OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Projectors Methodology v3.0
Projectors Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Projectors Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Projectors Methodology v3.0

Kodak Luma 150 review: 86 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Native panel resolution:640x360ANSI lumens:60Throw ratio:1.2:1Lamp life:30000 hours

Kodak Luma 150 Review: Compare 86 technical specifications, 8 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Projectors category and whether it is worth buying.

Kodak Luma 150
4.7/10

Overall score

Score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

35%

4.5

Technical score

30%

4.5

List score

25%

4.5

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 99% of projectors
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the projector's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a projector with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

4.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▼Worse than 78%
4.5

Technical score

Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

42%

3.6

Image Quality

22%

4.5

Projection & Lens

12%

5.7

HDMI & Gaming

10%

4.2

Audio & Features

8%

5.3

Connectivity

6%

7.7

Design & Power

▼Worse than 99%
4.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models

4.5

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.5

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (8)
6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 99%
4.5

List score

List score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 112 lists (1%)
▲Better than 76%
  • kodak-luma-150
  • kodak-luma-150
  • kodak-luma-150
  • kodak-luma-150
  • kodak-luma-150
kodak-luma-150
kodak-luma-150
kodak-luma-150
kodak-luma-150
kodak-luma-150
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Kodak Luma 150

Based on 5 · 2

Reviewers love how small and light it is, but the speaker sounds weak, focus is fiddly and battery life divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of projector Kodak Luma 150

Technical score
Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

42%

3.6

Image Quality

22%

4.5

Projection & Lens

12%

5.7

HDMI & Gaming

10%

4.2

Audio & Features

8%

5.3

Connectivity

6%

7.7

Design & Power

4.5
Reviews score
4.5
List score
4.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the projector's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a projector with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

4.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.0
ANSI lumens
60
Market range: <280 – >4k
This projector reaches 60 ANSI lumens, dimmer than 99.7% of projectors.
Contrast ratio
1,500:1
This projector has a contrast ratio of 1500:1, lower than 81.1% of projectors and equal to 3.2% of projectors.
Native panel resolution
640x360
This projector uses a native resolution of 640x360, lower than 99.8% of projectors and equal to 0.2% of projectors.
Output resolution
854x480
This projector supports output resolution up to 854x480, lower than 95.5% of projectors and equal to 2.3% of projectors.
Supports 1080p input.
Projection technology
DLP
Show more
What reviewers say
Throw ratio
1.2:1
Min throw distance
0.25 m
Market range: <0.5 m – >1.651 m
This projector needs a minimum throw distance of 0.25 m, shorter than 95.4% of projectors and equal to 0.1% of projectors.
Max projection size
120 inch
Market range: <120 inch – >301 inch
This projector supports projection sizes up to 120 inch, smaller than 80.2% of projectors and equal to 10.7% of projectors.
Zoom ratio
N/A
Motorized zoom
no
This projector does not have motorised zoom. 14.8% of projectors offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Input lag
31.5 ms
Market range: <8 ms – >68 ms
This projector has input lag of 31.5 ms, higher than 54.3% of projectors.
At 1080P/60Hz.
Auto low latency mode (ALLM)
no
This projector does not switch to low-latency mode automatically. 16.1% of projectors offer this.
Variable refresh rate (VRR)
no
This projector does not support variable refresh rate. 1.8% of projectors offer this.
HDMI version
1.4
This projector supports HDMI 1.4, older than 54% of projectors and equal to 35.7% of projectors.
Max HDMI bandwidth
10.2 Gbps
Market range: <10.2 Gbps – >48 Gbps
This projector supports HDMI bandwidth up to 10.2 Gbps, lower than 51.2% of projectors and equal to 46.5% of projectors.
Show more
N. of HDMI ports
1
Market range: <1 – >2
This projector has 1 HDMI port/s, fewer than 54.2% of projectors and equal to 42.9% of projectors.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This projector connects to Wi-Fi networks for streaming. 46.7% of projectors offer this.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This projector uses Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), which is newer than 50.1% of projectors and the same as in 5.4% of projectors.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This projector does not support Bluetooth. 50.7% of projectors offer this.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Smart TV features
no
This projector does not have built-in smart TV features. 43.9% of projectors offer this.
Operating system
proprietary
Android OS
no
This projector does not run Android OS. 19.1% of projectors run Android OS.
Dedicated smartphone app
no
This projector does not come with a dedicated smartphone app. 36.8% of projectors come with a dedicated smartphone app.
Remote control
no
This projector does not include a remote control. 98.6% of projectors offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Light source type
led
This projector uses led light source technology, more advanced than 33.6% of projectors and equal to 39.9% of projectors.
Laser light source
no
This projector does not have a laser light source. 26.8% of projectors offer this.
Lamp life
30,000 hours
Market range: <3.5k hours – >30k hours
This projector offers lamp life of 30,000 hours, shorter than 67.9% of projectors and equal to 25.9% of projectors.
Lamp life (eco mode)
30,000 hours
Market range: <5k hours – >30k hours
This projector offers eco-mode lamp life of 30,000 hours, shorter than 64% of projectors and equal to 31.9% of projectors.
Eco mode rating.
Operating power consumption
12 W
Market range: <57 W – >390 W
This projector uses 12 W of power, less than 99.2% of projectors.
Show more
What reviewers say

