OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£170PassMark benchmark result:13867N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:4.2 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):95 W

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

▲Better than 51% of processors

5.3

▼Worse than 53% of processors

9.7

★Better than 99% of processors

4.0
Gaming
Gaming
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
4.2
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
3.7
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
5.5
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.5
L3 cache
8.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
4.5
Video editing
Video editing
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
4.6
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
20.0%
6.6
CPU threads
15.0%
2.5
L3 cache

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

5.8

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.2

Show more

Hide

Brand name

AMD

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Show more

Performance

4.9

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

Threads per core

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

Show more

Cache & Architecture

5.2

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

6.6

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated Graphics

4.0

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

6.5

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

8 more PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
24
▲ Better than 81% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
24 vs 16
Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
Includes stock cooler
Cooler included
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
55.8% more L3 per core
L3 per core
2.67 MB/core
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.7 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.67 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
CPU temperature
95 °C
▲ Better than 72% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
4 more CPU threads
CPU threads
12
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
Higher base clock
CPU base clock speed
6 x 3.6 GHz
▲ Better than 70% of models
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
6x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz

10x more popular
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is more popular than the average processor (10 vs 1).
10 vs 1
21.5% higher user score
User score
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
the average processor
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a higher user score than the average processor (9.72 vs 8.000).
9.72 vs 8

Modern CPU socket
CPU socket
AM4
▲ Better than 77% of models
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP4).
AM4 vs FP4
Broader instruction support
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2
▲ Better than 80% of models
This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA

Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
4 more CPU threads
CPU threads
12
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
Higher base clock
CPU base clock speed
6 x 3.6 GHz
▲ Better than 70% of models
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
6x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
31.2% higher PassMark score
PassMark benchmark result
13,867
▲ Better than 57% of models
Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (13,867 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
13,867 vs 10,572.5
Supports Turbo Core
Turbo Core version
3.0
▲ Better than 85% of models
This processor supports Turbo Core, the average processor does not. 1.00% of processors support Turbo Core.
3.0 vs 2.0

55.8% more L3 per core
L3 per core
2.67 MB/core
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.7 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.67 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
2x larger L3 cache
L3 cache
16 MB
▲ Better than 64% of models
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
16 MB vs 8 MB
50% larger L1 cache
L1 cache
576 KB
▲ Better than 74% of models
Market range: <128 KB – >1.2k KB
This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (576 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
576 KB vs 384 KB
More advanced foundry
Foundry
GlobalFoundries 12 nm
▲ Better than 49% of models
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (GlobalFoundries 12 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
GlobalFoundries 12 nm vs Intel 14 nm

8 more PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
24
▲ Better than 81% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
24 vs 16
Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
Supports ECC memory
ECC memory support
yes
▲ Better than 68% of models
This processor supports ECC memory, the average processor does not. 32.5% of processors support ECC memory.

Includes stock cooler
Cooler included
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
CPU temperature
95 °C
▲ Better than 72% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2600X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Less advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Pinnacle Ridge
▼ Worse than 81% of models
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Pinnacle Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
Pinnacle Ridge vs Kaby Lake
No configurable TDP
Configurable TDP
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.11x higher base power
Base power (PL1)
95 W
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
13.9% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Cinebench R20 single-core benchmark score
421
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <282 – >775
This processor has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (421 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
421 vs 489
15.2% lower single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,248
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,248 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,248 vs 1,471
5 °C lower TJ Max
Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
95 °C
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
2.11x higher TDP
TDP (Thermal design power)
95 W
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
20.3% larger die size
Die size
213 mm²
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (213 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
213 mm² vs 177 mm²

2 years older release date
Release date
2018
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <2k – >2k
This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2018 vs 2020).
April 2018
2018 vs 2020
Older TPM support
TPM type
fTPM 2.0
▼ Worse than 59% of models
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

13.9% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Cinebench R20 single-core benchmark score
421
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <282 – >775
This processor has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (421 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
421 vs 489
15.2% lower single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,248
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,248 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,248 vs 1,471
4.9% weaker single-core performance
PassMark single-core benchmark score
2,378
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.4k – >4k
This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,378 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
2,378 vs 2,500
2.3% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
4.2 GHz
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
4.2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
11.8% slower Blender rendering
Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
342
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <97 – >1.3k
This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (342 vs 387.66). The average processor needs 387.66 for the Blender BMW27 test.
342 vs 387.66

Less advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Pinnacle Ridge
▼ Worse than 81% of models
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Pinnacle Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
Pinnacle Ridge vs Kaby Lake
20.3% larger die size
Die size
213 mm²
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (213 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
213 mm² vs 177 mm²

No integrated graphics
Integrated graphics
no
▼ Worse than 88% of models
This processor does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.

