projector uses a laser light source instead of a traditional lamp.
When it matters: When lower maintenance, faster startup, and a lamp-free light engine matter over the long term.

Importance: LOW

no
Kodak Luma 350 does not use a laser light source. 28.1% of projectors use a laser light source.
Lamp life
What it is: Expected operational lifespan of the lamp in standard mode, measured in hours.
When it matters: When you care about running costs and maintenance intervals, light-source lifespan matters.

Importance: LOW

20,000 hours
Kodak Luma 350 offers lamp life of 20000 hours, shorter than 34.3% of projectors and equal to 27.5% of projectors.
Eco mode rating.
Lamp life (eco mode)
What it is: Expected operational lifespan of the lamp in eco mode, measured in hours.
When it matters: When you care about running costs and maintenance intervals, light-source lifespan matters.

Importance: LOW

30,000 hours
Kodak Luma 350 offers eco-mode lamp life of 30000 hours, shorter than 59.6% of projectors and equal to 35.6% of projectors.
Eco mode rating.
Operating power consumption
What it is: Average power consumption during normal operation.
When it matters: When electricity use and heat output matter because the projector runs for long sessions or frequent daily use.

Importance: LOW

24 W
Kodak Luma 350 uses 24 W of power, less than 97.2% of projectors and equal to 0.6% of projectors.
Show more

Kodak Luma 350 vs the average projector

  • Supports HDR10+
    Kodak Luma 350 supports HDR10+, while the average projector does not. 15.6% of projectors support HDR10+.
    What it is: Support for HDR10+ dynamic high dynamic range format.
    When it matters: When you care whether the projector supports dynamic HDR metadata rather than static HDR formats alone.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 supports HDR10+, while the average projector does not. 15.6% of projectors support HDR10+.
  • Built-in smart TV features
    Kodak Luma 350 has built-in smart TV features, while the average projector does not. 43.7% of projectors have built-in smart TV features.
    Android-based smart OS.
    What it is: Includes built-in Smart TV functions or operating system.
    When it matters: When you prefer built-in apps and streaming convenience instead of adding an external media stick or box.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 has built-in smart TV features, while the average projector does not. 43.7% of projectors have built-in smart TV features.
  • Built-in stereo speakers
    Kodak Luma 350 has stereo speakers, while the average projector does not. 48.9% of projectors have stereo speakers.
    dual 1.5W speaker.
    What it is: Built-in stereo speakers for audio playback.
    When it matters: When casual use should include left-right sound without automatically adding an external audio setup.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 has stereo speakers, while the average projector does not. 48.9% of projectors have stereo speakers.
  • 10 degrees greater vertical keystone correction
    Kodak Luma 350 offers more vertical keystone correction than the average projector (40 degrees degrees vs 30 degrees degrees). The average projector offers 30 degrees degrees of vertical keystone correction.
    What it is: Range of vertical keystone correction supported.
    When it matters: When the projector sits too high or too low relative to the screen and vertical image correction becomes necessary.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Kodak Luma 350 offers more vertical keystone correction than the average projector (40 degrees degrees vs 30 degrees degrees). The average projector offers 30 degrees degrees of vertical keystone correction.40 degrees vs 30 degrees
  • Supports Bluetooth
    Kodak Luma 350 supports Bluetooth, while the average projector does not. 49.9% of projectors support Bluetooth.
    What it is: Support for Bluetooth wireless connectivity.
    When it matters: When you plan to pair wireless speakers, headphones, remotes, or other accessories directly with the projector.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 supports Bluetooth, while the average projector does not. 49.9% of projectors support Bluetooth.
  • Supports AirPlay
    Kodak Luma 350 supports AirPlay, while the average projector does not. 41.6% of projectors support AirPlay.
    What it is: Support for Apple AirPlay wireless streaming.
    When it matters: When you want smoother casting from Apple devices instead of relying on cables or third-party workarounds.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 supports AirPlay, while the average projector does not. 41.6% of projectors support AirPlay.
  • 209.9 W lower power use
    Kodak Luma 350 uses less power than the average projector (24 W vs 233.9 W). The average projector uses 233.9 W of power.
    What it is: Average power consumption during normal operation.
    When it matters: When electricity use and heat output matter because the projector runs for long sessions or frequent daily use.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 uses less power than the average projector (24 W vs 233.9 W). The average projector uses 233.9 W of power.24 W vs 233.9 W
  • 89% lighter weight
    Kodak Luma 350 is lighter than the average projector (0.3 kg vs 3.1 kg). The average projector weighs 3.1 kg.
    What it is: Total weight of the projector including lamp and lens.
    When it matters: When you move the projector between rooms or setups, lower weight matters.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 is lighter than the average projector (0.3 kg vs 3.1 kg). The average projector weighs 3.1 kg.0.34 kg vs 3.1 kg
  • Supports HDR10+
    Kodak Luma 350 supports HDR10+, while the average projector does not. 15.6% of projectors support HDR10+.
  • 10 degrees greater vertical keystone correction
    Kodak Luma 350 offers more vertical keystone correction than the average projector (40 degrees degrees vs 30 degrees degrees). The average projector offers 30 degrees degrees of vertical keystone correction.
  • Supports AirPlay
    Kodak Luma 350 supports AirPlay, while the average projector does not. 41.6% of projectors support AirPlay.
  • Supports Bluetooth
    Kodak Luma 350 supports Bluetooth, while the average projector does not. 49.9% of projectors support Bluetooth.
  • Supports Miracast
    Kodak Luma 350 supports Miracast, while the average projector does not. 45.1% of projectors support Miracast.
  • Includes memory card slot
    Kodak Luma 350 includes an external memory slot, while the average projector does not. 34.9% of projectors include an external memory slot.
  • Built-in smart TV features
    Kodak Luma 350 has built-in smart TV features, while the average projector does not. 43.7% of projectors have built-in smart TV features.
  • Built-in stereo speakers
    Kodak Luma 350 has stereo speakers, while the average projector does not. 48.9% of projectors have stereo speakers.
  • 209.9 W lower power use
    Kodak Luma 350 uses less power than the average projector (24 W vs 233.9 W). The average projector uses 233.9 W of power.
  • 89% lighter weight
    Kodak Luma 350 is lighter than the average projector (0.3 kg vs 3.1 kg). The average projector weighs 3.1 kg.
  • 10,000 hours longer eco lamp life
    Kodak Luma 350 has a higher lamp life in eco mode than the average projector (30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours). The average projector has 20,000 hours of lamp life in eco mode.
  • 187.5 mm narrower width
    Kodak Luma 350 is narrower than the average projector (112 mm vs 299.5 mm). The average projector has a width of 299.5 mm.
  • 98 mm lower height
    Kodak Luma 350 is shorter than the average projector (29 mm vs 127 mm). The average projector has a height of 127 mm.
  • 117 mm thinner body
    Kodak Luma 350 is thinner than the average projector (28 mm vs 145 mm). The average projector has a thickness of 145 mm.