Kodak Luma 150 vs the average projector

246810TotalImage QualityProjection & LensHDMI & GamingConnectivityAudio & FeaturesDesign & Power
  • 0.76 m shorter throw distance
    This projector has a lower throw distance than the average projector (0.3 m vs 1 m). The average projector has 1.0055 m of throw distance.
    0.25 m vs 1.0055 m
  • Supports AirPlay
    This projector supports AirPlay, while the average projector does not. 40.3% of projectors offer this.
  • Includes built-in battery
    This projector has a built-in battery, while the average projector does not. 6.3% of projectors have one.
  • 10,000 hours longer lamp life
    This projector has a higher lamp life than the average projector (30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours). The average projector has 20,000 hours of lamp life.
    30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours
  • 218 W lower power use
    This projector uses less power than the average projector (12 W vs 230 W). The average projector uses 230 W of power.
    12 W vs 230 W
  • 92.6% lighter weight
    This projector is lighter than the average projector (0.2 kg vs 2.98 kg). The average projector weighs 2.98 kg.
    0.22 kg vs 2.98 kg
  • Supports Miracast mirroring
    This projector supports Miracast, while the average projector does not. 46.4% of projectors offer this.
  • 10,000 hours longer eco lamp life
    This projector has a higher lamp life in eco mode than the average projector (30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours). The average projector has 20,000 hours of lamp life in eco mode.
    Eco mode rating.
    30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours
  • 2.54x cheaper
    Kodak Luma 150 is cheaper than the average projector (£260 vs £660).
    £260 vs £660
  • 0.76 m shorter throw distance
    This projector has a lower throw distance than the average projector (0.3 m vs 1 m). The average projector has 1.0055 m of throw distance.
    0.25 m vs 1.0055 m
  • Supports AirPlay
    This projector supports AirPlay, while the average projector does not. 40.3% of projectors offer this.
  • Supports Miracast mirroring
    This projector supports Miracast, while the average projector does not. 46.4% of projectors offer this.
  • Memory card slot included
    This projector has a memory card slot, while the average projector does not. 9.4% of projectors offer a memory card slot.
  • Includes built-in battery
    This projector has a built-in battery, while the average projector does not. 6.3% of projectors have one.
  • 10,000 hours longer lamp life
    This projector has a higher lamp life than the average projector (30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours). The average projector has 20,000 hours of lamp life.
    30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours
  • 218 W lower power use
    This projector uses less power than the average projector (12 W vs 230 W). The average projector uses 230 W of power.
    12 W vs 230 W
  • 92.6% lighter weight
    This projector is lighter than the average projector (0.2 kg vs 2.98 kg). The average projector weighs 2.98 kg.
    0.22 kg vs 2.98 kg
  • 10,000 hours longer eco lamp life
    This projector has a higher lamp life in eco mode than the average projector (30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours). The average projector has 20,000 hours of lamp life in eco mode.
    Eco mode rating.
    30,000 hours vs 20,000 hours
  • 198 mm narrower width
    This projector is narrower than the average projector (99 mm vs 297 mm). The average projector has a width of 297 mm.
    99 mm vs 297 mm
  • 100 mm lower height
    This projector is shorter than the average projector (22 mm vs 122 mm). The average projector has a height of 122 mm.
    22 mm vs 122 mm
  • 128 mm thinner body
    This projector is thinner than the average projector (22 mm vs 150 mm). The average projector has a thickness of 150 mm.
    22 mm vs 150 mm
  • 40.8% lower list score
    List score
    4.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 112 lists (1%)
    4.5 vs 7.6
  • 97.3% dimmer image
    This projector has lower ANSI lumens than the average projector (60 vs 2,200). The average projector has 2,200 ANSI lumens.
    60 vs 2,200
  • Low native resolution
    This projector has a lower native panel resolution than the average projector (640x360 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
    640x360 vs 1920x1080
  • Lower output resolution
    This projector supports a lower output resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    Supports 1080p input.
    854x480 vs 1920x1080
  • 39.2% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models

