OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Intel Core i7 6800K Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130PassMark benchmark result:10714N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:3.8 GHzCPU socket:LGA2011-3TDP (Thermal design power):140 W

Intel Core i7 6800K Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

▼Worse than 51% of processors

5.4

▼Worse than 53% of processors

8.2

▲Better than 82% of processors

3.6
Gaming
Gaming
3.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
3.9
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
3.6
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
4.2
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.4
L3 cache
8.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
4.6
Video editing
Video editing
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
4.9
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
20.0%
6.6
CPU threads
15.0%
2.4
L3 cache

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7 6800K

5.7

Show more

Hide

Platform

7.4

Show more

Hide

Brand name

Intel

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

?

CPU architecture

Show more

Performance

5.3

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

Threads per core

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

Show more

Cache & Architecture

4.8

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

7.1

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated Graphics

4.0

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

4.2

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

Tau (power duration limit)

?

Configurable TDP

Show more

Intel Core i7 6800K vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i7 6800K better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

12 more PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
28
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (28 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
28 vs 16
Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
45.9% more L3 per core
L3 per core
2.5 MB/core
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
4 more CPU threads
CPU threads
12
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
67.7% higher memory bandwidth
Maximum memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <25 GB/s – >100 GB/s
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
2x more memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
▲ Better than 62% of models
Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB
Higher base clock
CPU base clock speed
6 x 3.4 GHz
▲ Better than 67% of models
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
6x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz

4.14x more popular
Intel Core i7 6800K is more popular than the average processor (4.14 vs 1).
4.14 vs 1
3% higher user score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Intel Core i7 6800K
the average processor
Intel Core i7 6800K has a higher user score than the average processor (8.24 vs 8.000).
8.24 vs 8

Modern CPU socket
CPU socket
LGA2011-3
▲ Better than 60% of models
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA2011-3 vs FP4).
LGA2011-3 vs FP4

Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
4 more CPU threads
CPU threads
12
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
Higher base clock
CPU base clock speed
6 x 3.4 GHz
▲ Better than 67% of models
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
6x3.4 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
18% higher multi-core score
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
5,696
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <763 – >14k
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (5,696 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
5,696 vs 4,829

45.9% more L3 per core
L3 per core
2.5 MB/core
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
87.5% larger L3 cache
L3 cache
15 MB
▲ Better than 64% of models
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (15 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
15 MB vs 8 MB

12 more PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
28
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (28 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
28 vs 16
Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
67.7% higher memory bandwidth
Maximum memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <25 GB/s – >100 GB/s
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
2x more memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
▲ Better than 62% of models
Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB

2 °C lower CPU temperature
CPU temperature
98 °C
▲ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (98 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
98 °C vs 100 °C

Why is Intel Core i7 6800K worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

No configurable TDP
Configurable TDP
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
3.11x higher base power
Base power (PL1)
140 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
140 W vs 45 W
11.6% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
3.8 GHz
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
2.33x higher boost power
Boost power (PL2)
140 W
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <25 W – >150 W
This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
140 W vs 60 W
16.7% larger process node
Semiconductor size
14 nm
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
14 nm vs 12 nm
Narrower instruction support
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, BMI1
▼ Worse than 77% of models
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, BMI1 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
MMX, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, BMI1 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
16.8% lower single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,224
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,224 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,224 vs 1,471
39% larger die size
Die size
246 mm²
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (246 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
246 mm² vs 177 mm²

Narrower instruction support
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, BMI1
▼ Worse than 77% of models
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, BMI1 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
MMX, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, BMI1 vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
4 years older release date
Release date
2016
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2k – >2k
This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2016 vs 2020).
May 2016
2016 vs 2020
No crypto acceleration
Cryptographic acceleration
AES
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This processor does not include crypto acceleration, the average processor does. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
AES vs AES, SHA

11.6% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
3.8 GHz
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
3.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
16.8% lower single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,224
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,224 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,224 vs 1,471
9.9% weaker single-core performance
PassMark single-core benchmark score
2,253
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <1.4k – >4k
This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,253 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
2,253 vs 2,500

16.7% larger process node
Semiconductor size
14 nm
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
14 nm vs 12 nm
50% less L2 per core
L2 per core
0.25 MB/core
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <0.25 MB/core – >2 MB/core
This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
39% larger die size
Die size
246 mm²
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (246 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
246 mm² vs 177 mm²
Less advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Broadwell
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Broadwell vs Kaby Lake).
Broadwell vs Kaby Lake
40% smaller L2 cache
L2 cache
1.5 MB
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
1.5 MB vs 2.5 MB

Lower JEDEC memory speed
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-2400 MHz
▼ Worse than 66% of models
This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2400 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR4-2,400 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
18.2% lower memory speed
Maximum memory speed
2,400 MHz
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2400 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
2,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
2 fewer memory channels
Memory channels
4
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This processor has fewer memory channels than the average processor (4 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
4 vs 2

No integrated graphics
Integrated graphics
no
▼ Worse than 88% of models
This processor does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does. 87.6% of processors include integrated graphics.

