OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Routers Methodology v1.0
Routers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Routers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Routers Methodology v1.0

Apple AirPort Express Review | 77 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi speed:300 MbpsLAN port speeds:100 MbpsMesh Wi-Fi:no

Apple AirPort Express Review: Compare 77 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the router's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best routers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of routers
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

26%

4.9

Wireless

20%

3.9

Ports

18%

6.4

Networking

14%

6.7

Security

12%

4.4

Hardware

10%

6.7

Management

â–¼Worse than 99% of routers
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 303 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 75% of routers
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £90

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of router Apple AirPort Express

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

26%

4.9

Wireless

20%

3.9

Ports

18%

6.4

Networking

14%

6.7

Security

12%

4.4

Hardware

10%

6.7

Management

5.3
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.4

Number of reviews

Based on 303 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a router reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Popularity:
Apple AirPort Express has a popularity score of 6.4 points, which is lower than that of 51% of products in this category.
6.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

60%

5.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.9
Brand name
Apple
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), which is less advanced than 60.8% of routers and equal to 37.3% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
â–² Better than 25% of models
This router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are more versatile than 24.8% of routers and equal to 68.1% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
300 Mbps
Wi-Fi speed
300 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
This router delivers 300 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, which is lower than 73.7% of routers and equal to 16.8% of routers.
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This router supports 20 MHz + 40 MHz channel width options, which is fewer than 59.3% of routers and the same as 35.1% of routers.
Show more
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
This router supports WPA2 Wi-Fi security protocols, which are less advanced than 93.4% of routers and equal to 4.2% of routers.
DoS protection
yes
DoS protection
yes
â–² Better than 13% of models
This router includes DoS protection. 12.8% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
no
SPI intrusion protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
This router does not include SPI-based intrusion protection. 94.1% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
MAC address filtering
yes
â–² Better than 2% of models
This router supports MAC address filtering. 2.2% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
no
URL filter
no
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
This router does not support URL filtering. 96.8% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
IPv6 support
yes
IPv6 support
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This router supports IPv6. 11.5% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
no
Dynamic routing
no
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
This router does not support dynamic routing. 52.5% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
no
Inter-VLAN routing
no
â–¼ Worse than 24% of models
This router does not support inter-VLAN routing. 23.5% of routers support inter-VLAN routing.
VLAN tagging
no
VLAN tagging
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This router does not support VLAN tagging. 62% of routers include VLAN tagging.
QoS
no
QoS
no
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
This router does not include QoS controls. 97.1% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
1
N. of LAN ports
1
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 LAN ports, which is fewer than 95.1% of routers and the same as 4.4% of routers.
LAN port speeds
100 Mbps
LAN port speeds
100 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
This router offers 100 Mbps on its LAN ports, which is slower than 73.2% of routers and on par with 26.4% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
1
N. of WAN ports
1
â–¼ Worse than 9% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 WAN ports, which is more than 1% of routers and the same as 90.1% of routers.
N. of USB ports
1
N. of USB ports
1
â–² Better than 39% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 USB ports, which is more than 39.5% of routers and the same as 39.5% of routers.
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
Category Benchmark
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 0.5% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
Management interface
App, Utility
Management interface
App, Utility
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
This router uses App, Utility for management, which is less advanced than 69.3% of routers and equal to 0.5% of routers.
AirPort Utility
Firmware upgrade method
App, Utility
Firmware upgrade method
App, Utility
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This router supports App, Utility firmware update methods, which are less convenient than 66.8% of routers.
AirPort Utility
Traffic monitoring
yes
Traffic monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This router includes traffic monitoring. 18.1% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Via SNMP/AirPort Utility.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
â–² Better than 9% of models
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 8.6% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Requires router mode.
Captive portal
no
Captive portal
no
â–¼ Worse than 24% of models
This router does not offer captive portal features. 23.5% of routers offer captive portal features.
Show more
CPU clock speed
1x 0.6 GHz
CPU clock speed
1x 0.6 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This router runs at 1x0.6 GHz, which is slower than 66.9% of routers and on par with 2% of routers.
RAM capacity
64 MB
RAM capacity
64 MB
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <0 MB – >1k MB
This router has 64 MB of RAM, which is less than 69% of routers and the same as 14.3% of routers.
Internal storage
0.015625 GB
Internal storage
0.015625 GB
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
This router has 0.015625 GB of internal storage, which is less than 58.6% of routers and the same as 13.8% of routers.
Hardware acceleration
no
Hardware acceleration
no
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
This router does not offer hardware acceleration. 68.9% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
0
N. of external antennas
0
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 – >10
This router has 0 external antennas, which is fewer than 59.6% of routers and the same as 40.4% of routers.
Show more