    4.5

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.5 vs 7.4
  • No HDR10 support
    This projector does not support HDR10, while the average projector does. 57.6% of projectors support HDR10.
  • 1 fewer HDMI ports
    This projector has fewer HDMI ports than the average projector (1 vs 2). The average projector has 2 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 2
  • 2 bit lower color depth
    This projector has a lower color depth than the average projector (8 bit vs 10 bit). The average projector has 10 bit of color depth.
    8 bit vs 10 bit
  • 40.8% lower list score
    List score
    4.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 112 lists (1%)
    4.5 vs 7.6
  • 39.2% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models

    4.5

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (8)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.5 vs 7.4
  • 14.9% worse value for money
    Kodak Luma 150 has a lower value-for-money score than the average projector (6.05 vs 6.9).
    6.05 vs 6.95
  • 97.3% dimmer image
    This projector has lower ANSI lumens than the average projector (60 vs 2,200). The average projector has 2,200 ANSI lumens.
    60 vs 2,200
  • Low native resolution
    This projector has a lower native panel resolution than the average projector (640x360 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
    640x360 vs 1920x1080
  • Lower output resolution
    This projector supports a lower output resolution than the average projector (854x480 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    Supports 1080p input.
    854x480 vs 1920x1080
  • No HDR10 support
    This projector does not support HDR10, while the average projector does. 57.6% of projectors support HDR10.
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This projector has a lower contrast ratio than the average projector (1500:1 vs 10000:1). The average projector has 10000:1 of contrast ratio.
    1,500:1 vs 10,000:1
  • 2 bit lower color depth
    This projector has a lower color depth than the average projector (8 bit vs 10 bit). The average projector has 10 bit of color depth.
    8 bit vs 10 bit
  • 29.4% lower refresh rate
    This projector has a lower refresh rate than the average projector (60 Hz vs 85 Hz). The average projector has 85 Hz of refresh rate.
    60 Hz vs 85 Hz
  • Narrower color gamut
    This projector has a lower color gamut coverage than the average projector (81.24% Rec.709 % vs 99% Rec.709 %). The average projector has 99% Rec.709 % of color gamut coverage.
    81.24% Rec.709 % vs 99% Rec.709 %
  • No 3D video
    This projector does not support 3D video, while the average projector does. 55.4% of projectors support 3D video.
  • 0.17 inch smaller DMD chip
    This projector has a lower DMD chip size than the average projector (0.3 inch vs 0.47 inch). The average projector has 0.47 inch of DMD chip size.
    0.3 inch vs 0.47 inch
  • No 3D glasses support
    This projector does not display 3D with glasses, while the average projector does. 54.4% of projectors offer 3D with glasses.
  • 2 earlier release
    This projector was released earlier than the average projector (2019 vs 2021). The average projector was released in 2021.
    July 2019
    2019 vs 2021
  • 130 inch smaller image size
    This projector has a lower projection size than the average projector (120 inch vs 250 inch). The average projector has 250 inch of projection size.
    120 inch vs 250 inch
  • 43.3% lower HDMI bandwidth
    This projector has a lower HDMI bandwidth than the average projector (10.2 Gbps vs 18 Gbps). The average projector has 18 Gbps of HDMI bandwidth.
    10.2 Gbps vs 18 Gbps
  • Older HDMI version
    This projector has Old HDMI standard than the average projector (1.4 vs 2). The average projector supports HDMI 2.
    1.4 vs 2
  • 4.5 ms higher input lag
    This projector has a higher input lag than the average projector (31.5 ms vs 27 ms). The average projector has 27 ms of input lag.
    At 1080P/60Hz.
    31.5 ms vs 27 ms
  • 1 fewer HDMI ports
    This projector has fewer HDMI ports than the average projector (1 vs 2). The average projector has 2 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 2
  • No Bluetooth connectivity
    This projector does not support Bluetooth, while the average projector does. 50.6% of projectors offer this.
  • No RS-232 control
    This projector does not support RS-232 control, while the average projector does. 50.6% of projectors support RS-232 control.
  • 85% weaker audio output
    This projector has a lower audio output power than the average projector (1.5 W vs 10 W). The average projector has 10 W of audio output power.
    1.5W speaker.
    1.5 W vs 10 W
  • No sleep timer
    This projector does not have a sleep timer, while the average projector does. 82.4% of projectors have one.
  • No remote control
    This projector does not include a remote control, while the average projector does. 98.5% of projectors include a remote control.
  • Basic light source
    This projector has Basic light source than the average projector (led vs laser). The average projector uses a laser light source.
    led vs laser

