OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

PNY Quadro P400 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:64 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):30 W

PNY Quadro P400 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

PNY Quadro P400
4.0/10

Overall score

Score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

90%

3.4

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 97% of graphics cards
5.8

Value for money

Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

70%

4.0

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 94%
3.4

Technical score

Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

44%

1.7

Performance

24%

1.4

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

7.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

6.4

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 99%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 93%
  • pny-quadro-p400
  • pny-quadro-p400
  • pny-quadro-p400
  • pny-quadro-p400
pny-quadro-p400
pny-quadro-p400
pny-quadro-p400
pny-quadro-p400
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card PNY Quadro P400

Technical score
Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

44%

1.7

Performance

24%

1.4

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

7.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

6.4

Connectivity & Media

3.4
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
PNY Quadro P400 has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components:

70%

4.0

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

5.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
1,060 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 1,060 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 99% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
1,254 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 1,254 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 96.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
0.64 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 0.64 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 99.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
2 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
64 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 64 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 97.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
32 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 32 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 99% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
vendor-name or prompt-tail contamination removed; Vulkan version unresolved.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
5120x2880
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 5120x2880, which is lower than that of 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
17.28 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 17.28 Gbps, which is slower than on 57.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
30 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 30 W, which is lower than that of 98.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
30 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 30 W under peak load, which is lower than 98.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
200 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 200 W PSU, which is lower than that of 99.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
30 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 30 W, which is lower than that of 98.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
30 W
Show more
Size
144x 68x 16 mm
Length
145 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 145 mm long, which is shorter than 98.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1% of graphics cards.
Height
68.9 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 68.9 mm tall, which is shorter than 93.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
129 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 129 g, which is lighter than 99.7% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

PNY Quadro P400 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 86% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (30 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    30 W vs 215 W
  • 69.2% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (200 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    200 W vs 650 W
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 140 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    145 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 56.1 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (68.9 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    68.9 mm vs 125 mm
  • 86.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (30 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    30 W vs 225 W
  • 4 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    4 vs 0
  • 16.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    PNY Quadro P400
    the average graphics card
    PNY Quadro P400 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.35 vs 8.000).
    9.35 vs 8
  • 4.82x cheaper
    PNY Quadro P400 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£110 vs £530).
    £110 vs £530
  • 2.36x more popular
    PNY Quadro P400 is more popular than the average graphics card (9.96 vs 4.2).
    9.96 vs 4.22
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 4 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    4 vs 0
  • 55.3% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (132 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    132 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 86% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (30 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    30 W vs 215 W
  • 69.2% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (200 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    200 W vs 650 W
  • 86.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (30 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    30 W vs 225 W
  • 86.4% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (30 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    30 W vs 220 W
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • 140 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    145 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 56.1 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (68.9 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    68.9 mm vs 125 mm
  • 87.4% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (129 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    129 g vs 1,021 g
  • 50% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1252 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,252 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 38 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (2 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    2 vs 40
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 2.8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    14 nm vs 5 nm
  • 168 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (16 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    16 vs 184
  • 24.3% worse value for money
    PNY Quadro P400 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.79 vs 7.2).
    5.79 vs 7.2
  • 50% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1252 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,252 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 38 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (2 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    2 vs 40
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 168 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (16 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    16 vs 184
  • 44.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1070 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,070 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 94.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (20 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    20.03 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 87.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (20 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    20.03 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    16 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 97.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (0.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    0.64 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 95.3% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (1060 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    1,060 points vs 22,653 points
  • 89.6% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (1254 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    1,254 points vs 12,074 points
  • 97.2% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (0.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    0.64 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 95.8% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.02 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4,096 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (256 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    256 vs 4,352
  • 98.9% lower INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (2.6 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    2.56 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 92.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (32 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    32 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 78.9% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (4000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    4,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 42.7% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1002 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,002 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 2.8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    14 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • 6 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2017 vs 2023).
    February 2017
    2,017 vs 2,023
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4 vs 8
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5.1 vs 6.8).
    5.1 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 85.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (3300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    3,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.1).
    1.4 vs 2.1
  • No VRR support
    This graphics card does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
    No vs yes
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    3 vs 6
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (5120x2880 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    5120x2880 vs 7680x4320
  • Fewer NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has fewer concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    3 vs 8
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No overclocking support
    This graphics card does not support overclocking, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
develop3d.com
05/02/2017
Summary of the review
Review: Nvidia Quadro P2000 and Quadro P4000 for CAD, viz & VR
S
score.nero.com
05/05/2021
Summary of the review
NVIDIA Quadro P400 Benchmarks - Nero Score
S
storagereview.com
15/03/2026
Summary of the review
Test NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. (Inclut des données comparatives sur la Quadro P4000Go to product viewer dialo...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about PNY Quadro P400

  • Compact low-profile, single-slot design fits easily into small form factor (SFF) office workstations
  • Excellent for multi-monitor setups, supporting up to three 4K or 5K displays
  • Very energy efficient with a low 30W power draw and no need for additional PCIe power connectors
  • Effective for light professional tasks like CAD (AutoCAD), basic 3D modeling, and office productivity
  • Popular for budget Plex servers due to its capability to handle multiple 1080p transcodes
  • Reliable and quiet operation during standard use

What we don't like about PNY Quadro P400

  • Weak performance for modern gaming; struggles with AAA titles even at low settings
  • Limited 2GB VRAM is increasingly insufficient for high-end professional applications or large datasets
  • Requires mini-DisplayPort to HDMI/DP adapters (often not included), which can be an extra cost or inconvenience
  • Outdated Pascal architecture lacks modern features like ray tracing and AI-based DLSS
  • Poor value for money if purchased new today compared to more modern, second-hand consumer GPUs

Verdict

The PNY NVIDIA Quadro P400 is an entry-level professional workstation graphics card built on the 14nm Pascal architecture, featuring 256 CUDA cores and 2GB of GDDR5 memory with up to 32 GB/s bandwidth. Designed for space and power-constrained environments, its main characteristics include a single-slot, low-profile form factor and a low 30W maximum power consumption that requires no external power connectors. Its primary pros include the ability to drive up to three 4K displays at 60Hz via mini-DisplayPort 1.4, ISV certification for professional CAD and DCC applications, and superior efficiency for basic 2D and 3D modeling compared to integrated graphics. However, notable cons include its limited 64-bit memory bus and low core count, which make it unsuitable for modern AAA gaming or demanding high-resolution rendering tasks.

Compare PNY Quadro P400 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of PNY Quadro P400 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found