No configurable TDP
Configurable TDP
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.11x higher base power
Base power (PL1)
95 W
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
2.11x higher TDP
TDP (Thermal design power)
95 W
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower TJ Max
Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
95 °C
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techgage.com

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

A Performance Review: AMD’s Ryzen 5 2600X & Ryzen 7 2700X Processors Would you like a performance comparison between the Ryzen 5 2600X and its modern...

According to Techgage, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X are "Zen+" refinements built on a 12nm process, offering improved latency and a 3% IPC boost. While the 2700X excels in multi-threaded tasks like Blender, the 2600X provides exceptional value for creators. Cons include lower single-threaded performance compared to Intel and limited manual overclocking headroom due to efficient, aggressive stock boost algorithms. Copy

techporn.ph

02/05/2018

Summary of the review

Review: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 6-Core AM4 CPU(www.vortez.net) | November 05 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X CPU Review(overclock3d.net) | April 19 2018 | AMD Ryze...

The TechPorn review characterizes the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X as a 12nm "Zen+" 6-core/12-thread processor offering significant mid-range performance improvements over its predecessor for $229. While slightly trailing in certain single-threaded benchmarks, the chip excels in multi-threaded productivity and gaming. The review highlights excellent thermal performance, with the chip maintaining 60ºC under load, though it notes high power consumption (up to 173W full system load) as a drawback. Key advantages identified include strong value, improved Precision Boost 2/XFR2 capabilities, and a capable bundled Wraith Spire cooler. However, the review notes limitations, specifically high power draw, difficult manual overclocking beyond 4.3 GHz, and slightly inferior single-threaded performance compared to Intel rivals in specific tasks. Copy

kitguru.net

22/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X – the CPU that does all the work for you

Leo Waldock’s review for KitGuru characterizes the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (6-core/12-thread, 12nm) as a refined, versatile all-rounder, leveraging Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 to maximize all-core speeds around 4.025GHz. Key strengths include strong multi-threaded performance, a soldered heat spreader for better cooling, inclusion of the Wraith Spire cooler, and a lower price point than the Intel Core i5-8600K. While offering great value, the 2600X lags slightly behind Intel in single-threaded tasks and gaming, and offers only marginal improvements for owners of the original 1600X, making it best suited as a new, cost-effective build rather than a direct upgrade. For more details, visit KitGuru.

eteknix.com

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Processor Review - eTeknix

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, reviewed by eTeknix, utilizes the 12nm Zen+ architecture to provide a significant refinement over its predecessor, offering 6 cores and 12 threads with boosted clock speeds up to 4.2 GHz. Key improvements highlighted include substantially enhanced memory performance, reducing latency to 65 ns, and better DDR4 compatibility. The processor delivers strong synthetic and gaming performance, even exceeding the Ryzen 7 2700 in specific titles. With effective Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 technology, manual overclocking provides limited gains, allowing for "out-of-the-box" performance. The 2600X excels in multitasking and offers strong value, including the capable Wraith Spire cooler. Despite higher 95W TDP heat output, it remains a strong choice for AM4 platforms. Pros include excellent value, high single and multi-core performance, the included cooler, and improved memory support. Cons, however, consist of the higher TDP, limited overclocking headroom, and slightly lower single-threaded performance compared to some Intel competitors.

uk.pcmag.com

21/09/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review - PCMag UK(www.legitreviews.com) | April 27 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Processor Review

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a 12nm "Zen+" processor featuring six cores, 12 threads, and a 3.6GHz base clock, offering excellent multi-threaded performance and value for a mid-range, unlocked chip. Pros include improved memory latency, strong overclocking potential, and the capable Wraith Spire cooler, making it a "champ" for creators and workstation tasks, according to PCMag. Cons include lower single-threaded performance compared to Intel rivals and the lack of an integrated GPU, meaning a dedicated graphics card is mandatory.

gamersnexus.net

21/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD R5 2600 & 2600X Review | Stream Benchmarks, Gaming, Blender

