OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price: ~£55
PassMark benchmark result: 15625
N. of physical cores: 8
CPU boost clock speed: 3.8 GHz
CPU socket: AM4
TDP (Thermal design power): 95 W

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Good

5.8

Good

9.3

Exceptional

7.3
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
?
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
?
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
5.1
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
?
L3 cache
8.0%
6.4
N. of physical cores
7.7
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
?
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
6.4
N. of physical cores
20.0%
?
CPU threads
15.0%
?
L3 cache

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a first-generation 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the 14nm Zen architecture, featuring a 3.4 GHz base clock and a 3.8 GHz boost frequency. Designed for the AM4 socket, it includes 16 MB of L3 cache, a 95W TDP, and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory up to 2667 MHz. Its main characteristics include an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking and Extended Frequency Range (XFR) technology, which can push single-core speeds up to 3.9 GHz depending on cooling. Key pros include exceptional multi-core performance for content creation, 3D rendering, and multitasking at a competitive price point. Main cons include lower single-core IPC and gaming performance compared to contemporary Intel 'Kaby Lake' rivals, lack of an integrated GPU, and the omission of a bundled stock cooler in many retail packages.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Overall score

6.2

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.4

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: LOW

AMD

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: LOW

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: LOW

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: LOW

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Performance

5.4

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: LOW

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

5.7

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: LOW

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

7.0

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: LOW

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5600 MHz

?

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=5200 MHz

?

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

4.0

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: LOW

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: LOW

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=24

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=350 MHz

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

6.5

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <50 W

?

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: LOW

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 1700X better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

8 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 16+
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.16 vs 8
8 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
16 usable lanes
What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.
When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=20
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.24 vs 16
Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
What it is: Has an unlocked CPU multiplier, which makes manual CPU overclocking much easier on supported platforms.
When it matters: When you plan to push clock speeds beyond stock settings instead of leaving the processor completely at default behavior.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
Higher base clock
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).8x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
2 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.8 vs 6
47.8% higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (15,625 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (15,625 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.15,625 vs 10,572.5
Supports memory overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
What it is: Allows memory speeds beyond official stock settings through manual tuning or profile-based overclocking.
When it matters: When you want to push RAM performance higher than stock support allows, especially in enthusiast or gaming builds.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
2x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=16 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.16 MB vs 8 MB
Advanced security extensions
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, Secure Boot, SME, SKINIT vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
Modern CPU socket
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP4).
Broader instruction support
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
8 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
Unlocked for overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
Higher base clock
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
47.8% higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (15,625 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
2 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
15.2% higher multi-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (5,562 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
19.5% better multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (3,336 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
Supports Turbo Core
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports Turbo Core, the average processor does not. 1% of processors support Turbo Core.
2x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
2x larger L1 cache
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (768 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
60% larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
8 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
Supports memory overclocking
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
2x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
Supports ECC memory
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports ECC memory, the average processor does not. 32.5% of processors support ECC memory.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Why is AMD Ryzen 7 1700X worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

3 older release date
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has an older release date than the average processor (2017 vs 2020).
March 2017
Older TPM support
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
25.3% lower single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,099 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
31.5% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (335 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
11.6% lower boost clock
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
16% weaker single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,101 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
36.4% slower Blender rendering
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (246.7 vs 387.66). The average processor needs 387.66 for the Blender BMW27 test.
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
16.7% larger process node
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
20.3% larger die size
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher die size than the average processor (213 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
Limited PCIe bifurcation
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8 vs x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4).
No integrated graphics
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.
2.11x higher base power
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
2.11x higher TDP
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher TDP than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
5 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
25.3% lower single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,099 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,099 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.1,099 vs 1,471
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake).Summit Ridge vs Kaby Lake
31.5% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (335 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (335 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.335 vs 489
11.6% lower boost clock
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
16% weaker single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,101 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,101 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.2,101 vs 2,500
2.11x higher base power
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.95 W vs 45 W
16.7% larger process node
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <10 nm
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.14 nm vs 12 nm
5 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=100 °C
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.95 °C vs 100 °C

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 7 1700X?