No configurable TDP
Configurable TDP
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This processor does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does. 52.8% of processors support configurable TDP.
3.11x higher base power
Base power (PL1)
140 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
140 W vs 45 W
2.33x higher boost power
Boost power (PL2)
140 W
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <25 W – >150 W
This processor has a higher boost power draw than the average processor (140 W vs 60 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 60 W.
140 W vs 60 W
3.11x higher TDP
TDP (Thermal design power)
140 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (140 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
140 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

tomshardware.com

30/05/2016

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-6950X, 6900K, 6850K & 6800K Review

The Tom's Hardware review of Intel’s Broadwell-E HEDT lineup (i7-6950X, 6900K, 6850K, 6800K) highlights the transition to a 14nm process, with the 10-core i7-6950X delivering exceptional multi-threaded performance alongside new Turbo Boost Max 3.0 technology. While performance is strong, the flagship's $1,723 price point and the platform's overall high cost (X99 motherboard) limit value, particularly with reduced PCIe lanes on lower-tier models like the i7-6800K. Key benefits include unmatched multi-threaded power and improved efficiency, contrasted by significant cons such as lower overclocking headroom due to thermal density, limited gaming gains over cheaper chips, and high cost.

pcgamer.com

23/08/2016

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-6800K Review - PC Gamer

The Intel Core i7-6800K represents a balanced entry point for the Broadwell-E high-end desktop platform, featuring six cores and 12 threads that excel in multi-threaded tasks, including roughly 20% higher performance in content creation over the i7-6700K when overclocked. While offering a solid 28 PCIe lanes for multi-GPU configurations, the processor's lower clock speeds make it slightly slower in raw gaming performance compared to cheaper, mainstream Skylake chips. Pros include its superior value within the HEDT lineup, offering near-i7-6850K performance for a lower price, and strong overclocking potential reaching 4.4GHz. Conversely, cons center on high power consumption, significant heat output requiring substantial cooling, and higher total platform costs (X99 motherboard) that do not translate into better gaming frame rates for pure gamers.

cpu.userbenchmark.com

01/06/2016

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-6800K BX80671I76800K - CPU UserBenchmarks

The Intel Core i7-6800K is a 6-core, 12-thread Broadwell-E processor for the LGA 2011-3 socket, featuring a 3.4 GHz base clock, 3.8 GHz turbo, and 15 MB L3 cache. It serves as an entry-level "Extreme" chip for workstation tasks, supporting quad-channel DDR4 memory. Pros include roughly 20% higher multi-core performance than the i7-6700K and improved memory bandwidth, along with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Conversely, the processor faces drawbacks with lower single-core performance compared to the 6700K and limited 28 PCIe lanes, which restricts multi-GPU configurations. It is an aging architecture that may bottleneck modern high-end GPUs, making it less suitable for top-tier gaming. For comprehensive specifications, visit TechPowerUp.

pcgamesn.com

28/07/2016

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7 6800K review - PCGamesN

The Intel Core i7-6800K, reviewed by PCGamesN, serves as an accessible entry into the Broadwell-E platform, featuring six cores, 12 threads, and a 14nm architecture, aimed at bridging the gap between mainstream and enthusiast desktops. Key performance benefits include strong 3D rendering and video editing capabilities, alongside 28 PCIe lanes that support advanced, multi-GPU configurations, often rivaling more expensive older models in productivity tasks. While offering high core counts, the processor is described as a "power pig" with high power consumption, and it occasionally struggles to outperform faster-clocked, cheaper quad-core chips in pure gaming, making it best suited for "prosumers" needing both high-end workstation performance and gaming functionality. Copy

chip.de

07/09/2016

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-6800K (Enthusiast CPU) Review

The CHIP review highlights the Intel Core i7-6800K as a strong value-oriented, six-core Broadwell-E processor for the LGA 2011-3 socket, offering high-end performance for workstation users at a competitive price point. Key advantages include exceptional multi-threaded performance in benchmarks, outperforming more expensive models in tasks like encryption and compression, alongside a fully unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Conversely, significant drawbacks include a 140 W TDP causing high power consumption and the limitation to 28 PCIe lanes, which restricts advanced multi-GPU configurations compared to higher-tier Broadwell-E chips. Copy

computerbase.de

31/05/2016

Summary of the review

Core i7-6950X and i7-6800K Review: 10 Cores, 20 Threads, and New Turbo for 1,600 Euros

