OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Potensic T25 Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Max flight time:18 minVideo resolution:1080p/30 fpsMax transmission distance:0.3 km

Potensic T25 Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

85%

5.5

Technical score

15%

7.8

Review score ( 8 · 12)

Review score 15% · 7.8 · based on 20 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
▼Worse than 67% of drones
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

26%

4.4

Flight

24%

5.7

Camera

20%

6.2

Safety

16%

5.9

Connectivity

14%

5.9

Battery & Design

▼Worse than 68% of drones
7.8

Review score

Review score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 3
≈ estimated
3

9.2%

8.0

the-gadgeteer.com

9.2%

8.0

thedronelogic.com

7.4%

9.0

dronedeliver.co.uk

Video reviews 7

4.6%

9.0

Our Life After 50

4.6%

9.0

Clough Reviews

4.6%

7.0

Hardwired Review

4.6%

7.0

BillM - RC & Gadgets

4.6%

6.0

Open Circuit RC & Tech

2.3%

8.0

Althea

2.3%

7.0

Jose Gomez

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 58% of drones
  • potensic-t25
  • potensic-t25
  • potensic-t25
  • potensic-t25
  • potensic-t25
  • potensic-t25
  • potensic-t25
  • potensic-t25
potensic-t25
potensic-t25
potensic-t25
potensic-t25
potensic-t25
potensic-t25
potensic-t25
potensic-t25