Exceptional multi-threaded performance, often rivaling or beating Intel CPUs that cost twice as much at launch
Excellent value for workstation tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and content creation
Unlocked multiplier allows for relatively easy overclocking to reach the performance levels of the flagship 1800X
Significantly improved power efficiency (95W TDP) and thermal performance compared to previous AMD FX generations
Strong value proposition within the AM4 platform, which offered a longer-lived socket than contemporary Intel alternatives

What customers dislike about AMD Ryzen 7 1700X?

Single-core performance and IPC (Instructions Per Clock) lag behind Intel's Kaby Lake architecture
Gaming performance at 1080p is noticeably lower than cheaper quad-core Intel competitors like the i7-7700K
Early adopters reported frequent memory compatibility issues and a 'finiticky' setup process requiring BIOS updates
Limited overclocking headroom, with many chips hitting a 'wall' around 3.9GHz to 4.0GHz regardless of cooling
Does not include a stock cooler in the box, requiring an additional purchase

Expert reviews

tomshardware.com

04/05/2017

Summary of the review

Overclocking Ryzen 7 1700 vs 1700X vs 1800X - Tom's Hardware Would you like a comparison of the benchmarks found in these specific articles for gaming...

Tom's Hardware testing of the first-gen Zen architecture achieved a stable 4.0 GHz at 1.425V on a Ryzen 7 1800X, noting that performance, particularly the Infinity Fabric, is heavily dependent on high-speed memory. Overclocking offers significant "free" multi-threaded performance gains for productivity, with the Ryzen Master utility providing accessible, real-time adjustments. However, manual overclocking deactivates key power-saving features, increases thermal output, and risks reduced component lifespan due to higher voltages, while early firmware often limited memory stability to 2933 MT/s. For more details, visit Tom's Hardware.

tomshardware.com

27/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X: Workstation & HPC Benchmarks - Tom's Hardware

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X offers 8-core, 16-thread performance that competes with expensive Intel HEDT processors in productivity, featuring SenseMI technology for automated overclocking. While offering a massive leap over previous AMD CPUs, it faces lower IPC and clock speeds, resulting in a performance gap for gaming, particularly at 1080p. Pros include high value for workstation tasks and good power efficiency, while cons include the lack of a bundled cooler and inconsistent launch gaming performance.

digit.in

01/08/2023

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review Review : Getting your money's worth - Digit

The Digit.in review identifies the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X as a high-performance, cost-effective, 8-core/16-thread processor designed for productivity and content creation. It offers value by delivering nearly identical performance to the flagship 1800X for less, with pros including immense multi-threaded power and an unlocked multiplier. However, cons include weaker single-core performance compared to Intel in gaming and the lack of an included cooler.

tweaktown.com

06/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and 1700X CPU Review - TweakTown

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and 1700X introduced 8-core/16-thread processing to the mainstream market, offering high-end productivity performance at significantly lower costs than Intel competitors. The 1700 is highlighted for its value, providing efficient 65W TDP operation and a bundled cooler, while both chips are easily overclockable. Pros include exceptional multi-core efficiency for video encoding and rendering, along with the promise of long-term socket AM4 compatibility. However, cons include lower IPC performance compared to Intel’s alternatives, resulting in slightly lower performance in high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming. The review concludes that these processors are ideal for content creators and professionals who require heavy multitasking capabilities. Despite limitations in single-core gaming, their unlocked multipliers and affordable motherboard options make them a disruptive, landmark release for AMD.

kitguru.net

06/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X CPU Review - KitGuru

In his March 2017 review for KitGuru, Luke Hill identifies the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X as a high-value 8-core, 16-thread processor, positioning it as a "sweet spot" in the Zen lineup with 3.4GHz base/3.8GHz boost speeds. The 1700X delivers exceptional performance in heavily threaded workloads, such as Cinebench, while offering substantial 4.0GHz all-core overclocking headroom. However, the processor faces drawbacks with lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel counterparts and requires a high-end, separate cooling solution due to heat output. For more details, visit KitGuru.