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
WeCookiers
≈ estimated
06/06/2026
Long-term test · 2 months of regular use
Verdict
Kodak Luma 150 impressed after two months of use: strong for close-range projection, though movies need an external speaker.
9.0
Now That Is Dope
≈ estimated
08/03/2024
Short hands-on test · picture in a lit room and in darkness
Verdict
Kodak Luma 150 delivers a crisp, clear picture at 120 inches, impressive in darkness and handy for travel.
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
03/03/2020
Lab test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Kodak Luma 150 is a pocket projector that suits short movie nights in a dark room, but it's too dim for large images or daylight.
1.0
rtings.com
✓ explicit
13/02/2024
Lab test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Kodak Luma 150 is tiny and has a built-in battery, but its dim picture and poor colors make it a poor choice for movies.
7.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
28/05/2024
Hands-on test · Backyard movie nights
Verdict
The Kodak Luma 150 is a lightweight, simple projector with several inputs that suits summer backyard movies, though it struggles in daylight and with dark scenes.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
03/03/2020
Hands-on test · Pocket-size projector
Verdict
The Kodak Luma 150 is a stylish pocket projector for casual viewing in a dark room, but its low brightness keeps the picture small.
7.0
gagadget.com
≈ estimated
05/05/2025
Hands-on test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Kodak Luma 150 is a pocket-sized projector with good colors in a dark room, but its dim picture and low resolution limit it to small screens.
7.0
gagadget.es
≈ estimated
04/05/2025
Hands-on test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Kodak Luma 150 is a small, fun projector that's good enough for films in a dark room, and its battery can charge your phone.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kodak Luma 150

  • Extremely portable, compact, and lightweight design suitable for travel
  • Versatile connectivity options including HDMI, USB, microSD, and wireless mirroring
  • Includes a built-in rechargeable battery that lasts approximately 2–2.5 hours
  • Affordable price point compared to larger professional projectors
  • Easy to set up and operate, featuring intuitive illuminated touch controls
  • Highly popular for hobbyist uses such as cookie decorating and art stenciling

What customers don't like about Kodak Luma 150

  • Low brightness (60 ANSI lumens) makes it difficult to use in anything but very dark rooms
  • Modest native resolution (854 x 480) can result in pixelated or less detailed images
  • Built-in 1.5W speaker is relatively soft and lacks cinematic depth
  • Wireless screen mirroring can be finicky or choppy depending on the device
  • Manual focus wheel can be fiddly and difficult to adjust precisely
  • Lacks advanced features like keystone correction or a comprehensive settings menu

Verdict

The Kodak Luma 150 is an ultra-compact DLP pocket projector featuring a native WVGA (854 x 480) resolution with support for 1080p input and a 1000:1 contrast ratio. Its primary strengths lie in its extreme portability, weighing just 7.75 oz, and its versatile connectivity options which include HDMI, USB, microSD, and wireless screen mirroring via AirPlay or Miracast. It further excels as an all-in-one mobile solution with a built-in 1.5W speaker and a rechargeable battery providing up to 2.5 hours of wireless runtime. However, its main drawbacks include a relatively low brightness of 60 ANSI lumens, which requires a very dark environment for clear viewing, and the lack of automatic keystone correction or a remote control.

Compare Kodak Luma 150 with other products in the Projectors category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kodak Luma 150 and other products in the Projectors category

No results found