The ComputerBase review of Intel's Broadwell-E processors highlights the Core i7-6950X as the first 10-core consumer CPU, offering unmatched multi-threaded performance for the X99 platform, while the i7-6800K serves as an accessible 6-core entry point. Key advantages include Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 for better single-core speeds and native DDR4-2400 quad-channel support. However, the review notes the extremely high price of the 6950X and the i7-6800K's limited 28 PCIe lanes, alongside lower overclocking ceilings compared to previous generations. For the full, original review in German, visit ComputerBase. Copy

tomshardware.fr

31/05/2016

Summary of the review

Broadwell-E Test: Core i7-6950X, 6900K, 6850K and 6800K break records

Intel's Broadwell-E lineup (i7-6950X, 6900K, 6850K, 6800K) introduces 14nm processors for the LGA 2011-v3 socket, featuring a flagship 10-core i7-6950X with Turbo Boost Max 3.0, aimed at high-performance computing. The series offers exceptional multi-threaded performance, improved DDR4 support, and AVX ratio offsets, making it ideal for rendering and video production, alongside PCIe lane variations like the 40-lane i7-6850K. Conversely, the platform suffers from limited overclocking headroom due to high heat density and a very high price point for the top model, while mainstream Skylake chips offer better value for general gaming. Copy

tomshw.it

31/05/2016

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-6800K: overclocking, power consumption, and temperatures

The Intel Core i7-6800K is a six-core, 12-thread Broadwell-E processor offering a balanced, high-end experience on the X99 platform. Its main pros include strong multi-threaded performance, compatibility with existing LGA 2011-3 motherboards, and an unlocked multiplier, though it is limited to 28 PCIe lanes. While efficient at stock, overclocking often leads to high power consumption, and the use of thermal paste (TIM) instead of solder makes effective cooling necessary to manage high temperatures.

tomshw.it

31/05/2016

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-6950X, 6900K, 6850K and 6800K Review

The Intel Broadwell-E lineup introduces the flagship 10-core Core i7-6950X, marking a major milestone for consumer-grade processors with 20 threads and 25MB of L3 cache. Designed for the LGA 2011-v3 platform, this lineup utilizes a refined 14nm process, delivering exceptional performance in heavily threaded applications such as 3D rendering and video encoding. Key innovations include Intel Turbo Boost Max 3.0 technology for optimized single-core speeds and broad support for 40 PCIe lanes on most models. Pros highlight unparalleled multi-core performance for workstations and platform longevity, while cons focus on the high pricing, significant thermal output under heavy load, and diminishing returns for gaming compared to cheaper, higher-clocked alternatives. The review suggests the i7-6950X is aimed at content creators, with the 6-core i7-6800K noted for having limited PCIe lanes (28 lanes). Overall, it is praised for raw power but criticized for its extreme cost.

Third-party reviews

Based on 10 buyer reviews from online shops.

Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Intel Core i7 6800K

Excellent multi-threaded performance for video editing, 3D modeling, and streaming due to 6 cores and 12 threads.
Support for quad-channel DDR4 memory provides significantly higher bandwidth compared to mainstream platforms.
More affordable entry point into the enthusiast X99 platform than its higher-core siblings.
Includes 28 PCIe lanes, offering better support for multiple GPUs and PCIe SSDs than standard 16-lane desktop CPUs.
Future-proof for modern games that are beginning to utilize more than four cores effectively.

What we don't like about Intel Core i7 6800K

Higher power consumption (140W TDP) compared to mainstream processors like the i7-6700K.
Requires more expensive X99 motherboards and robust cooling solutions, especially when overclocking.
Lower single-core performance and clock speeds make it slightly slower for gaming compared to high-end mainstream i7s.
Limited overclocking headroom compared to the previous Haswell-E generation.
Reduced number of PCIe lanes (28) compared to the higher-tier 6850K and 6900K which offer 40 lanes.

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-6800K is a high-end Broadwell-E desktop processor featuring 6 cores and 12 threads with a 3.4 GHz base clock and a 3.8 GHz Turbo Boost Max 3.0 frequency. Built on a 14nm process for the LGA 2011-v3 socket, it includes 15 MB of L3 cache, supports quad-channel DDR4-2400 memory, and provides 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes. Its main pros include strong multi-threaded performance for video editing and 3D rendering, an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast overclocking, and support for high-capacity 128 GB memory configurations. However, it carries a high 140W TDP that requires substantial cooling, lacks integrated graphics, and offers fewer PCIe lanes compared to higher-tier chips in the same family.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Processors

Intel Core i3 13100

Processors

Intel Core i3 14100

Processors

Intel Core i3 12100

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Intel Core i7 6800K with other processors

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7 6800K and other processors

No results found