AMD Ryzen 5 240 Review | 78 Data compared

The review from Tom's Hardware evaluates the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G's Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics, testing BioShock Infinite (Remastered) at QHD and 4K resolutions to determine the limits of integrated silicon. While the APU offers capable performance for 720p/1080p gaming, high-resolution gaming reveals significant bottlenecks due to its reliance on system memory. Tom’s HardwareThe 2400G outpaces competitors like the Intel UHD 630 and NVIDIA GT 730, providing a passable experience at QHD, but performance drops substantially at 4K, often falling below 30 FPS. Key pros include exceptional value for budget builds and solid multi-core performance for productivity, though it cannot replace a dedicated graphics card for high-resolution gaming. Tom’s HardwareCons involve the necessity of expensive, fast dual-channel DDR4 memory to unlock performance, and the chip can run hot, sometimes requiring better cooling than the bundled Wraith Stealth. The analysis concludes the 2400G is better suited for 1080p gaming rather than consistent QHD or 4K workloads. Tom’s Hardware

This Tom's Hardware review analyzes delidding the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G to replace the stock thermal paste with liquid metal, targeting the manufacturer's use of paste instead of solder in Raven Ridge APUs. While applying Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut yielded lower internal temperatures, it resulted in negligible overclocking improvements (roughly 75 MHz) and minimal performance gains, making the process largely unnecessary. The review advises against the modification for most users, citing high risk of damage and limited returns, despite improvements in thermal efficiency for small form factor builds.

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, evaluated by HardwareCooking, offers a budget-friendly, all-in-one solution combining a 4-core, 8-thread CPU with Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics on the 14nm "Raven Ridge" architecture. It features a 3.6 GHz base clock (3.9 GHz boost) and outperforms competitors like the Core i5-8400 in multi-threaded tasks, though it is limited by 4MB L3 cache and reduced PCIe lanes. The integrated Vega 11 GPU provides significantly better performance than Intel’s UHD 630, enabling playable 1080p frame rates in eSports titles and solid 720p performance for AAA games. While the included Wraith Stealth cooler offers good value, optimal GPU performance heavily depends on utilizing fast DDR4 RAM, adding to total build costs. Overclocking is a highlight, with CPU speeds reaching 4.0 GHz and GPU performance increasing, though high-level overclocking requires better cooling than the stock solution. The APU is ultimately presented as an exceptional value for building a capable PC without a dedicated graphics card, despite a higher cost relative to the Ryzen 3 2200G.

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G serves as a capable budget APU, combining a 4-core, 8-thread Zen CPU with Vega 11 graphics to offer playable 1080p gaming without a dedicated graphics card. Key advantages include significantly better integrated performance compared to Intel’s UHD 630 graphics and reduced inter-core latency, making it ideal for budget or small-form-factor builds. However, limitations include a reduced 4MB L3 cache that hinders performance in certain tasks and only 8 PCIe lanes, which may constrain future high-end GPU upgrades. While the included cooler works, intensive gaming or overclocking requires more robust cooling to avoid thermal throttling. Overall, the 2400G presents a strong value proposition for entry-level systems, though it faces stiff competition from the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.

The Comptoir-Hardware review of the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G (Raven Ridge) highlights these APUs as a significant leap for integrated graphics, utilizing a 4 CCX structure on a single die to reduce latency, despite a lower 4MB L3 cache. The Vega 8 and Vega 11 graphics deliver class-leading performance, making them capable of 1080p eSports gaming, while the unlocked nature allows for substantial CPU/GPU overclocking. Pros include unmatched value for budget builds, excellent integrated GPU performance that outperforms Intel's UHD 630, and improved internal latency. Cons include a dependency on high-speed RAM for optimal performance, reduced L3 cache limiting some workstation tasks, and only 8 PCIe lanes, along with the use of thermal paste rather than solder.