The GamersNexus review of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and 2600X highlights them as superior mid-range processors, utilizing 12nm architecture for improved clock speeds and better efficiency over the first generation. A major pro is their outstanding multi-threaded performance in production tasks like Blender, coupled with excellent streaming capability that delivers 100% frame delivery, outperforming rivals. Gamers NexusWhile gaming performance has improved to narrow the gap with Intel, a notable con is that they still lag slightly behind Intel's flagship i5/i7 models in high-refresh 1080p gaming. The 2600X offers higher stock speeds, but both chips offer similar overclocking headroom around 4.1-4.2GHz, making the cheaper 2600 a better value for users willing to tune. Gamers NexusThe 2600 and 2600X are recommended as top choices for new builds due to the mature AM4 platform, strong productivity performance, and quality stock coolers. On the downside, the 2600X is more power-hungry under heavy load compared to competitors, and the lack of integrated graphics requires a dedicated GPU. Gamers Nexus

pcgamer.com

29/05/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X review - PC Gamer

The PC Gamer review highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X as a highly competitive, 12nm "Zen+" mid-range processor that balances strong multi-threaded performance with productivity. A major pro is its excellent value, enhanced by the bundled, capable Wraith Spire cooler and effective automated overclocking via Precision Boost 2. While a strong all-rounder, a notable con is its slightly lower single-threaded performance in gaming compared to Intel rivals, along with higher power consumption.

tomshardware.com

27/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review: Spectre Patches Weigh In

The Tom's Hardware review finds that the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, built on 12nm "Zen+" architecture, offers significant improvements over its predecessor with enhanced Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 algorithms for superior multi-core performance. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU serves as a strong competitor to Intel's lineup, particularly due to higher productivity performance and better handling of security patches. While offering immense value with a included cooler and unlocked multiplier, it still trails slightly behind Intel in single-threaded gaming workloads, and the bundled cooler offers limited overclocking headroom. Copy

techradar.com

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X review - TechRadar

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, built on the 12nm Zen+ architecture, offers significantly improved multi-core performance over its predecessor, making it a powerful option for content creation and multitasking, according to the TechRadar review. Key performance gains are driven by a 0.2GHz higher boost clock, along with advanced automated overclocking features like Precision Boost 2 and XFR2, which work across all cores to maintain higher, more consistent frequencies. While the chip provides strong value and efficient multi-core processing, the review highlights that it operates at higher temperatures and with increased power consumption compared to competitors. Furthermore, while gaming performance is solid, it does not surpass more affordable options like the Intel Core i5-8400, making it more of an all-around workstation processor than a dedicated, budget-friendly gaming chip. Pros: Stronger multi-core performance, faster single-core speeds, and effective Precision Boost 2/XFR2 technology. Cons: High power draw and heat generation, higher cost than original Ryzen processors, and inferior gaming value compared to Intel alternatives. Copy

pcmag.com

21/09/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review(www.vortez.net) | November 05 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X CPU Review

The PCMag review highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X as a high-value, six-core/12-thread mid-range processor (3.6GHz base/4.2GHz boost) that delivers strong, budget-friendly performance for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Key strengths include excellent multi-threaded performance, an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and a capable bundled Wraith Spire cooler that enhances overall value. The processor also features improved memory compatibility and lower cache latency compared to its predecessor, the 1600X. However, the review notes that the single-threaded performance still slightly lags behind competing Intel processors, impacting some lightly threaded tasks. Additionally, the lack of an integrated GPU necessitates a dedicated graphics card, and the included cooler offers limited thermal headroom for aggressive overclocking. Copy

popzara.com

04/09/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Processor | Computer Reviews

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, a 6-core/12-thread 12nm "Zen+" processor, offers improved efficiency and a 3% IPC boost over its predecessor through better thermal management and reduced cache latency. It features advanced Precision Boost 2 technology, allowing for consistent 3.95GHz-4.0GHz speeds, making it an excellent, budget-friendly choice for creators and streamers needing multi-threaded performance. While it still trails Intel slightly in raw gaming performance and offers only marginal gains for 1600X owners, the 2600X is highly recommended for new builders due to its value and AM4 platform longevity. Copy

overclock3d.net

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X Review

The Overclock3D review of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X highlights these processors as a significant refinement of the original Zen architecture, utilizing a 12nm process and featuring Precision Boost 2 for higher sustained clock speeds. Key pros include greatly reduced cache and DRAM latency—with L2 latency falling by 34%—and superior multi-threaded performance, particularly in applications like Blender. The 2700X specifically is noted for outperforming first-gen counterparts and even Threadripper in certain HEVC benchmarks, while the included Wraith Prism cooler is considered a high-value inclusion. However, the review outlines that the limited overclocking headroom serves as a con, as Precision Boost 2 already operates near the silicon's limits, with the 2700X struggling to maintain stability above 4.2 GHz. While gaming performance is greatly improved, single-threaded performance still slightly trails Intel, and the StoreMI software is dismissed as a niche, largely redundant feature. Ultimately, the processors are lauded for providing excellent, cost-effective performance on the existing AM4 platform. Copy