Apple AirPort Express vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • 5.9 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    2.2 W
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <3 W – >18 W
    This router uses less power than the average router (2.2 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    2.2 W vs 8.1 W
  • 2 more internal antennas
    N. of internal antennas
    2
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (2 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    2 vs 0
  • 104 mm narrower width
    Width
    98 mm
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <100 mm – >300 mm
    This router is narrower than the average router (98 mm vs 202 mm). The average router is 202 mm wide.
    98 mm vs 202 mm
  • 22 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <28 mm – >98 mm
    This router is thinner than the average router (23 mm vs 45 mm). The average router is 45 mm thick.
    23 mm vs 45 mm
  • 24.5 mm lower height
    Height
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <30 mm – >180 mm
    This router is shorter than the average router (23 mm vs 47.5 mm). The average router is 47.5 mm tall.
    23 mm vs 47.5 mm
  • 5.9 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    2.2 W
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <3 W – >18 W
    This router uses less power than the average router (2.2 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    2.2 W vs 8.1 W
  • 2 more internal antennas
    N. of internal antennas
    2
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (2 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    2 vs 0
  • 22 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <28 mm – >98 mm
    This router is thinner than the average router (23 mm vs 45 mm). The average router is 45 mm thick.
    23 mm vs 45 mm
  • 104 mm narrower width
    Width
    98 mm
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <100 mm – >300 mm
    This router is narrower than the average router (98 mm vs 202 mm). The average router is 202 mm wide.
    98 mm vs 202 mm
  • 24.5 mm lower height
    Height
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <30 mm – >180 mm
    This router is shorter than the average router (23 mm vs 47.5 mm). The average router is 47.5 mm tall.
    23 mm vs 47.5 mm
  • 3 fewer LAN ports
    N. of LAN ports
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This router has fewer LAN ports than the average router (1 vs 4). The average router has 4 LAN ports.
    1 vs 4
  • Slower LAN ports
    LAN port speeds
    100 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This router has a lower LAN port speed than the average router (100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    App, Utility
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This router supports the firmware update methods App, Utility, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    AirPort Utility
    App, Utility vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This router uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • No hardware acceleration
    Hardware acceleration
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This router does not offer hardware acceleration, while the average router does. 68.7% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
  • No VPN server support
    VPN server support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 66.3% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • Less capable NAS services
    Built-in NAS services
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This router includes none NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access.
    none vs SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access
  • 13.1% worse value for money
    Apple AirPort Express has worse value for money than the average router (6.91 vs 7.8).
    6.91 vs 7.82
  • 2.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Apple AirPort Express
    the average router
    Apple AirPort Express has a lower user score than the average router (7.79 vs 8.000).
    7.79 vs 8
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This router uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 79.7% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    300 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
    This router has a lower Wi-Fi speed than the average router (300 Mbps vs 1475 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1475 Mbps.
    300 Mbps vs 1,475 Mbps
  • Narrower channel widths
    Channel widths supported
    20 MHz + 40 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This router has a lower supported channel width than the average router (20 MHz + 40 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz). The average router supports channel width of 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz.
    20 MHz + 40 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
  • 1 fewer spatial streams
    N. of spatial streams
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This router has fewer spatial streams than the average router (2 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    2 vs 3
  • No beamforming
    Beamforming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This router does not support beamforming, while the average router does. 56.7% of routers support beamforming.
  • No VPN server support
    VPN server support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 66.3% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • No SPI intrusion protection
    SPI intrusion protection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This router does not support SPI intrusion protection, while the average router does. 93.9% of routers support SPI intrusion protection.
  • No URL filtering
    URL filter
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This router does not support URL filtering, while the average router does. 96.6% of routers support URL filtering.
  • Weaker Wi-Fi security
    Wi-Fi security protocols
    WPA2
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA2, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS.
    WPA2 vs WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS
  • No network services filtering
    Network services filter
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This router does not support network services filtering, while the average router does. 93.2% of routers support network services filtering.
  • No PPTP server
    PPTP server
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This router cannot act as a PPTP server, while the average router can. 62.4% of routers can act as a PPTP server.
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • No QoS
    QoS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This router does not support QoS, while the average router does. 96.8% of routers support QoS.
  • No dynamic routing
    Dynamic routing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This router does not support dynamic routing, while the average router does. 52.3% of routers support dynamic routing.
  • No UPnP
    Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This router does not support UPnP, while the average router does. 98% of routers support UPnP.
  • 3 fewer LAN ports
    N. of LAN ports
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This router has fewer LAN ports than the average router (1 vs 4). The average router has 4 LAN ports.
    1 vs 4
  • Slower LAN ports
    LAN port speeds
    100 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This router has a lower LAN port speed than the average router (100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    App, Utility
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This router supports the firmware update methods App, Utility, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    AirPort Utility
    App, Utility vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • Less capable NAS services
    Built-in NAS services
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This router includes none NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access.
    none vs SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access
  • Weaker management tools
    Management interface
    App, Utility
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This router uses the management interface App, Utility, while the average router uses Web UI, App.
    AirPort Utility
    App, Utility vs Web UI, App
  • No DLNA support
    DLNA support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This router does not support DLNA, while the average router does. 54% of routers support DLNA.
  • No hardware acceleration
    Hardware acceleration
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This router does not offer hardware acceleration, while the average router does. 68.7% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
  • 75% less RAM
    RAM capacity
    64 MB
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <0 MB – >1k MB
    This router has less RAM than the average router (64 MB vs 256 MB). The average router has 256 MB of RAM.
    64 MB vs 256 MB
  • Narrower temperature range
    Operating temperature range
    0 to 35 C
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This router is rated for 0 to 35 C, while the average router is rated for 0 to 40 C.
    0 to 35 C vs 0 to 40 C
  • Lower CPU clock speed
    CPU clock speed
    1 x 0.6 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This router has a lower CPU clock speed than the average router (1x0.6 GHz vs 2x0.5 GHz). The average router has a CPU clock speed of 2x0.5 GHz.
    1x0.6 GHz vs 2x0.5 GHz
  • 2 fewer external antennas
    N. of external antennas
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This router has fewer external antennas than the average router (0 vs 2). The average router has 2 external antennas.
    0 vs 2
  • 11 older release date
    Release date
    2004
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This router is an older model than the average router (2004 vs 2015). The average router release year is 2015.
    2004 vs 2015
  • 87.5% less internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.015625 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
    This router has less internal storage than the average router (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average router offers 0.125 GB of internal storage.
    0.015625 GB vs 0.125 GB
  • Fewer power options
    Power input type
    AC
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    This router uses AC power input, while the average router uses DC barrel.
    AC vs DC barrel

