OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Screen size:1.55 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 7 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Technical score

30%

8.3

Review score ( 1 · 6)

Review score 30% · 8.3 · based on 1 written review + 6 videos
1 written review + 6 videos count as 3.3 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–²Better than 63% of smartwatches
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

24%

6.2

Health

21%

8.8

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

6.2

Smart features

12%

4.8

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

5.1

Hardware

â–²Better than 57% of smartwatches
8.3

Review score

Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Grades by review (7)
Video reviews 2

5%

9.0

Tech is Easy

5%

8.0

AKSHAY BHOPANI

estimated from the review
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 80% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
  • amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022
amazfit-gts-2-mini-2022

Best prices

    N/A~ £60

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

24%

6.2

Health

21%

8.8

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

6.2

Smart features

12%

4.8

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

5.1

Hardware

6.5
Review score
Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Grades by review (7)
Video reviews 2

5%

9.0

Tech is Easy

5%

8.0

AKSHAY BHOPANI

estimated from the review
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components:

60%

7.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.9
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 76.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 9.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
7 h
Battery life in training mode
7 h
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 7 h in training mode which is shorter than 77.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
15.5 h
Battery life with GPS on
15.5 h
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 15.5 h with GPS on which is shorter than 60.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.6% of smartwatches.
Battery power
220 mAh
Battery power
220 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 220 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 80.9% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1.6% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.55 inch
Screen size
1.55 inch
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.55 inch which is larger than the screens of 71.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
306x 354
Resolution
306x 354
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 306x354 which is lower than that of 60.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
302 ppi
Pixel density
302 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 302 ppi which is lower than that of 62.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.6% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
450 nits
Display brightness
450 nits
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 450 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 86.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
    VO2 max estimate typically requires an outdoor run or walk with GPS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • 48.5% more popular
    Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.09 vs 6.1).
    9.09 vs 6.12
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
    VO2 max estimate typically requires an outdoor run or walk with GPS.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 25.5 g lighter weight
    Weight
    19.5 g
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (19.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    19.5 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2.65 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    8.95 mm
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (9 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    8.95 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 0.15 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.55 inch
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.55 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 4.5 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    40.5 mm
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (40.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    40.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • 6.2 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.8 mm
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35.8 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.8 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • 12.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    7 h
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (7 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    7 h vs 19.25 h
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • 80 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    220 mAh days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (220 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    220 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 4.5 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    15.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (15.5 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    15.5 h vs 20 h
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 12.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    7 h
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (7 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    7 h vs 19.25 h
  • 80 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    220 mAh days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (220 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    220 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 4.5 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    15.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (15.5 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    15.5 h vs 20 h
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • 24 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    302 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (302 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    302 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    306 x 354
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 306x354, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    306x354 vs 352x430
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
AKSHAY BHOPANI
≈ estimated
30/10/2022
First impressions · unboxing and first week of use
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 is feature-rich and useful without a phone, though battery life is only average with always-on display.
9.0
Tech is Easy
≈ estimated
14/04/2022
First impressions · unboxing and first day of use
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 is a light, classy smartwatch with a bright always-on AMOLED display and many features for its price.
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 1 · 6

Reviewers praise the bright screen and neat design, but most feel the battery runs down too quickly.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
runfitfun.fr
≈ estimated
07/04/2022
Hands-on test · Running watch
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 is a light, attractive watch with a week of battery life, suited to most people tracking sport, health and sleep.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022

  • High-quality, bright 1.55-inch AMOLED display visible even in direct sunlight.
  • Extremely lightweight and slim design (19.5g) that remains comfortable for 24/7 wear.
  • Comprehensive health tracking features including SpO2, heart rate, and sleep monitoring.
  • Built-in GPS and GLONASS for accurate outdoor activity tracking without a phone.
  • Excellent value for money, undercutting many established competitors.
  • Useful additional tools like the Pomodoro timer and Alexa integration.

What we don't like about Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022

  • Real-world battery life typically lasts 5-7 days, falling short of the 14-day claim with heavy use.
  • Basic notification support that is non-interactive (no ability to reply).
  • Lacks automatic workout detection, requiring manual starts for activity tracking.
  • Occasional UI lag or stuttering during scrolling and animations.
  • Heart rate monitoring accuracy can falter during high-intensity interval training (HIIT).
  • Limited third-party app ecosystem and no support for mobile payments.

Verdict

The Amazfit GTS 2 Mini (2022 New Version) is a compact, ultra-lightweight smartwatch featuring a 1.55-inch Always-on AMOLED display with 450-nit brightness and an aluminum alloy body weighing just 19.5g. Key characteristics include built-in GPS/GLONASS, 5 ATM water resistance, and over 68 sports modes, alongside health monitoring for heart rate (BioTracker 2 PPG), SpO2, stress, and sleep stages. Its primary pros are the slim 8.95mm profile, high-quality vibrant screen, and a 220mAh battery offering up to 14 days of typical use. However, notable cons include a lack of internal music storage, no built-in speaker for Bluetooth calls, and basic notification support that does not allow for interactive replies.

Compare Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit GTS 2 Mini 2022 and other Smartwatches

No results found