guru3d.com

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X review

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a 12nm "Zen+" 6-core/12-thread processor offering 3.6 GHz base/4.2 GHz boost speeds, with a key pro in its exceptional $229 USD value proposition. Performance improves over the 1600X through lower latencies and faster DDR4 support, though a con is that the i7-8700K still leads in CPU-bound gaming scenarios. The 2600X features advanced SenseMI and Precision Boost 2 for automatic overclocking via XFR2, and includes a capable Wraith Spire cooler, though it has higher power consumption than its predecessor. Offering great multi-threaded performance and compatibility with X470 and 300-series motherboards, it is highly recommended for workstations, despite the performance jump feeling modest compared to the 8-core 2700X. For more details, visit Guru3D. Copy

chip.de

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

Powerful yet affordable: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X review

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, based on the 12nm Zen+ architecture, offers 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 3.6 GHz, representing a notable performance increase over its predecessor through higher clock speeds and improved efficiency. It excels in multi-threaded tasks, rendering, and content creation, bolstered by Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 technologies that automatically optimize frequency, providing strong value for users in these areas. The package includes the capable Wraith Spire cooler, offering good out-of-the-box value. However, the 95W TDP processor can run hot and requires a discrete graphics card, as it lacks integrated graphics. While multi-core performance is strong, single-threaded performance still trails competitors, and manual overclocking headroom is limited due to the aggressive nature of the auto-boost algorithms.

hardwareinside.de

14/07/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600, 2600X & 7 2700X Quick Review vs. Intel Core i7-8700K

The HardwareInside review indicates that AMD's 2nd-gen Ryzen CPUs (12nm) close the performance gap with Intel in multi-threaded applications, with the Ryzen 7 2700X outperforming the Core i7-8700K in productivity tasks. Key advantages for AMD include competitive pricing, bundled high-quality Wraith coolers, and long-term AM4 platform support. Conversely, the Intel Core i7-8700K remains the leader in gaming due to superior single-core speeds, although this advantage diminishes at higher resolutions. The Ryzen 5 2600X is highlighted as a high-value, mid-range option for gamers. Ultimately, the i7-8700K is recommended for high-refresh-rate gaming, while Ryzen chips are preferred for content creation and better upgradeability. Copy

allround-pc.com

04/06/2018

Summary of the review

Review: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 & Ryzen 5 2600X on Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming

Allround-pc.com reviews the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 5 2600X on the ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming motherboard, highlighting the 12nm "Zen+" architecture's improved clock speeds, efficiency, and refined memory support. The Ryzen 5 2600X is lauded as a strong, high-frequency mid-range option, while the 65W Ryzen 7 2700 delivers efficient, high-performance multi-core capabilities. The ASUS X470-F motherboard is praised for its stability, effective VRM cooling, and quality audio, though it is noted as a premium, non-flagship option. Key disadvantages identified include single-threaded and 1080p gaming performance that still trails Intel competitors. Furthermore, the review notes the motherboard's high launch price and lack of integrated Wi-Fi, alongside marginal overclocking gains on non-flagship CPUs. Pros: Strong multi-core performance, improved efficiency (R7 2700), stable VRMs, and robust memory support. Cons: High price for the motherboard, lack of integrated Wi-Fi, and trailing single-core/gaming performance. Copy

gamestar.de

03/05/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review - Fast Six-Core for Gamers

The GameStar review highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X as a highly capable 12nm Zen+ mid-range processor (6 cores/12 threads) that offers excellent value for gamers and content creators. Performance excels in multi-threaded applications, with efficient automated boosting via Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 technologies that narrow the gaming gap with Intel counterparts. The processor features, pros, and cons include strong multi-core performance and the included Wraith Spire cooler, balanced against higher power consumption and lower single-core performance compared to some competitors.

pcwelt.de

23/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review: Second-Gen Ryzen 6-Core CPU Tested

