OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:6.1 inchesMain camera megapixels:16 MP

LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.1

Overall score

Score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of smartphones
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

25%

5.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.2

Camera

15%

5.7

Display

15%

3.6

Battery

10%

3.9

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

5.6

Audio

3%

7.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 96% of smartphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • lg-g7-fit
  • lg-g7-fit
  • lg-g7-fit
  • lg-g7-fit
lg-g7-fit
lg-g7-fit
lg-g7-fit
lg-g7-fit

Best prices

    N/A~ £350

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

25%

5.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.2

Camera

15%

5.7

Display

15%

3.6

Battery

10%

3.9

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

5.6

Audio

3%

7.7

Design

5.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

5.1

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

6.2
Brand name
LG
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 processor model which is slower than processors in 88.7% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.1% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 97.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.4 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 36.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 13.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 8 Oreo
Android version
Android 8 Oreo
Android version
Android 8 Oreo
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 8 Oreo which is older than that found in 96.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 1.7% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
no
Dark mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartphone does not offer dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
Multi-lens main camera
no
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 16 MP which is lower than that of 87.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is narrower than that of 96.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
16 mm²
Main camera sensor area
16 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 16 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 96.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1 µm
Main camera pixel size
1 µm
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1 µm which is larger than in 57.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 20% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.1 inches
Screen size
6.1 inches
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.1 inches which is smaller than the screens of 92.1% of smartphones and equal to those of 2% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1440x 3120 px
Screen resolution
1440x 3120 px
★ Better than 94% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1440x3120 px which is higher than that of 94% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Pixel density
564 ppi
Pixel density
564 ppi
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 564 ppi which is higher than that of 99% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 3,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 97.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 1.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
Charging speed
18 W
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
Stereo speakers
yes
â–² Better than 36% of models
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 66% of models
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
153.2 mm
Height
153.2 mm
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 153.2 mm which is shorter than 92.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
71.9 mm
Width
71.9 mm
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 71.9 mm which is narrower than 93.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.9 mm
Thickness
7.9 mm
â–² Better than 72% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.9 mm which is thinner than 72.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Weight
156 g
Weight
156 g
★ Better than 98% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 156 g which is lighter than 97.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.1% of smartphones.
Device volume
76,041 cm³
Device volume
76,041 cm³
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 76,041 cm³ which is smaller than 95.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Show more

LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1440 x 3120 px
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3120 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3120 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 83.3% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    11 W
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (11 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    11 W vs 6 W
  • 42.8% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    564 ppi
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (564 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    564 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    HDR10+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI CAM, QLens, Google Lens, Google Assistant
    productivity vs fundamental
  • 83.3% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    11 W
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (11 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    11 W vs 6 W
  • 50% more L2 cache
    L2 cache
    1,536 KB
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <512 KB – >4.1k KB
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (1536 KB vs 1024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1024 KB.
    1,536 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    2 x 2.4 GHz & 2 x 1.6 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.4 GHz & 2x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.4 GHz & 2x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI CAM, QLens, Google Lens, Google Assistant
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/1.9
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    HDR10 video recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • 0.2 µm larger main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    1.0 µm
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.0 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    3.1
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1440 x 3120 px
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x3120 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x3120 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 42.8% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    564 ppi
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (564 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    564 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    HDR10+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 20.5% lighter
    Weight
    156 g
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (156 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    156 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >2 m
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 4.1 mm narrower
    Width
    71.9 mm
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (71.9 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    71.9 mm vs 76 mm
  • 10.4 mm shorter
    Height
    153.2 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (153.2 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    153.2 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 0.4 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7.9 mm
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Better IP rating
    IP rating
    IP68
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 22.2% smaller volume
    Device volume
    76,041 cm³
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (76041 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    76,041 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.2
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 87.5% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 50% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    16 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (16 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    16 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 2.33x larger process node
    Process node
    14 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (14 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    14 nm vs 6 nm
  • 18.2% worse value for money
    LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.21 vs 7.3).
    6.21 vs 7.34
  • 5.44x less popular
    LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 34.6% more expensive
    LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£350 vs £260).
    £350 vs £260
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 87.5% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 256 GB
  • 2.33x larger process node
    Process node
    14 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (14 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    14 nm vs 6 nm
  • 50.4% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    5,352
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <7.1k – >15.9k
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (5,352 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    5,352 vs 10,783
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    650 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    6 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    1,866 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1866 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <4 – >14
    This smartphone supports fewer CPU threads than the average smartphone (4 vs 8). The average smartphone supports 8 threads.
    4 vs 8
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 8 Oreo
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 8 Oreo vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 8 Oreo vs Android 14
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    Wi-Fi password sharing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Lacks dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartphone does not support dark mode, the average smartphone does. 95.8% of smartphones have dark mode.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    App offloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    Instant markup
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    Scrolling screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • No theme customization
    Theme customization
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartphone does not support theme customization, the average smartphone does. 91% of smartphones allow theme customization.
  • No offline voice commands
    Offline voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartphone does not support offline voice commands, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer offline voice control.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    Play while downloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    Dynamic theme
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.2
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 50% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    16 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (16 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    16 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    16 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (16 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    16 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    Multi-lens main camera
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • No slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartphone does not support slow-motion recording, the average smartphone does. 90.3% of smartphones offer slow-mo features.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • No continuous autofocus in video
    Continuous autofocus in video recording
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average smartphone does. 94.2% of smartphones have continuous AF.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone does not offer manual exposure control, the average smartphone does. 94% of smartphones have manual exposure.
  • No burst mode
    Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This smartphone does not have a burst mode, the average smartphone does. 98.1% of smartphones support burst shooting.
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (4.2 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    4.2 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.57 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.1 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.1 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.1 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    77
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (77 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    77 vs 99.5
  • 62% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    299 min
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <487 min – >1.3k min
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (299 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    299 min vs 786 min
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    18 W
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • 6 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2018 vs 2024). 6.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    August 2018
    2018 vs 2024
  • Poor brand origin
    Brand origin
    South Korea
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gsmarena.com
Ongoing
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit - User opinions and reviews
A
androidpolice.com
04/09/2018
Summary of the review
LG G7 One and G7 Fit hands-on: Surprisingly pleasing hardware will live or die based on pricing
P
phonescoop.com
30/08/2018
Summary of the review
Hands On with the LG G7 Fit and G7 One
T
techradar.com
01/09/2018
Summary of the review
Hands on: LG G7 Fit review
T
techindeep.com
09/11/2018
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit | Technical Specifications and Comments
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
05/02/2019
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit review: bright display, dark camera
(Translated)Show original
N
netzwelt.de
08/11/2018
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit hands-on: Trying out the Lite version of the G7 ThinQ
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/01/2019
Summary of the review
CES 2019 – LG showcases its Q9 at CES, a recycled G7 Fit
(Translated)Show original
A
altroconsumo.it
01/2019
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit Smartphone Review - Altroconsumo
(Translated)Show original
T
techprincess.it
03/12/2018
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit Review: Is it worth buying? - Tech Princess
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
19/12/2018
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit Review: The flagship on a diet
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
03/12/2018
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit Review: A solid mid-range phone, but camera and battery life need improvement
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
06/02/2019
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit Review: A great smartphone, but who is it for?
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
26/12/2018
Summary of the review
LG G7 Fit Review: A charming mid-range phone that blends old and new
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB)

  • High-quality 6.1-inch QHD+ display that remains bright and vibrant even in direct sunlight
  • Excellent audio experience featuring a 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC and loud 'Boombox' speaker
  • Premium water and dust resistance rating of IP68
  • Affordable price point compared to flagship models from Samsung and Apple
  • Lightweight and compact design that is easy to hold with one hand

What we don't like about LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB)

  • Underwhelming 3,000mAh battery life that often struggles to last a full day
  • Outdated Snapdragon 821 processor which was already two generations old at launch
  • Limited 32GB internal storage that fills up quickly with system apps and cannot host apps on SD cards
  • Inconsistent camera performance, particularly with grainy images and poor zoom in low light
  • Difficult to find compatible accessories like protective cases in local retail stores

Verdict

The LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) is a premium mid-range smartphone from 2018, blending flagship features with a slightly older processor to keep costs down. It runs on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 chipset with 4GB of RAM and 32GB of expandable internal storage. The main pros include a vibrant 6.1-inch QHD+ (3120 x 1440) IPS display with 1000 nits brightness, robust IP68 water/dust resistance and MIL-STD-810G compliance, as well as a 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC and Boombox speaker for excellent audio. Cons include the use of the older Snapdragon 821 processor (compared to the flagship G7's 845) which is less power-efficient, a single 16MP rear camera setup without the wide-angle lens found on other G7 models, and the absence of wireless charging.

Compare LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of LG G7 Fit (4GB + 32GB) and other smartphones

No results found