Total
Image Quality
Projection & Lens
Connectivity
Audio & Features
Design & Power
  • 90.9% dimmer image
    Kodak Luma 350 has lower ANSI lumens than the average projector (200 vs 2,200). The average projector has 2,200 ANSI lumens.
  • Low native resolution
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower native panel resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
  • Lower output resolution
    Kodak Luma 350 supports a lower output resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    Supports 4K input.
  • 2 bit lower color depth
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower color depth than the average projector (8 bit vs 10 bit). The average projector has 10 bit of color depth.
  • 29.4% lower refresh rate
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower refresh rate than the average projector (60 Hz vs 85 Hz). The average projector has 85 Hz of refresh rate.
  • 0.27 inch smaller DMD chip
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower DMD chip size than the average projector (0.2 inch vs 0.47 inch). The average projector has 0.47 inch of DMD chip size.
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower contrast ratio than the average projector (3500:1 vs 10000:1). The average projector has 10000:1 of contrast ratio.
  • No 3D glasses support
    Kodak Luma 350 does not support 3D glasses, while the average projector does. 55.9% of projectors support 3D glasses.
  • Narrower color gamut
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower color gamut coverage than the average projector (96.21% Rec.709 % vs 99% Rec.709 %). The average projector has 99% Rec.709 % of color gamut coverage.
  • 40.3 ms higher input lag
    Kodak Luma 350 has a higher input lag than the average projector (67.3 ms vs 27 ms). The average projector has 27 ms of input lag.
    At 1080P/60Hz.
  • Old HDCP version
    Kodak Luma 350 has Old HDCP version than the average projector (1.4 vs 2.2). The average projector supports HDCP 2.2.
  • 1 fewer HDMI ports
    Kodak Luma 350 has fewer HDMI ports than the average projector (1 vs 2). The average projector has 2 HDMI ports.
  • No RS-232 control
    Kodak Luma 350 does not support RS-232 control, while the average projector does. 52.1% of projectors support RS-232 control.
  • 70% weaker audio output
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower audio output power than the average projector (3 W vs 10 W). The average projector has 10 W of audio output power.
    2x1.5W.
  • Basic light source
    Kodak Luma 350 has Basic light source than the average projector (led vs laser). The average projector uses a laser light source.
  • 2 W higher standby power
    Kodak Luma 350 uses more standby power than the average projector (2.5 W vs 0.5 W). The average projector uses 0.5 W of standby power.
  • 90.9% dimmer image
    Kodak Luma 350 has lower ANSI lumens than the average projector (200 vs 2,200). The average projector has 2,200 ANSI lumens.
    What it is: Brightness output measured in ANSI lumens.
    When it matters: When you watch with ambient light or on a large screen, higher brightness matters.

