Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

Apple M3 Max Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£3,420PassMark benchmark result:41262N. of physical cores:14CPU boost clock speed:4.06 GHzCPU socket:N/ATDP (Thermal design power):78 W

Apple M3 Max Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

7.9

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 85% of processors
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

8.3

Performance

18%

7.8

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.6

Memory & PCIe

7%

6.2

Power & Thermal

4%

6.3

Platform

1%

9.0

Integrated Graphics

â–²Better than 85% of processors
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £3,420

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Apple M3 Max

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.3

Performance

18%

7.8

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.6

Memory & PCIe

7%

6.2

Power & Thermal

4%

6.3

Platform

1%

9.0

Integrated Graphics

7.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Apple M3 Max has a popularity score of 1 point, which is higher than that of 0% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.9

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

5.8
Brand name
Apple
Processor type
mobile
Processor type
mobile
This processor belongs to the mobile processor class, which is more advanced than that of 7.3% of processors and equal to that of 48.6% of processors.
laptop
CPU socket
N/A
Chipset
N/A
CPU architecture
ARM64
CPU architecture
ARM64
This processor uses the ARM64 architecture, which is less advanced than that of 98.4% of processors and equal to that of 1.7% of processors.
Apple silicon
Show more
N. of physical cores
14
N. of physical cores
14
This processor has 14 CPU cores, which is more than 87.1% of processors and equal to 4.3% of processors.
CPU threads
16
CPU threads
16
This processor offers 16 CPU threads, which is more than 71% of processors and equal to 14% of processors.
Threads per core
1
Threads per core
1
This processor offers 1 threads per core, which is fewer than 69.8% of processors and equal to 30.2% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4.06 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
4.06 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4.06 GHz which is lower than that of 59.2% of processors and equal to that of 0.3% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
10x 4.05 GHz & 4x 2.75 GHz
CPU base clock speed
10x 4.05 GHz & 4x 2.75 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 10x4.05 GHz & 4x2.75 GHz which is higher than that of 95.3% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
3 nm
Semiconductor size
3 nm
This processor uses a 3 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 96% of processors and equal to that of 4% of processors.
Foundry
TSMC 3 nm
Foundry
TSMC 3 nm
This processor is built on the TSMC 3 nm foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 96.2% of processors and equal to that of 3.8% of processors.
L3 cache
?
L2 cache
36 MB
L2 cache
36 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 36 MB which is larger than that of 98.4% of processors and equal to that of 0.6% of processors.
L1 cache
?
Show more
DDR memory version
?
Maximum memory speed
6,400 MHz
Maximum memory speed
6,400 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 6,400 MHz, which is higher than that of 83.9% of processors and equal to 8.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5-6400 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5-6400 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to LPDDR5-6400 MHz, which is higher than that of 84.4% of processors and equal to 3.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
N/A
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
This processor supports up to 128 GB of memory, which is more than 61.9% of processors and equal to 21.4% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
yes
Integrated graphics
yes
This processor includes integrated graphics. 12.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
?
Integrated GPU execution units
?
Integrated GPU base frequency
500 MHz
Integrated GPU base frequency
500 MHz
This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 500 MHz which is higher than that of 78.3% of processors and equal to that of 1% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), ProRes (HW decode/encode), ProRes RAW (HW decode/encode)
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), ProRes (HW decode/encode), ProRes RAW (HW decode/encode)
This processor supports H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), ProRes (HW decode/encode), ProRes RAW (HW decode/encode) media codecs, which is broader support than 99.9% of processors and equal to 0.1% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
78 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
78 W
This processor has a TDP of 78 W which is higher than that of 86.9% of processors and equal to that of 0.1% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
?
Boost power (PL2)
N/A
Tau (power duration limit)
N/A
Configurable TDP
no
Configurable TDP
no
This processor does not support configurable TDP. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
Show more