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
31/07/2012
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express review - TechRadar
T
trustedreviews.com
29/08/2012
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express (2012) Review
P
pocket-lint.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
Airport Express (2012)
G
gizmodo.com
26/06/2012
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express (2012) Lightning Review: Probably the Best Router Ever
M
macworld.com
24/06/2012
Summary of the review
New AirPort Express a tiny Wi-Fi base station powerhouse
E
expertreviews.co.uk
09/07/2009
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express review
W
wired.com
26/01/2010
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express review
U
uk.pcmag.com
11/01/2005
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express with AirTunes - Review 2005
B
biztechmagazine.com
09/08/2012
Summary of the review
Review: Go Wireless with Apple's AirPort Express Base Station
T
terrywhite.com
14/06/2012
Summary of the review
Review: The 2012 AirPort Express – I love it, I hate it!
L
letemsvetemapplem.eu
23/06/2014
Summary of the review
Review AirPort Express: a handy, but a bit truncated router
S
stereophile.com
08/05/2005
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express Wi-Fi Hub-D/A processor
C
cnet.com
24/03/2008
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express Base Station (802.11n) review
T
trustedreviews.com
16/12/2009
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express Review
C
cnet.com
11/06/2012
Summary of the review
Apple AirPort Express Base Station (Summer 2012) review
F
fedtechmagazine.com
21/08/2012
Summary of the review
Review: Go Wireless with Apple's AirPort Express Base Station

Third-party reviews

Based on 303 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: October 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Apple AirPort Express

  • Extremely simple setup process, especially for users on Mac or iOS platforms
  • Unique AirPlay support allows for easy wireless music streaming to speakers via its audio jack
  • Highly portable, compact design makes it an ideal travel companion for 'road warriors'
  • Versatile functionality, serving as a wireless router, network extender, or print server
  • Stable and reliable performance with a reputation for 'just working' once configured
  • Support for simultaneous dual-band (2.4GHz and 5GHz) in later generations improves performance for different devices

What we don't like about Apple AirPort Express

  • Lacks Gigabit Ethernet ports, limited to 10/100 Mbps, which is slow for modern high-speed internet
  • Outdated technology that lacks support for modern standards like Wi-Fi 6 or WPA3 security
  • No web-based configuration interface, requiring the specific AirPort Utility software for management
  • Limited signal range compared to modern routers with external antennas
  • The USB port is restricted to printer sharing and does not support external hard drives for NAS
  • Weak data throughput in multi-client scenarios, which can lead to stuttering or slow connections

Verdict

The Apple AirPort Express is a compact, discontinued Wi-Fi router renowned for its portability and unique integration with AirPlay for wireless audio streaming. The final second-generation model (A1392) features simultaneous dual-band 802.11n Wi-Fi, supporting both 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequencies, and includes two 10/100BASE-T Ethernet ports (one WAN, one LAN), a USB 2.0 port for printer sharing, and a 3.5mm analog/optical digital audio jack. Its main advantages are its incredibly easy setup via the AirPort Utility app, the ability to turn traditional speakers into wireless ones, and its small form factor, which is ideal for travel. However, its primary drawbacks include dated 100Mbps Ethernet ports (lacking Gigabit speeds), the absence of modern Wi-Fi 6 or 6E standards, and a USB port that does not support external hard drive storage for network-attached backups.

Compare Apple AirPort Express with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Apple AirPort Express and other routers

No results found