    Importance: HIGH

    Kodak Luma 350 has lower ANSI lumens than the average projector (200 vs 2,200). The average projector has 2,200 ANSI lumens.200 vs 2,200
  • Lower output resolution
    Kodak Luma 350 supports a lower output resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    Supports 4K input.
    What it is: The resolution the projector can actually display through its imaging system.
    When it matters: When you want to know the actual image detail the projector can put on screen rather than just the source format it accepts.

    Importance: HIGH

    Kodak Luma 350 supports a lower output resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.854x480 vs 1920x1080
  • Low native resolution
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower native panel resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
    What it is: Native resolution of the display panel or imaging device.
    When it matters: When picture sharpness matters enough that you want to know the projector's true native imaging resolution, not just supported input formats.

    Importance: HIGH

    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower native panel resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.854x480 vs 1920x1080
  • 2 bit lower color depth
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower color depth than the average projector (8 bit vs 10 bit). The average projector has 10 bit of color depth.
    What it is: Number of bits per color channel for color depth.
    When it matters: When you care about accurate tones and refined image quality, color precision matters.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower color depth than the average projector (8 bit vs 10 bit). The average projector has 10 bit of color depth.8 bit vs 10 bit
  • 1 fewer HDMI ports
    Kodak Luma 350 has fewer HDMI ports than the average projector (1 vs 2). The average projector has 2 HDMI ports.
    What it is: Number of available HDMI input ports.
    When it matters: When you need a console, streamer, set-top box, and another source connected at the same time without swapping cables.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 has fewer HDMI ports than the average projector (1 vs 2). The average projector has 2 HDMI ports.1 vs 2
  • Basic light source
    Kodak Luma 350 has Basic light source than the average projector (led vs laser). The average projector uses a laser light source.
    What it is: Type of light source used by the projector.
    When it matters: When maintenance expectations, startup behavior, brightness stability, and long-term running costs all matter in the buying decision.

    Importance: LOW

    Kodak Luma 350 has Basic light source than the average projector (led vs laser). The average projector uses a laser light source.led vs laser
  • 40.3 ms higher input lag
    Kodak Luma 350 has a higher input lag than the average projector (67.3 ms vs 27 ms). The average projector has 27 ms of input lag.
    At 1080P/60Hz.
    What it is: Time delay between input signal and displayed image, measured in milliseconds.
    When it matters: When gaming responsiveness matters and you want controls to feel more immediate on fast titles.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Kodak Luma 350 has a higher input lag than the average projector (67.3 ms vs 27 ms). The average projector has 27 ms of input lag.67.3 ms vs 27 ms
  • 29.4% lower refresh rate
    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower refresh rate than the average projector (60 Hz vs 85 Hz). The average projector has 85 Hz of refresh rate.
    What it is: Number of screen refreshes per second, measured in hertz.
    When it matters: When motion clarity matters for gaming, sports, or fast-moving video instead of slower cinematic content only.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Kodak Luma 350 has a lower refresh rate than the average projector (60 Hz vs 85 Hz). The average projector has 85 Hz of refresh rate.60 Hz vs 85 Hz
Total
Overall
Image Quality
HDMI & Gaming
Connectivity
Audio & Features
Design & Power

Graphic comparison of Kodak Luma 350 and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom
amazon
3.6
33 Reviews
amazon
3.1
28 Reviews
amazon
3.8
22 Reviews
amazon
5.0
1 Reviews

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about Kodak Luma 350?

  • Extremely portable design that can fit in a pocket or small bag
  • Built-in Android OS allows for direct streaming from apps like Netflix and YouTube without extra devices
  • Intuitive setup and user-friendly interface
  • Integrated rechargeable battery provides up to 2–2.5 hours of wireless use
  • Versatile connectivity options including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI, and USB
  • Auto vertical keystone correction for easy image alignment

What customers dislike about Kodak Luma 350?

