OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:20000 DPIWeight:59 g

Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical score

20%

8.3

User score

â–²Better than 81% of mice
8.4

Value for money

Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 81%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

36%

6.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.1

Controls

16%

9.1

Design

14%

8.8

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 80%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 63%
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
  • pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
pulsar-xlite-v2-wireless
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

36%

6.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.1

Controls

16%

9.1

Design

14%

8.8

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.0

Battery & Charging

7.5
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Popularity:
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 65.7% of products in this category.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.4
Brand name
Pulsar
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
70 hours
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse has a battery life of 70 hours, which is less than 62.4% of mice and equal to 14.1% of mice.
Battery capacity
300 mAh
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, which is smaller than 70.3% of mice and equal to 19.9% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
5
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 5 buttons, which is less than 76.9% of mice and equal to 9.6% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
5
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, which is less than 64.5% of mice and equal to 13.4% of mice.
DPI switching button
no
This mouse does not include a DPI switching button. 85.4% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
59 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 59 g, which makes it lighter than 78% of mice and equal to 2.7% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
4
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 4 onboard profiles, which is more than 78.1% of mice and equal to 3.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
Pulsar Fusion
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 3 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 4 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    4 vs 1
  • 28% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 59 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    59 g vs 82 g
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 2x higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 20,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    20,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 14.4% better value for money
    Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless has better value for money than the average mouse (8.36 vs 7.3).
    8.36 vs 7.31
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 2x higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 20,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    20,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • Versatile connectivity
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 28% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 59 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    59 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 3 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 4 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    4 vs 1
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6
  • No DPI switching button
    This mouse does not include a DPI switching button, while the average mouse does. 85.3% of mice include a DPI switching button.
  • Thin glide feet
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 15 hours shorter battery life
    This mouse has a battery life of 70 hours, while the average mouse has a battery life of 85 hours.
    70 hours vs 85 hours
  • 2.29x more expensive
    Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless is more expensive than the average mouse (£80 vs £35).
    £80 vs £35
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 2.29x more expensive
    Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless is more expensive than the average mouse (£80 vs £35).
    £80 vs £35
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 1 fewer stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 4 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    4 vs 5
  • 15 hours shorter battery life
    This mouse has a battery life of 70 hours, while the average mouse has a battery life of 85 hours.
    70 hours vs 85 hours
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6
  • No DPI switching button
    This mouse does not include a DPI switching button, while the average mouse does. 85.3% of mice include a DPI switching button.
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • Thin glide feet
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
Fresh Reviews
≈ estimated
09/04/2022
Hands-on review · gameplay clip and comparison with V1
Verdict
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless is a clear upgrade over V1 and the best ergonomic wireless mouse for players whose hands suit its shape.
9.5
DiamondLobby Reviews
≈ estimated
14/04/2022
Hands-on review · in-game use, battery and feet tests
Verdict
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless is a must-buy upgrade with strong hardware, though its shape may not suit every grip.
7.0
Jaypher
≈ estimated
09/04/2022
Full review · changes compared with the original
Verdict
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless is a worthy buy for newcomers, but existing owners don't need to upgrade for these subtle changes.
8.0
DiamondLobby Reviews
≈ estimated
04/04/2022
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless has clear improvements from the removed side holes and better weight balance, though the scroll wheel feels small.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
22/06/2022
Summary of the review
Pulsar Xlite V2 Mouse Review - RTINGS.com
P
prosettings.net
25/04/2022
Summary of the review
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless Review - ProSettings.net
L
latestintech.com
09/05/2022
Summary of the review
Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless Gaming Mouse Review - LatestinTech
T
techpowerup.com
24/05/2022
Summary of the review
Pulsar Xlite Wireless V2 Review - What Has Changed?
T
techpowerup.com
22/07/2022
Summary of the review
Pulsar Xlite V2 Mini Wireless Review - TechPowerUp
C
cowcotland.com
18/05/2022
Summary of the review
Test souris Pulsar Xlite Wireless v2 - Pulsar se fait concurrence à lui-même
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless

  • Extremely lightweight (approx. 59g) making it ideal for FPS gaming and reducing fatigue
  • Excellent right-handed ergonomic shape that is comfortable for long sessions
  • Flawless wireless performance and sensor tracking with no noticeable lag
  • High build quality with no creaking or flex despite the honeycomb cutouts
  • Great value for the price compared to other high-end wireless gaming mice
  • Smooth gliding stock PTFE feet that don't feel scratchy

What customers don't like about Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless

  • Side buttons can feel mushy or 'hollow' compared to the main clicks
  • No internal storage compartment for the USB wireless receiver (dongle)
  • Average battery life that may require charging every few days with heavy use
  • Scroll wheel is noted by some as being too light or lacking tactile definition
  • Open bottom design makes it susceptible to dust and debris
  • Coating can feel slightly slippery for users with dry hands

Verdict

The Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless is a high-performance, ergonomic right-handed gaming mouse that weighs just 59g and features a flagship PixArt PAW3370 optical sensor supporting up to 20,000 DPI, 400 IPS, and 50g acceleration. Its key characteristics include a well-balanced weight distribution, a 1000Hz polling rate, and durable Kailh GM 8.0 mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks. Main pros include its ultra-lightweight design, solid build quality with non-perforated side grips for improved rigidity, and a flexible superflex paracord cable for charging. However, some users note cons such as the lack of on-board storage for the USB receiver, no Bluetooth support, and potentially inconsistent battery life tracking in the software despite its 70-hour rating.

Compare Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless and other products in the Mice category

No results found