tomshardware.com

27/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review - Tom's Hardware

The Tom’s Hardware review identifies the 8-core/16-thread AMD Ryzen 7 1700X as a high-value workstation processor, delivering performance competitive with Intel’s more expensive HEDT options in multithreaded tasks like rendering and encoding. Its key pros include strong price-to-performance, a lower cost than the 1800X, and an unlocked multiplier allowing for easy overclocking to 3.9-4.0 GHz. However, the chip faces cons regarding lower single-threaded performance and gaming performance compared to competitors like the Intel Core i7-7700K. Additionally, the 1700X lacks a bundled cooler for its 95W TDP, necessitating an aftermarket solution, and it faces competition from the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700, which offers similar value.

overclockers.com

27/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD RYZEN 7 1700x and 1700 CPU Review - Overclockers

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and 1700X review by Overclockers highlights these 8-core/16-thread processors as a significant breakthrough, offering high-end multi-threaded performance and impressive efficiency with low 65W/95W TDPs compared to competitors. Key pros include an exceptional price-to-performance ratio for productivity tasks, strong multi-core rendering capabilities, and, for the 1700X, the eXtended Frequency Range (XFR) feature. While both chips overclocked well toward 4.0 GHz, the platform experienced initial "cons," including memory compatibility issues requiring specific RAM kits and manual tuning for stability. Additionally, the review notes that while gaming performance was solid at higher resolutions, it did not always match Intel's top chips at 1080p, positioning these CPUs primarily as professional workstations. Copy

kitguru.net

06/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X CPU Review - KitGuru

The KitGuru review highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X as a high-performance, 8-core, 16-thread CPU offering superior value for multi-threaded productivity tasks compared to Intel counterparts. While excelling in rendering and encoding, the processor faces challenges in 1080p gaming performance and requires manual BIOS tuning for memory stability. Key advantages include its lower cost and overclocking potential to 1800X levels, though it lacks a stock cooler. Pros and Cons Summary Pros: Competitive price-to-performance ratio for multi-threaded workloads, strong rendering capabilities, and excellent overclocking potential to 1800X performance.Cons: Lower 1080p gaming performance versus competition, lack of included stock cooler, and early memory compatibility issues. Copy

chip.de

09/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X: Key Information

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is an 8-core, 16-thread 14nm "Zen" processor designed to compete with high-end Intel chips via a 3.4 GHz base and 3.8 GHz boost clock. It offers exceptional multi-threaded performance, providing massive value for workstations and heavy multitasking at a lower price point than competitors, while running relatively cool, according to the CHIP.de video review. However, the chip shows weaker single-core performance, lagging behind Kaby Lake processors in 1080p gaming and exhibiting potential memory compatibility issues and limited platform maturation at launch.

pcwelt.de

16/03/2017

Summary of the review

Processor Review: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

The PC-WELT review highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X as a competitive, 14nm Zen-architecture eight-core processor that brings strong multi-threaded performance via the AM4 platform, featuring 3.4 GHz base and 3.8 GHz boost speeds. It excels in productivity tasks, outperforming competing Intel chips in rendering benchmarks while maintaining good energy efficiency and operating temperatures. However, the chip faces limitations in 1080p gaming, where it falls behind Intel's Kaby Lake, and it lacks both integrated graphics and a bundled cooler in the box.

computerbild.de

13/03/2017

Summary of the review

Ryzen 7 1700X, 1700: AMD CPUs Review

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and 1700 marked a significant return to the high-end CPU market for AMD, utilizing 14nm Zen architecture and 8 physical cores with 16 threads, offering high-performance computing on the AM4 platform. The 1700X operates at 3.4 GHz (3.8 GHz boost), while the 1700 acts as an efficient 65W, 3.0 GHz variant (3.7 GHz boost). The processors excel in productivity, offering a superior price-to-performance ratio and outperforming competitors in multi-threaded benchmarks. The Ryzen 7 1700 is highlighted for its low power consumption and included Wraith Spire cooler, whereas the 1700X offers near-flagship performance, often matching the 1800X when overclocked. However, the chips show lower performance in 1080p gaming compared to Intel competitors due to lower single-core speeds and lack initial optimization. Other notable downsides include required manual BIOS adjustments for memory, a lack of integrated graphics requiring a dedicated GPU, and no box cooler for the 1700X.

hardwareluxx.de

07/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review: The Best Ryzen?