  • Low native resolution of 480p, which can result in less defined images at larger screen sizes
  • Poor brightness (150–200 ANSI lumens), making it difficult to use in rooms that aren't completely dark
  • The official Kodak Luma companion app is reported to be glitchy and prone to crashing
  • Limited onboard controls, often requiring the remote or a mouse for full navigation
  • Average built-in audio quality that may require external speakers for a better experience
  • Prone to 'rainbow artifacts' common in single-chip DLP projectors, which can be distracting to some users

Expert reviews

R
rtings.com
28/02/2024
KODAK LUMA 350 Projector Review - RTINGS.com

The RTINGS review of the Kodak Luma 350 highlights the portable smart projector's exceptional, pocket-sized form factor, which offers true cable-free operation through built-in smart capabilities, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and an integrated battery. However, the unit is deemed a poor choice for movies, with significant drawbacks including abysmal out-of-the-box color accuracy, a lack of...Read more

P
pcmag.com
29/05/2020
Kodak Luma 350 Portable Smart Projector Review - PCMag

The Kodak Luma 350 Portable Smart Projector is an Android 6.0-based palmtop projector that balances high portability with an impressively large usable image for its brightness class. Weighing just 12 ounces and measuring 1.1 by 4.4 by 4.4 inches, this white-and-gold DLP projector offers a native 480p resolution and a rated brightness of 200 ANSI lumens, which allows for ideal...Read more

R
realhomes.com
23/08/2022
Kodak Luma 350 Projector review - Real Homes

The Kodak Luma 350 is a pocket-sized, wireless projector that is highly portable and easy to set up. It features built-in Wi-Fi and an Android operating system, allowing users to stream content directly from pre-loaded apps like Netflix and Prime without needing extra devices. The projector can display a screen up to 150 inches on any flat surface, making it highly versatile for...Read more

P
purewow.com
25/10/2022
Review: Is the Kodak Luma 350 Worth it? - PureWow

The Kodak Luma 350 is a portable, hand-sized mini projector that can cast an HD screen up to 200 inches on light-colored walls without needing a dedicated projector screen. Priced at $300, it features a sleek white and Champagne gold design and runs on an intuitive Android interface that supports Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity. Key advantages include its top-notch picture quality,...Read more

U
uk.pcmag.com
29/05/2020
Kodak Luma 350 Portable Smart Projector - PCMag UK Would you like to see a comparison of how the Luma 350 stacks up against newer models like the Luma...

The Kodak Luma 350 Portable Smart Projector ($349.99) is an Android 6.0-based palmtop entertainment projector that balances extreme portability with versatile smart features. Weighing just 12 ounces and measuring 1.1 by 4.4 by 4.4 inches, this lightweight DLP device delivers a native 480p (854-by-480) resolution in a 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio. Its built-in 7,500mAh rechargeable...Read more

W
which.co.uk
15/03/2026
Best home projectors 2026: portable, budget and 4K

The Which? 2026 home projector review evaluates various models from leading brands like Anker Nebula, Epson, and Samsung to determine the best budget, portable, and 4K options under £1,300. Expert panels assess performance across critical areas including picture accuracy, sound fidelity, brightness using light meters, and general ease of setup. While the detailed testing scores and...Read more

R
rtings.com
28/02/2024
KODAK LUMA 350 Projector Review

The KODAK LUMA 350 is an ultra-portable smart projector offering exceptional convenience for on-the-go travel, featuring a compact form factor, integrated battery power, and robust wireless connectivity options. However, the review highlights significant drawbacks, including poor overall picture quality, terrible brightness levels that require a pitch-black environment, and abysmal...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

formovie-s5
Formovie S5

Projectors

6.4
jmgo-picoflix
JMGO PicoFlix

Projectors

6.3
No image
XGIMI Z9X

Projectors

7.5
samsung-the-freestyle
Samsung The Freestyle

Projectors

6.2
xgimi-mogo-3-pro
XGIMI Mogo 3 Pro

Projectors

6.4
viewsonic-px701hd
ViewSonic PX701HD

Projectors

6.0
epson-eh-tw650
Epson EH TW650

Projectors

5.8
xgimi-mogo-pro-plus
XGIMI Mogo Pro Plus

Projectors

5.8
No image
Yaber K3

Projectors

6.4
No image
Samsung Freestyle Gen 2

Projectors

6.4
xgimi-mogo-2-pro
XGIMI Mogo 2 Pro

Projectors

6.5
vivitek-qumi-q9
Vivitek Qumi Q9

Projectors

6.0

Compare Kodak Luma 350 with

VS
VS

Compare