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, based on the 12nm "Zen+" architecture, is a 6-core, 12-thread processor designed for mid-range gaming and productivity, featuring improved precision boost 2 technology for automated high-clock speeds. It offers strong multi-threaded performance, often outpacing Intel competitors in content creation tasks, while maintaining compatibility with both new X470 and older AM4 motherboards. The package includes the capable Wraith Spire cooler, representing good value, though it lacks integrated graphics and has higher power consumption under load. Copy

hardwareluxx.de

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

Successful Fine-Tuning: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X Review

The Hardwareluxx review details the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and 5 2600X, featuring a 12nm "Pinnacle Ridge" architecture, which offers a 10–12% performance increase over previous generations due to higher clocks, improved Precision Boost 2, and XFR2 algorithms. Pros include reduced cache/memory latency, excellent value with included Wraith coolers, and AM4 platform compatibility, making them strong contenders for productivity tasks. However, the CPUs exhibit higher power consumption (105W TDP for 2700X), lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel competitors, and limited manual overclocking headroom. For more details, visit Hardwareluxx. Copy

computerbase.de

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, 2700, 5 2600X & 2600 review

The ComputerBase review of the AMD Ryzen 2000 series highlights the 12nm "Zen+" architecture as a refined, incremental upgrade over the first generation, featuring improved clock speeds and memory latency. Key pros include the effective Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 technologies that maximize performance, alongside high-quality included coolers like the Wraith Prism. Performance-wise, the 2700X and 2600X show strong gains in productivity, with enhanced DDR4-2933 support mitigating previous Infinity Fabric bottlenecks, though the Intel i7-8700K maintains a slight edge in high-refresh-rate gaming, which constitutes a minor con. The AM4 platform continues to offer great value with X470, and a key pro is the backward compatibility with older motherboards. However, a notable con is the limited manual overclocking headroom, as the factory-optimized boost algorithms leave little room for further manual tuning. Copy

comptoir-hardware.com

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

Review • AMD X470 & Ryzen 5 2600/2600X / Ryzen 7 2700/2700X

The Comptoir Hardware review of the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X highlights the "Zen+" 12nm architecture as a significant, mature refinement over the first-gen Ryzen, featuring improved Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 for better sustained multi-core frequencies. Performance testing demonstrates a roughly 10-15% generational leap, positioning the 2700X as a top-tier, cost-effective productivity tool. While Intel maintains a slight edge in 1080p gaming, the 2600X is noted as an exceptional value for gamers, significantly closing the performance gap. Key advantages include excellent value with bundled high-quality coolers, significantly reduced cache/memory latencies, and continued compatibility with AM4 motherboards. Conversely, the 2700X exhibits higher power consumption with a 105W TDP, and the enhanced Precision Boost 2 algorithm leaves minimal headroom for manual overclocking. Copy

geeknetic.es

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Pinnacle Ridge Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X Review

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X "Pinnacle Ridge" processors represent a refined 12nm Zen+ evolution offering higher clock speeds and improved memory latency, maintaining compatibility with AM4 boards while introducing the X470 chipset with better power delivery and StoreMI technology. These chips provide impressive multi-threaded performance and value, highlighted by the high-quality, included Wraith coolers and more efficient Precision Boost 2 and XFR 2 technologies. However, the review notes that Intel maintains a slight edge in single-core gaming performance, and the 2700X operates with a higher 105W TDP, limiting overall overclocking headroom due to aggressive stock boosting algorithms.

profesionalreview.com

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review (Full Analysis)

The Profesional Review analysis of the 12nm Zen+ AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (6 cores/12 threads, 3.6 GHz base/4.2 GHz boost) highlights a mid-range, 12nm Zen+ processor that offers strong multi-threaded performance. Key improvements include up to 13-24% lower memory latencies and higher clock speeds, resulting in better productivity and gaming performance than its predecessors. Pros include high raw performance per dollar, a capable stock cooler, and the durable AM4 platform, while cons are limited overclocking headroom due to aggressive stock Precision Boost 2 behavior and slightly lower single-thread performance compared to Intel rivals.

spaziogames.it

15/04/2019

Summary of the review

Ryzen 5 2600X Review - SpazioGames

According to the reviewed SpazioGames article, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X features a 12nm architecture with Precision Boost 2 and XFR2, offering high-frequency, "intelligent" performance for the mid-range market. The processor excels in multi-threaded tasks, such as rendering and streaming, while narrowing the gaming gap with Intel, often limited by GPU rather than CPU. While it includes a capable stock cooler, the review notes limited overclocking headroom due to its efficient, automated nature, alongside a lack of integrated graphics and higher power consumption compared to competitors. Copy

multiplayer.it

19/04/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X: The Review", "Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X Review