The Hardwareluxx review identifies the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X as the "sweet spot" of the first-gen Zen lineup, offering 8-core/16-thread performance for multi-threaded tasks like rendering at a better value than the 1800X. Key pros include high productivity performance, an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and longevity on the AM4 platform, though it is hindered by lower single-core speeds affecting 1080p gaming, °C temperature offset, and initial memory compatibility challenges. The processor is lauded for efficiency and competitive pricing, yet it requires higher-end cooling and specific RAM for optimal performance compared to competitors.

computerbase.de

02/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, 1700 Review: King of Productivity, Prince of Gaming

The ComputerBase review of the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, and 1700 marks a significant, competitive return for AMD in the high-end desktop market by providing strong multi-threaded performance via the new Zen architecture. These processors, particularly the 1800X, offer exceptional value for productivity tasks like rendering and video encoding, often rivaling much more expensive Intel alternatives while maintaining high efficiency. While offering great multi-core value, the review notes drawbacks including lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel, sensitivity to high-speed memory, and limited overclocking headroom.

pcgameshardware.de

02/03/2017

Summary of the review

Ryzen 7 1700X: Review, Benchmark, Price, Specs

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is positioned as a high-value, 8-core/16-thread processor, delivering exceptional multi-threaded performance in productivity and workstation tasks, such as video encoding and rendering, at a significantly lower price point than competitors. It operates with a 3.4 GHz base and 3.8 GHz boost, with XFR capabilities, and maintains high efficiency with a 95W TDP. Key advantages highlighted include its superior price-to-performance ratio and overclocking potential, with many units reaching 3.9 GHz to 4.0 GHz, allowing it to compete with the higher-end 1800X model. The processor is generally praised for offering competitive performance for content creation. Conversely, the review notes that the 1700X often trails Intel's Kaby Lake alternatives in single-threaded performance and 1080p gaming due to lower IPC and clock speeds. Additionally, the platform experienced early adoption issues, specifically regarding memory compatibility and the need for manual tuning to achieve higher DDR4 speeds. You can find the full review at PC Games Hardware.

gamestar.de

10/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review - Almost as Fast as the 1800X

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X, an 8-core/16-thread processor based on the Zen architecture, provides roughly 95% of the performance of the flagship 1800X for significantly less money. Key benefits include exceptional multi-threaded performance, an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking, and support for the modern AM4 platform. However, the review notes lower 1080p gaming performance, a lack of a bundled cooler, and initial memory compatibility issues.

chip.de

08/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review - CHIP

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X, an 8-core/16-thread processor based on 14nm "Zen" architecture, is praised for its outstanding multi-threaded performance, making it ideal for rendering and heavy workstation tasks. Key advantages include its high efficiency, 3.4 GHz base/3.8 GHz boost clock, and strong value for money compared to competition, though it lacks an integrated GPU and initially faced BIOS and memory compatibility issues. The 1700X offers a "sweet spot" for performance per dollar, making it a powerful choice for content creators, though it may lag behind Intel in pure high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming.

cowcotland.com

20/04/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700 Review: AMD is back!

The Cowcotland review highlights the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X as a market-disrupting, 8-core/16-thread processor offering performance comparable to Intel’s high-end Core i7-6900K at a lower price point, utilizing 14nm Zen architecture and XFR technology. Key advantages include exceptional multi-core performance for productivity, solid 4.0GHz overclocking potential, and the introduction of the forward-looking AM4 platform. Conversely, the review notes lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel’s Kaby Lake, initial memory compatibility challenges, and the lack of a bundled cooler as drawbacks.

hardwareand.co

07/10/2024

Summary of the review

Ryzen 7 1700X Retro Review: Is this beast still up for gaming in 2024?