Best prices

    N/A~ £130

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Potensic T25

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

26%

4.4

Flight

24%

5.7

Camera

20%

6.2

Safety

16%

5.9

Connectivity

14%

5.9

Battery & Design

5.5
Review score
Review score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 3
≈ estimated
3

9.2%

8.0

the-gadgeteer.com

9.2%

8.0

thedronelogic.com

7.4%

9.0

dronedeliver.co.uk

Video reviews 7

4.6%

9.0

Our Life After 50

4.6%

9.0

Clough Reviews

4.6%

7.0

Hardwired Review

4.6%

7.0

BillM - RC & Gadgets

4.6%

6.0

Open Circuit RC & Tech

2.3%

8.0

Althea

2.3%

7.0

Jose Gomez

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Potensic T25 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 74.3% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.1
Max flight time
18 min
Max flight time
18 min
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 18 min, shorter than 55.5% of drones and equal to 4.5% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.3 km
Max flight distance
0.3 km
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.3 km, shorter-range than 65.2% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Max flight speed
6.94 m/s
Max flight speed
6.94 m/s
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 6.94 m/s, slower than 71.5% of drones and equal to 1.9% of drones.
Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
Max wind resistance
10.56 m/s
Max wind resistance
10.56 m/s
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 10.56 m/s, lower than 54% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
120 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
120 m
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 120 m, lower than 70.2% of drones and equal to 20.2% of drones.
Altitude limit set in the app.
Show more
What reviewers say
Video resolution
1080p/30 fps
Video resolution
1080p/30 fps
▼ Worse than 62% of models
This drone records video at 1080p/30 fps, lower than 61.9% of drones and equal to 5.9% of drones.
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
▼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
12 MP
Main camera megapixels
12 MP
▼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 12 MP, higher than 41.3% of drones and equal to 16.7% of drones.
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This drone supports Return-to-Home (RTH). 33% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 35% of models
This drone supports GPS. 35.3% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS
▲ Better than 50% of models
This drone supports GPS, GLONASS GNSS systems, which are more comprehensive than those of 49.8% and the same as those of 17.1%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Max transmission distance
0.3 km
Max transmission distance
0.3 km
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.3 km, shorter-range than 62.2% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
▼ Worse than 44% of models
This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 8.2% and the same as that used by 47.7%.
Live view quality
1080p@25 fps
Live view quality
1080p@25 fps
▲ Better than 50% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps, higher-quality than 50% of drones and equal to 10.4% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
▲ Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 1,000 mAh, smaller than 79.3% of drones and equal to 3.1% of drones.
Battery energy
3.7 Wh
Battery energy
3.7 Wh
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 3.7 Wh, lower than 87.7% of drones and equal to 2.4% of drones.
Charging time
60 min
Charging time
60 min
▲ Better than 80% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges in 60 min, faster than 80% of drones and equal to 8.8% of drones.
Weight
185 g
Weight
185 g
▲ Better than 63% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 185 g, lighter than 63.4% of drones and equal to 1.6% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Potensic T25 vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • 30 min shorter charging time
    Charging time
    60 min
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges faster than the average drone (60 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    60 min vs 90 min
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports HDR mode
    HDR mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This drone supports HDR mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Richer manual controls
    Manual camera controls
    partial
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This drone offers partial manual camera controls, while the average drone offers no.
    No shutter-speed control.
    partial vs no
  • 30 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    120 °
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (120 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    120 ° vs 90 °
  • 24.8% lower weight
    Weight
    185 g
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (185 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    185 g vs 246 g
  • More polished companion app
    Companion app
    Potensic-G
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This drone uses the Potensic-G companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    Potensic-G vs HS FPV
  • Supports HDR mode
    HDR mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This drone supports HDR mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Richer manual controls
    Manual camera controls
    partial
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This drone offers partial manual camera controls, while the average drone offers no.
    No shutter-speed control.
    partial vs no
  • 30 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    120 °
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (120 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    120 ° vs 90 °
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • More polished companion app
    Companion app
    Potensic-G
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This drone uses the Potensic-G companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    Potensic-G vs HS FPV
  • 30 min shorter charging time
    Charging time
    60 min
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges faster than the average drone (60 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    60 min vs 90 min
  • 24.8% lower weight
    Weight
    185 g
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (185 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    185 g vs 246 g
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    GPS, GLONASS
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports GPS, GLONASS GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    GPS, GLONASS vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 8.06 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    6.94 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (6.9 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
    6.94 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • No POI mode
    POI mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone does not support POI mode, while the average drone does.
  • 1,200 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,000 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (1000 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    1,000 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • Fewer frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    -75 to 0 °
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (-75 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    -75 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • 6.47x less popular
    Potensic T25 is less popular than the average drone (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.47
  • 8.06 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    6.94 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (6.9 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    Value reflects maximum mode speed (for example Sport/Manual mode).
    6.94 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 3,380 m lower service ceiling
    Max service ceiling (ASL)
    120 m
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <120 m – >6k m
    This drone can fly at a lower max service ceiling than the average drone (120 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
    Altitude limit set in the app.
    120 m vs 3,500 m
  • 5 years older release date
    Release date
    2018
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is older than the average drone (2018 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    September 2018
    2018 vs 2023
  • 0.14 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    10.56 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (10.6 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    10.56 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • Simpler motor design
    Motor type
    brushed
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone uses brushed motors, while the average drone uses brushless motors.
    brushed vs brushless
  • Non-foldable design
    Foldable design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
  • 0.7 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.3 km
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0.3 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.3 km vs 1 km
  • 2 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    18 min
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (18 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    18 min vs 20 min
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    -75 to 0 °
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (-75 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    -75 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • Lower photo resolution
    Photo resolution
    2592 x 1944 px
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This drone offers lower photo resolution than the average drone (2592x1944 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
    2592x1944 px vs 4096x3072 px
  • 3 x lower digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    0 x
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    0 x vs 3 x
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    GPS, GLONASS
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports GPS, GLONASS GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    GPS, GLONASS vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No POI mode
    POI mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone does not support POI mode, while the average drone does.
  • 2 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    2
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (2 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    Follow Me, TapFly
    2 vs 4
  • 25.7% higher takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    185 g
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a higher max takeoff weight than the average drone (185 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    185 g vs 249 g
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Fewer frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • 0.7 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.3 km
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0.3 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    0.3 km vs 1 km
  • More basic controller
    Controller model
    T25 Remote Controller
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone uses the T25 Remote Controller controller, while the average drone uses LiteRadio 4 SE.
    T25 Remote Controller vs LiteRadio 4 SE
  • 1,200 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,000 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (1000 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    1,000 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • 13.48 Wh less battery energy
    Battery energy
    3.7 Wh
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
    This drone has lower battery energy than the average drone (3.7 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
    3.7 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
  • 57.5 mm taller body height
    Height
    120 mm
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is taller than the average drone (120 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    120 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 29 mm wider width
    Width
    270 mm
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (270 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    270 mm vs 241 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Our Life After 50
≈ estimated
13/10/2020
Hands-on review · flight, photo and video tests
Verdict
Potensic T25 offers strong features for the price, though its controls are very sensitive.
7.0
Hardwired Review
≈ estimated
05/03/2020
Hands-on review · flight test and flaws
Verdict
Potensic T25 is cheap enough for casual flying but too flawed for serious photography or video.
9.0
Clough Reviews
≈ estimated
26/09/2019
Setup and review · app pairing, flights and features
Verdict
Potensic T25 is a very good value and easy to fly, with a few minor limits such as no collision prevention.
7.0
BillM - RC & Gadgets
≈ estimated
20/09/2019
Hands-on review · flight time, follow-me and camera tests
Verdict
Potensic T25 is pleasant to fly and holds position well, but video is unstable and flight time is short.
6.0
Open Circuit RC & Tech
≈ estimated
12/07/2019
Flight review · battery, camera and handling tests
Verdict
Potensic T25 is an okay drone held back by short battery life and a bland 1080p camera.
8.0
Althea
≈ estimated
22/12/2021
Unboxing · bundle with case and accessories
Verdict
Potensic T25 is worth the extra money in this bundle, which includes a sturdy carrying case and accessories.
7.0
Open Circuit RC & Tech
≈ estimated
01/07/2019
Unboxing · first look at contents and controller
Verdict
Potensic T25 is a neat little drone with a comfortable controller; the real verdict is saved for the flight review.
7.0
Jose Gomez
≈ estimated
22/11/2018
First flight · unboxing and short test flight
Verdict
Potensic T25 is easy to fly and steady in light wind, though the camera still needs testing.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict

What reviewers agree on

Based on 9 · 13

Reviewers like the camera and how easy it is to fly, but flight time is short and video stabilization disappoints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
the-gadgeteer.com
≈ estimated
01/09/2018
Review · Beginner GPS drone
Verdict
The Potensic T25 is a sturdy GPS trainer for beginners willing to swap batteries, but it drifts in wind and flies for only 6 to 8 minutes.
9.0
dronedeliver.co.uk
≈ estimated
Undated
Review summary · Entry-level GPS drone
Verdict
The Potensic T25 is a tough entry-level drone with Follow Me and a tilting 1080p camera that suits beginners, though its footage may not be smooth.
9.0
produktgetestet.jimdoweb.com
≈ estimated
No Date
Review roundup · Entry-level GPS drone
Verdict
The Potensic T25 is a steady, well-equipped first drone with Follow Me and Auto Return Home, but shaky video and 6 to 10 minute flights limit it.
8.0
drohnen.de
≈ estimated
17/10/2018
Expert review · Beginner GPS drone
Verdict
The Potensic T25 is a good first drone with reliable Return-to-Home, but jerky footage and short flights make it a poor fit for serious filming.
8.0
dronologue.fr
≈ estimated
20/10/2026
Review · Stable beginner drone
Verdict
The Potensic T25 is a stable, easy-to-fly GPS drone for beginners that looks like a DJI Phantom, but flights last 6 to 10 minutes and footage is shaky.
8.0
guide-drone.com
✓ explicit
30/11/2018
Expert review · Entry-level GPS drone
Verdict
The Potensic T25 is a beginner GPS drone with Follow Me, automatic Return to Home and a carrying case, but flights last only 6 to 10 minutes and footage is shaky.
7.5
nerdmovieproductions.it
✓ explicit
12/01/2019
Expert review · Beginner drone
Verdict
The Potensic T25 is a sturdy beginner drone with excellent GPS stability and one-button takeoff, but flights last only 8 to 10 minutes and footage is shaky.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Potensic T25

  • Beginner-friendly with easy-to-use features like One-Key Take-off/Landing and Headless Mode.
  • Dual GPS system provides stable hovering and reliable Auto Return-to-Home (RTH) when power is low or signal is lost.
  • Adjustable 2K/1080p camera can be tilted up to 75 degrees via the remote control during flight.
  • Comprehensive package typically includes a dedicated carrying case and multiple batteries.
  • Responsive customer support that is helpful with replacements and technical queries.
  • Compact and lightweight design (under 250g) often exempts it from FAA registration requirements.

What we don't like about Potensic T25

  • Short battery life, with many users reporting only 5 to 10 minutes of flight time per charge.
  • Lack of a physical gimbal leads to shaky video footage, especially during movement or in windy conditions.
  • Limited flight range for video transmission, with some users noting lag or cutouts beyond 50-100 feet.
  • Calibration process can be tedious, requiring manual 360-degree rotations before every flight.
  • Lightweight build makes it highly susceptible to being pushed off course by moderate winds.
  • The 'Follow Me' mode is based on phone GPS rather than visual tracking, which can be less precise.

Verdict

The Potensic T25 is a beginner-friendly GPS drone featuring a 1080p or 2K HD adjustable camera with a 120-degree field of view and 75-degree remote-controlled tilt. Its main characteristics include dual GPS and GLONASS positioning for stable hovering, a 300-meter control range, and intelligent flight modes like Follow Me, Waypoint Fly, and Auto Return Home. The primary pros are its ease of use for novices, precise GPS-assisted safety features, and a lightweight design that often exempts it from FAA registration. However, notable cons include a short flight time of approximately 8–10 minutes per battery, a lack of mechanical gimbal stabilization leading to shaky footage in wind, and relatively slow camera response times during flight.

Compare Potensic T25 with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Potensic T25 and other drones

No results found