The Multiplayer.it review highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and 7 2700X as refined 12nm "Zen+" processors offering superior multi-core productivity performance, such as rendering, compared to Intel counterparts. Key advantages include improved Precision Boost 2 technology, high-quality stock coolers (Wraith Prism), and continued AM4 socket compatibility. While gaming performance is strong, the review notes a slight disadvantage against Intel in 1080p, along with higher power consumption and limited manual overclocking headroom.

tomshw.it

29/04/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen 5 2600X Review: AMD's New 6-Core Processor

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, a 6-core/12-thread CPU based on the 12nm "Zen+" architecture, offers improved performance over its predecessor with higher 3.6-4.2 GHz clock speeds and reduced latencies. It utilizes advanced Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 technology, which automatically pushes the chip to its limits based on thermal headroom, often making manual overclocking unnecessary. Key strengths include excellent multi-threaded performance for its $229 price point and a capable bundled Wraith Spire cooler, though it slightly trails competitors in 1080p gaming and lacks integrated graphics. For more details, visit Tom's Hardware. Copy

techtesters.eu

20/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X review", "Review: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - is this CPU worth the money?", "AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Review – The new mid-range king?", "AMD Ryze...

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, featuring six cores and twelve threads on a 12nm process, is a mid-range CPU that improves over the 1600X with Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 for automated, optimized performance. Its core strengths lie in its excellent multi-core performance for rendering and streaming, along with solid stability on the AM4 platform. Key pros highlighted include strong out-of-the-box performance and a capable Wraith Spire cooler, reducing the immediate need for manual overclocking. Additionally, the processor offers cost-effective upgrade paths through backwards compatibility with 300-series motherboards. Cons of the 2600X include higher power consumption and thermal output compared to rivals. It also falls slightly behind competitors like Intel's i5-8400 in single-threaded tasks and gaming frame rates, with limited headroom for manual overclocking.

techgaming.nl

22/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X Review - TechGaming

The TechGaming review covers the second-generation AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (8C/16T) and Ryzen 5 2600X (6C/12T), which utilize the refined 12nm Zen+ architecture to offer improved performance over their predecessors. Featuring Precision Boost 2 and reduced memory latencies, the chips are positioned for high-end gaming and content creation, with the 2600X providing a strong price-to-performance ratio. Advantages include a 10% to 15% raw speed increase, impressive single-threaded improvements, and high-quality stock coolers included, all while maintaining compatibility with existing AM4 motherboards. However, the processors still slightly trail Intel Coffee Lake counterparts in 1080p gaming scenarios, and the higher out-of-the-box clock speeds result in greater power consumption and higher thermals. Additionally, the aggressive factory tuning limits manual overclocking potential, offering little headroom beyond automatic boost settings. Copy

Third-party reviews

Based on 9,338 buyer reviews from online shops.

Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Excellent multi-core performance for productivity tasks like video editing and rendering
Strong multitasking capabilities with 6 cores and 12 threads
Great value for money, especially as a mid-range all-rounder
Includes a capable Wraith Spire stock cooler in the box
Unlocked multiplier allows for easy overclocking
Reliable and stable performance on the mature AM4 platform

What we don't like about AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

High power consumption compared to some competitors
Tends to run hotter than similar mid-range processors
Gaming performance lags slightly behind Intel's equivalent CPUs in some titles
No integrated graphics, requiring a dedicated GPU
Stock cooler can be difficult/painful to install according to some users
Limited performance gains when manually overclocked compared to its automatic boost features

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a mid-range desktop processor based on the 12nm Zen+ architecture, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads with a 3.6 GHz base clock and a 4.2 GHz boost frequency. It includes 19MB of combined cache (3MB L2, 16MB L3) and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory up to 2933 MHz on the AM4 socket. Main characteristics include an unlocked multiplier for overclocking and advanced features like Precision Boost 2 and XFR2 for automated performance tuning. Its primary pros are its high multi-threaded performance for content creation, a bundled Wraith Spire cooler, and excellent value for multitasking workloads. However, its cons include relatively high power consumption with a 95W TDP, the absence of integrated graphics, and single-core speeds that may lag behind comparable Intel chips for high-refresh-rate gaming.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 9600

Processors

Intel Core i5 12600K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7645

Processors

Intel Core i5 13600K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Processors

Intel Core i5 12400

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7745

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 2600X with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X and other processors

No results found