A 2024 retrospective by Hardware & Co evaluates the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X, finding that the 7-year-old, 8-core CPU remains viable for productivity and casual gaming, particularly when paired with a strong GPU at 4K resolution. While the platform benefits from long-term AM4 socket support, the review notes significant aging in single-core performance (IPC) and memory latency, causing issues in modern, demanding titles. Key pros include excellent reactivity for multitasking and the ability to maintain over 100 FPS in popular eSports titles like Apex Legends and Fortnite, making it a capable budget, or even retro-gaming, option. However, the processor faces stiff challenges, with some modern games failing to run optimally and high-refresh-rate gaming (144Hz+) proving difficult even at 1080p. Ultimately, the lack of official Windows 11 support, coupled with the inability to handle the newest, heavily-optimized games, limits its longevity, forcing a reliance on older Windows versions or Linux. Despite these drawbacks, it serves as a testament to the longevity of the initial Ryzen architecture. Hardware &

profesionalreview.com

24/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 1700X Review (Full Analysis)

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a high-performance 8-core/16-thread processor based on the Zen architecture, featuring a 3.4 GHz base clock and XFR technology, positioning it as a "sweet spot" for enthusiasts. It excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding, frequently outperforming Intel competitors in synthetic benchmarks, though it sometimes trails in 1080p gaming performance. Key pros include excellent price-to-performance value and easy overclocking, while cons include the lack of integrated graphics and early platform maturity issues.

topdigamma.it

02/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs Intel Core i7-7700K – Reviews and Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X leads in multi-threaded performance with 8 cores/16 threads, offering up to 62% better performance in workstation tasks, though it lags in raw single-core speed. Conversely, the Intel Core i7-7700K (4 cores/8 threads) excels in 1080p gaming with higher clock speeds but is a "dead-end" platform with limited future upgrade options. The review concludes that the 1700X is superior for productivity and future-proofing, while the 7700K is best for maximum FPS in current gaming. Copy

hwupgrade.it

11/04/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 5 Review: 17 CPUs Compared

This 2017 review by Hardware Upgrade evaluates first-generation Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 5 processors, highlighting superior multi-threaded performance in tasks like video encoding for 8-core and 6-core models. The Ryzen 5 1600X is lauded as a high-value, all-around performer, offering roughly 90% of high-end Intel performance for significantly lower cost. Conversely, the analysis notes lower single-core performance compared to Intel’s Kaby Lake architecture due to lower peak clock speeds. Consequently, a performance gap exists in CPU-limited 1080p gaming scenarios with high-end GPUs, though this impact reduces at higher 1440p resolutions. Hardware Upgrade | il sito Overall, the, test shows AMD successfully disrupted the market by offering higher core counts at aggressive price points. While Ryzen 7 suits professional workloads, the Ryzen 5 1600X is positioned as the ideal "sweet spot" for most users, particularly when paired with accessible B350 motherboards.

tomshw.it

31/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review: Power Consumption and Temperatures

The Tom’s Hardware review of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X highlights an 8-core/16-thread processor that offers high-value, multi-threaded performance, often exceeding Intel's HEDT competition in professional applications, making it a compelling "sweet spot" option. A significant advantage is the unlocked multiplier, allowing for easy overclocking to 1800X performance levels, though gaming performance at 1080p is a disadvantage, often lagging behind cheaper Intel i7-7700K alternatives. Regarding thermal and power efficiency, the 1700X is a 95W TDP chip that offers a superior, soldered heat spreader for better heat transfer, maintaining manageable temperatures around 66.5°C under full load, though early BIOS iterations required updates to optimize performance. For more details, visit Tom's Hardware. Copy

tech.everyeye.it

23/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review: Great performance at a balanced price