Apple M3 Max vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • 4.34x higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    20,965
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (20,965 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    20,965 vs 4,829
  • 3.9x higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    41,262
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (41,262 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    41,262 vs 10,572.5
  • 91.6% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    4,789
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,789 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    4,789 vs 2,500
  • 2.11x higher single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    3,107
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (3,107 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    3,107 vs 1,471
  • 8 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    14
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (14 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    14 vs 6
  • 14.4x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    36 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (36 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    36 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    10 x 4.05 GHz & 4 x 2.75 GHz
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (10x4.05 GHz & 4x2.75 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    10x4.05 GHz & 4x2.75 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • 8 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    16
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    16 vs 8
  • Includes crypto acceleration
    Cryptographic acceleration
    AES, SHA, RSA/PKA
    This processor includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2023 vs 2020).
    November 2023
    2023 vs 2020
  • Supports HMP
    Uses HMP
    yes
    This processor supports HMP, the average processor does not. 22.7% of processors support HMP.
  • 4.34x higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    20,965
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (20,965 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    20,965 vs 4,829
  • 3.9x higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    41,262
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (41,262 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    41,262 vs 10,572.5
  • 91.6% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    4,789
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,789 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    4,789 vs 2,500
  • 2.11x higher single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    3,107
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (3,107 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    3,107 vs 1,471
  • 8 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    14
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (14 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    14 vs 6
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    10 x 4.05 GHz & 4 x 2.75 GHz
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (10x4.05 GHz & 4x2.75 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    10x4.05 GHz & 4x2.75 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • 8 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    16
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    16 vs 8
  • 4 wider front-end design
    Front-end width
    8
    This processor has a higher front-end width than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
    8 vs 4
  • 14.4x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    36 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (36 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    36 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • 75% smaller process node
    Semiconductor size
    3 nm
    This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (3 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    3 nm vs 12 nm
  • More advanced foundry
    Foundry
    TSMC 3 nm
    This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 3 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
    TSMC 3 nm vs Intel 14 nm
  • Uses big.LITTLE design
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    yes
    This processor uses a big.LITTLE design, the average processor does not. 20.5% of processors use a big.LITTLE design.
    performance + efficiency cores
  • 18.59x more transistors
    N. of transistors
    92 billion
    This processor has more transistors than the average processor (92 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
    92 billion vs 4.95 billion
  • 8.73x higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    400 GB/s
    This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (400 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
    400 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
  • 2.18x higher memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    6,400 MHz
    This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (6400 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    6,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • Newer PCIe version
    PCIe version
    4.0
    This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
    4.0 vs 3.0
  • 2x more memory capacity
    Maximum memory capacity
    128 GB
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Higher JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    LPDDR5-6400 MHz
    This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (LPDDR5-6400 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    LPDDR5-6,400 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • 1 more supported displays
    Maximum supported displays
    4
    This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
    4 vs 3
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 42.6% weaker multi-core performance
    Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
    1,601
    This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,601 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    1,601 vs 2,791
  • 3.67x larger die size
    Die size
    650 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (650 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    650 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • No multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    This processor does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
  • Less advanced architecture
    CPU architecture
    ARM64
    This processor uses a less advanced architecture than the average processor (ARM64 vs x86-64).
    Apple silicon
    ARM64 vs x86-64
  • 13.68x more expensive
    Apple M3 Max is more expensive than the average processor (£3,420 vs £250).
    £3,420 vs £250
  • 5.6% lower boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.06 GHz
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.06 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 73.3% higher TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    78 W
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (78 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    78 W vs 45 W
  • 13.68x more expensive
    Apple M3 Max is more expensive than the average processor (£3,420 vs £250).
    £3,420 vs £250
  • 12.8% worse value for money
    Apple M3 Max has worse value for money than the average processor (5.82 vs 6.6).
    5.82 vs 6.56
  • Less advanced architecture
    CPU architecture
    ARM64
    This processor uses a less advanced architecture than the average processor (ARM64 vs x86-64).
    Apple silicon
    ARM64 vs x86-64
  • Narrower instruction support
    Instruction sets
    NEON, AES, SHA1, SHA2, SHA3, SM3, SM4, BF16, AMX
    This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (NEON, AES, SHA1, SHA2, SHA3, SM3, SM4, BF16, AMX vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
    NEON, AES, SHA1, SHA2, SHA3, SM3, SM4, BF16, AMX vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
  • 42.6% weaker multi-core performance
    Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
    1,601
    This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,601 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    1,601 vs 2,791
  • No multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    This processor does not support multithreading, the average processor does. 74.2% of processors support multithreading.
  • 5.6% lower boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.06 GHz
    This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (4.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.06 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 1 fewer threads per core
    Threads per core
    1
    This processor has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
    1 vs 2
  • 3.67x larger die size
    Die size
    650 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (650 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    650 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 6 fewer memory channels
    Memory channels
    8
    This processor has fewer memory channels than the average processor (8 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
    8 vs 2
  • No configurable TDP
    Configurable TDP
    no
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 73.3% higher TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    78 W
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (78 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    78 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
macworld.com
06/11/2023
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
10/06/2024
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
18/12/2023
Summary of the review
C
creativebloq.com
16/07/2024
Summary of the review
A
alexreviewstech.com
27/02/2024
Summary of the review
M
macworld.com
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
T
techcrunch.com
06/11/2023
Summary of the review
P
popsci.com
07/11/2023
Summary of the review
A
attilavago.medium.com
12/11/2023
Summary of the review
P
provideocoalition.com
06/11/2023
Summary of the review
M
mrdbourke.com
24/12/2023
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
21/12/2023
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
20/11/2023
Summary of the review
A
appleinsider.com
13/11/2023
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
04/12/2023
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
06/11/2023
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.fr
20/11/2023
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.fr
27/12/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
11/09/2023
Summary of the review
T
tomsguide.fr
05/01/2024
Summary of the review
M
macg.co
14/11/2023
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.fr
25/04/2024
Summary of the review
N
numerama.com
06/11/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
06/11/2023
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
29/12/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.biz
21/11/2023
Summary of the review
M
mac.iphoneitalia.com
02/11/2023
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
27/11/2023
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
16/11/2023
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
13/11/2023
Summary of the review
I
iculture.nl
28/11/2023
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
08/11/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Apple M3 Max

