OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Zepp E Square Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Screen size:1.65 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Zepp E Square Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 15 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Technical score

30%

7.5

Review score ( 7 · 8)

Review score 30% · 7.5 · based on 15 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 55% of smartwatches
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

24%

6.2

Health

21%

7.8

Fitness

16%

5.6

Battery

14%

5.0

Smart features

12%

3.1

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 55% of smartwatches
7.5

Review score

Review score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Grades by review (15)
7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

11.9%

8.0

techadvisor.com

11.9%

6.0

t3.com

9.5%

8.0

coachweb.com

≈ estimated
1

4.8%

9.0

zdnet.com

Video reviews 1

4.8%

9.0

Stu’s Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 57% of smartwatches
  • zepp-e-square
  • zepp-e-square
  • zepp-e-square
  • zepp-e-square
  • zepp-e-square
  • zepp-e-square
zepp-e-square
zepp-e-square
zepp-e-square
zepp-e-square
zepp-e-square
zepp-e-square

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Zepp E Square

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

24%

6.2

Health

21%

7.8

Fitness

16%

5.6

Battery

14%

5.0

Smart features

12%

3.1

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

6.0

Hardware

6.0
Review score
Review score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Grades by review (15)
7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

11.9%

8.0

techadvisor.com

11.9%

6.0

t3.com

9.5%

8.0

coachweb.com

≈ estimated
1

4.8%

9.0

zdnet.com

Video reviews 1

4.8%

9.0

Stu’s Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Popularity:
Zepp E Square has a popularity of 6.7 points, which is higher than 54.5% of smartwatches.
6.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Brand name
Zepp
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may rely on phone GPS or step-based estimation on some models.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
224 mAh
Battery power
224 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 224 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 80.8% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 120 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Uses a proprietary OS with companion-app ecosystem support. OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.65 inch
Screen size
1.65 inch
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.65 inch which is larger than the screens of 78% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.5% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
348x 442
Resolution
348x 442
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 348x442 which is lower than that of 50.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
341 ppi
Pixel density
341 ppi
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 341 ppi which is higher than that of 59.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Display brightness
500 nits
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 500 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 70% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.6% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Huangshan 1
Processor model
Huangshan 1
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
This smartwatch uses the Huangshan 1 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Zepp E Square vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • 2.6 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    9 mm
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (9 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    9 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 0.25 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.65 inch
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.65 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 2.6 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    9 mm
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (9 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    9 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 0.25 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.65 inch
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.65 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, leather, metal
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, metal for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, metal vs silicone
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 9 g lighter weight
    Weight
    36.0 g
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (36 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    36.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 6.3 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.7 mm
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35.7 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.7 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 69 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    11
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (11 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    11 vs 80
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 76 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    224 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (224 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    224 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    Also reported with 5 ATM water-resistance rating.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • 4 mm wider band
    Width of band
    26.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a wider band width than the average smartwatch (26 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    26.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2020
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2020
    2020 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Stu’s Reviews
≈ estimated
10/09/2020
First look: sleep tracking test and price verdict
Verdict
Zepp E Square has a solid metal build and is worth its price, despite missing GPS.
Not graded yet
Overview video
Overview video
Brand video
Not graded yet
Brand video
Hands-on video, no verdict

What reviewers agree on

Based on 8 · 9

Reviewers love the sleek, comfortable design and sharp display, but GPS is weak and calls, apps and notifications disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
zdnet.com
≈ estimated
03/10/2020
Hands-on review · Health-focused fitness watch
Verdict
The Zepp E Square is a comfortable fitness watch with a smooth touchscreen and battery lasting most of a week, but it has no GPS and no calls.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
03/12/2020
Full review · Round or square watch
Verdict
The Zepp E Square is a stylish watch in round or square shapes, but limited notifications and no third-party apps hold it back.
8.0
coachweb.com
✓ explicit
25/09/2020
In-depth review · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Zepp E Square is a stylish fitness watch with a bright screen and long battery life, but its lack of built-in GPS is hard to forgive.
6.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
19/02/2021
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Zepp E Square is a bright, long-lasting fitness watch for everyday activity, though its cheap-feeling strap and only roughly accurate heart-rate readings hold it back.
9.0
elespanol.com
≈ estimated
12/09/2020
Hands-on test · Sleep tracking
Verdict
The Zepp E Square is a light, steel-cased watch for everyday health tracking, with detailed sleep data and about six days of battery, but it cannot run extra apps.
8.0
chollodeportes.com
✓ explicit
25/05/2022
Hands-on test · Stylish sport watch
Verdict
The Zepp E Square is a stylish watch that feels fast and lasts about a week, best for casual exercisers rather than serious athletes.
8.0
ilfattoquotidiano.it
≈ estimated
17/11/2020
Week-long test · Everyday health watch
Verdict
The Zepp E Square is a light, bright watch with solid health sensors that works well all day, but no GPS and no notification replies hold it back.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Zepp E Square

  • Elegant, ultra-slim stainless steel design with a premium feel
  • Vibrant and sharp 1.65-inch AMOLED display with high pixel density (341 ppi)
  • Impressive battery life, typically lasting 5 to 7 days on a single charge
  • Lightweight and comfortable enough to wear all day and while sleeping
  • Comprehensive health tracking features, including SpO2, heart rate, and stress monitoring
  • Smooth and responsive user interface with an intuitive companion app
  • Water-resistant up to 5ATM, making it suitable for swimming

What we don't like about Zepp E Square

  • Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a tethered smartphone for location tracking
  • Limited smart features: no third-party app store, no NFC for payments, and no speaker/microphone for calls
  • Proprietary magnetic charger is necessary and can be easily forgotten
  • Notification system is basic, with no ability to reply to messages directly from the watch
  • The default leather and fluoroelastomer straps are frequently described as uncomfortable or flimsy
  • Higher price point compared to competitors with more advanced features
  • No dedicated night mode, which can lead to the screen accidentally lighting up during sleep

Verdict

The Zepp E Square is a premium lifestyle smartwatch featuring a 1.65-inch always-on AMOLED display with 341 ppi resolution, housed in a slim 9.1mm stainless steel chassis with 3D curved bezel-less glass. Key specifications include 5 ATM water resistance, SpO2 blood-oxygen monitoring, and 11 sports modes, powered by a 188mAh battery offering up to 7 days of typical use. While it excels with its elegant design and vivid screen, it lacks integrated GPS, a built-in speaker for calls, and a wide ecosystem of third-party apps.

Compare Zepp E Square with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Zepp E Square and other Smartwatches

No results found