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X, an 8-core/16-thread processor based on 14nm Zen architecture, offers high-end desktop performance with a 3.4GHz base clock, 3.8GHz boost, and SMT/XFR technologies. The review highlights its competitive edge against Intel's pricier Broadwell-E chips, providing superior multi-threaded power for applications like video editing and rendering. Key pros include exceptional value and significant overclocking potential, often reaching flagship 1800X performance levels, coupled with improved power efficiency and lower thermal output compared to previous AMD processors. However, cons involve lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel due to a lower single-core IPC and early platform limitations, such as memory frequency issues. Furthermore, the 1700X does not include a stock cooler, requiring additional investment for cooling. Copy

tweakers.net

14/02/2019

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - Reviews - Tweakers

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a 14nm, 8-core/16-thread processor designed for high-performance computing, featuring a 3.4 GHz base and 3.8 GHz boost clock (with XFR support). A primary pro is its exceptional multi-threaded performance, often rivaling more expensive competitors in productivity tasks, although a notable con is lower single-core performance compared to Intel’s Kaby Lake, affecting 1080p gaming. Positioned between the 1700 and 1800X, the 1700X offers a strong balance, with a pro being its significantly lower price than the flagship for near-identical performance when overclocked to 4.0 GHz. The AM4 platform provides a pro in terms of longevity and modern features, while cons include limited memory bandwidth and initial, though largely resolved, motherboard compatibility issues. Efficiency is a key pro, with a 95W TDP that remains manageable under heavy load. However, a specific con for enthusiasts is that the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 offers similar overclocking results, challenging the 1700X's value proposition.

techgaming.nl

18/09/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Review

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen architecture and 14nm process, featuring a 3.4 GHz base and 3.8 GHz boost clock, with 100 MHz XFR headroom for improved performance. It offers exceptional price-to-performance, delivering near 1800X, or superior to i7-6800K, results in multi-threaded workloads for a lower cost. Key pros include excellent multi-core performance, a fully unlocked multiplier for overclocking to 3.9–4.0 GHz, and high efficiency with a 95W TDP. The chip supports modern DDR4 memory and provides a cost-effective alternative to higher-end models, making it ideal for workstations. On the cons side, the retail package does not include a cooler, requiring additional investment for optimal thermal management. It trails behind Intel Kaby Lake processors in single-core performance and 1080p gaming, and early adopters encountered memory compatibility issues with higher-speed RAM.

hardware.info

02/03/2017

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X/1700X review: Finally competition for Intel again

The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and 1700X processors, based on the Zen architecture, mark a significant return for AMD to the high-end desktop market, offering 8-core/16-thread performance with a 52% IPC improvement. These chips provide exceptional value in multi-threaded tasks, with the 1800X ($499) competing directly with Intel's high-end, higher-priced models, while utilizing SenseMI technologies like Precision Boost for optimized performance. Despite the high performance, limitations include lower 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel, limited overclocking headroom, and early platform compatibility issues.

tweakers.net

02/03/2017

Summary of the review

Ryzen 7 Processors Review - AMD is Back in the Race

The Tweakers.net review of the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, and 1700 marks a significant turning point, confirming AMD's return to the high-end CPU market with the Zen architecture, which achieved a 52% IPC increase. Offering 8 cores and 16 threads, the lineup delivers performance competitive with Intel’s premium chips at significantly lower price points. Key advantages include exceptional multi-threaded performance in rendering and video encoding, with the 1700 recommended as a "best buy" due to its overclocking potential. However, the review outlines initial disadvantages, specifically weaker 1080p gaming performance compared to Intel’s higher-clocked alternatives and early, teething issues with the AM4 platform's BIOS and memory compatibility. The review highlights that while the processors are strong in productivity, early adopters must navigate Windows scheduler optimizations to fully leverage the new architecture. For a complete analysis of the launch, visit Tweakers.

Video reviews

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 4500

Processors

Intel Celeron G6900

Processors

Intel Core i3 10105

Processors

Intel Celeron G4950

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Processors

Intel Core i3 9320

Processors

Intel Core i3 9300

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 2400GE

Processors

Intel Core i3 10100F

Processors

Intel Pentium Gold G5500t

Processors

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

Processors

Compare AMD Ryzen 7 1700X with other processors

Compare