  • Exceptional multi-core performance that rivals desktop workstations like the Mac Studio
  • Massive integrated GPU power (up to 40 cores) supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading
  • Incredible energy efficiency, offering all-day battery life (up to 22 hours) even with professional workloads
  • Consistent performance levels regardless of whether the device is plugged in or on battery power
  • Support for high memory configurations up to 128GB of unified memory for heavy multitasking
  • Advanced media engines that significantly accelerate ProRes video encoding and AI-based tasks

What we don't like about Apple M3 Max

  • Extremely high cost of entry, with prices skyrocketing for maxed-out configurations
  • Fans can become quite loud and noticeable during sustained, intensive tasks like 3D rendering
  • Thermal management can be a challenge in the 14-inch chassis compared to the 16-inch model
  • The 'Space Black' finish, while more resistant, still attracts visible fingerprints and oils over time
  • Hardware is completely non-upgradeable after purchase, requiring users to pay high premiums upfront
  • Performance gains over the previous M2 Max may not justify the upgrade for existing users

Verdict

The Apple M3 Max is a flagship 3-nanometer processor featuring up to 16 CPU cores (12 performance and 4 efficiency) and a powerful 40-core GPU with 92 billion transistors. It supports up to 128GB of unified memory with a bandwidth of up to 400GB/s and includes a 16-core Neural Engine for AI workloads. Key advantages include desktop-class performance in a portable format, hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and Dynamic Caching for optimized graphics memory allocation. However, main drawbacks include its high cost for top-tier configurations and tendency to run hot or loud under sustained heavy loads.

Compare Apple M3 Max with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Apple M3 Max and other processors

No results found